 President Wama Dubwari has warned those promoting crime and insurrection in the country, noting that his administration will treat them in the language they understand. The president also said many of those misbehaving today are too young to be aware of the destruction and loss of lives that occurred during the Nigerian civil war. He spoke on Tuesday after meeting with the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Mamudya Kubu and other Electoral Commissioners in Nassauville, Abuja, over the series of attacks on ionic facilities, especially in the south-eastern part of the country. The question of insecurity in the country is being mentioned all over the world, not only here in Nigeria, but I believe there are Nigerians that will attempt at least to be fair. By what I believed, that I will run the country according to the constitution. Now, all these people who want power, whoever they are, have they proved that I was not following the constitution? Am I not leading the country according to the constitution? What do they want? I had one inflection which gave me a lot of hope and confidence to continue the way I wanted. So whoever wanted diversion or distraction of the system at this point, I think will soon have their shock of their lives. I think we have given them enough latitude. They have made their case. They just wanted to destroy the country. Simple. Because what do they want? We are now joined by Biyadun Shawmi, a political analyst. Good morning. Thanks for joining us, sir. Good afternoon. Apologies. President Buhari has promised to shock all of those who perpetuate violence in Nigeria. There's been various reactions to it. Some Nigerians see these as simply talking tough. So let's get to your view. What is your reaction to the President's statement? Well, I think the President is right to talk tough. But it has to be tough with the causes of criminality. It is one thing to talk tough about crime. And it is also another thing to deal with the causes of crime. The President is not addressing the causes of crime. He's talking tough, promising to deal with the promoters, according to Mr. President, those who he identified as promoting outside the post of the Constitution. But at the same time, he's not addressing the occurrences. In fact, Mr. President exhibited a lack of understanding of the challenges facing the country, the security challenges facing the country. Apologies for the poor network with that conversation. Mr. Shoomi, if you can hear me, let's move on to talking about let's move on to talking about the type of actions we should be expecting from the presidency and security agencies in the next few days. You already mentioned that it seems like he misunderstands what the actual situation is. Well, it's not about misunderstanding. I think Mr. President lacks the appreciation of the agitations and the reasons for agitations by those who are calling for to exercise their right to self-determination. If you listen to the speech clearly, he's not talking about it. He's saying, what do they want? That is, he does not even understand the issues being raised by people about fuller money, it's destroying farmers' farm, about the fact that there's widespread poverty in the country, about the fact that banditry has taken over the whole security architecture of the country. What the president is saying is, what do they want? What about those who have been calling for the structural informants, which the government failed to listen to? We suddenly now have the whole thing migrating away from structuring to the right to serve that issue. I think Mr. President does not understand the issues or he lacks sense of appreciation of it, but he's talking tough about criminality and that on his own will not solve the problem. On the security, on what we expect, we expect the military to get a matching order to crack down and possibly impose conflict in some sections of the country. But this will not solve the problem because the nature of the struggle we are facing currently is like an insurgency. It's it and wrong. It's not a conventional warfare. And I don't think we have the capacity to hook on two or three multiple war fronts, given the fact that we're already fighting in the Northeast against the people around. So I think we can do it. Just moving on, still on the same thing. Do you think that like what you've said, military action would be best? Or would you recommend dialogue as a way to foster peace in the country as it seems? You remember you also have said that the president may not appreciate the reasons behind the agitations? Yes. What is very clear is the country must not embark on an exercise of self-deception. If there's anybody in this country today who does not understand the havoc and the plight of farmers, you know, the havoc wrecked by full anneedsmen rampaging all over the whole place with cattle, you know, I'll be surprised. And that's an exercise in self-deception, you know, not actually seeing it as it is. The fact of the matter is no matter the level of militarization of the landscape in Nigeria, that will not stop people from agitation. The solution is always dialogue. It is far better for us to draw, draw now, either convoke a sovereign national conference or go back to the ones did by Jonathan's regime, you know, and then we can resolve most of our problems in that way. If we don't migrate to true federalism, we will not be able to handle the fallout of this issue. Most Nigerians want to live together, but they don't want to live as second-class citizens in their own country or where their lives are threatened in their own villages and communities. And these are the basic facts. The president has not addressed the issue facing Nigeria, so we really need to sit down and talk so that Mr. President can understand these issues clearly. Then he will realize that there is no military solution to this problem other than... All right. So do you think, you know, from your statements, do you think the president doesn't appreciate the details, you know, surrounding all of the insurrections or has chosen to ignore them? Which would you think it truly is? Because there's people in reaction to his message yesterday had pointed out that ethnicism and tribalism and, you know, you know, something about, you know, looking like hate for the Southeast. So do you think it is a lack of understanding and appreciation of the situation or the president chooses to ignore them? We don't see that in the president. Does not know what is going on in the country. If the president is not reading newspapers, his aides are reading newspapers. So obviously he must have it too. And I'm sure Mr. President at least watch the national television. Okay. Well, I was hoping that you get my last question. Shagwin, show me. Thank you so much for joining us. Okay. Thanks. All right. Hello. Hope you enjoyed the news. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.