 I think a lot of people would consider the most volatile quarterback prospect of the Big Five to be Trey Lance because of sample size issues. Is that a concern for you? It definitely is because sample size does matter when trying to evaluate NFL quarterbacks. And they're definitely pros and cons with Lance. The pros are just 20 years old. He was hyper efficient in college and those throws did come against FCS defenses, but some of that was in the playoffs in the FCS. So it's not like they were facing total pushovers. And he obviously has elite arm strength and athleticism. The cons with Lance are he's inexperienced as you mentioned. He struggles at tons of his accuracy. So I would say he actually looks like a lot, a lot like a thicker version of Michael Vick, where both guys, absolute canons, they can run as well. But Lance can run through you in, in addition to running around you. Kind of, he has some like Marshawn Lynch, which is a very weird con for a quarterback, but you know, looking at Vic and Lance, they both have limited experience coming out, limited pass attempts in college. And they did sometimes struggle with accuracy. So it's a volatile prospect for sure, as you said, but part of that volatility is upside. He has the ability to hit the high end of his range of outcome. So sure, he could bust, but I think that's a risk teams should be, should be taking here because the upside is so big.