 I would go around for years to highlight how Linux has developed, and partly to showing who contributes. If you want to know. And my main point of that is, and talking to companies, is do you, anybody can contribute. If you rely on Linux, shouldn't you help contribute to Linux if you want to make sure it goes in the way that's useful for you? Or do you trust these other companies? That's the best thing about Linux. Everybody can contribute it and drive it in the way they want to. And Canonical's business decision is to not contribute. That's fine. That's perfectly valid and we have no problem with it. And Canonical agrees with that. That's what they do. So there's not really any controversy. I don't think people realize that. That's all. Has anything changed because they released their own catalog of supported devices or supported hardware catalog? That's what the Linux kernel supports. It's no different from any other desktop. They have contributed more. There's no problem. Question about that. But lots and lots of people contribute. They just aren't a major contributor, which is fine. I have no objection to that.