 I believe that your goal without condescension and without manipulation is to tell the truth as you see it. And I align myself when the truth as I see it overlaps with an atheist movement or a skeptic movement or a libertarian movement or Kato. I'm very happy to get on board there but I don't spend any time thinking about what we're trying to accomplish. And I believe that's really important because if I think how do I convince this person I'm sitting across from someone that I've met. And in my mind if I'm thinking how do I get that person to become a libertarian I believe at that moment I am a pig. I am a bad person I am doing the wrong thing. I should be thinking what do I believe what's in my heart I try to say that then that person says that back because it's possible they're right. And if I'm trying to convince them I have not given any possibility of them being right. When you say to the person condescendingly well how do you think UFOs could have gotten here? That's not a real question. You're trying to manipulate them and it's possible that the person sitting across from me has information on Roswell that'll change my whole point of view. It's very unlikely. I don't really entertain it but in theory I want to be open to that. So my brand of libertarianism if you will is I love having people preach to me. I don't want to ever become the person that's trying to change their mind and the difference is so subtle as I think outside of me to be non-existent. The difference between telling the truth as you see it from your heart with passion and trying to win people over is I guess the technical term would be an RCH. Just the slightest possible difference. But to me it's very important and I try to stick with that. So I don't really have I'm a member of the Cato Institute. I subscribe to Reason. I think I have to check but I think I'm a card carrying member of the libertarian party. I never know what I filled out and what exactly I've done but I voted libertarian for many years now. 25 years whatever and I miss Harry Brown every second. He was wonderful. So the flavors of libertarianism I go with there's just I think I go with maximum freedom. I often say that I'm probably leaning closer to anarcho capitalist. I would love to see I mean every situation and I've said this a million times to Larry King in every problem you come up with I would like to have one of the first questions to be is it possible we can solve this with more freedom instead of less. Is that possible? And sometimes the answer is going to be no. You know if someone is committing a rape you know if someone is killing someone and you're a police person and you have a gun and they are holding a gun to someone's head like this and they're going to pull the trigger you might not be able to solve that problem with more freedom to that person. You know if a country is attacking ours and actually changing our way of life you may not be able to solve that with more freedom to the other side but team use of tobacco television shows we don't like libraries at least consider the possibility of going with more freedom that having been said I'm not for burning down the situation that we have I'm not for hose it down as a friend of mine says on everything just hose it down start again it's not the style person I am I believe that you just keep saying the truth as you see it as often as you can you change your mind every time you see yourself as being wrong and you hope that that truth will win out in the end and I think it does I think that the major quality you need to be an atheist and the major quality you need to be a libertarian is optimism and trust in love of people.