 Do you truly in your heart of hearts truly believe that this is a human being this without a doubt without a doubt? Yes, this is a dolphin fetus So let me without a doubt a dolphin fetus is a human being this is a human fetus Look how similar they look that amazing clip was from a debate featuring Charlie Kirk and comedian Ben Gleebe And the reason why it's so incredible is because Ben Gleebe sets up a trap and Charlie Kirk Unknowingly walks right into it and the result is just humiliating for Charlie Kirk now There's a lot more to be said about that exchange, but before I talk more about this I do want to share the extended version of that clip so you can see kind of what happens in the lead-up to that moment and Shortly afterwards so enjoy at eight weeks. We have tails at eight weeks and Embryo has tails do humans have tails Charlie? I'm sorry what serious question to human beings have tails I'm not exactly sure the essence of the human beings have tails. Do you have a tail? You know, I have Never met anyone with a tail. I'm not exactly sure the exactly, but fetuses have tails kind of proves that at that phase They are not a human being they got tails humans don't tails. We're not dinosaurs Let me even show you a photo if I may okay, do you truly in your heart of hearts? Truly believe that this is a human being this without a doubt without a doubt. Yes, this is a dolphin fetus So let me without a doubt a dolphin fetus as a human being this is a human fetus. Look how similar they look, but Quite different dolphin. You just confirmed that a dolphin in life Do you confuse dolphins for human babies often? So let me see world and you're like someone's got human babies in that aquarium get the human babies out of the aquarium Well, you labeled it as a human fetus. No, I did not dishonest. No, I did not label it as anything Let me let me say human fetus on there. Let me ask you a question though So let's let's hold up those two pictures. Sure. Is there a moral difference between the dolphin and the baby? At this stage, no Perfection that was sheer perfection What we just saw was a debate tactic that I want more leftists to use Because Ben Glebe is kind of using Charlie Kirk's tactic against him because if you watch longer on and I'll link to the full Debate down below for anyone who wants to see it Charlie Kirk once he kind of gets knocked off of his feet He gets back up and he then uses the same tactic that Ben Glebe just used on him because what Ben Glebe did was he kind of presented Charlie Kirk with a common sense Question, right? This is a fetus and the argument is that life begins at conception for Charlie Kirk So of course if he is given an image of what he believes is a human fetus He's gonna answer but in answering and knowing that he's gonna answer you kind of prove Ben's point that Does life really begin at conception if you can't tell the difference between a dolphin fetus and a human fetus? Isn't this just a clump of cells at this point? Now the way that Charlie Kirk rebounds from that is he asks Okay, well, is that human fetus that you showed me is that dead or alive? Ben Glebe then says it's dead Now that was a bait as well and Charlie Kirk kind of got him into a corner by saying that because it's not dead But the point is that does life begin at conception? That's the point of contention that they're both arguing over so to say that it's dead and to bait Ben Glebe into saying Yes, it's dead You kind of prove your point as well So I don't necessarily know that this was a blowout for Charlie Kirk or for Ben Glebe overall But that particular moment was really really insightful Because one it shows how successful leftists can be when they replicate the same debate tactics of right wingers And two It's important because what ben glee did there was masterfully attack the root The core of Charlie Kirk's argument now Charlie Kirk goes on to explain His thoughts on abortion But really if we could find one moment in the debate where he summarizes his entire worldview about how he believes life begins at conception It's it's this clip that we're going to show you now Basically if you establish that life begins at conception and you accept that notion Then of course if that is indeed life if fetus is life then of course Killing it is tantamount to killing a fully developed human being once you kind of accept that premise So take a look at what Charlie Kirk says and then I'll tell you why this whole pro life this quote unquote pro life thing That he's trying to espouse here. Does it actually add up if we're logically consistent? Take a look This really kind of goes down to the question of when does human life begin when does personhood begin And the science of embryology says very clearly that life human life begins at conception Now speaking non scientifically is a moral argument We have overseen the slaughter of our fellow citizens over the last couple decades This is a genocide dare I say a holocaust of our citizens that has occurred since roe versus wade You talked about women. Well, just statistically half of the 62 million abortions since roe versus wade are 31 million women that never had the chance to live So first of all, I just want to say that regardless if abortion is legal or not They're still going to continue to happen banning abortions Is not going to lead to less abortions instead of them being Safe and legal now. They'll just be unsafe and illegal But by banning abortions, you're not going to get rid of abortions entirely but To get to charlie kirks argument here. He claims that That right there that fetus that's human life and it's so important that we protect that human life That we violate a woman's bodily autonomy even if she doesn't want That clump of cells in her. Well, you know, that's that's life If you don't think it's life. Well, then at least it's going to develop into a human being at some point So he's taking what he believes is a pro-life stance But if you take that pro-life position and you extend it Then logically it should also follow That charlie kirk believes that under no circumstances Should a state have the death penalty under no circumstances should war ever be supported He should be a pacifist. He should also support medical advancements that save lives such as the covid 19 vaccines He should also be very pro-life when it comes to supporting refugees and asylum seekers He should also make sure that no human being on the planet goes hungry and that everyone has basic health care And certainly the most pro-life stance of all means that we do everything in our power dedicate every single Penny that we have To make sure that there is a planet for future generations And we have to combat climate change that is the ultimate Test of who is and isn't pro-life if you don't believe that there should be a habitable planet for future generations Then you're not pro-life. That's the logical extension of this pro-life stance But that's not what charlie kirk believes. In fact, he disagrees with all of the things that i just listed So it's weird that your pro-life when it comes to fetuses But that's where you draw the line I mean certainly if you're gonna accept this notion Which I do not but if you're going to accept that life begins at conception Then wouldn't you accept that a fully developed life a child who's sentient who can think who can feel pain Is also deserving of life So why stop supporting life After the fetus is born either charlie kirk doesn't actually care about life because he does want to control a woman's body or He doesn't really care either way and like many republican politicians He's just using this as a wedge issue To slide through a really insidious right-wing economic agenda that disproportionately benefits elites What is this really about because if you say that you're pro-life Why do you arbitrarily draw the line at fetuses? But once the baby is born you don't care if that baby deals with war and global anthropogenic climate change We don't care if that baby goes hungry and doesn't have health care Why draw the line there? the entire Pro-life movement and it's a misrepresentation to even call them pro-life The entire pro-life movement is based on a farce clips like this are so persuasive because charlie kirk He's just a talking head. He has a lot of rehearsed talking points But ben glee being a comedian. He was able to kind of knock him off balance Kind of prove how silly his point is so overall I think that this was really really incredible to see and this is something that you can easily replicate On a personal level if you have a really anti-abortion uncle or someone in your family Who's anti-abortion and please don't call them pro-life call them anti-abortion because they've shown time and again That they're not pro-life. They're just anti-abortion. But if you have someone in your family, that's anti-abortion You can do the same thing show them a picture of I don't know an elephant fetus And will they be able to tell the difference Probably not probably not so where they choose to arbitrarily believe Life begins Like that entire notion that anti-abortionists base their world view on it can easily be dismantled Just like that and a comedian did it in less than 30 seconds To a right-wing hack who's been trained to debate people who knows Which rhetoric is effective to use so if it works on charlie kirk It's gonna work on someone, you know, and perhaps you can use this same tactic and change somebody's mind Girlie mike fettuccine needs your support on patreon. What a loser Visit patreon.com Slashed humanist report to support the low ratings humanist report sad My views are much higher