 Ladies and gentlemen, very warm welcome to the module 156. I'll take you the different part today. We have seen a lot many approached in the entrepreneurial development. We have seen economists turn into the profit. We have seen risk-taking, mitigated risk. We have seen other ideas. We have seen psychologists. We have also seen what Mr. Weber thinks. We have also seen what Mr. Shampeter thinks. We have also seen that the entrepreneurial ideas are different from the pure business ideas. We have also seen that the entrepreneurial planning initiative and the closure design is different from the project management. But we are seeing consistently that the role of the entrepreneurial societal development is very positive. Now, are there only pros and cons in it? Are there no negatives? Let's take you to the dark side of the entrepreneurial side. See, I mentioned Jeff Bezos. You keep being positive. I have seen a lot of people. I will tell you without mentioning the name in Pakistan that there are about 50-60 people who want to become Jeff Bezos because of their unconventional thinking. They do not have any ideas but they want to become Jeff Bezos because of their unconventional thinking. Remember that Jeff Bezos has a suitable idea. You search for your own idea. Some people are suitable for moral values. Some people are suitable for talking with stress. Some people are suitable for speaking with anger. Some people are suitable for talking with their own ego. Some people are suitable for talking with their own ego. Some people have a different idea. If Muhammad Ali was someone else's style then he would have been beaten up a lot. But he was a unique player of his time. Similarly, Zainuddin Zidane was different. People only remember Zainuddin Zidane because his anger aggression defeated the word of abuse. But if Zainuddin Zidane won, no one would remember him. That is his style. But this is what I want to tell you. That he is not an individual. Zainuddin Zidane has made himself alive but he lost the match. If you are taking an example of Jeff Bezos then it is a very selfish approach towards entrepreneurship. That's the dark side. Opportunists are there. You made them and sold them. Maximum people make a passionate business for 5 years. They sell them. The one who makes them is the one who destroys them. All the constructors are the destructors. But this is only for Allah. Don't try, just think. What do you want to do to develop societies? But what happens? I want you to give a stress on the dark side of entrepreneurship. Look, who either adopts flawed strategy or failed to deliver? Sometimes you click with the wrong logic. You can't do it right. To me, Jeff Bezos is not the ideal for everyone that you become a billionaire. And then some people become basic billionaires. You started a business with a shortcut. Did it go bad? If for example you don't even do fraud but you do some things that don't have a complete structure approach and don't have a betterment of employees, don't have a development of society but only benefit from it. That is, you don't do those things. For example, for a university, you only show 25-30 big products to make a big brand. And then you don't do anything but get admitted. That means your subject was a profit. The game is off. The rest of the project is gone. That means there was no entrepreneurial space. It was just an admission space. So you took out your chunk and left it in the betterment. Now let's move on to the inventor who became a failed entrepreneur as the lackey project championing capability. That's what I'm saying. Then is the empire building. Who grow too quickly and lose control? Go quickly. I can give you 100 and 100 examples from Pakistan. And this is usually done in the West. For example, to destroy one thing in the market, I mean for example, one thing is going for 15 rupees. All of a sudden, something more than that can be broken into 3 rupees. In your market, for 6 months, they destroy the entire market. And the impact of that will always be on the industry. That will destroy the entire industry. But for a little while, you get peace. Absolutely. This is a psychological problem. And a lot of people have done this. A lot of people have completely, overnight, they have taken a family and gone. The real entrepreneur is forever. Even after that, they keep going. Even after that, they keep the name of the organization. Even after that, they keep going. Take the name. Even after that, even after their departure, the last day, they didn't go for the chemotherapy of cancer. And they said, I will design something else. So this is how they think for the coming generation. Next is the point. Entrepreneur who makes mistakes or whose business fails, but who determinately make a comeback. And then there is the entrepreneur who attract controversy dishonest entrepreneurs. Controversial. Once I talked to someone, he said that it is good to write in our rights. And it is very good to write against us. So this is how the people think. If you come very soon in controversy, you will leave. But try not to do this. This is the dark side of entrepreneurs. What do we have to keep? Take the decision to make it right. If you have made some wrong ideas from the wrong side, then remember your rule. The rule of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. He is called the rule of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Because he takes the idea and make it right. He takes the decision to make it right. Because the idea he made, he gave the structure in it. And the next generation gave one tenth of an idea. He changed his views. And one such idea was for Pakistan. And it was consistent. Thank you very much.