 Legislators have already introduced 10 proposals for Section 230 reform in the 117th Congress, including one for outright repeal. But it may remain just as difficult to get alignment on a specific proposal since in general the parties want different outcomes. Republicans would like to see less content moderation and Democrats generally want to see more content moderation, particularly of harmful disinformation and hate speech. That's why public knowledge has proposed a set of principles that we hope legislators from both parties would use to guide their discussions of Section 230 reform. They encourage things like ensuring that platforms have clear due process and transparency in their content moderation decisions, that they protect the voices of traditionally marginalized communities, that they focus any liability for platforms on their own business activities and conduct, rather than on any specific type of content posted by users. And we'd also like to limit reforms to the dominant platforms or make accommodations for small platforms so that we can encourage competition and choice for users. We want to learn more about our principles for Section 230 reform from public knowledge at Section 230 proposals to protect free expression online.