 Open air is about opening up science to new possibilities. We need to make science more social, more relevant, and more dynamic. As scientists, we often wonder, is my idea really new? We already have indexing tools and text mining is coming, so why not using intelligent semantics to make search engines understand what we're looking for and show us whether it has been done before? We also need to see how ideas evolve. Citations already link publications to each other, but we need to show it in meaningful ways and find the papers that really matter. We should weigh the influence of scientific works on the publications that cite them. But before that, papers need to be reviewed and that is generally a waste of resources for our scientists and reviewers. Opening up manuscripts to public peer review should reduce workload for all and allow for transparency where we really need it. Science is dynamic, it changes all the time. Accordingly, just like folks can go through different editions, scientific papers should have version numbers. Currently, papers stay fixed in time from the moment they're published, but there is always something to improve upon. Still, papers are one thing and data is another thing. So, we should keep track of data as well. We can already share it on open platforms and be rewarded when someone else uses it. So, data use counts should be a measure for the output of a researcher. Then again, we scientists often cling to our own data. But maybe sharing is worthwhile. It takes us further with collaborations and it makes us work faster and better and we become more responsible too. So, let's face it.