 Well, for the High Court, Susan Angelingo has managed hearing on the search seeking the disqualification of the Gov. candidates of APC and that of the PDP in the state. The Gov.'s parent, under the banner of APC David Kente, approached the court seeking the disqualification of Senator Emmanuel Poichard in the forthcoming election, stressing that the claimed party primaries that allegedly produced him never held in line with electoral act. Also, a PDP Gov.'s parent, Mr. Jerome Iame, instituted a suit seeking the immediate disqualification of Kefas Agu on the grounds that it did not purchase the expression of interest in nomination forms of the party. On the basis of the nature of process used to commence the action, it could be said that all the processes are in, but there are a series of anomalies with the case which we have brought to the attention of the courts. So depending on how things go between now and the next adjunct, the case may or may not proceed outright hearing. We're here today to reclaim the mandate of the professor before the federal high court. We are ready with our witnesses. We informed the court we have our witnesses to prove our case, but the defendants are obviously not ready because they brought some objections which they just brought this morning and so the court cannot proceed with hearing as a result of their objection. So for us, we are ready to call our witnesses and prove our case. We will respond to the objection they have brought and proceed with the hearing of our case on the 14th day of July 2022. Senator Boatak came and said, I've been served but it was placed there at the wrong place. Don't worry, we are not going to start argument over where you were served or whether you were served. You are here now, isn't it? That's the important thing. Take the paper, lawyer, take the paper. So we are taking the paper today in front of the court. Now what has happened is none of them has served or anything requiring us to respond. To the court today, I appeared under protest and said, look, my noble lord, your order was not complied with and an order of substance service must be strictly complied with. It's an order of court. Every order of court need to be obeyed. So that was the position. And my little friend on the other side later they said, I agree with us. I said, in that case, if you could be served in court. And I said, yeah, I could be served on court but on one condition. If you are not going to apply for any adverse order against my client. And he gave us an undertaking that he would not. I said, gentlemen, and I agreed and he could order that we should be.