 Much has been talked about ethical standards, ethical principles. Now we are going to see that how can we resolve the ethical issues. Resolving ethical issues is a section which is broadly designed to guide psychologists to a variety of ethical issues. The first one is misuse of psychologist work. If psychologists learn of misuse or misinterpretation of their work, they also know that their work is being misinterpreted. Their research is being misused. They may take reasonable steps to correct and minimize the misuse and misinterpretation. As soon as it is identified that a researcher or a psychologist's work is misinterpreted or their work is being represented in a wrong way, it is very important to take action. A conflict between ethics, law, regulation and other governing legal authorities. In such a situation, where a conflict arises, between ethics, law, regulations and governing legal authorities. For instance, what can such a situation be? An individual, during the therapy, reported his self-harm impulse. He says that I have a very strong impulse to harm myself and I want to burn myself in this place. Now this is a situation where the right to keep the situation in confidence or to keep it in confidentiality or to break the protocol of consent is important. Rather than saying confidentiality and not reporting it, when he will burn himself, he will also be harmed. The people who are affiliated with him, his caregivers will also be harmed. The way he will burn himself, that place can also create a problem for people. And a nuisance can be created in the surroundings. So here, informing the law agencies and informing caregivers, informing the state will be a responsibility. Rather than it comes into the breaking the confidentiality rights. Conflict between ethics and organizational demand. In such conflict, if such conflict arises, where the psychologist should clarify the nature of the conflict, made known their commitment to ethical code and to the extent feasible, resolve the conflict in a way that permits adherence to ethical code. Like an organization's code, an APA's ethical code. You feel that they are conflicting over a certain standard. So there, in front of these ethical principles, a psychologist before working further will be sure to resolve them first. Let's say, if an individual is taking therapy in an organization and he is taking medication with him, in which side-effects, drowsiness is getting too much or he is having too many hunger-pangs or other symptoms, then the drowsiness may conflict with his organizational work. Let's say, if he works on a machine where a very vigilant worker has to work and because of that effect of medication, he is feeling drowsiness, then his work demand cannot be fulfilled. So there, a psychologist's job is to take in writing a written letter that you should provide in your institution that you are not capable enough to work with this machine for a certain period of time. And the organization should respect it rather than stigmatizing the other person that they should stigmatize him that you are unwell, you are unhealthy and you cannot work in our company. Until and unless we are going to break these barriers, psychological consultation that could not be improved. This scenario will only be seen when these ethical standards are to be fully utilized. Then reporting ethical violation. If an apparent ethical violation has substantially harmed or it's likely to be substantially harmed a person or organization, psychologists may take further actions like referral to the state or national committees or professional ethics or state licensing boards or to relevant institutional authorities. For instance, an individual is working on a workplace and he is telling in therapy that my workplace ethics is very bad. I take things from here and steal things. I misuse the machines here for my personal work. This has become my habit that I keep doing this and I can't control myself with therapy. Now, besides providing him therapy, it is very important for the person to inform the relevant people so that he can improve his conduct so that he can keep his procedures under control so that he can do minimum stealing so that he can do fabrication. So it's on both way because it's for the wellness of a person. His purpose is to improve. Now, this standard does not apply when an intervention would violate confidentiality rights and when psychologists have retained to review the work of other psychologists whose professional conduct is questionable. For instance, a researcher who published a lot of research on the data that is very unethical. So the other professionals who reviewed their work to resolve this ethical issue they decided that that person is falsifying the result. Similarly, if we were not questioning someone's professional competence then a reality would have been public. In such a situation, we will not call it violation, but we will call it raising the ethical standards. So this should be interpreted according to the situation given to us. Otherwise, if we are only looking at it in a specific limitation then maybe some ethical standards would not be able to understand their interpretation in such a way. The situation-based scenario-based or context-based explicit explanations are very helpful for understanding the ethical standards.