 Right now, there are open platforms that admit everyone to the community and that bring everyone together and say, you know, you are welcome to come join in, but that have practices underneath them that aren't transparent, that the users of those platforms don't have input into and that ultimately do harm to the relationships among the folks who are trying to use the platform and to our ability to trust that the platform is going to be there and be in the interest of scholars going forward. And so really being able to think about openness, not just as anyone can come use this platform or anyone can download the stuff off the platform, but as a kind of transparency that makes clear all of the operating principles under which the platform is being sustained and supported becomes absolutely crucial. And so some of that, I think, has to reflect at the level of governments. We really have to have platforms that are not just open to any member, but that members have some kind of faith in because they have a say in their futures.