 Good morning, Manette. Can you hear me? Yes, I can clear you clear and sound. Oh, perfect. Thank you so much. Thank you. So I want to invite any of our attendees, if you're part of an applicant team, and you'd like to test your sound, please raise your hand. Alright, we have Karen's Wallya. I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing that correctly. You should receive a prompt and as soon as you answer that prompt, you can go ahead and test that sound. It looks like you're unneeded. I'm here. Oh, there you are. Yes. Perfect. Okay. So if you want to mute yourself until it's the appropriate timing, then we won't have to go through the prompt every time. Okay. But if you happen to forget, I might mute you. Okay. Thank you. You're welcome. Alright, so we have more people arriving. Just want to see if there's anyone that's a member of an applicant team that would like to test your sound. Can you please raise your hand? Anyone that's a member of an applicant team. Alright, so we're still pretty early. We'll give everyone time to log on. Thank you. Alright, I want to go ahead and give our applicant teams anyone else part of an applicant team that would like to do a sound check. Please raise your hand. The George forgive me. I'm not going to attempt your last name, but you can certainly let us know. Go ahead. You should receive a prompt. There you go. I did. So I'm assuming you can hear me. Excellent. Good morning. Good morning. Thanks. If you want to keep yourself muted when it's appropriate, then that would be helpful. If you forget to mute yourself, I might mute you, but we'll make sure you're able to speak at the appropriate. I will make sure that they keep myself muted. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right, Susie, if we can get a sound check. Morning Kimberly, it's Susie. Can you hear me? We can. I'm going to go on mute just for a couple of minutes and I'll be right back. Kimberly, are we good to go? I think we are. Can you tell me if, if Andy usually gives a couple extra minutes for people show up or if he starts right on time, I don't want to draw. Yeah, we usually start on time. Okay, great. Well, with that, I'm going to call the meeting to order and introduce myself. I'm my name is Susie Murray. I'm serving as the zoning administrator this morning. And I want to call to order the zoning administrator meeting on September 2 2021. I want to let people know that this is a bona fide meeting and compliance with the provisions of the governor's executive orders to suspend certain requirements of the brown out and allow these meetings to take place in remote locations. So it allows people to shelter in place and minimize the spread of COVID staff, all the planners admin staff and myself are all at remote locations right now. And I want to let people know that members of the public of course are welcome in this meeting as are the applicants. Anybody can speak when you want to speak and the appropriate times of course. And you can, if you're calling in, you can hit star nine on your telephone and wait for, I believe you get a prompt. And, and if you're on the zoom meeting, you can go ahead and just raise your hand. Believe that hand on my screen is located at the bottom of my screen. I think that's the way it shows up for everybody. So, I want to make some announcements before we actually get moving on the agenda items. First, the all items, all actions taken today are appealable. So, the 10 day appeal period that 10 day appeal period falls on on a Sunday on September 12, and therefore is extended to Monday, September 13. So your application for appeal would need to be submitted by September 13. If there is an item that you would like to appeal or decision that you would like to appeal. Please contact the project planner, and he or she can help you with that. I am also going to make I'll make this announcement again, but there was a we received a request for public hearing on item 3.4, which is a proposed high health side development permit at 3926 Chanterelle circle that as such we've continued that item. I'm going to wait for the planner to let me know when the item comes up to what date that is continued to. Let's see. Next item is going to be public comments that are not related to any of these agenda items. There is a period here where if you have comments that you would like to make that are relevant to the zoning administrators purview. This is your opportunity to do so. So if you do, if you're again if you're on the zoom meeting go ahead and raise your hand so that we can see you and if you are calling in press star nine. Kimberly, do you see anybody raising hands. I don't see any raised hands right now. Okay. With that. So the first item. Thank you very much by the way, not agenda up in front of me. The first item is on Westgate circle. Ah, disappeared. I'm sorry Kimberly can you bring it up I don't have my agenda. Oh, found my agenda. All right, the first item item 3.1 is a conditional use permit proposed at Westgate circle along the third street frontage and I am going to hand it off to Connor McKay city planner will be presenting that project today. Thank you madam zoning administrator. Can everybody hear me. Yes. So, can everybody see my screen. Yes. Great. Thank you so much. I'd like to make sure. Okay. Yeah, so. Thank you miss Murray. My name is Connor McKay here presenting this project for Adam Ross interim senior planner. And the file number is CP 21 021 and it is located at zero Westgate. I have avenue but it could potentially be circle. Here the aerial shows where the fence proposed scope of work would be located as madam and zoning administrator described the the fence currently exists on the west third street frontage of the valley Vista state's subdivision, specifically the area that fences off the RV storage. And we have the so the proposal is to extend existing six foot redwood fencing, an additional two feet into the exterior setback. This fencing would consist of three strands of tension wire fencing, and this would be angled at 45 degrees. The fencing would not extend over the sidewalk, sidewalk, and it would be 409 feet in length. And then this I don't know what happened to the quality of this image. I think it might have gotten blown up a little bit. It basically just identifies again, a little bit more zoomed in that the northern project site frontage is the area of proposed work. So here is kind of a little side view of what the fence would look like on the left side of the diagram would be the. I believe the side that is facing the sidewalk, whereas the right side is the inside but Karen might be able to speak to that a little bit better in her remarks after my presentation. So there we have kind of an illustration of what the tension wire fencing would look like I just want to reiterate this would not be barbed wire because barbed wire is not allowed in residential zoning districts. So this this would basically just be to provide security, because the site has been experiencing problems with trespassing and vandalism and theft. So this would hopefully reduce that issue. And we have here photos of the existing fence as it stands now and obviously there's signage that is posted that trespassers should keep out but this has proven unsuccessful and determined deterring these acts. So the project is the project qualifies for class three categories that categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act, and that the project consists of the construction of a small accessory structure, including fence. There's one public comment that the tension wire proposed tension wire fencing resembles a bit of an institution, and we appreciate this comment and we do recognize that this is not necessarily the, the most perfect aesthetic for residential area but this is I think a great alternative to continued vandalism and seeing as there's no barbed wire proposed complies with city standards for fencing, assuming approval, accounting for the approval of a minor conditional use permit. And with that the planning and economic development department recommends that the zoning administrator approve this two foot addition to the existing fence for security improvements. This is not consisting of approximately 409 linear feet of tension wire for the property located at zero Westgate. And I also want to make a note that the APN and the original resolution was incorrect and that has since been updated to reflect the accurate APN. I'm available to answer any questions. My name is Connor McKay city planner and Karen the applicant is also available, and she would like to make some remarks as well. Thank you very much Connor and Karen I'm going to let you go ahead and make your remarks and if you could just clarify, Connor if you could back it up to slides number five and six and just kind of toggle between them as necessary. And where that that tension wire will, will it be pointed towards the street or towards the, towards the storage area. The tension wire will be strung between, as you can see on the fence there. The tension wire will be strung between the two supports. The reason why we're going with the 45 degree angle is because we firmly believed that this would be less easier to get over the fence with the angled towards the street, a pose to a lattice work that would be straight up and all they need was to just scale another two feet than what they are already doing. The tension wire wire would go between two of these posts. The angled part is where the three strands of tension wire would be the pole part will not be seen at all from the street. All you'll see is the top portion, which is see through. So it is less obtrusive in my mind than what a solid piece of whatever would look on that fence. There are also no residential homes, viewing this fence. All the closest residential homes are the Valley Vista three development. Those are all homes that are not facing the third street, they are the back sides of the homes. So the only view of this fence extension would be from motorists driving on Third Street. And again, it is not a solid fence. It's not a solid extension. In fact, it does not even extend to feet. It would be 1.8 I believe feet in from above the fence because of the angle of 45 degrees. Thank you. So I think I think to clarify the the which it's sloped towards the fence so it will be or towards the streets towards the street. Thank you for that clarification I actually thought it was sloping the other way and this this helps me because I was thinking gosh how is that going to keep people from going over but I think sloping it towards the street would keep people from going over it and I also I want to point out that I'm also aware there's pedestrian traffic along that street as well. I want to compliment the existing fence although you know it looks like maybe I don't know are you replacing that fence in addition to adding these. No, this will be this will be actually over the fence. So if we ever had to replace any sections of that fence we could easily do it. The area of the other thing I'd like to point out that the area between the fence in the sidewalk for that entire length of 409 feet ranges anywhere between four inches for feet and 11 feet. So at no time will this extension ever go near the sidewalk. I reviewed the resolution and the plans prior to the meeting and and the public comment. And I, the only thing I didn't understand again is is the direction of the, of the, the angled edition. I think it makes a lot of sense. I am going to, I want to, I want to point out that the comments that we received there. I saw comments, you know, very institutional I'd like to point out to, to whomever is listening that 10 years ago 15 years ago. I would probably agree with that, but we would see some more and more interesting fences that incorporate various types of metal, whether it's wire or corrugated metal into them and, and they really spice up neighborhoods. I also want to compliment this fence because I've been driving up and down west third for about 16 years since I've worked for the city of Santa Rosa, and honestly never knew there was RV storage behind this fence so that's kudos to it looks like the fence is serving, serving that because oftentimes RV storage is not something very attractive that passersby want to look at. Thank you. Okay, I would, I have a few other comments that I would like to make that are not included in the project submission. So, Karen. I'm sorry I thought you were done with making your comments I'm going to ask you to go ahead and finish up your comments and then let us take it from there, and we will ask you questions after that, but you can go ahead and finish your comments and let me know when you're done. Okay, thank you. The requesting approval for a proposed project known to require planning and building department permits is performing due diligence prior to formal presentation to an Association's homeowners. This was first introduced at an open business meeting on February 2, 2021. On March 2 at another open business meeting, the fee for filing the CUP was approved on August 3 at another open business meeting, a subsequent report was made on this project. The identified area is available at a modest cost for any of the 269 homeowners to store any registered and insured vehicle they own. The Civil Code provides the common interest development, the ability to charge a fee for an amenity that is reasonably related to the cost of operating that amenity. In the Association Board's judiciary duty to place the cost of an amenity used by only a few members on those members, rather than all members pay. Therefore, the costs of this project will be distributed among the users of this area. But thank you for your time and considering this CUP. I'm done now. Thank you very much. So what I was going to get into is, in terms of the homeowners Association, I want to explain that well, city staff are sympathetic to it we don't normally get involved in proposing homeowners Association's rules and regulations that's between property owners and homeowners Association so the purpose for the conditional use permit and the conditional use permit fee that you paid is for consideration not approval. I so I'm just going to say the purpose for the conditional use permit is the use itself that we're considering. I agree with both first Connor thank you very much for bringing this forward for Adam today, and you did a spectacular job as usual, and the I am inclined to approve the defense I do, I think we added, did you add an additional condition on that resolution. I just wanted to mention that the condition was added to remove any remaining barbed wire that might be present at the existing fence. Yeah, I'm super happy to see that I did a drive by yesterday and I'll say, there's some parts of that fence it's a long fence. Some parts look a little bit, you know, like they could use some replacement boards, but I also did notice some like straggling pieces of barbed wire which as Connor aptly pointed out we don't approve that in residential neighborhoods. So, I'm hoping that can be removed as part of the approval. And with that, let's hang on a second because we have a we have public comment we have somebody with their hand raised. Oh, you're good Kimberly thank you for catching me. Okay, let's go ahead and listen to the public comments. Yeah, and this is a phone caller so I want to let the phone caller know I'm going to go ahead and allow that permission to talk on that phone call. Okay, go ahead. It's a call ending 5659 go ahead and Good morning. Good morning. Good morning. Yes. I have a comment in regards to the request for this particular project. In the request it said something in regards to there was increase in vandalism, but I am curious as to what written police reports does the association, the run by Karen squaglia have in regards to that. Are there any other comments generally what our processes so people know is, we listened to all the comments, and, and we respond after the fact so that's not a dialogue it's a, it's a response. Thank you for your comments. Do you have more. Well, my, I just wanted to point out that that was part of the reason for wanting this extension was because there was additional theft, but I was wondering as to what documentation backs that allegation. Thank you. Okay, thank you. Kimberly are there any other comments. I don't see any other raised hands at the moment. Let me just check once more. No, I think that would be it. Okay, I am going to ask the applicant if you if you'd like to respond to that. Um, we, the owners of the vehicles have filed police reports. We do not. The police department. This is all done via computer to in today's environment. We have the homeowners to file those reports. They report to us that they have been filed. We have, they have the copies of the reports, not the association. Thank you very much. Okay, now I'm going to get back in. So again, the relationship or the discussion. There are some disagreements between homeowners within the association and the home of the homeowners as a association itself. Generally take place at their own meetings in the city, unless it's on some unlawful activities generally doesn't get involved. So thank you very much for I appreciate the question I appreciate the answer. And the participation in the public process very much. I'm sorry. We do have another question that popped up in our chat. Okay, and let's go ahead. Let me see what it says. Hi everyone we've had people hop the brick walls very easily. What can you do regarding people easily jumping the brick walls. Karen, I think I'm going to defer to you on that as well. The design includes some sort of block on those brick posts. To my knowledge, there have been no breaching of the perimeter fencing, other than in the RV area. I'm not aware, because as you have seen traveling down this road on Third Street, there are numerous homes that extend along that street as well. To my knowledge, there have been no breaching of that fence into personal property or the common area behind those homes. The only area that has been breached is the RV park. That is why we are proposing to put the fence any further than the RV parking area. Thank you very much. Kimberly are there any other hands raised. I don't see any more chats. I don't see anything else. Okay, now I'm going to close the public comment period. I'm going to go back. If there is additional fencing that's needed, I would encourage residents to contact the homeowners association and that can come forward at another time. For now, for this project, the scope of this project, as conditioned, I'm going to go ahead and approve the fence extension. And I hope that resolves the security problem I received several emails from not just people who have put their RVs in that area, but some of the neighbors to that area that are very thankful for the additional security. So with that, it's approved as conditioned. Thank you. And now I think we can move on to item 3.2, which is a proposed conditional use permit at 921 Sevastopol Road. Again, Connor McKay will be the planner presenting on behalf of Adam Ross. Go ahead Connor. Thank you madam zoning administrator. Let me bring up my slideshow real quick. So this is conditional use permit 21044 located at 921 Sevastopol Road. This is for the operation of a mobile food vendor at that location. So here is the aerial area location of 921 Sevastopol. There is an existing motet food park is under construction. It's an entitled mobile food. Park, located to the east of this project site. So Sevastopol Road has currently mobile food vendors. This is a proposal for a new mobile food vendor. The mobile food vendor would operate from 6am to 11pm daily. I apologize for that error but it is correct in the resolution. The operation of a mobile food vendor would be limited to one operator at at a time at all times from 6am to 11pm daily. The parking has been conditioned to not take up more than four parking spaces for the existing convenience store. And the parking has been conditioned to be located in front of the property between a fuel canopy and the south eastern property line. And we will, the following slides should provide a little bit more clarity about that. Just a bit of background on the project. So our zoning code section related to mobile food vending does not allow the transfer of a conditional use permit from one vendor to another, which requires a new conditional use permit being issued for each change of vendor. And so, CUP 18066 approved two vendors at this site, one from 6am to 11am and one in the afternoon from 11am to 11pm. The vendor change was recognized with an additional conditional use permit. And then, following in 2020, two zoning clearances were actually issued an error to allow new vendors where a new conditional use permit would be required for this vendor change. And that is why we are here this morning is to to legalize the operation of these two vendors to existing vendors at this location. And I just want to reiterate that the location would operate from 6am to 11am and 11am to 11pm with only one operator at a time at all times. Here's a slightly more zoomed in aerial of the project site as you can see this is the existing gas station and then the convenience store back here. So right here the red box indicates where the topic truck would be located. Oh, I'm sorry this is the, this is the previous topic truck location so this was the submitted site plan. And there's a right of way easement that that was not being complied with. Additionally, a code enforcement case was filed against this operator, due to parking issues that were resulting as a result of the operation of this taco truck. So the resolution is conditioned to require where the parking is shown on this image. So right here these four parking spaces that I mentioned previously would be used for the operation of the taco truck. So we received a comment from the convenience store operator, and the concern expressed was that there was a lot of parking on their property and other neighboring properties. And it was creating a hazard parking and site access and just overall congestion, due to that the parking of the proposed project. So the the mobile food vendor did not obtain proper fire permits and fire was cause at the location so we received a comment related to that. And in response we added some conditions of approval to ensure that the applicant adheres to the location of the mobile food vendor, and that the mobile food vendor shall not inhibit traffic or circulation in the site or parking sites, the mobile food vendor and customers shall not occupy more than four parking spaces on site as I previously mentioned, and the customers for the mobile food vendor should not park on neighboring properties. The mobile food vendors also require to comply with all fire department codes and standards, as well as other applicable local state and federal codes. There's another comment I wanted to make but it slipped. So move on. And then in terms of the California Environmental Quality Act, the project qualifies for a class for categorical exemption under section 15304 and that the project consists of a mobile food vendor which is a minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment. And with that the planning and economic development department recommends the zoning administrator approve this minor conditional use permit to allow jalapeno Mexican Grill or a mobile food vendor to operate from 11am to 11pm, and then have another mobile food vendor operate from 6am to 11am. At 921 Sebastian Road, I apologize for the Frankensteining of that statement but let me know if anything needs to be clarified or explained further. I do not believe the applicant is an attendance to make any comments or respond to questions. Did we have we changed any of the conditions or anything since it was posted the resolution was posted. I believe we made some minor modifications just for clarification I don't believe that we added any new conditions. There are some errors in some of the descriptions, but I think those have since been updated. I don't I don't believe that there have been any substantial conditions or modifications to the resolution that would necessitate sharing those here but please correct me if you think I'm wrong. So, I'm just going to I'm going to butt in and say here that I, I did I read the resolution, and I also, but we didn't have any public comment on this item other than the two, I'm sorry, there were a couple seems like two business operators that nearby that were had some concerns. Maybe it was just one. I know that that as the project is conditioned, the location of the mobile vending truck, the location of the parking spaces, and the dry vial that will be kept open. I think that those will resolve those issues. I went by, I've driven by the site just to check it out. And I was there in fact yesterday during peak peak hours, and I saw the truck set up exactly where it's being told to be set up and I recognize that they don't have that conditional use permit and today they're under code enforcement. Normally, we don't shut people down we just require them to legalize their business and in this case, I will defend the applicant and they were issued that zoning clearance it's kind of a quirk in our zoning code that requires this particular use when there's a change of operator to get a new use permit. So with that, I think, I think it's conditioned really well. I encourage the business owner to to follow those conditions. I'd like to open up public comment. Before we do that remember the thing that I wanted to talk about. So these conditions are conditioned as part of the project and if they are not these conditions are not met. Code enforcement will investigate in response to any complaints received. So if there are issues happening at the site that are conflicting with the conditions of approval of the project. Code enforcement would be would respond as a result of a complaint being filed. I would add on to that the conditional use permit doesn't mean that you have the right to operate as you darn well please forever. They can be revoked so I encourage every applicant or everybody's granted a conditional use permit to really follow their conditions of approval because it's it's not a fun process to revoke a permit but it does happen so. So, again, thank you for that clarification Connor. Can. Kimberly do we have any public comments out there. If so I'd like to open the public comment period. I don't see any we can give maybe an opportunity for people to raise their hand if they'd like, but a lot of our attendees must have been interested in that very first item because we don't have nearly as many attendees now and I don't see any raised hands. Let's give another couple seconds for somebody to call in if they're having problems with their computer. No action yet huh. I don't see anything. Well, then I'm going to close the public comment period. And thank Mr McKay once again for an outstanding presentation. I appreciate you looping back and talking about the code enforcement very much. I think the project is conditioned. I think it allows the safe operation of the food truck I would make sure when we give a copy of that or when we notify the food truck operator that the fosters freeze parking lot is for fosters freeze patrons, not for his, and it's up to him to remind his patrons of that. I've also reviewed the findings and I think the findings can can be made safely be made. And this area is is one site one area that's in the city that's approved for mobile vending trucks and one of my favorite places to go and eat so with that I'm going to say I approve this project as conditioned and thank you very much. Connor, you have a nice day. I'm going to introduce item the next item 3.3. Thanks everybody. For a minor conditional use permit located at 374 Yolanda Avenue, the project planner is Monette Chicago. And I'm going to hand it off to her to give us the presentation. Good morning. Good morning, Ms. Moray. So I'm going to share my screen right now. So the project is called I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing it correctly, but I will do my best. Bruggan holding incorporated. This is a minor conditional use permit file numbers CUP 20-025 and as you mentioned located at 374 Yolanda Avenue. The project is a minor conditional use permit to occupy a newly like a brand new building nine, that is 909,990 square feet with cannabis cultivation type one a and type four, cannabis distribution type 11 and cannabis non volatile manufacturing level one, which is type six inside of the existing building. Here are some pictures from this building. It has never been occupied before so this tenant will be the first tenant occupying this building. The site is owned by L which is light industrial and the job land land use is also light industry. The site plan there is no changes in the approved site plan as the building was constructed everything will stay same the access will be from Yolanda Avenue parking is provided on site. And here are the floor here is the floor plan for each type of use. The blue area is the floor plan for cultivation which is less than five thousand square feet. That's why this is a minor if it was more than five thousand it will be a major conditional use permit, but it's less than five thousand. The purple area is being used for distribution and the orange area which is sweet sea is for manufacturing non volatile. The applicant because it's a cannabis project the applicant has to provide documents related order mitigation and security. And the applicant has provided an order mitigation plan that is certified by an engineer to mitigate for others inside of the building and anything outside. The applicant has provided plans that shows the security cameras on site and professionally monitor monitor alarm system and secure storage. And also the project is subject to building and fire permits and the applicant has to obtain the required permits to meet with those building and fire codes requirements. Just to mention that notice was mailed out to neighbors within 600 feet and I have not received any comments or email from anyone in the public. And this project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and it qualifies for two exemption class one and class three it is an existing building and there are minor modification to an existing facility. And with that the planning and economic development economic development department recommends that the zoning administrator by resolution approve a minor conditional use permit for the property located at 374 Yolanda Avenue. And below is my information and I know the applicant George is available to answer any questions that you might have. Thank you. Thank you. I, I do have one question I'm sure George you could probably answer pretty quickly for me. I'm just curious about in the distribution point. What the plan is with vehicles I see you've got plenty of plenty of roll up doors. Is the plan to bring those vehicles inside roll down the doors or and do the transfer then. Hi there. I wasn't sure if I should raise my hand or not but I did anyway. And yes, the, the solution here is what what number one we do have, you know that outside gate that you know is going to provide you know additional security but yes, any loading on loading any transactions would be occurring inside of the building, but the roll up door closed. So we are going to, we're going to, you know, assign one roll up door for, you know, for the vehicles to be able to drive inside and then we're going to close the roll up door and conduct our business. Thank you very much. That's, that's exactly what I was hoping to hear. I'm real familiar with this location over there we have this is kind of a booming development area with some housing going in right across the street from you and an in and out burger along Santa Rosa Avenue. It's kind of an area where industrial commercial and residential all converge. I think, I think the use is a pretty low traffic generating use I think it's a use that makes sense in this corridor. I want to thank Manette for making a beautiful presentation, as always. And, and I have reviewed all the findings and the conditions of approval. We haven't received any public comment that's not uncommon for this area. So first it's really us to up to us to look out for, look out for the public that don't this the silent public. And I think that Manette has done that in a very well conditioned project as has the fire department. So, so with that, I'd like to open up public comments. Are there any hands raised or collars wanting to chat. I don't see any raised hands and I don't see anything in the chat. Let's go ahead and just give it a second here just in case I know if it were me on the other end of the phone line it would take me a couple seconds to figure it out. Again if you're calling in if you hit star nine will be able to identify you and give you permissions to speak. Still nothing Kimberly. No, I think. I think most of our attendees like I said we're probably here for the fence. Gotcha. I'm glad that was first. So with that, I'm going to go ahead and close the public comment period compliment Manette again you did. I have just remembered something I wanted to talk to you about the exhibit eight for this project has a date for the plans, different than the days that I have received final plans, which is made 20 of this year. Exhibit a has a date that it's from December or September of 2020 I was wondering if we can revise them and have the correct date for the final plans and floor plan submitted on the exhibit a and change it to make it all consistent to the project. So, you know I'm going to say that a lot of times this comes up and, and my guess is because this building is already constructed that that engineering development services didn't have a lot of new conditionings and new conditions in the public right away. I, we can't. I am not comfortable changing their document. I will assume that their plans the plans that they were looking at where close to in terms of, you know, at least the site plan. Maybe not the floor plan but the site plan hasn't changed. Is that correct considering considering it's a constructed building. Yeah, there's no changes to the site plan it was mainly inside of the building for changing the floor plans for each use. So, George can confirm that they are not making any exterior and no side changes to the existing site. Yes, absolutely confirmed. Thank you. That's fine. I don't think we need to change I think we need to reference the date of the exhibit a engineering development services has a site plan that matches the approved set of plans. And if there are any conflicts will cross average when we get to it typically this is something that should be revised, you know, before we come to these meetings and I know right now, staff time is so limited. I'm not concerned about it because again, if it's if it's interior, it's not going to change anything on engineering developments exhibit a because that's all public right away stuff. So with that, I'm not concerned. I say leave it if you're reflecting the correct exhibit date of the exhibit a itself in the conditions and the correct plans in your resolution. Great. And I have added a condition that says all the plans shall be like all the work shall be done according to the latest receipt plans from May 20 of this year. So those are the final plans floor plan and project description. And that's exactly how it should be. If there are any if there are any required revisions engineering development services Deb does have a little bit of flexibility, because as site plans roll out. We run into some issues because you know that, you know, the measurement wasn't accurate or what have you it happens so long as it doesn't change for you so I'm really not concerned about that. And so thank you for bringing that to my attention. And again, now I think because it's clear I'm going to go ahead and approve this project as condition and compliment Monette and George thank you very much for the clarification. Thank you. Thank you. So I'm going to save if there are any members of the public that are still listening in that I want to reiterate Oh wait, I've got to get to item four point or 3.4 public hearing. Yes, item three point or 3.4. It was is for a hillside development permit for for the property located at 3926 Chanterelle circle. And when that if you could if you could just explain the public hearing process and when we're going to when we're going to hear that item again if we know. Okay, sure. So the project has been scheduled for the next meeting, which is on September 16. And the project has been already notified, but prepare the notification for it. The no notices should be mailed out on September 6. And, and on site sign, it seems has been already posted because the applicant has sent me an email that on site signs already posted, but it should be posted for sure prior to September 6 or on that date. And also a notice will be published in press democrat also 10 days prior to the meeting. And again, the project will be presented at the zoning administrator meeting so I will present that to. So I will present that to zoning administrator on 16. And there was one person who requested that public hearing. So we moved into this certain day, September 16. Thank you very much so so just for any members of the public that are listening, because we have continued this item to a date certain, which is September 16. So additional noticing except for the delta between public hearing and public meeting, which includes a notice in the press democrat, and on site sign sounds like Manette and the applicant have worked together and achieving that so great. I'm just gonna, I'm going to applaud you for getting such quick turnaround. Normally I have seen them bump out to two meetings so we have adequate time for noticing, but great job. So now, can we move past that I guess I should ask is there anybody here that is is or that's on the meeting call that is here for that item and would like to speak, in which case you could raise your hand, or hit star nine. Kimberly I'm not seeing any are you. No, we just have a few remaining attendees. Okay, so with that, I think I'll go ahead and close the public comment period since like this technically I just opened it, and say that all actions taken today. The on the first three items are appealable. There's a 10 day appeal period, which expires on Monday, September 13. If you would like to appeal the item. Please contact the respective planner. I would contact for the first two items for the defense and the mobile food truck. If you would like to submit the appeal I would contact Connor McKay. And if you need his contact information, you can, you can call us or email us and we'll get that for you. Otherwise, with that I'm going to feel like I needed to give you one more notice, but I don't think so. I'm going to go ahead and adjourn this meeting to the next scheduled meeting of the zoning administrator which it will be September 16.