 What's good chargeable Ross back again with another video, so we're gonna check out WWE has a big problem with money in the bank By none other than WrestleMania. We're gonna see what WrestleMania is talking about money in the bank is upon us I'm filming this on Friday. We will be live streaming it tomorrow on the main page So be gonna look out for that. We're gonna see who's going to win money in the bank and potentially Be thrown Roman Reigns. I'm also gonna do my probably my thoughts and well my previews in prediction video But I'm gonna switch it up I'm gonna probably drop that tomorrow, but I'm switch up the format I'm really just gonna be talking about the money in the bank matches the men's and women's because that's really the matches Everyone really wants to talk about it and interested in so I'm gonna really just be talking about that for my preview and predictions Video so be a little look out for that. Most likely. I'm thinking maybe tomorrow Most likely obviously I have to be tomorrow early tomorrow morning. So be a little look out for that Let's get right into this video man This should be a interesting one because I really want to see what WrestleMania has to say about money in the bank 22 money in the bank premium event But there's a serious problem with the show the money in the bank ladder match itself join us now We look at WWE's biggest problem with money in the bank You should have subscribed and hit that notification bell for daily wrestling videos and follow us on Facebook for exclusive list Also, check our wrestling video code UK and an un-wrestling channel incredible I should WWE scrap money in the bank all together Fans have already seen the WWE drop or diminish many of its stipulation heavy pay-per-views But should money in the bank which has been a pay-per-view since 2010 and a match since 2005's WrestleMania 21 join the pay-per-view trash heap of history Money in the bank wouldn't be the first themed event to see its star fall or disappear Yeah, for example the WWE dropped TLC in 2021 the show is currently not on the WWE's 2022 schedule Then there are stipulation heavy shows like extreme rules which have seen a decrease in number of stipulation matches on the shows 2021's extreme rules show featured just one stipulation Extreme rules definitely does not need to be a pay-per-view Hell in the cell, please get rid of that as a pay-per-view Yeah, the hell in the cell trash as a pay-per-view, but I can't stand it Even though this pre-recent hell in the cell was good because of the whole Cody situation Cody and sir Rollins, but it does not need to be a pay-per-view. No Match while this year's hell in a cell featured only one hell in a cell While the WWE seems to be moving away from stipulation heavy events Money in the bank has been seen as one of the WWE's special events besides its big four That being WrestleMania SummerSlam Survivor Series in the Royal Rumble Yeah So much that Nick Khan hopes to capitalize on its seeming popularity by holding this year's event at the Allegiant Stadium and Transforming the WWE's big four into a big five, but this turned into a big flop Enough tickets sold which as you no doubt heard led to the WWE switching venues to a small arena There are a number of reasons that could explain money in the bank's poor ticket sales But arguably the core problem is the WWE's handling of the match as winners and cash-ins Let's look at these problems and see if the event should be scrapped all together Rocket to the top and once upon a time the money in the bank contract was a useful tool for strapping a rocket to a Wrestler's back the concept of a match where the winner could earn a world championship contract They could cash in at any time quickly proved popular when they originally debuted at WrestleMania And it became a thing at WrestleMania It was for me one of the matches I was most looking forward to not only his the match was just always entertaining and just it was so much carnage Oh what not the sicko with me But the simple fact that you potentially was gonna see a new star being born from that match And that's what I initially a loved about it when it was featured only at WrestleMania each year Even better it proved to be a great way of elevating wrestlers to the next level This was seen when Edge used his cash in to take out John Cena after the chain-gang soldier had wrestled a hellacious match Edge went from a perennial title aspirant to a legitimate champion The WWE used CM Punk's briefcase wins even better Punk won the event two years in a row successfully Cashing them in both times and adding a twist to his second win by tanning heel Yep Cashed it in on Jeff Hardy after Hardy had finished wrestling these cash ins elevated Punk into the main event and while Punk was not Entirely happy with his WWE push. It's hard to argue that he did not enjoy a lengthy run in the main event Likewise, Rob Van Damme did well when he won the briefcase cashing it in successfully against John Cena at 2006's ECW one-night stand-paper view There's been some crappy cash-ins But every cash-in has been a success and the WWE deserves credit for maintaining a certain number of unsuccessful cash-ins to maintain Suspense whenever someone captures the briefcase The idea should be to maintain suspense without diminishing the wrestler's value when he's unsuccessfully cashing in his briefcase The WWE protected John Cena when he unsuccessfully cashed in his briefcase But it didn't do this with the unsuccessful cash-ins involving Damien Sandow They definitely did As in Corbin's case his unsuccessful cash-in was seen as a punishment for he did allegedly incurred with WWE management As bad as Braun Strowman's unsuccessful cash-in was, which was awful, less to do with the bad booking of the briefcase Than it did with the bad booking of Braun So is it down to poor planning? As fans have seen with AEW and WWE getting socked with injuries, long-term planning can prove problematic However, there are differences between plans going awry such as when Mr. Kennedy won the money in the bank briefcase in 2007 But had to drop it after an injury and the WWE's booking on the fly is 2020's decision to give Otis the briefcase That just made I didn't even I want to say I think that may have been the first money in the bank I didn't watch I Think that was that was the first money in the bank. I never watched I saw clips of it. I didn't really care and this was peak pandemic so I Was like watching WWE mainly just for the smackdown side of things of Roman Reigns But I do remember them talking about it was that you know It was at their headquarters or whatever, but I didn't watch this match This was the very first money in the bank match. I didn't watch Otis seemed like a clever choice at the time as he was right in the midst of a red-hot angle with Mandy Rose Regrettably the WWE had no idea what to do once No, they did not And it had the Miz beat him in for a poorly booked match In other cases the WWE has had some questionable situations involving mid-card stars winning the briefcase and making Successful cash-ins. The trouble here is that this can seem like a fluke Devaluing the winner rather than taking them to the next level the idea behind this seems to be Vince Believe that having former world champion before your name gives you instant credibility Even if you don't compete in the main event in some cases This has worked out well with the Miz collecting both his world championships through successful cash-ins Enjoying a solid career in the WWE as someone who can gravitate from main event down to mid-card as needed Unfortunately, the Miz has been the exception as other winners like Dolce and Jack Swagger saw their world title reigns Do diddly squat for their careers There have been some crappy championship reigns even when the briefcase cash-ins are successful The WWE is often booked the champions poorly Nikki ashes 2021 cash-in against Charlotte Flair for the Royal Women's Championship seemed like the perfect step in Nikki's comeback story Yeah, the rain turned into a disaster after she lost her title just two months later to Charlotte summer slam with a push evaporating yeah, this is the issue here is Sometimes when they put the belt or the briefcase on someone have them win it They don't do nothing with the rain. They don't do nothing to elevate their rain. It's just like Yeah, you have the belt that's cool Now what are you gonna do with it? And that comes down to their booking and the women's division Especially on raw. It's just it's not as it doesn't have that much depth I mean it does in a sense you could build up some interesting feuds if you choose to but That's if you choose to you know saying Nikki eyes went in the championship I'm like, okay. We're winning the money in the bank getting the championship off of Charlotte. I was like, all right That's cool. Just for them to put it on Charlotte too much later. So it was like what was the point? You know Even as she held the women's title Another questionable rain occurred that same year with the 2021 men's money Unfortunately, he successfully cashed it his briefcase to defeat Bobby Lashley for the championship Biggie's championship rain lasted 110 days with the champion often seeming to take a backseat to the drama going on between his challenges As bad as that was the WWE had big you drop the title Brock Lesnar day one in a fatal five way match. We're making didn't have to take the pin But he did big issue. I'm not taking the pin there. I'm sorry It's like Brock Lesnar has his love for destroying new day members is champs is it has no bounds Biggie should not have Eating the pin there anyone else could eat the pin Biggie though. It just it solidified His title run not really doing much. It didn't amount to much the same thing with Kofi They may be at one few between both of them Kofi and Biggie that was actually somewhat You know had some type of steam has some type of motion some momentum to it and after that it was just Nothing really like it's not really memorable and that sucks because a lot of us like Biggie a lot of us like Kofi But when we think of the title reigns, we don't think of Like oh, this was a legendary one like For example, we edge when edge cashing on John Cena We remember the cashing and we remember the title reign because that's when edge could not be controlled So We're Biggie in in Kofi Kingston Kofi Kingston, we remember his rise The the rise to the title was the most memorable memorable part We remember Biggie winning and then cashing in that moment. That was cool to see But after that people don't really too much remember anything after they want it except maybe a couple of years it's viewed with with with With Bobby Lashley Randy Orton feud in with Kofi Kingston that was cool It should have been better, but that's what I'm trying to say like Winning the championship is cool winning money in the bank is cool But if you're not booked correctly, none of it really matters in the grand scheme of King things other than all you met you may cash in and win the championship But you you know, it's like a it's like you won't be remembered for having a a memorable title Right, you'll just be oh, that's the guy that won the championship that one time for cashing in me person I think it should be it should be more Important they should be booking them as the next as the next big star for that brand Making his reign appear weak in the eyes of many of his fans Maybe the problem seems the Roman Reigns factor Oh The biggest problem plaguing the men's money in the bank matches Roman Reigns holding the undisputed championship a short of a dramatic change in WWE's booking there's no end in sight for Reigns's vice-like grip on the undisputed title further complicating matters Is the WWE's decision to unify both belts? It doesn't matter who wins the briefcase because there's no way someone is gonna successfully cash in their briefcase against Reigns While there has been talk of Reigns somehow dropping the championship in order to free up a belt for the mere mortals on Rua But Ross cheated like like Like garbage, bro when we're talking about just having a main champion they don't have one and Honestly, Rod's been more of the more enjoyable show surprisingly It's been more enjoyable than SmackDown because SmackDown Roman barely shows up Rogers you mirror peasants. You don't get a head champion. All you get is Austin's theory Which is cool, but you don't have no head champion You know women's raw champion that's cool too, but you don't get no head champion Likely Tar says the only way that would happen would be for the WWE to strip Reigns of the belt over a storyline infraction A money in the bank has lost some of its illustrator over the years But there's no reason it can't be fixed the women's money in the bank is relatively new compared to the men's match But other than the questionable Reigns like Nicky Ash WWE has a good track record with the women's briefcase For the most part there's no reason to scrap the women's ladder match But what about the men's match the men's briefcase bout has a number of flaws We've already mentioned as long as Roman Reigns holds the undisputed championship the suspense of the title being cashed in at any Time is non-existent as long as fans think Reigns is gonna remain champion Plus he won't even be around for the summer Things won't be any better if a babyface wins either as it's likely they'll announce their championship challenge ahead of time Yeah, how can we fix it? The good news is that it shouldn't take much to fix the money in the bank stipulation It's number one time in the cash in right for now The WWE should consider holding off on having this year's briefcase win a cash in their contract The ideal situation would be to tease having someone cash in their briefcase when Reigns appears vulnerable Yeah for something that's what they cash in this scenario has played out successfully before and could stretch out a cash in until WrestleMania 39 or after when there's more chance of Reigns counting the lights number two Switching things up one way the WWE could improve the money in the banks appeal would be to consider changing things up Much as it did at the 2020 when the pandemic forced them to hold the event at WWE's headquarters This unforgettable night saw the competitors from both men's and women's events making their way from the bottom to the top of WWE's headquarters with plenty of shenanigans ensuing Something that they should be doing every year it shows that there are ways to change things up This includes the WWE thinking quick when the company learned that they then raw women's champion Becky Lynch was pregnant They had ask her when the briefcase and the next night reveal Becky's pregnancy and that askers briefcase win had made her the red branch champion Although money in the bank has its problems its overall history suggests There's no need to scrap it if the WWE makes some minor modifications It could turn into one of its most popular shows again. What do you guys think of the problem? Honestly, I don't think they need to scrap it It's still one of their popular shows because people just love the idea of someone winning a briefcase and cashing in what they need to do is Find a way to get the titles off Roman or at least one of them Maybe they need to add some type of stipulation where the money in the bank contract It guarantees you a title shot for one of the titles because he's not losing both If it's guaranteed for one of the titles that makes sense That's how you get probably the WWE Championship off of Roman You have to because raw has no main champion doesn't matter how many times he show up raw has no main champion So the best way to do this is this this year's WrestleMania We'll have a con the contract will say, you know, I'm saying potentially whoever wins this You're able to take either the WWE Championship or the Universal Championship from Roman granted. This is why Another problem comes into play when they unified it because they're they're standing up as is all as one But they need to find a way to separate it because if not Whoever wins the money in the bank, they're not beating Roman for both titles They're not Then they're not doing that because then you would get rid of Roman Reigns lengthy Universal Street, which I think they want to still keep intact probably till WrestleMania Who knows? I just want them to be able to get the WWE Championship off of them and put it back on raw That's all I care about. That's really all I care about You can do whatever you do later. So I don't know, but I don't think they need to let go of the format They need to expound kind of go back to what they were doing before making planning it out Best way they can planning it out and having it be whoever wins this There's a good chance. It's not a hundred percent chance, but it's a good chance. This may be the next guy up And what they do is see How the crowd reacts to this person being money in the bank being the money in the bank winner How do they react or they really feel in his vibe or they're digging his energy? If so pull the trigger at the right time. It's very difficult Very strategic, but I feel like sometimes they they throw the belt or the briefcase that someone and then It doesn't really go nowhere, you know, I'm saying it They don't really have it planned out on when they're gonna cash in or how to increase Their stock as the money in the bank winner I think they need to just go ahead and really think about all right We want this person to win because the crowd likes this guy or the crowd hates this guy And he has a lot of momentum We want to try to make him a new star That should be the only reason money in the bank is there to create a new star because When Roman is going when Brock is going when all the legends from the past can't come back All you will have is what's on the roster. So the time to build up stars Should have been years ago, but you got to keep Continuing building up your main roster so people can be can buy into These the people that's on the roster. That's just me personally I think they just need to go with that format and really plan this shit out To be like, all right, we want this guy to be the guy. This is how we're gonna do it For example, I can see whenever Austin theory Drops the United States championship. Maybe next year I can see him being if he had if he drops it, you know, sometime next year or this year I can see him next year go around for money in the bank I can see him being in that match and I can actually see him winning because of how How much they're really behind Austin theory right now And if they continue to keep pushing him in that direction, he could be the next guy up I can see him winning it sometimes next year if they continue to push him because they clearly have an idea They want him to be the next guy So you gotta, you know, make sure you align things and it works that way If not, you just throw something together and hope and pray that it works May get some you may get some luck there. You may not so But comment down below. Let me know Do you guys think they should get rid of the money in the bank format or do you guys Think they should keep in and how would you make it better for future stars to be created? I appreciate all of them sport row two 90k appreciate y'all kicking with me. See y'all next one. Peace