 rather looking at regulations and remodeling regulations. And second of all, Mr. Christers on the national question, how would you describe the current mood and statues in the NATO process with Turkey and your view on Turkish expectations on extraditions? Would you please? Yeah, thank you. No, you are absolutely right that competitiveness is a key priority. In fact, this is indeed an important year. We are celebrating 30 years of senior market. And the signal is the sort of understandable asset for the EU. It is the basis for our social protections across the EU. It's also the reason for this very strong European position in the United States. First, we have for very good reason within the EU, the highest labor cost, because we have a social model, which is very good. Point one, point two, we have also very high environmental and climate standards, because we want to lead. We want to convince the rest of the world that we need all together to address these climate change challenges. But it means there is an effect for our businesses, big businesses, but also the SMEs. And three, we have today an energy crisis. It's very important also to address the creation of energy, because this is a topic related to climate change. It's a topic related to the cost of living for the families, for the businesses, for the households, and also for the companies. And for the competitiveness of our industry. And on the one hand, for many years, we are addressing the question of China and the risk of this on China and the importance to make our relationship with China more reciprocal and more balanced. Point one, this is a serious topic, because China is a fact and we need to take into account the reality. And on the other hand, there is a decision taken a few weeks or a few months ago by our ally in the United States with this IRA, this decision to invest in the green technologies, which is positive because this is important to work together in order to address climate change. But in fact, it's a possible impact for the situation across the EU. And that's why the European Council took a very reasonable decision. A few weeks ago, we tasked the Commission, in order for the Commission by the end of January to put on the table an impact assessment in order to have a more objective vision what can be, what could be the consequences on the economic situation across the EU and what are the possible tools we can use. And I try to act with common sense. Let's use the state aid regime. What can we do in order to keep our model? We believe in the private sector. We believe in the private initiative, innovation, productivity, point one. And what can we do with the existing EU financial means? This is the priority. I do not exclude that some friends and colleagues will sooner or later ask for additional funding. This is possible, but this is the debate that we will have if the debate needs to be addressed in the following weeks and months. And by the end of June, we are supposed to start the assessment of the European budget, which is also a midterm occasion to address the attrition of financial means. Thank you. I think it's fair to say that the coming months will challenge and will kind of test our ability to think in long term and short term at the same time. Very different kind of content, but still. And obviously what we do in the short term cannot contradict necessities in the long term. Often to say, I think nobody wants to see a kind of a state-aid race between the U.S. and Europe, for example. On the other hand, you have to acknowledge the fact that the U.S. is doing things also for very good reasons. They are back on track in fighting climate. We think climate change, that is basically good. We appreciate that. They are also reacting towards previous several years of Chinese economic actions. It's fairly reasonable for them to do so. And then the EU has to find a way of cooperating with the U.S. without creating a bad situation for European companies, for example, in the clean tech sectors. I think this is challenging, but I think that would be room for compromises and room for action in the short term that is not contradicting necessities in the long term. Don't forget the fact that Europe has been lagging behind in terms of competitiveness and productivity for a long time. This is nothing that the U.S. has created through its ERA or IRA initiative. We've been lagging behind this for 15 years in different sectors. It's a well-known secret that most of the world's tech companies, they are based either on the U.S. west coast or in the Chinese east coast. So we have a lesson to learn anyway. In terms of Turkey, if you don't mind. I think we are in a very good position. The situation in the negotiations or the following memorandum is going well. As I said a few times, it's well-known that Sweden has a law firm when it comes to deliveries, and we stick to that. There will be demands from Turkey. They are being tested in the way they are to be tested, and that's nothing new. So I don't think that anything fundamental has changed from this. We are at the same place as we did earlier, and that's foreign Turkey that can understand the decisions. Then we'll do one last question from TV4. Channel 4. Yes, I have a live TV4 Sweden. Well, Kristesson, could you be more precise? When do you think Sweden will be a member of NATO? I mean, it's an election in Turkey, and many people are expecting us to be members very quickly. But what is your guess? I don't have any other. I think I can talk for all the 28 countries who have already readified Sweden. The answer is quite simple, as soon as possible. I think that's the only answer there is, because everybody knows and everybody respects the fact that every country has to make their own ratification processes. I mean, that's to say what is to state the obvious. And we all realize that the Turkish decision is only for Turkey to make themselves, and we are coming closer to a Turkish election also. So I think there are a lot of unknowns so far, but I'm still very convinced that sooner or later we will become members of NATO. And I think we are, I feel very confident in the fact that Sweden and Finland, we are doing exactly what we promised to do and committed ourselves to do in accordance with the memorandum. And that is actually what we are obliged to do. Before the summer or after the summer? No, I won't give any guess. I think there are a few kind of formative. We have a pre-de-election. Of course, I would prefer that. I think all the NATO countries would prefer that. And then we have the time after the election. We have the NATO summit in Vilnius late June. There are many different occasions that could be marking a decision making. But for obvious reasons, there is no meaning in guessing, but instead simply full respect that Turkey is making Turkish decisions. Thank you. And thank you all for coming. We have to stop the press conference. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you, Shafiq. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you so much.