 So, consequential imperative states that act only on that maxim which you can will into universal law. In essence, what a weird consequence of this is, is that your behavior determines a set of rules, not your intentions, not your desires, but a set of rules by which everybody acts. So, this leads to a question, right, what would the world be like if everyone acted like you? Consider your behavior and imagine everybody behaves the same way that you do. You can consider circumstances, okay, but in those circumstances, how do you behave? And what would the world look like if everyone behaved like you did in all the circumstances? Well, consider a friend here. This is becoming a widespread event, a widespread phenomena where people are exaggerating on their resumes. And I'm not accusing anybody, at least not outright, but there are some people that think this is a perfectly legitimate way to go, okay, I mean, maybe you have your reasons. But again, a categorical imperative does not consider your reasons, intentions or anything like this. Only that your behavior would determine a set of rules by which everybody else would also behave. So, everyone else would also exaggerate their resumes. And what would the world be like if everyone did that? Resumes would be useless. And we're fast coming to that point. Everything on the resume would be useless. Your education, your work experience, even everything that's actually true would be useless because everybody's lying on their resume and resumes can't be trusted. What about kitten fishing? If everybody started kitten fishing, no matter what your reasons, okay, you're lonely, okay, I get it, or you're trying to find love, I get it, I'm not knocking the purpose, and neither is con, right? You can have your purposes, that's fine. But your actions will determine whether this is moral. But everybody were to engage in kitten fishing. Well then trying to find romance through these apps would be useless. Everyone would be lying. You couldn't trust the apps. They are natural. Frankly, it's just a self-defeating act to try to change somebody's mind by berating them online, even if you have good reason. You never change anybody's mind by berating them online or even face to face. I mean, how many times has it actually worked where you've just absolutely humiliated and defeated somebody by showing that their reasons were poor from the beginning and they shouldn't have even questioned your reason? You just ground them into the dirt and then you walk away and say, gosh, I'm really glad you did that. You really helped me change my mind? No. You know, everybody started berating everyone with whom they disagree. What kind of war would that be like? Is it divisive, angry, pointless, do you even have discussions online? Also, here's the question. Do you think the world should be like you? If you're engaging in these behaviors, do you think everybody, are we actually better off this way? I mean, maybe it's self-defeating. Maybe it isn't. I mean, suppose it's still self-defeating. Are we better off berating each other online and lying kitten fishing and lying on resumes? If you don't think the world is actually better off being like you, then maybe, just maybe, act different.