 I'm into people using technology to create human-to-human experiences and expanding their network to find more information and more people to connect with and collaborate with for new content or to explore or inquire about all content. My question is, how do we ensure that we can provide this technology effectively? Because we don't want it to only belong to the elite and then power would be once again concentrated. We have to make sure that we do distribute this equity. I think this was actually a very good experience to have to see what other educators have to say and also think this is a discussion that we need to continue to have especially including more students. So the question was asked, it gave an example of a, I believe, Microsoft product that had to be taken down. It was an AI chat bot because it quickly learned how to reproduce offensive posts in language. And so the question asked about how AI is, how in education we need to be responsive to ensuring that these systemic inequalities are reflected in the technology. How do we do this was my take on it. And so I think that as long as we, the big piece is we need to examine who is creating, right, the artificial intelligence tools and what biases they create to the table in understanding that since it is created by humans and we aren't equal that the systems, too, are going to be reflective of those biases that the programmers bring into that. The prompt was about artificial intelligence systems that are designed by corporations that look for user engagement. And the question was about can there be a system that wants making more profit but also increases social good. And my comment was that it's this notion of having a win-win situation where you can make money while making the world a better place. And I think that's a policy so that's kind of what I meant. Coming from a less of an educator standpoint and more of a future designer, I thought it interesting that this talk involved, I guess, primarily educators. And I remember that the speaker mentioned a suggestion towards designers that said that perhaps designers should, when designing their systems, should offer or consult a panel of educators, therefore having an open table for both sides to agree. But then at the same time, it's curious that when proposing that, the whole meeting to which it's directed to educators, there isn't as many designers present. I love Nicole Miro's work and it was really exciting to hear the discussion of critical civic empathy and how we can use digital tools to help students learn how to break those bubbles created by residential segregation, school segregation, and really just as a way to foster empathy and great responsiveness.