 Yr cyfnod o'i wneud i gael ei fod yn credu fawr gwwysig a ran y bydd yn gymhiliadol iawn, ac oedd yn cyfrofiad o'r gyfnod preferred ar gyfer y gwirwyr ar gyfer yw peth. Felly mae'n dweud i'r cyrdin nhw, mae'n ei fod yn ymwneud o'r cyfnod sydd yn cymoeddol iawn i gwirwyr yn y Gwyrdd ac i'n sefydlu mewn ni, a'r cyfnod tensionsio aethau o'i gwaith, a'r cyfnod ein hyn yn gwybeth na'n dwynghiaeth, Cymru o'r cyfwyr a mae gwybod yma'r FFAP. Yn gweithio i bwysig am hynny i agaf weld yma. Rwy'n gofio'r T100, 200 a 300. Rwy'n gofio'r ddiddorol o 3 gydag o'r rei. Rwy'n gofio'r ddiddorol o'r cyfwys. Rydyn ni'n gilydd i'r oedd ymddangas ar y clyw. Rydyn ni'n gilydd i'r oedd yma'r ffordd. Ond ydych chi'n gilydd i'r oedd yn ddannu. Yn gilydd i'r oedd yn ysgrifennu ar yr oedd gwybod. rhaid i'w ddaeth gyda'r cyfnod drwy gyd, ac rhaid i'n ddechrau'n cael eu cyfnod o'r cwrs. Dwi'n dweud yma'r T100. Y T100 yn ddaeth i'r cyffredin iawn arall, ac mae'n mynd i'ch gweithio'r ddweud yma, mae'n pethau gwaith yn ei ffordd, yn ei ddwyllfa, mae'n llwydd gael. Mae'r 34 oed yn cyfnod o'r 7 iawn, ond yn gymryd i'r bromig i'r cwrs 3. I'm not going to talk too much about the tech that Taelist have said is in these, it's there if you want it in terms of videos that are already out there, so I'm not going to repeat that. But what I will say, let's start off with dry ball data and interesting for me was that 34 degrees worth of loft and these were the numbers that it produced. And surprisingly, ball speed is very, very good, 119 and very consistent, apart from that final ball you see there. Again, as you'd expect it, or maybe not for me, but this is a very high spinning club and carry distance is the shock at 163. Launched at 2110 peak height, so very, very high in terms of peak height and carry was the surprise. 163 out of a 34 degree, 7 iron is a lot longer than I'd expected to be. It defied its loft in my hands. Surprisingly so, like I said, I would expect that kind of loft to achieve a sort of just over 150 carry. That's what I've done with other 7 irons of this type. So a bit confused is that the loft versus carry distance, so obviously something going on in there in terms of a bit of fire off that face. And the spin number was again impressively high if that's kind of thing floats your boat. But I'm going to talk about when I get that out on the course very shortly how sometimes that high spin number can also have some negative impacts as well. Anyway, let's get out on the course. I tried them in a number of situations and the first one you will see is literally shorts of a green in a bit of a chip and run. And nothing great to highlight here apart from the fact where you see this ball rises sort of four or five feet off the floor. When you see me try this with the other two irons that we're looking at in this video, you'll see. It's the only one place where you really visibly see the difference in the loft of the three clubs. But anyway, great feel. I said great feel, good feel. I don't think this is anything like a forge club that's always used in Mizuno as the barometer because of their title. Nothing feels like a Mizuno. Well in this case it doesn't. It for me hasn't got that softness of a real true forge. It's not got that same kind of feel at all. So I'd class it as good but not great by any stretch at all. Irons are played in here. It was a windy day down at Conway Golf Club and I always talk about this about this obsession with spin amongst average golfers. Yes, it can have benefits in terms of it needs to be at a level to look at stopping balls on greens. But in this case with the T100 out there on the course, I found the ball flight was a little bit too floaty for me. The 34 degrees it was a weak ball flight. And the spin number obviously worked against it playing into the wind and downwind. Well you ain't stopping nothing on links greens downwind no matter what the spin number says. And that's the interesting fact for me. I don't know what conditions people play in. But the reality is out on the golf course the spin number was almost removed and it was a negative because playing into the wind it became very very difficult to get the ball progressing. And you see a large drop off between that and the other clubs that I tested. But anyway my overall assessment, I'd say okay without ticking. I never left there feeling anything fantastic about this club. It's an okay performer. I'll only want to remove it from it. It's got AP2 written all over it from last or previous year's models. That's all I would say on that one. Next club in let's go to the far end of the spectrum which is a T300. And again I don't want to remove away from the AP models. This is the effectively the AP1. It's again it's a thick top line. It's overall a bulkier club. Looks wise I mean I don't know I'd be really interested in your feedback on this. I'm kind of unsure about looks. Maybe growing me a little bit the three of the clubs. But again I think it might be a bit of a marmite look. It's quite different and unique in terms of what Titlist have done again. I think trying to move away from the traditional looks. I'm not sure. In this again I think it's an okay looking club. Top line and all the different colours of crumbs on the top line itself. And the chamferedges make it. They're doing everything they can to make this appeal. Visually appear rather. Visually like a thinner top line. The balls are here. First of all let's have a look again those chips into the green. Very very low this way you see the loft changing. It's 29 degrees sorry the loft on this. So right at the other end of the spectrum. But again decent enough feel. It's a more clicky feel than you'd expect from the forge club. It certainly feels a little bit springy. But I'm not negative towards that. I actually quite liked it what they've done with the T300. Then again balls into the wind again. This is where for me yes it's stronger lofted. But it achieves a distance that it maintains from that more penetrating ball flight. It's not a low launching 7 iron bite any means. And again it just cut through the wind. It was lower spinning. But it certainly did a job and downwind like I said. You ain't stopping a ball on these greens anyway. It travelled quite a bit further out there on the course. Then it did in terms of the difference between it and the T100. In terms of dry ball data. And let's still the dry ball data up for you now. So don't forget there the averages. And it's the longer of the three clubs again. As you'd expect from the loft. 174 or 175 or almost carry. Spin drops off at 55. But again more than respectable for me based on all the tests that I do. Ball speed like I said was higher at 122. There are more variables in there for people who are thinking that consistency is an issue perhaps with this. Then yeah I would say we've got a ball speed of 118. And a ball speed of 128 would you believe in there. So there are some differences. Pkite at 103 so again it still launches the ball. Although it's slightly lower in launch angle at 17.8. It gets to an incredibly high peak height. Like I said what I noticed out there on the course transferring that. Where it really matters I think. Is that certainly in the conditions that I played in at Conway yesterday. It was absolutely superb in terms of performance both into and downwind. And I never had. I thought it was a good good performer. And for average golfers I think this is a really really good product. I never did the AP1. Right now we will move on T200. The one that sits in the middle and it does exactly that. It just is it's a smaller version of the T300. And a bigger version of the T100. I like the look of this club. Again it's kind of grown on me when I say I like the look of it. Is quite different and unique from tight list. The performance you get from it. So the loft first of all let's go the other way around loft is 30 degrees. And I'll throw up the dry ball data for you now. So again pretty much exactly where you'd expect it to be. 170 carry. Which is bang on the button for this kind of loft. 6000 spin which is really really good for me. 121 ball speed. A lot more consistent across on the ball speeds there than we've seen from the T300. Launching again very very similar launch angle to that of the T100. Peak height was identical in terms of average at 110. Out there on the course again the short game chipping in. It has got a sort of clicky feel but again nothing that is offensive to me. It gives feedback into the hands and you can react to that feedback as well. It's nice and easy to bit the ball up. I thought again a more penetrating ball flight than that of the T100 in my hands. And again preferred it. It did again pretty much what I'd be looking for from that type of iron. A sort of iron that sits in the middle of the two. It was an overall good performer. But I'm going to get to a summary because I feel already that I'm waffling on with this review. Because there's an underlying tone to it and that is that these clubs are okay. No they're not okay. These clubs are very very good. But the problem that I have is that the AP1, AP2 and AP3, the 718 range were also very very good. As much as titleists want to say these are not the same, they're a different setup and the technology's different, I find it hard to separate the three profiles from the three previous profiles. I find the characteristics of each club into the performance difficult to separate. I would guess that if I looked at my numbers now for each of those three products that I've just mentioned from the 718 range, apart from spin which is probably an improved number, I don't think there would be any difference. Someone take the time to go and have a look. But I don't think there will be any great differences. When I say I don't think there will, I took out, I played AP3s which was the one that sat in the middle because it mixed the numbers around a little bit. I played AP3 on the same day as I collected the dry ball data and it was virtually identical to that of the T200. That's the bit that I just, if you look at a set of clubs that fit any of these remits these are very very good clubs. If you've got 718 APs then you've no need to worry about changing whatsoever and it's just one of them ranges of clubs which there might be some people getting excited out there about these. I'm not in that category I'm afraid. I just think very very good. This is not a, this is where you've got to be careful with these reviews. I'm not knocking these clubs, they are really really good. It's not because I'm afraid to knock them, believe me I'll tell you if I don't think they're any good. They are very good but I can't get away from the fact that in the back of my mind they don't differ that greatly from the AP718 range in every category and I'm afraid that's my honest assessment of it, like it or not. I can't really say no more than that. I've not mentioned price because I'm not 100% where these are going to sit on the balance with you. My review is a day later than others because I got a bit confused over the embargo date so apologies for that. Hope you enjoyed it, like I said for me dry ball data is a fantastic barometer to measure clubs performance from and it's a good starting point but getting that out on the course is reality and it's a real eye open if I had just done a review based on dry ball data it might have been slightly different but when I got out there on the course and you see the differences in what happens in like I keep using the same word in reality when the wind's blowing, when conditions are different, when lies are different that's when you see the true performance of a golf club and to take the three different heads out to see the difference in the performance was really really good and for me if I was choosing a club to game I'd go to the opposite end of the spectrum and gain the T300 why wouldn't I? I keep saying this, it's packed with a bit of power, plenty of help spinning plenty high enough for me and that compared to that of the T100 I'd be far more sweet towards that easier option anyway I've waffled on more than I thought thank you for watching, comments down below interesting your feedback out of these, look what do you think of the performance what do you think of the review I'm going, see you later