 week. Armageddon has arrived here for week number seven. So let's talk about some replacements you can pick up on waivers to fill in as you've hopefully got superstars on buy for this week. This is the waiver wire Q&A right here on the FanDuel YouTube, Twitch and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com joined here as always by JJ Zacharyson. He is the editor-in-chief of number fire and FanDuel JJ. Have you had a chance to look at your week seven lineups yet to see how bad things are for this week? I mean, what is the NFL doing? They're putting all of the high powered offenses on buy the same week. Well, you got Buffalo this week, you have Minnesota this week, right? Minnesota is this week. Yeah. You have Dallas this week, which is a huge one. And I mean, Pittsburgh even, I know they're not a high powered offense, but you know, you have Chase Claypole, Deontay Johnson, Najee Harris, because they're such a, they just target their players at such a high rate. It's just, it's, it's rough out there, man. This is probably, and I tweeted about this about 15 minutes ago, but this is, I've been playing fantasy football for about 20 years. This is probably the worst buy week that I've ever experienced in my life. Yeah. It's rough. I was checking out my Scott Fishbowl lineup and be certain, three tight ends this week. So that's going to be exciting. The good thing is we get the best running back in football, Cordero Patterson back this week. We get the Jets back. So big time consolations here across the league to try to offset the loss of those scrubs like CDLam and Amari Cooper. As always, we are taking your questions, no matter where you're watching the Fandal YouTube Twitch or Twitter pages for today with Facebook being a little bit walkie. So no matter where you're watching, get those questions in. We'll take them live on air and help you get your waiver set for week number seven. And as always, make sure you are subscribed to the Fandal YouTube Twitch and Twitter pages. We have a new show debuting tomorrow. Tom Beccy is going to talk some NBA DFS every Wednesday with you at 4 p.m. That's at 4 p.m. to 4 30, breaking down that day's NBA DFS slate tomorrow, a big one across the NBA. So make sure you are subscribed to your platform of choice. Swing back here tomorrow at 4 p.m. We have our Thursday night football previous branding a doula on Thursday at 4 p.m. And also our snake draft Q and A every Friday at 4. So a lot of reason to swing on by the Fandal YouTube Twitch and Twitter pages and start things off by talking to Elias over on YouTube. How should I prioritize geometric felton, Jared Patterson, DJ Dallas, Devonte Freeman and Michael hasty when dropping Jerick McKinnon and have PPR assuming I won't get Dearness Johnson and they have Alex Collins. So JJ basically asking who's your top waiver ad for this week? If you're not going to get Dearness Johnson, you've already got Alex Collins. Yeah. This one's kind of tough because we don't have all the information that we would want to ideally have. I think that Felton is the safest option to go to because I think that they're going to end up utilizing Dearness Johnson as the 1a and then offense. Felton hasn't really lined up as in played running back this year. Let's get that out of the way that like this is a lot of projecting that we're doing when it comes to Demetric Felton. But if you look at what the Browns do, they split a backfield number one and number two, Kareem Hunt's been sort of the, you know, he's been a fairly heavily used pass catcher out of the backfield. So we can assume that they'll want sort of that dynamic in some way. And so there's projection going on here with Felton, but I think that in a PPR format, even half PPR, I think that he's okay. But I think of these guys, I might risk it with like Jared Patterson. And I say that only because I don't know what Felton's role is going to really be like, I think that of these guys, like right now today, from a projection standpoint, we can probably feel best about Felton of this group, maybe Devonte Freeman, maybe, but probably Felton of this group. But I think that Jared Patterson has the highest upside. I don't know if Gibson's going to play this week. You know, he's had that shin issue that's clearly been lingering. He was in and out of that game against Kansas City quite a bit. I'm just not feeling that optimistic about Antonio Gibson. And I think a lot of people, you know, they'll assume that JD McKessick is a great play and that he's not a bad play at all. But you know, don't think that McKessick's just going to steal all that early down work. Jared Patterson, who's sort of like a, you know, his comp is basically like Devin Singletary. Jared Patterson is going to take on a lot of that role too if Antonio Gibson is out. So I might risk it with Patterson because I don't know if Felton really has like that massive of a ceiling because I think Johnson is going to be the dude on early downs at least. But if you want to play it a little bit safer, I think Felton's okay. Yeah, I think that with Felton, he did play two snaps from the backfield on Sunday. Those are the two snaps he's played all year. And that was when Nick Chubb was out. So I think there's potential for him to play a bit in the backfield, but his large role will be as like a playmaker, I would say. Like, I mean, I could fantasize about having like a Cordero Patterson type role that's not going to happen. But like, I can like, I can think about it. But I think that I'd agree with you where if you need, need someone, he's probably the guy with like the highest floor in terms of a snap percentage for this week, at least there. But I think Patterson, I'd agree. Given the way Gibson stuff has gone, there's a really good chance that that gets pretty ugly pretty quick. Like if we were to assume that Antonio Gibson was out this week, like right now, we had that information that he was out this week, I think we would both be sitting here saying get Patterson, right? Like, yeah. And so that's why I think that you can, you know, like, let's say that there's like a 75% chance that Gibson's out, I think that that's the right risk to take in getting Patterson. I think that's the correct percentage. It's about where I put it personally. Talk to Joseph. We don't usually do start sick questions here on Tuesday. So just keep that in mind because it's too far out. We don't really know how things play. But some of these guys could be on waivers, JJ. So if we're looking for bi-week fillings, Rashad Bateman's was in your was Rashad Bateman was into 15 transactions to this week. Is he a guy you're looking to if you are in pretty desperate need of a bi-week fill in? Yeah, I think I think Rashad Bateman's a really good add this week. If he hasn't been added already, because I talked about him on the show, you know, a couple of weeks ago when it was like questionable that he would be returning from IR. But 22% target share in the Ravens offense, you know, the Ravens, I don't want it to get like, I feel like people think that the Ravens are like past heavy now, because they're doing well through the air, but they're still not. I mean, they're still a bottom five team in past raid. And a lot of the reason that they've been able to be as past heavy as they've been is because the defense hasn't been playing well and they've just not seen like, you know, so many negative game scripts or so many positive game scripts rather to be able to just run the football. And then obviously the running back situation. But yeah, I mean, Bateman is still a good ad. I think that there's a non-zero chance that Bateman just ends up being the team's wide receiver one by the end of the year. So he's a good ad. You know, Ron Del Moore is still interesting. He gets Houston this week. So, you know, that's a matchup that you can definitely exploit. Robbie Anderson is still interesting too. I mean, if, you know, to me, so Robbie Anderson was in my was in 15 transactions this week as a hold. And the reason I say that is because over the last three weeks, if you look at the first three weeks versus the last three weeks, Anderson's target share has gone from like 10% to 20. I mean, he's, he's seeing a fairly hefty target share in the Carolina offense. He just isn't converting and he's not getting that because McCaffrey is out, which will still be the case this week. And Terrace Marshall got a concussion too. And so, you know, there's, there's, there are issues going on with the past catchers in Carolina where I think that he's even viable in a fairly decent matchup against the Giants. Even, you know, Darnell Mooney is viable this week, you know, against Tampa Bay. I think Darnell Mooney is actually pretty good this week. Yeah, we do. In a game where they have to throw against a beat up secondary, I think that's really interesting. Yeah. I mean, I like, I get the Marquez Callaway. It's like, I just, I just don't like investing in the Saints offense right now because they're, they're averaging the fewest targets per game in the league. There's like 22 team targets for them per game. And you know that Alvin Camara is going to see about 20% of those. And it's just, you know, it's sort of a crapshoot as to who's going to see the rest of the looks. And they're also distributing those looks a lot throughout the offense. It's not just going to like one or two guys. So I wouldn't really put him in this group. And then obviously Jalen Waddle did what he did. You know, last week and he gets Atlanta, they should be fighting against Atlanta. So I mean, I don't know who I would start right now, but I at least wanted to throw takes about each of those guys to help make your decision a little bit. Yeah. I think that I think that with the Saints, if the team doesn't trust the quarterback, we probably shouldn't trust the quarterback either. I like the passing game. And I think that's what Sean Payton is telling us right now. Of that group though, of that group, I will say, I think the safest option right now on Tuesday is Jalen Waddle. Like I just think that he's a, because he's going to see a ton of volume. You get Atlanta. The pass catchers are still banged up for what we know right now on Tuesday. I mean, if he's going to see the same type of share that he saw on Sunday, then I'm going to, I would rather invest in because think of it this way too. I would say that Waddle and Mooney probably project to have a similar target share in week seven, but I'm just going to invest a little bit more probably and feel a little bit better about the passing attack for Miami than in Chicago. Joseph, you're better off than a lot of people right now is what I'd say. I think that you're actually okay. Those are fine options. Yeah. Right. Let's talk to the commission. So the options here are to add Jared Patterson or Devonte Freeman on waivers or trade Oda Beckham for AJ Dylan. What would be your view of those two scenarios there, JJ? I would first see if I could get Patterson. The thing is the trade for Oda Beckham for AJ Dylan is not a bad trade. I don't really think it's that bad of a trade because AJ Dylan right now is probably an RB three, probably like a flex play, like he's fine enough, especially during bi weeks. But then on top of that, you get the upside of, if Aaron Jones were to get hurt, knock on wood, AJ Dylan's a full blown, probably low end RB one, high end RB two and fantasy. So don't think of AJ Dylan as only that RB three flex type play. And Oda Beckham's not doing anything. And they have a quarterback right now who's very, very injured. And so the offense in general is just hard to get behind. So if you want to trade OBJ for AJ Dylan, if you need running back depth, or if you feel like you need to take on some running backs, I think that's fine. But I would go after Patterson over Freeman, I think on the waiver wire this week. And with AJ Dylan too, this week specifically, it's a script that fits up well for him based on the way they used him in the Steelers game where they were up big and they used Dylan a bunch. That could be similar to this week too. So this week specifically, Dylan I think does great out pretty well. Let's talk to Luke on YouTube had Dawson knock sounds like he will, he's on by this week and might miss a couple of games after that too due to a broken hand. You like CJ Uzama or Cole, can that better in full PPR? So I'm doing, I have living the stream, one of my podcasts and we give quarterback tight end and defensive recommendations each week. And this week is just so bad. It's terrible. I mean, in both of those tight ends are actually on the tight end list this week. That's how bad it is at the tight end position. I mean, here's the thing, I think commit is probably a little bit more interesting. And I only say that because Uzama is at best the fourth best option in that passing attack. I mean, he's running just as many routes as Tyler Boyd is right now. So that's good. But he's just not seeing, and he's seen a double digit percentage target chair and two of his last three and that's all great and stuff. But let's be honest, he's only been viable because he's found the end zone. Whereas I think it's just intriguing. It's at least, you know, you already mentioned it, but it's a little bit intriguing to see what Chicago's offense does against Tampa Bay because Chicago has been so run heavy. They're not throwing the ball that much and they're not getting that many targets within that offense, but you cannot do that against Tampa Bay. Maggie might test you there, but I guess it would be Bill laser, but like still, I'm just smart teams don't run on the box, but I don't want to put that label to every team. You're right. You're right. You're not wrong. But to be, you know, from a data perspective, from a rational coaching perspective, Tampa Bay has allowed the highest pass rate in the league so far this year by pretty significant margin. I mean, I think like 74% of their of their plays against have been through the air, which is just absolutely like ridiculous. So from that perspective, I do think that Justin Fields could actually hit 30 pass attempts this week. And if that happens, you know, it is a, it is a fairly narrow target tree there in Chicago. I mean, it's, it's, so like that's good. You know, that's another reason why I think Alan Robinson is a hold right now because he's still seeing like a 25% target share in that offense. So once, you know, if and when they start to throw the ball a little bit more, Alan Robinson is still my benefit. If he doesn't do anything this week, then maybe you can drop him. But, you know, that all just plays into how I feel about Cole Comet. Do I love him this week? Of course not. It's like impossible to like love Cole Comet. But I do think that he's at least somewhat intriguing. So in games with Bill laser calling plays, Cole Comet has 19% of the team's targets. Darnell Mooney is at 32%. And Alan Robinson is at 24%. If you jack with the volume, that could be pretty fun. Like you said, it's a narrow target tree. So every increase in passing attempts they get matters a bit more. I think that's, that's the key cell for Cole Comet there. Socton Joe, target TY Hilton or Devontae Freeman and PPR. Like now Hilton got some yardage on Sunday, but then got hurt. We haven't gotten on him. It sounds like Paris Campbell, though will miss time. So are you adding TY Hilton over Devontae Freeman right now? Yeah. In a vacuum, you know, if we were to remove injuries, because I don't know what's going on with TY Hilton, or I don't even know if we've gotten an update today on TY Hilton, it sounded like it wasn't that big of a deal, though, the way that they were talking about it. I think even like players were saying that it wasn't that big of a deal. I would go Hilton over Freeman. I just, I don't really want to deal with the, the Ravens backfield. It's like a, last week it was like a one-third split between the guys. And Freeman's not seeing, you know, Latavius Murray has been seeing priority at the goal line. I just don't really care about that backfield and don't want to deal with it. And it's a full PPR league. So I'm going to lean to TY Hilton. Another thing too is if you take out one guy, they're still going to just add in Tyson Williams and like you say, 30% of the snaps. So I don't know if it matters, honestly there. Dr. Raymond, any updates on Kaderious Tony? No, we have the same info as you, but JJ, let's say you're in a roster crunch right now. You got guys on by Kaderious Tony is on your bench. Do you consider dropping him given that it sounds like the injury news is pretty rough, or do you hang on in hopes that he's okay to use him later on this year? I think you have to hold on to him. You know, like Kaderious Tony, you know, the first week we saw him in action against New Orleans, he has a really solid day. And that's his first game action really, you know, in the NFL has a really solid day next week. He goes absolutely berserk against Dallas. And then this past week, he runs four routes and he's targeting on three of them. I mean, Tony has an opportunity to be an actual league winner at the wide receiver position. I don't use that term. I use that term. I don't use that term loosely. Like I think that it gets thrown around way too much in the fantasy football world. But the way Tony was playing, even though there's an extremely small sample size, and even though there were concerns about him as a prospect entering the league, I mean, you can't just give that up. I don't think right now. So even if he's banged up, we'll see how long and obviously if it's like season ending, then you don't want to hold on to him. But, you know, we'll see how long he's banged up for, but I would not be dropping Kaderious Tony. And the good thing Raymond is, although waivers run Tuesday, you can still add guys later on. We'll get clarity on Tony later on this week. So you're not going to get the best pickings off waivers later on, but if it wants to be in season ending, you have to make a move later on. You can still get someone at least. So hopefully that's a comfort there for you. So after a monjot over on YouTube, would you trade away Joe Mixon and Tyler Lockett for Devonte Adams and David Montgomery in 12 person PPR? I'll do it. Yeah. I mean, look, like, like, like break trades down like this. Like, I try to think about like the different pieces in the trade and who the better player player is within that trade. Joe Mixon versus Devonte Adams. Those are the two best players on either side, right? Devonte Adams is the best player in the trade period. Devonte Adams is way, way, I mean, he's one of the best fantasy football assets out there. I like Joe Mixon. Don't get me wrong, but Mixon's more of like a low end RB one, maybe even a high end RB two when Samaj P Rine is healthy. Tyler Lockett with Gino Smith and not Russell Wilson. And look, I've said this, and we might have talked about this last week, but I'm legit concerned that Russell Wilson doesn't play again this year because why would two and four, I think now, right? Right. I mean, like, we have to be realistic about this, that there's no reason for them to throw Russell Wilson on the field if they're statistically out of the playoffs, right? And so if that happens and Tyler Lockett's even, I mean, he's just not going to be a viable fantasy asset. And then David Montgomery, he'll be back eventually and he's, I would write, I mean, lock it for Montgomery, give me Montgomery Devonte for Joe Mixon, give me Devonte. Yeah, I would agree with that 100%. Let's talk to Moe. Would you drop Corey Davis or Jacoby Myers in half PPR for any of the streaming running backs this week, like Dyrannis Johnson, Rashad Penny, et cetera? Those guys have roles, which makes it tough for me to drop them. But it's possible that they're just the lowest guys in the bench from Moe. So would you drop them for a running back this week? Yeah, I think I would. I mean, number one, I think in a vacuum, I would not. But if you really need a running back, if you need to take a chance, if you're in a shallower league where these guys are like your wide receiver five, six, seven or something like that, I think I would drop Myers over Davis, like before Davis, right? So Myers would be the guy that I would let go. You know, if you look at their peripherals, similar-ish target shares in their offenses, but Jacoby Myers doesn't score touchdowns. So that's Corey Davis' quarterback throws downfield. Yeah, right. I mean, like, that's really the bottom line is that you have an aggressive quarterback, negative game scripts too for the Jets. They're probably going to end up seeing a little bit more passing volume. So I would go Corey Davis over Jacoby Myers. I don't know if I would add Johnson for Myers. It just depends on what I would need for this particular week. So let's go here to truly epic on YouTube. How do you think about Hunter Henry or do we pick up Dallas Goddard at tight end? I'm surprised Goddard's available. I guess it's probably because he was on the COVID list this past week, but now he's back. There's no Zach Ertz. So who do you prefer, Dallas Goddard going forward or Hunter Henry? Got to be Dallas Goddard, right? I mean, Zach Ertz, we've talked about this on the show in the past, but you know, Zach Ertz, when he was active with Hunter Henry, with Dallas Goddard last year, Goddard was not very good in fantasy football. And we saw that this year. Goddard has not been very good in fantasy football when Zach Ertz has been healthy, which is the season. And so with without Zach Ertz last year, Dallas Goddard saw almost all of his top 12 performances. So I think Goddard's going to see a pretty big uptake in Target share. He might end up seeing like a 17, 18% target share in the offense. And you know, the offense may be a little bit more appealing to me in general, not not like a lot more appealing, but it may be a little bit more. But I'll go, I'll go Goddard over Hunter Henry. Henry's at least fine. But I think I'd rather take a swing on the ambiguity with Goddard and go there. Like we know what Hunter Henry is, there's more unknown with Goddard in a good way. That's why I phrase that. Let's talk to the large ism. Have PPR, would you drop Latavius for dearness Johnson? I'm Ron Burgundy. I will go, I will, I will say no. And the main reason is I think, I mean, I know that I just pooped on the Ravens backfield, but, you know, Latavius is still sort of like the one A in their offense anyway, and it's a better offense in general. And dearness Johnson may only see this week as like this lead back. So probably hold on to Latavius, Marty. Okay. Radarad is asking, should we add Khalif Raymond or Brian Edwards? Edwards is not allowed to get targets before the fourth quarter. So you should keep that in mind. Khalif Raymond at least getting work, but in a really bad offense. So preference here between these two? I don't know if I really have one. I'm not, you know, the thing with the line, I think of the, of the Lions pass catchers right now, I'd rather have Amon Ross, St. Brown, if he's out there. And I would assume that St. Brown is out there in a league where you're talking, you know, just in most leagues in this league. So I would probably want Amon Ross, St. Brown over both of them. I might just go with Brian Edwards over Raymond, but I don't think either of these guys are going to be relevant enough. And like, I would rather throw darts at other players that have more upside than both of these players. Like a Rashad Bateman type, you add them over them every single day. Yeah. I mean, even, even though like you, you could even think of it as like a, you know, I would rather have Van Jefferson over these guys, not just because, you know, I think both of these players might project to be just as good as Van Jefferson, but you have to think about what happens with an injury. And Van Jefferson, all of a sudden would become probably like a wide receiver three, if something happened to Cooper Cooper, Robert Woods. So you have to think about that when you're dealing with guys on your bench. Absolutely. Let's talk to Milo. Should I bid for David Johnson? I assume this is probably not Deontay. Oh, Deornis. Okay. Wow. Deornis Johnson. Way too many. Deornis Johnson started over Javante or Stevenson. So like we know Nick Chubbs out, where do you view Deornis Johnson relative to those guys? Let's say you've got small bench spots, don't have a lot of space to add dudes you might not use. Would you likely be using them over those two guys? I think that you can definitely use them over Stevenson. And I only say that because, you know, Stevenson's still not going to see the early downwork. We did see him run the most routes in New England's offense this past week. I want to see that in the backfield, I should say. I want to see that continue for me to feel confident starting Stevenson. You know, it could just be a blip in the radar and just something that is just not going to happen consistently. But there's the best target share that a New England running back has seen since James White's been active. So that's something. And I think Stevenson's a good running back too. So I would try to still roster him. And I think that I would still just start Javante over a guy like Johnson. So, yeah, you can bid on him if you have the space. And then I would play, you know, I would rank them this week, probably Javante, Deornis, then Stevenson. And remember, I think Melvin Gordon's a little bit banged up too right now. So that could play into Javante, maybe seeing a little bit more work. Yeah, they've been holding Melvin out like every Wednesday. It hasn't led to changes yet, but like at some point it could. And that's something to keep in mind there. The commission, would you hold Jerry Judy and Michael Thomas? Should I try shipping them the next few weeks? They do have Steady Lam, Jamar Chase, no doubt Beckham. So good receivers. I think that Odell, you probably might be starting Jerry Judy over Odell at some point. This based on the way things have gone there. So I feel like I'd be trying to hang on to Judy and Thomas there despite having good receiver depth. What about for you? Yeah, look, I mean, I think that you got to hold on to them. Am I optimistic about Michael Thomas? Not really. Am I optimistic about Jerry Judy? Yes. I love Jerry Judy. I think Jerry Judy is very good and there is going to be a role for him when he's healthy pretty immediately. And so I mean, yeah, I think Judy is going to step in and be a potential like wide receiver too in fantasy football. Michael Thomas, if you can sell on name brand, I'd say that's fine enough to try to do because like we talked about earlier, this New Orleans offense is just not generating that much volume. And I don't think that's going to dramatically change when Michael Thomas is back. I'd agree with that as well. Let's talk to the bathroom on YouTube. I need to sacrifice a player sounds dramatic to navigate the buy weeks. Are Leviska Chinalt or Devin Singletary dropple? Leviska is on buy this week. Singletary actually also on buy and losing work to Zach Moss. Would you drop those guys to fill in for this week? I mean, yeah, you got to drop. I mean, yeah, I think both of them in a league that seems fairly normal slash maybe a little bit shallow. I think that both guys are fine enough to drop in like a 10 or 12 team league, which one would I rather drop? If it's a, let's say if it's a PPR league, let's go Leviska. If not, or if it's not, you know, if it's not PPR league, go Leviska. If it is a PPR league, maybe go Singletary. Okay, let's talk to Wormlips. Weird. Anyway, I was trying to try to mild Sanders all last week. Wasn't able to, but now Torrent's reading the 15 transactions week. There was another question on mild Sanders later on too. So just if people didn't listen or read, what was your justification behind trying to hold on to mild Sanders or potentially even add him right now? Yeah, look, I think that this is like one of the best buy low moments that you're going to find for a player in general. Because if you, you know, rarely do you get like the masses all coming together and being like, this dude sucks and not really this dude sucks, but more so like this coaching staff sucks. This workload sucks. This is awful. And so, you know, you have this general sentiment around mild Sanders as being a bad fantasy asset, which isn't that wrong given how he's produced, but look at what's going on over the last two weeks. He's seen a massive rise in running back rush share, seen a rise in tar share is 10% to 15%. His running back rush share has been like 92% after being like two thirds, like 66, 67%. They're utilizing him more. It's just that over the last two weeks, they played Tampa Bay and Carolina and those are two of the best rush defenses in the league or teams at defending the running back position. And so that could be playing into why mild Sanders didn't really produce. And the teams also, I mean, Philadelphia also, especially against Tampa Bay, they didn't really go and teams don't do this. They don't go with this very like run heavy approach because of the Buccaneers and they can stop the run so well. So, you know, with mild Sanders, I think that right now is the perfect time to buy because you could realistically give away bench players to get mild Sanders. Right. And Sanders, like he's getting passing game work too. He had four targets last week, five weeks before that, three, four, two, five. I think we just kind of got a little over our skis on Kenneth Gainwell. I think was the, what basically would happen there. Moe is trying to acquire mild Sanders for Jerry or trying to trade Jerry Judy for mild Sanders. We talked about liking Judy. Is that too much to give up for Sanders or is that fair to you? I mean, I think it's like fair enough, but I think that you can probably give away something a little bit less. Like I think that like the line, realistically, you should try to give up like someone like a manual Sanders for mild Sanders. Like those types of pieces because I think Jerry Judy has like a crazy good ceiling, whereas like I like many Sanders is great. I mean, I've been talking about him all year long, but like we have to be realistic about, you know, what his ceiling looks like and all that kind of stuff, whereas Judy could just like dominate. So, you know, I don't think you need to even start that high because I think that a lot of people who have mild Sanders are extremely frustrated with mild Sanders and they're willing to give him away for not a lot. I think part of the reason we've soured on Teddy is that he hasn't had pass catchers, but Jerry Judy coming back should improve Teddy. So I think that people are souring the Broncos passing offense because Teddy hasn't played well, but he'll play better once Jerry Judy is back. Sock to Fanta on YouTube, help guys. Panthers, defense or Cardinals rest the way. We don't tend to roster defenses for the full year because it's heavily matchup based and stuff like that. Cardinals have a dream matchup in week number seven. So I feel like what I'd be doing here is just use the Cardinals this week and then go from there. Is that what you would be doing as well? Yeah. I mean, if people aren't streaming defenses, I would highly advise streaming defenses where you play different defense every week. But if I'm going to pick one between the Panthers and the Cardinals, I'm going to go with the Cardinals because I think that the defense is going to play with more positive game scripts than Carolina. Yeah, I'd agree with that. Sock to Matt. He has to drop one or shot Bateman or Ty Hilton. Probably dropping Hilton here, right? Yeah, dropping Hilton. Okay. Let's talk to Terry. Who do you like better between Miles Sanders or Elijah Mitchell? Mitchell coming off by week, kind of fun, kind of into Elijah Mitchell. But as we said, Miles Sanders still doing stuff. How would you feel about those two relative to each other? Here's my, here's a small fear I have with Elijah Mitchell. There's two things. There's actually a few things. So number one, if you look at the schedules rest of season, San Francisco's from a running back perspective looks a lot worse than Philly's does. That's something. It's not everything, but it's at least something. One of the things, one of the reasons why I do like Miles Sanders is a buy also is because their rest of season schedule is really good. It's looking pretty strong. So that's one reason so that's that's one point for Miles Sanders. The other thing that I'm a little bit worried about is your Michael Hasty eventually coming back and Jeffrey Wilson Jr. And Jeffrey Wilson Jr. of course. So you have Wilson, Wilson, I would be worried about goal line work because that's basically what he did last season. And I think the year before that. So you have Jeff Wilson could take goal line work to Michael Hasty before he got hurt was playing the third down and past catching role for the, for the 49ers. So that's not good. I mean, Miles Sanders has more of that like three down workforce potential than Elijah Mitchell does. And then on top of that, you know, eventually San Francisco might be forced to go to train Lance and that might seem like a good thing, but I've done studies on rookie quarterbacks and mobile quarterbacks. And it's not good for the running backs or the past catchers on those teams because those mobile quarterbacks take more volume up in that offense and are a bigger, you know, take a bigger share of that offense for themselves. So do I, I don't mind Elijah Mitchell from here on out. Don't get me wrong. I think he's a really good prospect. He, you know, we've talked about this. He's like a most dirt clone and then often, so obviously Kyle Shanahan likes him, but I think Miles Sanders is the play there. I would rather have Sanders and Elijah Mitchell. I think I would too. Again, like you said, I like Elijah Mitchell, but it's worthwhile to keep that in mind, especially because like we want targets, we want goal line work. And if he loses both those, that's a, that's like an Amir Abdulla a couple of years ago situation, which we don't want for fantasy at all. Milo is asking to a tongue of a low over Taylor Heinecke this week to his face in the Falcons. Heinecke gets the Packers is a big underdog on the road. Yeah, I'd go to a, I don't mind to this week. To have had really bad moments on Sunday, but he also was decent despite having nobody. So like, don't let the bad moments scare you off of to a there. Daniel is asking a quick one. You're just an overview of your priorities on waivers between Dearness Johnson, Rashad Penny, Jared Patterson and Demetric Felton. How would you rank out those guys in a vacuum? So I would take the way they're listed there, and I would flip Patterson and Penny, I think. Okay, perfect. So Dearness Johnson, Jared Patterson, Rashad Penny and Demetric Felton. That is all that we have here for today on this waiver wire Q&A as mentioned that we've got a lot of shows coming up later on this week. We have Tom Vecchio with NBA DFS tomorrow at 4pm. We have the Thursday football previous Brandon Cadulla on Thursday. And then of course the snake draft with myself, JJ and Brandon on Friday. So make sure you are subscribed to the Fando YouTube, Twitch and Twitter pages, Facebook as well, once that is back up and running. JJ, appreciate the time. Good luck to you with your week seven waivers. Talk to you once again on Friday. Thanks, Jim. Appreciate it, man. Check out JJ on Twitter at later on QB. Check out the podcast or the later on podcast, wherever you get your podcast. I am at Jim Sonos on Twitter, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to Joy Affleck, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Joy, as always. And thank you to everyone for tuning in. Good luck to you with waivers. Good luck with bi-weeks this week. We'll talk to you once again next week on the waiver wire Q&A.