 Joan asks, did you ever have the privilege of interacting with Satoshi, or some of the first innovators, in the early days of Bitcoin? What advice did they give you that propelled you into Bitcoin? Thank you. I never had any interactions with Satoshi. By the time I got involved in Bitcoin, Satoshi had departed the scene. I did interact in the very early days with a few of the core developers. In fact, what I did was I picked a fight with them over some minor governance and political issue. Some words were exchanged, then some apologies were served up, and things went on. At the time, I didn't know who the important, let's put it within quotes, or committed long-term core developers were. I was just chatting with some people on Bitcoin Talk, GitHub, and places like that. I got into some arguments. Some things were said that were probably not very wise at the time. I actually did apologize for being a bit too passionate in my argument, toned it down a tiny bit. That was it. No respect lost, I hope. That was my interaction. It's funny that in situations where there are a lot of passionate people who really care about the principles of a technology like this, some of the most common interactions you have are minor verbal skirmishes and debates, which sometimes get a bit heated, because people really care about these details. Those are some of the interactions I had with the early innovators in Bitcoin and the core developers. Nowadays, the interactions I have with the early innovators and core developers are mostly more rare, because they are doing their work, I'm doing my work. Overall, very pleasant and very interesting. I continuously read the development mailing lists, the GitHub pull requests, and issues, both in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a couple of other projects. I try to follow what the cutting-edge innovations that are happening in my field are. I have enormous respect for the innovators who are working on these protocols. I'm constantly amazed by the incredible things they come up with. Then I have to explain them in my box, which is not always easy. So that's it. My question is, what if this is like a long shot? Yes. We become the mainstream. Oh, yeah. That's a great question. What if we become the mainstream? I think that's extremely unlikely, because that's a generational thing. I think it happens over several generations. For example, I think that, eventually, the idea of free information, access to all information at all times, sharing information, being a content creator and publisher as an individual, and not using an intermediary to do that, is becoming part of the culture of this generation. People who grew up with the internet can't imagine a time where, in order to publish something, you had to sign contracts with a publisher and have a gatekeeper who decided what was worth publishing and what wasn't. You couldn't access information unless you went to a library, and then you only had what they had. So that generation is going to grow up knowing that the generation that still remembers the past is going to die, and then no one will remember a time before the internet. They'll remember it only in terms of a historical documentary that shows funny people with weird clothing, behaving in ways we can't quite comprehend, which is how it always happens. Trust me, this is going to be funny clothing in thirty years. It always is. The bottom line is that with the next generation, eventually, the new becomes normal, the old becomes forgotten. Eventually, you will have a whole generation that is born into a world where banks are not the dominant form of commerce, where being banked is not a necessary gatekeeper to having access to financial instruments, commerce, where people can innovate commercial and financial instruments on their own, and anyone on the planet can do a transaction with anyone else on the planet, instantaneously, without any controls. That will happen. First it will be weird, then it will be normal, and then people will forget the time when that wasn't the case. But we are looking at three generations, so we won't become the mainstream. Are grandkids? Maybe. Just in regards to new success and adoption, are we in the early adopter phase, or are we still in the lunatic fringe? I think we are beginning to touch the early adopter phrase. You may have heard this before, which is, we are not the early adopters, we are still in the lunatic fringe. The early adopters come next. One of the funny things that has happened is that there is a big transition in recognition of certain words. The word cryptocurrency and bitcoin as a brand is now broadly recognized by people who don't understand what it is. They have never used it, they have no interest in the principles, they don't understand why it matters. It is the currency of hackers, drug dealers, and weirdos. Yes, all of that, but they recognize the word. In 2013, if you said, hey, do you take bitcoin, they would stumble over the word itself. Now they will be like, no, we are not drug dealers. Progress! Soon they will get it. But in the meantime, at least they were... I was at a comedy show in Chicago, and just like low-key among the audience, Chicago is like a great area for improv. Just after we did the first event in Chicago, I was at a comedy show, and they were doing this improv sketch, where one of them was pretending to be a hairdresser and the other one was pretending to be a customer getting a haircut. And the comedian being the hairdresser said, so what do you think about bitcoin? And the other person went, oh, I don't know, I don't understand it. And everybody laughed. And I looked around and said, oh, I hope no one recognizes me. I do not want to be invited on stage to try to explain that joke. That was surprising to me. When you say that word now, people recognize it. So the zeitgeist has happened. It's on TV shows. I remember when a single article in a single newspaper anywhere in the world was something worth discussing on Reddit for hours. Now it's on every newspaper every day in 30 different countries. So we keep hearing it a lot. That's a very big difference from actually using it. And I think the number of people using it is probably in the 20 to 25 million. So I think maybe 20 to 25 million people have ever used any cryptocurrency of any kind. Well, that's a very small percentage of 750. I think we're not in the early adopter phase. Still the lunatic fringe. So welcome. Thank you so much.