 Welcome to Digital Asset News to get top stories and cryptocurrency assets and break them down into bite-sized pieces. Today, there's some concerning news. First up, this is from a tweet from Fidel Digital Assets. And what they're talking about here is a nice little powwow with Michael Saylor over at MicroStrategy. And it looks like they're going to get the whole band back together and tell all the corporations exactly how to play Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency market. This lead us into a nice little interview with ARCS Cathie Wood, where it's pretty bullish about what's going on in the Bitcoin market. And those are the good news. Then on top of the other part of the flip side, we've got a little bit of FUD, Guggenheim CEO or CIO expects Bitcoin to drop to $20,000. We'll take a look at why he may have said that and is talking so negatively about the price action of Bitcoin. And we'll finish up with our friend over there at Goldman Sachs CEO, where he states regulators should be hyperventilating at Bitcoin's success. So we'll take a look at all those articles. But first, let's take a look at what's going on in the market. So today, not so much of a great day. It is January 27th. It is about 10 a.m. El Paso, Texas time. So not too shabby. We'll take a look here. $30,000 for Bitcoin. And it's dropped 4% in 24 hours and 15% for the week. So maybe all this FUD talk could have some legs. I'm not for sure. No, I'm just kidding. It's really not too much to it. And I'll explain why. Ethereum down 1%, 7% for the week, looking at $1292, but still pretty good. Almost at that $1440 tempest point. So also Tether, my car is the dot, 7% down. Everything's down today. Let's see anything up. Ooh, hey, DeFi looking pretty strong. 12% for Uniswap. That's looking pretty good. Rap Bitcoin. 6% for Ave, one of my holds. Finally breaking the top 15. I think that is a top 10 project. And all the things that it could potentially do, it's giving it a run for the money for between Ave and Synthetix. And we'll see it all works out. 3% for Synthetix. ZEM 2.6. Nothing really good. That's about it. So that's what's going on in the market. Not a great day. But again, the volatility is essentially what we all signed up for. If you're not really familiar with cryptocurrency assets, first of all, welcome. These are the things that go on every single day. You could have a nice little upside of 20%, 40%. And you could also have a downside of 60%. Cryptocurrency. So that's what's going on. Let's jump into today's top story. So first of all, this came through my Twitter feed. This was on January 25th, so a couple of days ago. And Fidelity, if you don't know, they're a pretty massive organization. They've got trillions of assets under management and they have their own digital assets department. And they said that they are excited to participate in the MicroStrategy Bitcoin for Corporations presentation. I was like, what the heck is that? And there was actually a link to it that I found. And it looks something like this. This is on the MicroStrategy website. You may be familiar with this gentleman's face right here. That is Michael Sayo, the CEO. And there's a lot of things going on. But before I get into that, I need to play you a video real quick, which is going to make this whole thing make sense about what is going on and why this is happening right now. So this is ARC's founder and CEO, Kathy Wood. ARC is a traditional investment management fund or organization. And they've got billions of assets under management and they are pretty heavy into Bitcoin. They've made some controversial calls that have actually came up to be totally correct. And Bitcoin is one of them. So what she's going to talk about here is what's going on with Bitcoin and how surprised they are at how fast the market has accelerated and picked at the pace. And then that's the first part. And the second part she's going to talk about is a nice little price prediction which everybody loves. But it's going to make total sense when she talks about the volatility of Bitcoin and what institutions need to do to make sure it does not become so volatile. So let's just take a quick listen. Corporations, we didn't expect this. We expected institutional interest, but we didn't expect corporations to substitute Bitcoin for cash. Micro strategy was the first. All of its cash is now in Bitcoin. And in fact, it did an offering so that it could buy more Bitcoin. It is a technology company. I'm a little suspicious. I don't know what the SEC is going to do with this because this is not its base business. This is its cash. Square has put 5% of its assets into Bitcoin. And we're seeing more mature companies like PayPal enabling the buying and selling of Bitcoin on its platform as cash outdoes as well. Well, if companies in the S&P 500 were to put 1% of their cash into Bitcoin, that would increase the price of Bitcoin by $40,000. Today, it's close to $30,000. So that's more than a double right there. If we saw 10%, of course, that would add $400,000. And I just told you Micro Strategy has put all of its cash in. All of their cash has been put in. That's what I like to see for Micro Strategy. So this was a pretty good little piece. So yeah, the S&P 500, and remember the S&P 500 is just the top 500 companies. Really the top, it makes up of like four or five, which is like the 25%, which is Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, those are like the big heavy companies. So if they just put 1% in, that's like 20%, that's going to increase it just enough. And then like she says, 10%, you're looking at $400,000. And I'm like, okay, well, that makes a lot of sense as far as corporations. But what she says next here, is that like around a 336 mark? I could totally understand why these corporations need to put a big amount of money into it. And I'll just have her tell you exactly what she's talking about. If our analysis on how institutions will look at allocating to this space is correct, and this is using Monte Carlo simulation, institutional involvement could increase the price of Bitcoin. Again, it's $30,000 now by $200,000 if they want to minimize volatility to $500,000 if they want to maximize their sharp ratios. So they need to raise this, they need to put enough of their treasury in there to hit Bitcoin at $200,000 to decrease the volatility, which I think they would be very happy about. And that would make their shareholders very happy. And then to increase that as far as like the $500,000, there's additional benefits. So that makes a lot of sense as to, well, first of all, why they'd want to do it. Nobody likes, well, I mean, no, let me just phrase that. Traders like volatility, but these big corporations, they're investing into it because they're like, well, we don't know exactly where it's going to go, but it looks pretty positive. If they can bring down the volatility by putting a, or dumping a bunch of cash, especially their, you know, their, their treasury, which is on fire right now because of all the money printing or the quantitative easing that the American government is doing, then sure, why wouldn't they want to do that? And then they could stabilize it at $200,000 and they could buy and go, okay, this is the equilibrium. It's not going to go up too much. And we'll talk about that a little bit more. So this makes a lot of sense. So how do you get a bunch of corporations to actually do that? Well, you need someone to pick up the mantle, to pick up the flag and go, you know what, just follow me. We've done all the hard work. You jokers don't have to do squat. Just listen to what we did and just follow the lead. And you might make a ton of money. So that's what is going on here with the MicroStrategy Bitcoin for Corporation. So this is why I talk about an actual thumbnail and the actual title you got until February 4th. February 4th is when it all kicks off. And really what it comes down to is this, it's a two day event. So on Wednesday, February 3rd, they're going to start off at noon. Michael Saylor is going to be there. He's inviting all these corporations. And I would love to be there just to sit down and be the fly on the wall. I'm like, wow, there's a CEO of that one. There's a CEO of that one. There's these guys. I think this would be probably a pretty high profile event. I would guess, oh no, maybe Elon's going to be there. Who knows? So when we take a look here about what's going to happen. So if we click on this, we're going to see like the basics. Like they're going to go over the basics at noon, right? This is the history. This is the macroeconomic outlook. Pretty much just hitting these guys down and our guys and gals going, sitting down and going, look, this is what's going to happen. This is why you want to be a part of this. So if we go back, it's a very cookie cutter type of thing. I like this one here, the Bitcoin Corporate Playbook, because it's not just Michael Saylor. It's also this gentleman named Fong Li, the chief financial officer. And he's going to talk about, hey, you can't, you don't just do this by yourself. Here's some vendor selection to your due diligence. Here's the execution technique. Here's the debt equity and shareholder relations. Here is everything you guys need to know to make sure you don't screw this up, because we've already done this. We've already done the hard work and had our mistakes. So just don't do these things and just do the things we're going to tell you and you're going to make a massive amount of money and you can offload all of your cash into cryptocurrency, actually Bitcoin, let's be honest, they're not doing anything else. It's all Bitcoin. So I thought this was a pretty interesting thing. So we understand these people will be attending, they'll be listening, they'll be learning. But then the next day is I think the more of the powerhouse, which is on February 4th, when they said about the selection or doing some kind of selection for who is actually going to be a part of this and going to be actually instituting or executing your plan, well, who's going to be there? Well, it's going to be Binance, Vince Kwak. And when I say who's attending here on the 4th of February, this isn't like, oh, this is Pete from accounting. He's going to tell you what's going on. And this is Jay and he's over there from the institutional department. No, no. It's you got Binance, Coinbase presentation, Brett, head of institutional sales. You've got Kraken, Jesse Powell, the CEO, NY Dig, Robbie Gutman, the co-founder. You've got Fidelity Digital Assets, Tom Jessup, who is the president. You've got Genesis Presentation, CEO, Grayscale, Michael Sonnenschein. Well, I didn't say that right. Sonnenschein, yeah, maybe Sonnenschein. Gemini, Global Health and Business Development, Galaxy Digital, you've got Mike Novigratz and Charles Cascaria, the CEO of PAXO. So it's not like they're just like, you know, this will be a nice little thing to talk about. Every big gun is going to be there because they want to make sure that these huge entities, these institutions, these corporations that are going to sit down, they want their business and they want to make sure that they go with them and they will institute exactly what Michael Saylor is talking about. This is a pretty good organization of how they're going to actually institute this at a very high level. So when I took a look at this, I'm like, yeah, February 4th is the kickoff. Now you have to understand something. Some corporations and some entities, they've already been planning this. They've already been doing these things. So they're pretty much ready, but they need a playbook. They need someone that's a little bit more safer and that's what Michael Saylor's got. So I don't know if he's charging for this, maybe maybe not. I have no idea. But so some of these guys are going to jump in feet first, feet first, and they're going to make a big splash. Others are going to take a little bit more time and some are not going to institute this at all. So do I think that Bitcoin on February 5th will be $100,000? No, but I will just say this. I believe that this is the time when everybody starts to kick this off and they all are going to get in. But here's the thing. If you're there and you're a CEO and you're looking around going, there's all these CEOs, damn, there's a lot of people here. I better get on this because now you start to feel the FOMO like if I don't get my hands on my grubby hands on Bitcoin, then all these jerks are going to get bears and the price is going to go up. You can only buy so much in OTC. You can only buy so much in OTC. So if it was me looking around like, you know what, make sure this happens. And I would go from there. Now, having said all that, it really comes out of the point of how are they going to make sure that the price stays low? Well, what MicroStrategy did is they worked with Coinbase and they bought these micro transactions. And it was over the course of like two or three weeks where they would buy like 0.13 Bitcoin here and then five seconds later it would be 0.008 Bitcoin there. It was a little small amounts for like three weeks until they got up to their $425 million price range and they've done even more so. So there's only so much Bitcoin to go around and Grayscale has bought up, well actually at one point it was between Grayscale and PayPal. They have bought up all the daily supply that was coming out for Bitcoin, which they run nine, I want to say nine or a million is that right? That can't be right. It was a lot. And then 90 million, something like that. And then all of a sudden then they said, you know what, we're going to buy a ton more and they bought like 13 X of the daily supply and now the race is on. So once these people get in, this will be a dangerous deal because the price will start to go up. So what do they need you to do? They need you to sell all your Bitcoin as fast as possible. And how do they do that? Well, they do stuff like this. So this was from Guggenheim, the chief investment officer expects Bitcoin to drop to 20,000. And this was again, Scott Menard, he's a CIO. He believed that the top was in at 42,000. He says, he says, I think for the time being, we probably put in the top for Bitcoin for the next year or so, and we're likely to see a full retracement back towards the $20,000 level. So this could be true. And when I was actually on Alex's, Alex Masioli show, CJ from Market Rebellion, he was talking about a retracement to $20,000 level. But here's the thing, which comes first, the chicken or the egg, because in these types of situations, when you have a pretty high profile Guggenheim, which, you know, they have billions of assets under management, and they're saying, you know what, we think Bitcoin is going to go down 20,000. Then all of a sudden it's like a ripple effect. And then before you know it, it does go down 20,000. So the thing is, I wonder is, I believe that this whole market, a lot of this market is moved by whales and news and sentiment, essentially. So I think stuff like this, if you have enough of this, then you get people who sell. And we saw that with BitMEX when they said, oh, there's a double spend issue. And then all of a sudden, you will see reports of people selling their Bitcoin. It's like, oh, Bitcoin sucks. It doesn't even work because it's double spend issue. And then later on, they go, eh, guess not. And then so I was like, good job, BitMEX, because you just screwed a lot of people out of a lot of money by doing that, because they just sold their cryptocurrency assets. And then of course, maybe you did that for a reason, because you want your buddies to get in. I'm not going to say that's what it is. Don't sue me. But it's just hearsay. It's just my opinion. Who knows? So there is that part. And I just don't know about this. So I don't think it's going to retrace that 20,000, but I've been wrong before. But here we are. Anyhow, despite Menard's bearish short term Bitcoin prediction, the CIO apparently still maintains a stance that one Bitcoin is worth 400,000. So he's like, yeah, yeah, it's going to go to 20,000, but it's going to be worth 400,000 in the future. And that's the problem when people make these predictions. They don't say when it's really going to be. And it's like, well, you know, Bitcoin could go to a million. When's that going to be? And the future. When's the future? Later. Tomorrow. So it's like, eh, okay. Me personally, I think it's going to 150,000 this year, 2021. I think if there is going 10,000 dollars this year, 2021, I think fate is going to $20 something like that this year. I don't think, you know, I think it's going to be a pretty slam dunk type of thing. And that's just my opinion. So you'll have these types of stories, these things will come out. And what they're trying to do is to separate you from your cryptocurrency. And like I've always said, this is going to be the year. And I think everything kind of is going to start to kick off on February 5th. So on top of that, let's not forget this little sweetheart, Goldman Sachs CEO regulator should be hyperventilating at Bitcoin success. So at first glance, I'm like, okay, maybe they should be a little bit worried. But the way that this, this guy was talking about, it's like the end of the world. So while appearing on CNBC Squawk box on January 25th, Blancfien asserted that Bitcoin's pseudonymus, pseudonymus major, I always forget that word wrong, makes it perfect for a listed financing stating, you don't know whether or not you're paying the North Koreans or Al-Qaeda or the Revolutionary Guard. So here's another example of someone going, you know what Bitcoin's used for listed activities. Just ignore the fact that the dollar is used for 99% of all listed activities, because that's all we had as opposed to 12 years ago. So whatever. So you have that part here, but he's going to talk about transparency and things like that. But in all honesty, in all honesty, you can track Bitcoin pretty easily. You can track cryptocurrency pretty easily, except Monero, that's a privacy coin. So like with this one, this was an article that says US Department of Justice sees millions of crypto funds from Al-Qaeda and ISIS networks. And this wasn't too, this was August 13th. Then this other one here, researchers in Philippines track crypto use by terrorist. So I think when people talk about like, it's, you know, it's, it's, it's totally used for listed activities and it's not transparent. I'm like, do you understand the whole concept of blockchain and public ledgers and things like that? I mean, you can track anything. Speaking of which, like you'd always got to do is go to bpc.com. You can put in any of your wallets or transactions and you can track anything. Here's a transaction of one of mine where I moved .03 of my Bitcoin. So that's one of those easy dealies. You can track, like I said, you can track anything. Just so you know, if you're on an exchange, like a Coinbase, if you go look at your actual wallets, they will always change the Bitcoin address. So this was an article I just found on Coinbase. And of course, there's a problem with Coinbase Pro, probably another problem with Coinbase because they seem to be shutting down probably because they're dealing with all their high-profile institutions. Anyhow, it says that when checking your cryptocurrencies from your primary account page, you may notice that the address currently displayed differs from one you have listed in the past. So every time you take a transaction, they change the wallet address. We automatically generate a new address for you after every transaction you make or when funds are moved between your wallet and our storage system. This is done to protect your privacy so that third party cannot view all of the transactions associated with your account simply by using a blockchain explorer. So there's a thing. So at first you're like, what are you talking about? Because first you just said you could track it and now you're saying you can't. Well, if it's on an exchange, any exchange, you did KYC and AML. The U.S. government can definitely take a look at that and they've already subpoenaed Coinbase for different records in the past and they've done it and they've gotten it. So just make sure that you are first of all paying your taxes and that you know that they can actually look this stuff up. And of course if you want to look your information up, bpc.com. All right, so there is that piece. Let's go back to the actual article to talk about all this fun. So in order to conform Bitcoin to the existing financial regulatory apparatus, Blancfina asserts that many of the fundamental freedoms enabled by Bitcoin must be reined in. However, you question whether a strong demand would continue to exist for Bitcoin without its pseudonymus privacy features. First of all, there's no real privacy features. If you want to do Monero, Zcash, they can have privacy features. They can turn those on. I think Litecoin at some point was supposed to be doing that, but I'm not for sure. He said, he states this, this could be workable, but it will undermine the freedom and liberty and kind of lack of transparency that people like about it in the first place. So that's the conundrum that Bitcoin will have to deal its way out of. So I'm like, yeah, okay, I suppose so. But there's this nagging feeling that I have, which is when you're talking about transparency and you're a bank and you're like, well, you know, you know, you really should have more transparency. Look, banks are regulated pretty hard. Let's be honest, but they know all the rules. They know all the loopholes. And I think maybe the CEO might be a little bit worried that, hey, now we got to play by some additional rules and we don't like that. And I have nothing against banks. I mean, I bank with USA, that one's great. All the rest of them suck. They take forever to do wire transfers. They are stuck in like the 70s or 80s. I guess if you want to think about it, the transaction fees like wires are pretty pain in the butt. And I just don't like the whole way that it works. I think that if I can fax or if I can email a friend of mine in India, and it gets there in seconds, why can't I move money around the world in the same way? Because it's all digitalized anyhow, it's just digital notes on a ledger. So I don't understand. So when he's talking about we need transparency, well, they don't want that. I mean, look, banks, we know, still do some illicit activities. So here's one. If you don't remember this one, this was the Wells Fargo account fraud scandal, creation of millions of fraudulent savings and checking accounts. And people like, well, who cares? They just created a checking and savings account. Well, it's not so great when clients being noticed that the fraud are being charged unanticipated fees and receive unexpected credit or debit cards or lines of credit for which they may start to default on or whatever else. But still it's the same fees. If you're getting millions and millions of different accounts being generated, then you're charging these people without them knowing, that's not a great thing. But that's the bank. On top of that, Dutch bank ING fined 900 million for failing to spot money laundering. And again, if you have an open ledger that's very transparent, this kind of stuff goes away, especially like, let's take like Bernie Madoff for his Ponzi scheme. Don't you think if he could say, show us your ledger, your open ledger, show us on the blockchain of what's going on, that stuff wouldn't happen. You could actually track it. So you have something like that. You've also got Bank of America to pay 16 billion in historic Justice Department settlement for financial fraud. And then there's a new one. Actually, it's a continuation, Goldman Sachs, we're just talking about close to two billion settlement over one MBB scandal. It's formulating a deal under which it's Asian subsidiary, rather than what the parent company would pay a multi-billion dollar fine. And it made guilt for having an allegedly turned a blind eye while 4.5 billion was looted from its client, Malaysia's sovereign wealth fund, one MBB. So if you have something like this, and again, if this CEO from Goldman Sachs, if he knew about exactly how this is all transparent, then it wouldn't be such a big deal. And I think this is probably what ticks him off the most. This was an article that was sent to me just today. Goldman Sachs slashes CEO pay by 10 million over the IMDB scandal. So what this guy is, this was Goldman Sachs CEO. So I'm sure he's not too happy about being part of the scandal, losing 10 million dollars of his pay. Again, this could be just one of those things. All right, so sucks for you. Black and Fine also criticized Bitcoin as a store of value, emphasizing its price volatility and the technology literacy required to self-custody Bitcoin. I will give them a point on this one. I've got a lot of different emails and comments from people who have signed up over there at DanTeachersCrypto.com. And some people are just overwhelmed. Like if you get, you know, three kids run around, you got to a job, and you're trying to have a social life, and you got to figure out everything with self-custody, it's kind of a pain. And some people are like, you know what, I just put on the exchange. I don't want to deal with it. I got only so many hours in a day. And then some people will be like, oh, well, you know, they should just learn it because financial literacy and this is everybody's different. Everybody's got their own battles to fight. Okay. So like on this one, self-custody Bitcoin, it's a pain sometimes. So when you learn everything about the nano ledger, which was supposed to be, you know, so great. I mean, it's still great since it's unhackable so far. However, you know, people who buy it, then unfortunately they just had all their personal data leaked, which is their address, their phone number, their name and stuff like that. So it's like, well, shoot, I mean, how great is this industry when I'm getting everything stolen over here? And that is just the way it is. So there's that part. Price volatility is one part. And then the last thing, when he's going to, he's going to criticize the store of values comment, he says, it's a store of value that can move 10% in a day, that if you lose the code or if you lose a slip of paper, it's lost forever. Or if somebody takes it from you, how will you know? Well, it's the same thing with, with gold. First of all, people can steal your gold. If you have gold, it's, you can steal anything. And then as far as like Bitcoin, I mean, unless somebody breaks into your house and knows about Bitcoin, it still is your mnemonic phrase, which I will tell you, if you don't have one of those stone books, definitely pick those up. Links in the description. It holds all your, your, your past phrases. And I put them, I say for deposit box, very simple to use. So as far as like stealing, you can steal anything, but it's a pretty hard to steal that, especially let's say, if you're in a third world country and you're traveling with paper money, or you travel with gold or silver, easily to take. But if you have your mnemonic phrase, hopefully if you can remember that, or if you haven't written down somewhere in parts and pieces everywhere else, you can travel with it pretty easy. But the next part, the story of value, I get a lot. And it makes a lot of sense actually, because people say, well, how can you say it's a story of value when 2017 is worth 20,000? And then 2018, it dipped down to the around five or 6,000. It's a good point. However, if you take a look at story of value of what it actually is. So story of value to me, if you want to think about gold, or if you want to think alike, take, how about this? Let's start with gold. So gold, actually over its five years, or it's one year, it's changed about 18%. So the value from a year ago is around 1,500 bucks. Then I want the 2,000. So if you bought it, and it's been fluctuating, so let's say you bought it 2,000 and it goes on a 1,500. Well, you just lost a good chunk of that, 25%. So that is, if you want to say, well, it's over a year, but still, you're losing value in some way, shape, or form. And it's not like gold's going to go up that much. Now, if you take a look at the five year price, this gets even worse. So the five year low was about 1,000, and the five year high was 2,000. So let's say again, you buy it at 2,000, it goes down to 1,000 over five years. It's still not the greatest story of value over it, although there is some volatility, just not as much as cryptocurrencies. So yes, you will have some volatility. And even if you take a look at traditional stores of value, like besides gold, silver's the same way, let's take a look at art, because some people will say, well, I can have a Picasso, I can put it in there. Well, that's only what you can actually get paid for it at auction. So if somebody wants to auction it off, you bought it for $18 million, hopefully it appreciates, maybe it goes to $20 million. Like, oh, well, that's very volatile. You don't care. It's the same thing with Bitcoin. If you bought Bitcoin around March, got it for $3,000, and right now you're sitting at $30,000. That's a 10X in less than a year. I'm sure you're still not too upset. So for a store of value, it's just a lot more volatile, we will say, than a gold. But really, if you look at it, I mean, over a one-year time frame, gold's still volatile, art's still volatile. Heck, even the ones that I like, which is just buying land, that can still be volatile because the value is what you can get other people to actually pay you for it. So if I buy up an acre for $100,000, then someone comes to me and I've had it for a while, I say, I can only give you $80,000. Okay, I can either wait or I can take that offer. That's just what it is, lost 20%. So anyhow, so that's what we have for today. So the whole thing comes down to this. February 4th, you're going to see a lot of institutions, a lot of different big corporations probably get talked into finally to get into the Bitcoin cryptocurrency digital asset game by Michael Saylor because he's going to tell them just how fantastic this all works out. Remember, they bought 425 million and they kept buying more until they had a billion worth of Bitcoin. Now it's worth 2 billion. So do you think these corporations aren't going to be like, wow, I can actually double my money as time goes on? I like the sound of that and I don't get devalued like the dollar? Sure. On top of that, you're going to see some more flood articles. You're going to see more people saying, you know, you need to sell it. It's going to go out of 20,000. But here's the thing, what if it does? What if it goes on 20,000 in February? Just like, you know, and you're like, oh, that's it. Well, if you look at the four year cycles, it's still going to go up. This is the thing. People in these situations, they have their, it's like a mentality of like, I got to get paid now. I got to get paid today. These guys are looking at today. These guys are looking at 3,520 years from now. And I think that's what you really have to take a look at. Me personally, I've been in this game for going on for four years now. It's not, it's a blip. It's a blip. It's not, it's not anything. But I think this will still be our year, even if we go on a 20,000. Hell, if you ever go on a 15,000, 10,000, I still think 2021 is going to be great, especially with this type of news. So don't look at, like my friend Diddy says, when in doubt, zoom out and just take a look at the big charts over what's going to happen over the next 365 days, two years, three years. Anyhow, that's it for today. So if you made this far, the video, first of all, thanks for watching all the way. I really appreciate it. If you liked the video, give it a thumbs up, consider subscribing. I got a lot more of these as far as news. All right. So thanks so much for watching. I appreciate it. If you like these types of videos and be two months going to pop up on your left and right, let YouTube do its magic. And that is all for today. So thanks so much for watching. I appreciate it. And I'll see you on the next one.