 Test one two. Can you guys hear me? Test one two. Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Test one two. You guys hear me? So Paul if you can or Paul if you can give me a test count, they don't necessarily need to hear everybody. Well, yeah, we do we have board members online So we have to get this audio working Budge one testing one testing two one two Budge, can you hear me? Yeah, I can hear you. No problem. You guys got me. Yep, we got you Okay, I think we're ready. We're pros. So when we do Chris Herron's update, he will be remote All right, and some of the board members will have to um, um us, you know Answer to being here remote as well. So we'll have to make sure that's ready. Okay. Thanks guys. I'm gonna I'm gonna drop Okay, can you turn volume up on 1718? Just a little bit and then probably you could probably pull this down number 13 down just a pinch Testing one. Yep. We got good audio. I think we're good All right. Just want to make sure we got the audio working there. Good morning. Um, my name is budge courier I'm gonna call the 911 advisory board for the month of november to order And the first order of business is to do roll call So, um, I believe chief baxter is online. Is that correct? Yes, good morning budge. I'm here. Good morning All right, brenna brunner mark chase rosa ramos sheriff brawn sheriff a you present All right uh tracy gonzalez captain ramirez present captain warren Here And chief white Present Okay, so we have a quorum. Uh, there are a couple of members that may be joining but we certainly have a quorum The next order of business is the approval of the meeting minutes If you will recall at the last meeting there were some edits that were requested to be made to the May minutes We went back and looked at the recording Which did not record so There's a little bit of a problem there We tried to capture as best we could what was said in those may meeting minutes And we did not have the recording to go back to so I can't remember who it was that asked if if we would go back and do those additions, but You'll probably remember who you are If you could take a look at those may minutes, you've got a hard copy in front of you those uh board members are online You have an electronic version as well And uh welcome to accept any feedback on the may meeting minutes Okay, do we have a motion to approve the may meeting minutes seeing as how there's no uh comment on those Chief white motion to approve Okay, we have a motion from chief white. I have a second rosa ramos with a second Rosa second all right Any opposed to approving the may meeting minutes Okay, so the motion carries um We'll move on to the august meeting minutes So those are also a hard copy in front of you. You've also received an electronic version prior to today's meeting um I want to entertain discussion about the august meeting minutes if anybody has any adjustments or Clarifications they need on those meant meeting minutes. Okay seeing and hearing none. Do we have a motion to approve the august meeting minutes? Chief white motion approved. All right motion for chief white. Do we have a second? Brenda Brenda second Brenda's second stat. Thank you. All right anyone opposed to approving the august meeting minutes All right motion carries Um, we will be obviously posting a copy of those on our website so that they'll be available for others to view Um, the next order of business is a gender item number three closed session and pursuant to government code 11126 echo We're going to meet and we'll enter into closed session. We'll be adjourning upstairs. Um I'm supposed to be advancing the slides paul's motioning to me So, uh, i'm caught up now. We're on item three. Thank you, sir Um, so we're going to go into closed session. Um, we've got a we'll be meeting actually up in the lab conference room So we'll be in closed session. Uh, and we will report out on any members that were any items that were for public Uh discussion went up on our return. So we'll uh move Move to the closed session Yeah, those members that are online. Um, if you can please join the closed session meeting She should have received a microsoft teams Meeting uh, join us there and we'll be there shortly as soon as it Takes us to walk up to this uh conference room. So we'll stand adjourned until then You Okay, we uh, we're back from closed session. I'm going to take a roll call and then I'll give a report out so, um chief Baxter I'm here. Thank you friend bruner present mark chase present rosa ramos present sheriff brawn present All right, sheriff ayub present tracy gonzalez chief ramirez present captain warren present and chief white present Okay, so during closed session. Um, we did discuss Um, some of the details of the testing that's going on out in the psaap And so we have a slide on that where we're going to repeat that information back here But we did get into a little bit of that conversation to provide some backdrop So when we get to that slide, we'll we'll be sure to point out that that's what we covered in closed session You'll recognize the slide when you see it other than that. There's nothing to report from the closed session So, um, moving on we'll we'll head to agenda item number four We've got reggie here to give us a legislative update. Go ahead sir Good morning folks and uh, just in the interest of time the the bills that I will be reading will just be more of an annotated reader's digest version and um, uh There's any questions. I'll be free to follow up on that Now just uh for starters, uh, the governor did sign ab 988 Uh in september and what 988 does is it establishes the miles hall lifeline suicide and suicide prevention act multiple, uh provisions within the bill What it also what it does though is it also requires that no later than july 1st of 2024 Cal OES will verify the interoperability between and across 911 and 988 And it also requires uh, Cal OES to consult with specified entities on any technology requirements for 988 centers There is a legislative. There there is a agenda item So we can go further into that during if there's any other questions related to the bill during that Item that's on the agenda additionally ab 22906 had been previously signed in the summer back in uh, june By somebody member paterson Which would exempt So current law authorizes the puc to control and regulate the use of automatic dialing announce announcing devices to a telephone line uh, and as well as Uh, specifies the hours during which the devices may not be operated uh additionally It exempts from that control and regulations certain entities that use an automatic Dialing announcing device under various situations including contacting the parents And or guardians of pupils by schools regarding attendance and placing of calls by law enforcement agencies by protection agencies and public health agencies For specified purposes relating to public safety and emergencies What the bill does is that it exempts from that control And regulation the use of an automatic dialing announcing device for purposes of a school contacting parents Or guardians of pupils regarding the health and safety of pupils Additionally sb 857 by senator waso Uh was also signed back in september which extended the california high-cost administrative funds a and b And the program requirements until january 1st of 2028 as i'm sure some folks here may recognize that that is actually a Teleco fund that the cpuc has established, uh, which is for use for telecom purposes throughout the state So that is on the state side On the federal side hr 1250 the emergency reporting act by congresswoman matsui Would require the fcc to report on certain activations of the disaster information reporting system or durs Uh and to adopt specified rules related to network outage reporting That is currently in the senate and uh has been in the senate since july Just again as a reminder Uh folks may be aware that we are now currently in a lame duck session in congress So there's not that many bills that may be moving other than a concurrent resolution a concurring resolution for uh The federal government to be funded as well as perhaps the national defense authorization act those are two Then things that may be moving during this lame duck session Uh hr 1848 by congressman poloni Would rebuild and modernize the nation's infrastructure to expand access to broadband and next gen 911 Uh, and that is currently in the house Uh as well and it hasn't really moved From from uh It's intro uh Another another bill hr 1859 by uh congressman smith adam smith Would authorize the secretary of health and human services acting through the assistant secretary for mental health and substance Use to award grants to states territories political subdivisions of states and territories tribal governments and consortia of tribal governments to establish An unarmed 911 response program and for other purposes Again, that is also in the house. Uh has not moved and is currently in the uh subcommittee on health Uh another bill that has been around as well for is the calcy smith act set it bill 466 by senator moran Which would require a mobile or internet voice service provider to disclose the location information Of a device pursuant to certain requests That uh had actually passed the senate but has been sitting in the house since last year And lastly senate bill 1175 the 911 saves act by senator burton I would categorize uh Would categorize public safety telecommunicators as a protective service occupation under the standard occupational classification system And that is also in the senate Still okay. Thank you mr. Salvador. Um, do we have any questions from the board? All right any comments or questions from the public? All right seeing hearing none. Thank you, sir. Thank you move on to agenda item number five um, we're gonna get an update from mr. Paul troxel um on some uh information from the 911 branch Good morning everybody. Paul troxel with the 911 branch. Uh, thank you for joining us all this morning Here's a list of the topics that we'll be briefing out today um I'd like to first start with our 911 stats. This is a typical slide that we've had in prior briefings Is we're closing out 2022 we are starting to analyze Where we set we did uh some predictive analysis It's showing that we're going to have a slower year this year We are still trying to figure out why that is and take a look at what's happening at the local level So we'll brief some more out on what happened in 2022 when we needed in february With the legacy call processing equipment. Um, we've Briefed out some of the challenges that we've had In this advisory board. We wanted to go into the three distinct testing processes In what we're finding We did talk about this briefly in closed session as budge had briefed out. We wanted to point this out to everybody in open session um The the first thing that we're testing is compliance with the interface control document that's required by a prime network service provider And that's the defining document for that interface between Call processing equipment and the ng 911 network and that allows that call to flow in and out In the dispatcher to be able to answer that um The interface document Interface control document They've had to build in some workarounds because of some of the limitations that we found with our legacy cpe And we did define a way to overcome some of those limitations in the future slide i'll point that out The second testing that we're doing is the contract requirements for legacy call processing equipment when we purchased our cpe We purchased with the requirement that it meant i3 the nina i3 standard And when that contract was signed in 2017 There was no ng 911 lab to validate that Now we do have an ng 911 lab and it allows us to do some testing And we're finding Limitations to the legacy call processing equipment where it does not meet the i3 compliance So that has created A big challenge for our team in our ng 911 service providers to take a look at how do we Deliver a 911 call to legacy solutions And then the third Testing process that we're going through is our cloud-based call processing We do have a slide to identify What cloud systems we do have and where some of the other providers are in the testing process One of the biggest benefits that we've received out of our ng 911 lab Is prior to going live with any of these solutions we can validate the contract requirements are being met We can validate the i3 standard is being met So when we deploy we have a greater understanding of what needs to happen at installation to be able to deliver that call Through the ng 911 network through cloud cpe to the dispatcher So what we found this data is aggregated with our legacy cpe providers So Here we have some of the i3 requirements have been partially met We have some of the i3 requirements. They have failed to meet and then we had eight additional i3 requirements We knew if they couldn't do those Uh requirements there was no even need to test those additional eight they couldn't meet them So Here is is a basic report card with some of the challenges challenges that we've seen in our lab and trying to deploy the ng 911 network and um our provider and the call oes team have had to come together figure out how do we Deploy continue to get ng 911 rolled out And still be able to support legacy cpe So this graphic has been one that you've seen before the difference is the red box there about the middle of the screen the alley box This is the workaround that's been developed One of the challenges that we found is cpe cannot take an ng 911 location push through cpe to cad So this alley emulation box will bring next gen location in Turn it to a serial Uh delivery through serial port down through CAD system and it will allow that legacy cpe To display location display the number information Give the dispatcher the information that they need they can push it to cad and continue the call flow Everything else on that graphic is still accurate in the way of the testing process The installation process with the ng 911 service provider The legacy cpe provider whoever your maintenance provider is the only difference is we've got this This one workflow inserted to install the alley emulation box Yeah, go ahead. There's a question So with the alley box Is there going to be someone or technician or someone coming to each p-sap to install these boxes To the individual p-sap and what's the timeline anticipated for this to happen? So yes, there will be a technician. It does require a site visit And I believe the way this is going to roll out and andrew and budge. Keep me honest They're going to go to phase one p-saps first Where we planned on deploying And then through the rest of that list and and get 100 deployment over time Yeah, and just to clarify if you're wondering hasn't been tested yet. Yes Imperial county and el dorado county have these deployed today And they're working on the the network as we speak today Thank you for that budge. I was going to point that out on this slide here Some good news since our last meeting in august In to wallamnee county. We have cut at&t mobility. So they have T mobile verizon Frontier landline and at&t mobility On ng-911 network and I believe the That accounts for about 90 of their workload is on ng-911 today and working the alley emulation box has been installed there for quite some time And it is working Since our last meeting, we did go live in south lake tahoe T mobile was deployed there last week I would like to take a second to recognize angela chen who's our northern region project manager gaol kin who's our regional coordinator And then kurt a lot who is now our 988 advisor And project manager Who was there supporting gaol and angela? They drove up after the little snowstorm that they had to be there to support synergium in the testing and go live process When they got up there everything worked through perfectly. They were able to cut and have a successful deployment there So we now have a second county Deployed with ng-911 We do have a team down in imperial county today doing some testing The plan if all the testing is successful, they will cut and go live in imperial county today So exciting good news happening Um, and it's it's been a lot of work by our team and the the ng-911 service provider So I'd like to take a moment to recognize all that hardware Our statewide cpe installation one of the challenges that we had because of the contract and i3 compliance We did have to put a moratorium on on on the sale of legacy cpe So this year 2022 we are down to eight successful Deployments and installations those have been works that were in progress We do have quite a few agencies who are pushing to go to cloud cpe Jenae de broski's team is fully engaged We have a a couple active deployments and then we have a bunch of psaps contacting the team requesting their updated allotment letters what the process is and jenae and her team have been really organized to Do some demo some organized demo days showing the cloud cpe solutions Both here at our psc campus as well as down in uh, los angeles area. We have a few more coming up They've been very successful to show what this technology is. It is new. It is different so You know a huge kudo to jenae and her team for all the work and all the vendors that supported those days So in 2023 we do expect Deployments to go up and take less time So here we have our cloud cpe solutions On the lower right corner. We have lumen Autos and nga who are live cleared tested validated all through the lab. They are available for purchase today If any psap is interested Contact jenae and her team and they can point you to the right contacts for those companies We are happy to announce that intrado and rapid deploy cpe Are completing the phase one testing process and are engaging to the phase two testing process Depending on exact timelines and how testing goes that could be as early as early 2023 But likely march ish for those solutions to get validated through the lab and be available and then we'll have five cpe solutions available on contract We do still have motorola and carbine who are engaged in the conversation. However, they have not Engaged in phase one testing at this time In this graphic, we did have an addition to the uh, psap advisor team. That's anita lopez She joined the team here about four or five months ago. So she's received some county assignments and she is also the 988 advisor We did have one retirement on the team that position is still vacant. We're hoping to get that posted and filled soon Um, so this graphic is just the updated contact Um, I'd leave this in uh for everybody to take back to your represented organizations professional associations and psaps to share And jenae's information is there on the bottom if you have any questions about the team Reach out to jenae or your psap advisor director Yes, sir Just a question on the counties that fall into the vacant. Are they To contact their previous advisor or how is that handled entering the vacancy? Contact jenae. Um, what she's done is she's divvied up some of those counties for the other team members to Oversee while that vacancy is there. So jenae will get you in in touch with the right person A quick update on some of the procurements that we have going on are recruiting retention and training requests for The rfp proposal is still actively moving. Um, I'm engaged with the uh cal oes procurement team The contract that um drafted rfp is being reviewed and we'll go through dgs review prior to going out live We are on track. We do expect an early 2023 contract execution for that contract Question will we have access to seeing who are the bidders? for the rfp for the training rfp I don't believe so. I believe that All the bidders While they're going through evaluation will be confidential and then once the contract is awarded that data will be made public Got it. Thank you And then the 988 call processing equipment, uh, that procurement is actively moving forward. The evaluations Are happening. Um, and they expect the contract award by december of 2022 and that will Support all of the 13 988 centers in the state And then we have some pending activities that we've been discussing for quite some time Cal oes, we would like to do a statewide logging audiolog contract similar to our Cpe master purchase agreement get multiple vendors on contract And at the local level if you need an audiologger that needs to support something in addition to what cpe has in the cloud cpe contract You would have that procurement vehicle available to you Um, and then the statewide cad multi-vendor Contract the same thing we would like to do a statewide master purchase agreement for multiple cad vendors to be on contract And that would be an available procurement vehicle for the local agencies to engage In hopefully gain the buying power of the state of california to get a reduced price on that cad system At a question regarding the um cloud-based recorder Do you know if hand if there's support in that contract for recording the local radio channels or is it just the telephone Andrew When you did cloud cpe we had they had to connect into local pbx and local radio as well, correct Just telephony. Okay. Thank you. But but the new one would that's that's what we're looking at Yeah, the existing one there's that gap, which is the need for this captain and then funding It I would like to Again, express my appreciation for the professional organizations that the nine moment advisory board represents The support of all the p-saps in 2019 assembly bill 96 was moving through and that was reshaping the set in a funding model That was successful. And that has allowed us a good stable funding mechanism to support The the state operations what we do here at Cal OES and the support that we provide all of the p-saps in california So this is our current fund condition statement as of july of 2022 And then this is our fee calculation our last meeting in august We were still pending some of the carriers to provide us their access line data That requirement was met. We received all of that access line data We were able to take the information out of the fund condition statement Plug in all of the data for the formula and determine It was our recommendation that for the calendar year 2023 that the Fee remain at 30 cents and we did provide the analysis between 2021 and 2022 There on the right hand of that slide And if you notice a wire line and void did decline in 2022 and the wireless did increase Not significant amount, but there is continued change in those areas so We're very happy to say that we've been able to maintain that 30 cents That's where it was originally set um, and we um that information has been sent over to the california department of taxation and fee administration and and That was our intention With this slide If there's any questions Okay, so that concludes agenda item number five Any questions from the board for mr. Troxel right any questions or comments from the public? All right seeing and hearing none. We'll move on to agenda item number six mr. Troxel. You're still in the hot seat So take it away Thank you. Um, so I did sent out the drafted Chapter for the operations manual for alert and warning I was hoping to be able to get it done earlier. So we'd have a little bit more time to digest it at this meeting So I'm asking if you could review that and provide any feedback Through track changes to that document and return that by wednesday november 30th We will again collect that data and get that revised I think we're very close to the first iteration of a final chapter We do know initially this is going to be a living document. We'll post it We'll continue to get feedback either through this board the long-range planning committee or our locals using the solution Um, so we we do know that we'll have some revisions moving forward Um, here is the graphic we reported out on in august. This is the testing results from the rave alert solution Um, the rig the contract requires that the alert and warning solution support 250,000 notifications Per minute and here we have two examples where rave was able to support Um text voice calls and email In excess of that 250,000 requirement And this graphic shows Um, all of the systems that are live every agency that's live in the in the rave alert warning solution We have almost 2.4 million notifications that have been sent out since march I'm very proud of the autos and the rave Alert warning solution team. They have been actively engaging peace apps actively supporting whatever those deployment needs are And eldorado county is identified here on the list and they had a significant amount of Notifications that were sent when they had their fire here a couple of months ago So, um, they did use this solution only for community-based notifications. They could not use it for ipos Because fema could not get their ipos certificate back to them in time So for the ipos alerting they use their legacy system for community alerting They use this system and the reports back was it was Worked as designed. They were extremely pleased with the solution Here's our total engagement. The green represents those that are live and using the solution 100 of the time The purple is showing those Agencies who've committed to go and they're in some phase of deployment their systems being built out their data is being inputted Their log-ons and everything the training is all happening in the background So we continue to get agencies to sign up for this solution And and again the rave team has been able to meet all of the The locals needs To support alert and warning in california Here's our contact if anybody has any questions regarding the rave alert warning solution Ural cook is the autos project manager and michael elder from our team is our project manager Okay, that concludes gender number six. We have any questions or comments from the board on that I just wanted to comment to thank you for putting together the policy thing and address what my concerns was with just a basic Framework, so if an agency signs up, um from our perspective anyways, we've done some due diligence So thank you for putting that together The second thing was just a clarifying point if there's a city That is not a p-sap, but they're interested are they covered or they have to be a p-sap to fall under this They have to be they can be an alerting authority that is a city. That's not a p-sap. Yes. Thank you Yep Okay, any other questions from the board on this? This was a a topic we've been discussing for quite a few boards and we we tried to put together some information That'd be helpful. So we really would appreciate your feedback on this if you've got any further comments Okay, any comments from the public on this agenda item? All right seeing and hearing done. Thank you, sir The next agenda item number seven is on The 988 update. Uh, this was added as an agenda item at our last board meeting We know the importance of this. Uh, mr. Salvador provided an update on ab 988 And what we've got on this slide really is just a high level summary of some of the stuff that's in the statue So if you've read ab 988, there's nothing earth shattering on this slide But it is a rather long bill Because the revenue and tax code updates are also included in there and there's quite a bit of reading So we wanted to kind of give a summary here It does establish these 988 centers using the digits 988 And it requires uh cal oes and health and human services to do several things The slide is not exhaustive. There is a lot more that is contained in ab 988 in terms of execution But we've you know, one of the key takeaways in here is the integration between 988 and 911 to validate that by july of 2024 And it also establishes a 988 surcharge At eight cents in the statute for the first two calendar years. So that's 2023 and 2024 That is a 988 surcharge that goes into setna. So it borrows sort of the setna structure 911 is separate 988 is separate, but it borrowed kind of that infrastructure And cal oes is administering that We're the ones that do the access line reporting and all that. So that's how that statute is set up We'll report out more detail, but like I said for the first two years, it's already set at eight cents Subsequent surcharges are based on the authorized budget. So the process is the same as 911 The 988 budget is authorized in the governor's budget as ratified in the legislature That budget is then said, okay, that's the maximum revenue you can bring in You take the number of access lines you do the math That's how you set the fee to meet the authorized budget Same exact process that we just briefed out for the 911 surcharge. It's all the same There are a couple of other things that we have to do We being cal oes By the first 90 days, which if you do the math is december 28th So if you back that up that means before christmas because we obviously want to get this done Before we go on christmas break We need to appoint a 988 system director. We're working on that And we need to establish the 988 technical advisory board the statute establishes two boards an advisory board For policy that's administered by health and human services And an advisory board for technical matters that that is administered by cal oes We have a draft Membership list here. This is subject to change. We think this is pretty solid now You can imagine the number of folks we have to coordinate with to get this list Vetted the statute lists broad categories of stakeholders that need to be considered And so it doesn't specifically name like The 901 statute does the exact members of the board So the members of the 901 advisory board are very specific in statute and they're appointed by the governor This one just lists stakeholder groups that need to be represented The goal here is to ensure the interaction between 988 and 911 So you're going to see there's a there's a cross section of both 911 folks As well as 988 folks and then you've got to bring in some of the behavioral health aspect as well So the list is still being vetted and developed But we think this is pretty close to what it'll end up being And we're shooting we're targeting the first board meeting to be on december 8th From 10 to 12 And we'll put out public notice and it'll be a bagly keen Manage board just like this is so you can expect more details to come on that So any questions or comments on on that? I have a couple questions budge. Can you go back to the previous slide, please? Can you talk a little bit about the 988 system director that position? Um, so The statute Calls out For calo. We asked to appoint a 988 system director. We're still in the process of identifying that In a perfect world, uh, we would have received the authority in our budget In july to hire that person We did not We will work on that authority in the next budget cycle So between now and then we'll probably have to name an interim and we'll Have to absorb those from within our existing staff and then that'll More than likely depending on the process that happens for the upcoming budget year We'll we'll try and get authorized for that to name that permanent position so you can expect probably in the interim to be named and then From there we'll move forward with the formal process probably take us another year to get there So just confirming that's a position that will be staffed by a calo. Yes, simply correct Okay. Yeah, the statute is very clear on that that it's it's staffed by a calo. Yes person second question, um, the slide 23 The list of the members of the board and just confirming this is not going to be governor appointed Positions correct. The statute does not say that the membership has to be governor appointed. So we're working through a process internal on how that will be done, but yeah, it'll be It we're working collaboratively with every stakeholder group that you see on this list to make sure that we haven't missed anyone Um, so that's the process we're in right now once the list is agreed upon Then we'll go through a process of actually appointing people to fill those spots The other group that you mentioned that sounds so there's two groups. There's a 98 tack committee Which is that that you have on the slide and then there's a second one that's governed by health services Yeah, california health and human services will manage that board who Well, obviously they're managing it, but is there any influence excuse me from the branch office as to who will sit On that board will there be a 9-1-1 piece that community representative representative on that board If if I recall the statute correctly. Oh, yes has a seat on that board And we are working closely with health and human services with the assistant secretary Stephanie welch We I talked to her weekly And and we're in close communication. So yes, we want to make sure that that connection is there But it's their board and we're working with them, you know, we obviously it's their process But we are in close communication to make sure this is a real collaborative effort there Yeah, thank you Okay, so Some of the things that this board is doing And these come straight out of the statute. So if you're wondering where these bullets came from this is exactly what's in statute They're looking at, you know, the feasibility and a plan for sustained interoperability between 9-1-1 and 98 Hence the need for the makeup of that board Obviously, there's a behavioral health crisis service that's that's included in there And then all the the legislative and and regulatory and legal and other things that need to be considered Both on the 9-1-1 side and the 98 side to transfer calls back and forth. You understand there's a lot of complexity there The technical and operational standards for the 98 system similar to what we do in the 9-1-1 system That this this board will oversee that And then protocols for this the 98 centers to move calls from 98 to 9-1-1 And then vice versa And then once the plan is developed the implementation plan for 98, which is a date further down the line Whatever technical work is needed to support things like mobile crisis teams or the entire care continuum that's going to be considered as part of this 98 process Those tech technical aspects would all be rolled into this board as well. That's kind of what this board will be doing Very similar to how this board functions with 9-1-1 Yeah, go ahead Brenda. So once once the board is established Will there be an operation manual of sorts How the two entities will interact How what the expectation is of each one And how collaboratively they will work together So yes, but that's part of the implementation plan And if you go back to this slide, I think it's on here No, I don't think I have it. I think I have it on next steps. Let's see There is the call out for an implementation plan I want to say it was December of 2024 But there's an implementation plan that health and human services is developing as a result of the policy side And that document will drive some of the technology. So that linkage has to be in place But initially The charter for that board is captured in these three bullets. That's all that the statute calls out So the short answer to your question is yes But what level of detail I think we're going to have to walk through as that board is formed Yeah, maybe even sit Then crawl Then walk then run and we're probably at this Yeah, yeah, yeah birth sit crawl walk run and we're probably at the sitting stage where we're going to come together to have these conversations Yeah So next steps, um, we're continuing to work through the 98 procurement process that was authorized for a budget change proposal So it started before ab 988 was even signed into law So that's why that process is farther along. We knew that that needed to happen And we've been working on that we'll do the the call processing equipment installs It's a it's a whole call handling system suite and including Answering the calls and the customer relationship management software and interacting with everything that's at the 98 centers all that's included And then begin to have these conversations on best practices procedures Between 911 and 98 transfer just to understand the process so the technology can support the process And then we've got it obviously a lot of collaboration to be done This is a new partnership And those of you that are working with your mental health professionals in your Counties and and local areas, you know that they're distinctly different than 911 The analogy I like to use is for a 911 operator You get about 90 seconds, right? That's it and the call is done And if you don't get it done in 90 seconds They're moving on because there's a whole queue of other folks In the 98 space the average call duration is 20 minutes So it's a completely different conversation And the two need to come together because there's times where they need to work together Either a call comes into 911 that should be 988 or a call came in to 988 that escalates of needs emergency response And so that's really what this whole conversation is about I'm just really understanding those differences And then the the implementation plan will be developed that this board will have to adjust The technology to support that implementation plan and that'll be a key part of what this does And again, we're going to meet on december 8th in this room From 10 to 12. So you if you're interested you can certainly Participate the first meeting is probably going to focus a lot on The the fact that it's bagly keen and here's how the board is conducted and here's what the the board is about and Answering these initial questions really introducing members one to another because it'll be the first time that they've come together as a group So we're looking forward to that So any other questions on agenda item 7? I want to make sure we've we've covered your questions We know there's a lot of discussion on this any questions from the board Okay, any questions from the public Okay, a couple go ahead sir. Mike's here Three minutes for public comments. So take it away, sir So i'm i'm robert bennett bp and technology consultant for work vantage Back to slide 23. I noticed that You have a list of crisis folks fire agencies public safety On a technical advisory committee You don't actually have anybody representing the technology vendors that are Going to provide this service for you or or to The weigh in on the viability of some of these ideas. Can you comment on that please? Yeah, so the makeup of this board is very similar the 98 board is very similar to the 901 board historically There hasn't been any vendors on these boards I think we do a really good job on the 911 advisory board of hearing from the vendor community And we welcome the partnership So we're hoping that we continue that collaborative Exchange of information the other challenge too. I think is is worth noting If a vendor is overly involved in the development of policy, they're automatically restricted from Applying to any procurement And uh, we're pretty sure that a vendor would not want to put themselves in that situation either So I think we're trying to balance those two, but your your common is is very valid We absolutely need a partnership with the vendor community and we appreciate the input terrific. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, sir All right another public comment. I think go ahead We just so everybody online can hear you Yeah, my question is just are there public is is there a public education funds associated with this new bill? Or would that be a future budget consideration? So I don't I think that's a future consideration and probably more on the policy side So i'm not as familiar with that, but a good question. I just don't know offhand the answer to that Okay, I know at the federal level sam says handling some of that and there is some some outreach done at that level But I think that's probably gonna fall more on the policy side Yeah, just because I mean they're the public's gonna have to understand how this whole thing works and there needs to be a good push for that Yeah, absolutely. Thank you Okay, any other questions All right So we are going to move on to agenda item number eight And I believe we have the chair of the long range planning committee chris heron online So chris if you're there take it away, sir I'm here. Can you hear me? Okay A little muffled. Maybe don can mixing magic man can give him some more volume Go ahead chris. Okay. Well, we'll try it Good morning. Since the last advisory board meeting in august the lrpc met in october and again yesterday The next gen 911 task force groups also met this quarter and we received updates from them As well as oes on the progress Of the next gen on one implementation Now these task force groups also provide a good opportunity for oes to discuss many of their projects with a cross representation of psaps Making for a very collaborative process as we've talked about in the past And part of our discussion yesterday included a conversation about the focus of the lrpc um, you know, we want to ensure That we continue to provide value to the advisory board And oes without too much duplication of effort In terms of the work that goes on here at the advisory board and as well as sort of the working groups and task forces So kind of that in the middle body if you will Our plan is to have an lrpc overview for a distribution to the advisory board Either prior to or in conjunction with your february meeting On february 23 that is In that overview we'll provide some history of the lrpc which goes back more than a decade now Projects that we've worked on associated accomplishments And then where we see our focus over the next few years Items that are likely to be included in that focus would include the recruitment and retention project Which is targeted to have an rfp At least in early 23 PSAP 91 answer times the next gen 911 dynamic call routing And then of course what was just discussed the 988 integration with the 901 system We feel like each of these has broad implications that are a longer term and thus a fit For the lrpc format, which is quarterly public meetings I think we'll continue to have and need the working groups or task forces where we can essentially hand off Some of these projects once the advisory board and lrpc guidance is given So that oes can work directly with PSAP Representatives and get much quicker interaction and feedback on details That aren't suited to wait for these quarterly meetings So what we ask of you is that you be thinking about other topics or projects that you want the lrpc to have On its radar so that you can provide us with that feedback and direction in February Lastly, I want to mention that lrpc members and the appointment of the chair Are are all at the discretion of the advisory board. We have all six organizations From the advisory board represented on the lrpc now for the first time in quite a few years And while you all get here for me at each of your meetings We hope that there's a line of communication where each of you can hear from and interact with your counterparts on the lrpc And provide really provide guidance to them That is a representative of the parent organizations So i'm going to share our membership document with our contact information email and phone numbers With with you via oes. I'll ask them to provide that to each of you So our next meeting is in february as I said, we'll have that Sort of overview summary document about the lrpc to you before that and end of report unless there's any questions. Thank you Okay, so thank you And any questions on the board we we think we're trying to encourage some more interaction between the board and the lrpc So in february when chris gives his update, he'll provide you some history those that have been on the board for a while Historically the board has gone back to their member organizations and said hey Did you guys think about x and x and then that's brought back to the lrpc The lrpc takes that as a task and then they go out and discover whatever that innovation is And we just want to make sure that that mechanism is in place So we really asked chris to address the board With that intent and then in february We're hoping to come back very purposefully So between now and then I think the ask is Go pull your groups that you represent and see if you have some activities That the lrpc should be looking at and then bring them back to the lrpc chair As well as to this board so that we can Agendize them and get them moving forward as as projects. So any questions or comments on that? Yeah Yeah, chris, I definitely want to thank you and and the lrpc for the work you've been doing and helping collaborate with oes As as we dream up these crazy things to do. There are sounding board And it's hugely valuable for us There's been several things where we thought we could be of help and the lrpc has said no, thank you We don't need that kind of help And then there's been other ideas where we've said the same thing and they said absolutely We need that help and and here's how you can be more helpful in that way So it's been a great partnership and we appreciate the work of that group is doing And we just want to make sure that you guys recognize that it's there as an extension of the 911 advisory board And you have the ability to bring things up to them with taskers. So Any other comments from the board? Okay comments or questions from the public on that agenda item All right, thank you. Thank you chris for the report. We appreciate it. Thank you All right, so we've set our agenda for 2023 We basically took the same schedule we've been using for the past couple of years With the same kind of weekly rhythm and everything we think that there aren't any major events or You know association meetings or you know those kinds of things that we're aware of The schedule can be adjusted. Please let us know if this doesn't work And if we don't hear anything back from you then we you know silence is consent But this is what we set up for the board in the future and There are some changes potentially coming for bagliqueen that will be tracking closely so Um, obviously there's a couple of our members today that are participating remotely That was a change that happened this last legislative cycle We do need a majority of members present in person. I believe is still the rule So please work closely with the 911 branch whether you're able to be here or not It's much better in person. Trust me But we do understand the need to support remote members So any questions or comments on the meeting dates or the next year? Now if you're tracking the way oes does boards The 988 boards will be very close to these dates As well as the cal seek boards to california statewide interoperability executive council Mainly because it reduces our logistics and setting this room up So brenda go ahead. Yes. So I do want to say that this is my last advisory board meeting Um, this will be my final term. I'm terming out in january So there will be a new apco representative that I have yet to get the name to announce But it's it's been very interactive and great opportunity to serve on this board Thank you brenda. Thank you for your service and I believe Sheriff a you this may be your last board as well. Is that correct sir? Yes, that's right. I'm retiring at the end of the year and and uh regret regrettably this will be my last meeting and uh the state sheriff's She will recommend another person for appointment to the board in my place Thank you. All right. Thank you sheriff for your service. We appreciate the support And uh chief baxter from chp welcome aboard. You're our newest member. So we're excited to have you and uh As you can see, uh, you know, we we've got a pretty busy year coming up Yes, I'm very excited to be back Working with you budge and being a member of this board. So looking forward to the future And also new on the board today is mark chase. You thought I was gonna forget you but I did not So mark is representing calnina and I think there's a process underway To get that formalized but welcome aboard. I know you're sitting in for liam this week Um, but in february, uh, we hope that you're permanent Thank you. All right. Okay any other comments from the board on this agenda? Ida budge, I have a question for the 98 tactical uh tactical committee in, um, conjunction with the meetings we have posted here That comes to be the day before the day after Day after right So it's the cal seek meets on tuesdays The 911 advisory board is wednesdays and the 98 technical advisory board is is thursdays Unless something changes, that's what we've set up Thank you. Yeah, just so that we all know and The 98 times are the same and cal seek is the same 10 to 12 So all the times are the same. Wow. We must be pretty simple Oh, I like that. It was probably my idea. They're like we got to keep this simple for budge She's hard enough to wrangle in Okay, any other questions from the board on this? Okay, any questions from the public on agenda item number nine Budgets chris herron. Could you just, um verbalize the dates of the meetings in 2023 because we can't see the slides For those of us online. Oh, I thought we were sharing online. So I might at least I can't maybe it's just me No, it's probably us chris. It's usually we're the source of the problem. Okay, uh February 15th uh 2023 and then May 17th august 16th and november 15th And the times are all the same from 10 to 12 Thank you Yeah And those should all be wednesdays if we got it right. Okay. Any other questions or comments? All right, moving on Gen item number 10 public comment Any public comment that wasn't addressed? by The individual items that we've already gone over Okay, any comments from the board that was not adjust Accounted for in the agenda items we already had All right seeing and hearing none Your favorite slide item 11 adjourn. Do we have a motion to adjourn? Motion to adjourn. So we have a motion from brenda. Do we have a second? Second second from mark. All right I think I'm supposed to do a roll call. All right. All right. I better follow the rules All right chief baxter you Oh, well, I think it's a yes or no on this one chief. Oh, sorry You you agreed to adjourn. Yes Yes, all right, brenda. Yes Mark. Yes, rosa. Yes Sheriff brawn. Yes Sheriff ayub. Yes Uh chief ramirez. Yes captain warren. Yes And chief white. Yes. All right. We are adjourned. Thank you very much. The time is 11 32