 Super wild card weekend is wrapping up tonight with the Rams versus the Cardinals. We are here to break it down from a DFS and betting perspective and get you set for what should be a fun wrap up to a good week of football. This is the FanDuel Live Q&A. That's right here on the FanDuel, YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com. Joined here today by Josh Fuster. You can find him on Twitter at FYF Josh and of course a front yard fantasy. You've seen him here on the FanDuel YouTube page. Previously, he is in for Ryan Lancer today because Ryan's going to a basketball game. So Ryan, good reason not to be here. Excited to have Ryan back on with us in the very near future. But Josh, first of all, welcome to the show. How are you doing today? Oh, I'm happy to be here. Oh, Ryan, have a great time at your basketball game. Enjoy your time off. I'm happy. I could be here talking about tonight's game and really like you said, I hope it's a good one. We had a couple of good games this past week over the weekend, but I'm still, I need more. I need more again. I would like more because like the Saturday night game was dull. I mean, it was exciting to watch the bills like blow up because like, you know, I've lived near Buffalo-ish. So like, you know, it's fun to watch people get excited about that. It's fun to watch Tom Brady still doing Tom Brady stuff at his age. And like, you know, my home's doing my home stuff. That's also fun, but I want a close game. I want an exciting game that goes down to the wire. And I think that we could get that for today with the Rams versus the Cardinals. So Josh, I'm glad that you're here to talk about what should be a pretty fun game. First of all, I want to hear your initial thoughts here at Rams versus Cardinals for tonight. So I was looking through the Fandalsports book. It looks like the Cardinals are three and a half point underdogs, the Rams are obviously at home. So they're the favorites here. The total is 49 and a half point over under. I think the Rams ended up winning this game, but I think it's going to be a really, really close game. If you, we were talking about a little bit pre-show here, I think the Rams win the game. You make me put a score on the game. I'm going to say 28 to 27. So I think it's going to be a close one. I would take the Cardinals with the points and I would take the over as well here. Okay. Okay. So we're both in the Cardinals side. Cause I did that the Cardinals plus four back on Thursday. So I'm going to ride with that and I'll touch in three and a half. Don't need to anymore. So I think we're good to let that one ride. I think that we're on the same page there. And basically what that means to me is we are both expecting a competitive game on both sides here, which brings us to the daily fantasy side of things and some questions coming in around Cooper cups. Let's start things off. You're talking about the MVP discussion over on Fandall. If you're new to playing Fandall for single game slates, the way things work is you get to pick one player. You think to be the highest growing player in the game. Put that player at your MVP. You get a 1.5x multiplier and no drama is wondering, do you fade cup there? Do you go Kyler? Do you go Matthew Stafford? Do you go with one of the running backs? So Josh, what about you? What is your breakdown of the MVP slot for tonight's game? So it's got, in my opinion, it's got to be either cup Kyler or Stafford. All right. Now you could mess around. You could play Sony Michelle in there. Maybe Zachards, that's too much for me. But for me, for my lineups, it's going to be one of those three guys. And you're asking, do you fade cup? I don't know. All Cooper cup has done this year is produced at a high fantasy level. He's leading the NFL in pretty much every receiving category or stat you could mention. The Cardinals are not necessarily the best passing defense in the lead. Cup is going to be in a ton of lineups. So he's going to have a very high ownership percentage, but it's difficult not to envision him being in the optimal lineup at the end of the day. So in my mind, cup is the safest start in a DFS slate for tonight's game. And I think he belongs in your MVP slot in a lot of leagues. Yeah. And I think that that makes sense. You look at the projections here over at numberfire.com. Cooper cup is the second highest score based on projections, but you can kind of go anyway because they're all three within point three points of each other between Stafford, Cup and Murray. And it does go to what you said where you're sticking mostly to those three guys as your MVP. I think that you mentioned Sony Michelle. I think that's very interesting. Cause I do think that there is some thought to potentially considering Michelle there depending on what you expect the workload distribution to be between him and can make us talk about more about later on. Maybe if James Connor can't go, I think you could consider potentially, you know, rolling out some Chase Edmonds in that slot as well. But we'll talk about the running backs in depth later on. As far as Cooper cup goes, I think the one positive thing here, like you're trying to find a reason not to fade cup. But I think, you know, my primary concern here is I want to find a reason not to the main reason not to is there is some really good value on this slay looking at some lower salary guys. Zachary, it's $9,000. His salary is very low. Tyler Higby is getting good work recently, $8,500. Van, depending on the shoulder, he did pop up on the injured port on Friday. And then was limited again on Saturday at $8,000. A.J. Green may get some more targets here with Jalen Ramsey working in the slot versus Christian Kirk, A.J. Green mentioned him. So I think that you do have some guys down here who are viable. And that to me, Josh says, I can feel comfortable putting in two of these three guys. If I go Kyler and Cup, the two ISR guys in the field, 9,000 left, I'm living in that Earth's range and I'm comfortable with that. So to me, I think that we can easily jam in two out of those three, which to you go with, I don't care, just pick two of those three and go from there. Are you as comfortable with the value as I am, which allows you to jam in two out of those top three guys? I am 100% with you on this one, Jim. I completely agree. I am trying to get two of Kyler, Cup and Stafford. Now, who's gonna be your MVP for this? That's the question. That's kind of the game we're playing here. For me, I'm leaning Cup as my MVP in a lot of my lineups. And I like Stafford over, I mean, I like Kyler Murray over Stafford, even though Kyler Murray's a little bit more expensive. I like Kyler Murray's rushing ability. Like I said, he's a little bit more expensive than Stafford but the biggest question is whether Kyler's ceiling is enough to warrant his actual price tag. Yeah, it's a difficult matchup but I think Kyler has a great floor and a great ceiling. This is the playoffs. Kyler is going to be less concerned about staying healthy and more concerned about just winning this game. So I think he's gonna be running all over the place as well. So I like having Cooper Cup and Kyler Murray. And I think that's the key you mentioned where the playoffs do change things. You saw this with Josh Allen down the stretch during the regular season, he basically became Lamar Jackson effectively from a rushing perspective over the final five games carried over into that Patriots game on Saturday too. We saw this with Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawrence during the college football playoffs back in the day when things matter more, quarterbacks run more and Kyler did run quite a bit in that Dallas game, ran a decent amount against Seattle even though that game was proceeding. They could have still gotten the NSD West. They were trying very hard in that game. But I think the willingness to run should be there for Kyler. So to me, if I've got one single entry lineup I will go Kyler Murray as my MVP with Cooper Cup being the addition there on NoSex. I think that with Van banged up, with Odell's yardage output not being that great, I would expect the usage to be concentrated on a cup for today. So we're looking at those three guys for MVP. Now a question here from Rambo asking if James Connor is out, we don't know yet because he was limited in practice on Saturday. They're finally at practice. Listen to this questionable. Now with the Cardinals, we never get word ahead of time what the status will be. Usually we can like rely on an Adam Shaffter tweet at 1148 Eastern on Saturday night saying, hey, Player X is not gonna play with the Cardinals that is not been the case all year. So I don't think we're gonna know until an actives come out whether or not James Connor will go which is kind of a bummer but also for single game it doesn't matter too much. So we don't know yet Rambo. So I wanna talk to you, Josh. How are you viewing Chase Edmonds if James Connor plays and how are you viewing Chase Edmonds if James Connor sits for tonight? All right, and that's the whole question here. Does James Connor play or not? He didn't practice all week but he got in that limited practice on Saturday. Like you said, it doesn't look more and more likely like he does play if you ask my opinion. I know there's some beat writers and other people coming out and saying it looks like he's gonna play but he's banged up coming into this game regardless. Now Connor's ownership percentage could be really low if he does end up playing and maybe that's a way to find some value. Personally, he makes me nervous. I think there's a world where he could even play and gets a very small workload and Chase Edmonds is really the guy handling the majority of work there. So if Connor doesn't play, I love Chase Edmonds as a player. I really like finding a way to get him in lineups. If Connor does play it lowers my confidence a little bit but I like getting Chase Edmonds in my lineups regardless and I'm a little bit off of Connor personally. Yeah, with Edmonds he can come through even if Connor plays because the passing game work is so good. But I think that if he's out then I think that Chase Edmonds is in like the MVP discussion because the two games that have Connor this year Edmonds 80% snap rate he left with a rib injury in that game that Cowboys game but he was very active before that. 18 carries six targets in that game. The game where he was fully entire time 16 carries, nine targets, 127 yards 57% red zone share. He said 42% in the game against the Cowboys where he left early. So you're getting a featured back and you're getting a featured back for a very low salary. So we talked before about how I want to jam in two out of those top three. The equation shifter for me is if Edmonds is playing without Connor because you can make that work actually I guess so at 80,000 I can make that work. I can get in, you know go with AJ Green and Vanerson like that but I am less stars and scrubsy if we get Chase Edmonds with no James Connor because Edmonds will be pretty close to like a 100% ish roster rate at that point because the workload is so good. So to me, if we get Edmonds with no Connor he is at least a consideration at MVP and he is a borderline lock for an any flex spot. If we get him without Connor he's very much of a, you know a rotational type option not one I go to very often. I want to skew towards that stars and scrubsides type approach but still leasing considerations when I would say Connor, I don't think I would need a lot of stuff to break for me to get on him. So I think we're on the same page with that one there. Yeah, Connor is as much touch on upside as anyone you could name in the NFL when it comes down to it. But man, the only way I could feel good about putting my line up is the coaching staff comes out and they're like Connor's good to go. He's are starting to run it back. You never do. And they won't do that. So what am I even talking about here? Right, right. And the one thing that says Chase Edmunds apart like you've mentioned a couple of times is the targets he's getting. He is so involved in the passing game. He's a great pass catcher. Tyler Murray is going to have to check the ball down a lot in this game because the Rams have a really good defense. So we're on the same page there. Okay, so let's talk about the caliber check downs because most of the check downs have gone to Zach Erz and Christian Kirk ever since the Deandre Hopkins injury. Those guys have massive target shares. Now the one complication here is that Kirk operates a lot from the slot. In the game, they faced the Rams back on, I think it was week four. In that game, he faced Dylan Ramsey on 43% of his routes run. Ramsey did not play in the rematch because he had COVID. So we're probably going to see a lot of Ramsey versus Kirk for tonight. I don't think that makes Kirk a bad option. What it does is it pushes me more towards Erz being the primary pass catcher on this Rams team. $9,000, super low sour. You mentioned you like Zach Erz. Is he your favorite non-Kyler cardinal, assuming that James Conner plays for tonight? He is absolutely my favorite non-Kyler cardinal. A really weird way to phrase that in my part. Yeah, no, he's my favorite play out of all the cardinals receiving options, how about that? There we go. He's getting a ton of targets. He kind of seems like, he's been Kyler Murray's safety blanket, especially the last few weeks without the Deandre Hopkins in there. Over the last five games, Erz has averaged 10 targets per game, six and a half catches per game. He hasn't scored a touchdown in this stretch, but he is getting red zone targets. And maybe that's just something that keeps everyone from selecting him here. And that's part of why his price is a little bit lower. If Zach Erz does find his way into the end zone, I love, he's going to be a great DFS play. I think the Rams can be beaten over the middle of the field. Kyler and Erz, like I said, have developed this awesome chemistry in a very short period of time. I love stacking him with Kyler. Yeah, I do too. I think that he is kind of like Edmunds, where he's a core play for me. $9,000. You mentioned a lot of touchdowns and you cited that there is red zone work. There is a 25% red zone share for Zach Erz in the three games, or four games they played at Deandre Hopkins. Hasn't scored yet, but getting a lot of yardage, 74, 54, 84. So that's going to come back later on. We talked about some props. Just keep that in mind. What are your thoughts on Christian Kergin, AJ Green here on the Cardinal side? Honestly, I'm trying to avoid Christian Kergin, while he probably is the guy that's most guaranteed to have yards for this offense. Like you mentioned, he could be followed by Jaylen Ramsey. When you look at these guys, I am most nervous about Christian Kergin from a Rams perspective on defense. So I'd be probably most concerned about shutting him down, maybe putting Ramsey on him. I would rather play AJ Green at his price point. AJ Green sitting at $8,000 compared to Christian Kergin's $11,000. I would rather play AJ Green than Christian Kergin. Yeah. I mean, with those salaries, because again, we're talking about a start of the scrub type approach. Yes. Kirk doesn't fit that as well as AJ Green does. So I think that's kind of the key driver for me. So I think that we're on the same page there. Erz is the one guy. AJ Green, good value saver there. Let's transition over to the Rams here. DJ is asking about if we want to do a Cooper Cup bet of 100 plus yards and a touchdown. I want to see the odds on that because it does depend if that one's like a boosted. I was looking at his like anytime touchdown, it was like plus 170 or something. For Cooper Cup? Oh, it's minus 165. Okay, so there we go. So minus 165, his yardage probably. Minus 170, I'm sorry. Let's just, let's do a same game, Parley here quickly, really just with Cooper Cup yardage and anytime touchdown. And because it's receiving yardages right around there as well. So we go with that. That is a plus 152. It's not a bad number, DJ. It's not like the best number by any means because one of 3.5 is a good number. That's a very high number. You're cutting a little close, I would say personally. Also DJ is talking trash because Kendrick Bourne went off this weekend. DJ, I didn't celebrate the Kendrick Bourne touchdowns. I celebrated because I don't think about Kendrick Bourne for another couple of months. That was why I was celebrating because the Patriots got dusted. So Kendrick Bourne out of my consciousness for a very long time, I'm celebrating that. And you can celebrate, hope that you benefited from Kendrick Bourne doing well this weekend. Let's go back here to the Rams side of things. And Josh, I want to start things off with the running backs because that's another key decision point here is do you think that Cam Akers' role expands or do we continue to see Sonya Michelle operating as the lead back? I'm asking you because I don't know. So what are your thoughts on this Rams backfield? I don't think anyone knows for sure. Cam Akers, I mean, he just tore his Achilles over the summer coming into the season. And we know that's a pretty serious injury for running backs. Now we did see him in week 17. He got some work, it wasn't a very efficient at all, but he got a couple catches. He got some carries, but I'm mostly trying to avoid Cam Akers in any of my lineups. And honestly, it's incredibly impressive that he's even out there playing. I do believe that Cam Akers talent-wise is the best running back on this team. Hands down, there's no doubt about it, but that's when he's healthy. That's when he's sad, when he's been with the team, when he's been practicing. I don't think he gets the majority of carries or snaps for this backfield with Sonya Michelle playing so well lately. I mean, like Sonya Michelle in his own right, he's been getting targets. He's been looking really good. I think Sonya Michelle, I like playing Sonya Michelle. I'm staying away from Cam Akers. I think Sonya Michelle is guaranteed volume. I think we'll get 15 to 20 carries. And if they're winning the game, he'll get even more. He has, he's getting decent targets, like I said, really making him games grip proof in my opinion. I don't like prioritizing him because I think he's a little expensive, but right. You can beat the Cardinals running the football. Yeah, I think that looking at Michelle last week, you see an 80% snap rate, you see a 39% red zone share. It's important to keep in mind the context because early on in that game, I think it was their first drive, Cam Akers was in there on the goal line. He got a red zone touch. I think he had three total for the game. He got one early. Later in the game, when it became evident that they had to push because they were losing to the 49ers, they shifted things to being more centric around Sonya Michelle. I think that's an indicator what we can expect here. Now, yes, Akers is an additional week of practice, additional week get ramped up. I'm still expecting maybe not an 80% snap rate from Michelle, but I still think we're seeing 75 plus. And that's significant for a guy at $12,000. So that to me does translate to his being interesting for DFS again, not quite the optimal build we want to go with for tonight just because he said $12,000 kind of, there is a pretty high opportunity cost in going with him there because the 7,000, 6,000 value plays, not as appealing as the guys in the 8,000 range. But I do think that among the guys in the mid range, talking about Kirk, Edmunds if Connor plays, I would say Michelle ranks above them. So that's where I'm at there. I think that I do want to get there. I want to talk to you, Josh, though about the secondary Rams receive. So not Cooper cup. What do you think about Odell? If we assume van plays, we're out with him, Higbee, et cetera, et cetera. Any standouts for you relative to salary of those guys? So I kind of lump Odell Beckham and Van Jefferson together a little bit. If Van Jefferson didn't have this injury he was currently dealing with that kind of takes Van Jefferson out of the equation a little bit for me. So I think, but you can kind of define these guys very similarly. They're both big play threats. They're probably not getting more than seven targets in the game, but they both have developed pretty solid chemistry with Matthew Stafford. I think you could say that about both Van Jefferson and Odell Beckham, like I said, I would rather play Odell Beckham even at his current price over Van Jefferson because of the injury. The Cardinals are allowing the third most fantasy point to opposing wide receivers. And they've allowed 27 touchdowns, which is third in the league, I believe. So he's certainly a boomer, bust play, Odell Beckham. But if he does boom, then you're going to be really happy having him in your lineup there. Yeah, I think that I would also probably look at Odell because shoulder injuries matter a lot for receivers. Like, I know Anthony Miller, like he had a really rough year at the Bears a couple of years ago because like his shoulder was like, you know, like he'd get a ton of targets, but it wouldn't matter because he had a rough shoulder. And so like with us not knowing what Van's shoulder injury is, what his actual health is, I think that's a pretty legitimate concern. Otherwise I'd have gone to Van. Kind of, I think what you were saying there, well, like there was no injury. Yeah, exactly. I think I would have gone to Van as well. I can get to Odell. I think the one thing to keep in mind of Odell is that the yard is upside has not been there with the Rams. He's been feasting on touchdowns. He's getting that because he keeps getting targets in the end zone. So like it's not totally fluky, but the yard is upside has not been there. So honestly, I'm okay passing on both and going with the, you know, the more top heavy approach, but I would go Odell over Van even considering salary just because that injury does scare me quite a bit. There's another pass catcher I would play over both of them. Is it Higbee? It is Higbee. Okay, let's party. Talk me into Higbee. He's really more of a salary saving option compared to Odell Beckham. Like I said, I would have liked Van Jefferson a lot more. I think we both would have if he's healthy right now, but he's not. Now a lot of people are hate Higbee. I'm gonna be honest with you. Just living in the fantasy community, people dislike Higbee a lot, including you, it looks like. I lost a lot of money on this guy earlier on this year. I loved him then. He's been playing pretty well. He's been getting solid targets. He could very easily find his way into the end zone in this game. At most he's getting six or seven targets probably. He's a lower ceiling, but I think he has a pretty solid floor. And like I said, he has just a good opportunity to get a touchdown as a lot of these other guys. I like playing Higbee at his price point over Odell Beckham. So if you look at the games they've played with Higbee since they're by, so since Odell became a full-time player, he's at an 18.9% target share that's actually third of the team behind Cup and Beckham. It's right behind Beckham. So I think that I'd agree that you were like, the separation between Beckham and Higbee in reality is not as big as separation of their salaries. So like if you're looking at things from a production per dollar perspective, Higbee is a better option. And I'd agree with you. Like as much as he burned me earlier on this year, I can overlook that. I just got annoyed every time I got a touchdown last week. I was like, I had so many stupid Rand stacks and this guy is giving me the double barrel middle fingers in week 18. Just reminding me that this is what he could have done back in week three or whatever it was against the seed, I don't know, whatever it was, but like the bucks of that time, but just not my favorite, but I'm going to go there regardless. Do you get a question? I also think he is going to be a lot less rostered than Odell Beckham. I would agree with that too. I'd agree with that. I think you convinced Jay, because Jay says Josh is a legend. So you've sold Jay. I think this is during the Odell discussion, but I'm going to pretend it was on the Higbee distribution and that you sold Jay as being a Higbee guy for tonight. I do not make me the Higbee guy either. I am definitely not a Higbee guy, but I think he has some upside here. I think he has some upside. You can be the Higbee guy if he does well tonight. If he doesn't do well, we're not going to tell you to that. I love that. Let's negotiate that. Okay. Rambo is asking about kickers. We got Matt Gay and Matt Prater here. I think Rambo, what this depends on is the way you see the game flowing. Like if you think the Rams win, go gay. If you think that the Cardinals win, go Prater. That's kind of just the way it works. Also consider the way they operate with quarterbacks because if you have Kyler Murray at MVP, that implies you think Kyler's scoring touchdowns. If they're scoring touchdowns, they're not kicking field goals. So keep that in mind too. Quarterback and kicker, don't mesh that well and consider which team you think will win. So like if you go cup at MVP, then I'm totally okay pairing him with Matt Gay under the assumption that the Rams are ahead and stuff like that. Those are my thoughts on kicker. Do you have any different way you view things there, Josh? No, I'm right there with you. I completely agree. If I had to choose one of these guys, I know Matt Gay is a little bit more expensive, but it would certainly be him. Yeah, I'd agree with that too. Okay, so we've gotten consensus that you were the Higby guy. No, I'm not the Higby guy. Congratulations to you, Josh. Now he's going to blow up. They have overridden our agreement we had in place here. So you're just the Higby guy regardless. Sorry or congrats. I have the people saying it now, oh no. I'm saying sorry or congrats, you decide. He's going to blow up tonight and I'm going to look like a genius, so I'll take it. You just love Higby, you know? We got all the frontier people in here making sure that it's known that Josh loves Higby. Let's slide over here to the Fandall Sportsbook and check out some props. Yeah, exactly. Let's check out some props for tonight. I want to hear you first, Josh. Anything standing out to you over a Fandall Sportsbook? Any value you've seen that you want to touch on for today? Yeah, so I personally think this is going to be a quarterback display. I think the quarterbacks are going to be on display this game. I am feeling really good about both the passing yard lines for both Kyler Murray and Matthew Stafford. Kyler Murray, when I checked right before the show, he was at 255 and a half. And I'm taking you over there. He's averaged over 270 passing yards per game when he's been playing. I know the Rams have a very good passing defense. There's no doubt about that. Kyler just threw 383 passing yards when he played the Rams a week 14. Kyler threw 268 passing yards when he played the Rams a week four. Both of those numbers are above 255 and a half. So I'm taking you over here personally. And then I'm also taking you over with Matthew Stafford's passing yards. I think it's going to be a passing showdown. Matthew Stafford's a little bit higher, 274 and a half. But I'm still taking you over. He averages 287 passing yards per game this season. And again, the two games he played the Arizona Cardinals, he got over 274 and a half. Okay, so we're going over with both Kyler and Stafford. I'm hoping the Kyler one hits. Because if Kyler goes over, that implies there's a good chance that Zacharitz goes over. His receiving prop is 54 and a half. That has actually gone up about five yards from what it was when I looked before. I am less enticed by it right now because that number has shown up. Yeah, it was lower, I will say that for sure. So maybe we're going to look again. He's projected to be the leading receiving yards as a leader for the Cardinals, it looks like. Yeah, let's see what the yardage is here. They've got a number of fires at 49. Maybe the value's gone. Okay, so I wasn't going to talk about birds. We're going to Audible. We're going to pull a Cowboys punt team unit here and pull an Audible. We need greens at 46, you know, that's kind of tough. I can't quite get to Kirk. I'm just going to avoid the yardage prop all together. We're just going to say no to that and go over to the rushing props and check out Sonya Michelle. It's rushing plus receiving yardage number with 68 and a half, it is still there. Thank you. Okay, we're good. The 68 and a half number I think is very fair. Last week, the yardage is not there for Michelle and the production was not there. This goes back to what we discussed earlier, Josh, where I think that Michelle will still be the lead back for this team, despite the fact Acres has an additional week being back now. Acres, his yardage prop was 28 and a half. It has come down to 26 and a half. So clearly the sentiment on Acres is souring. That has not translated yet to Michelle's rushing plus receiving yardage going up. So I think 68 and a half, I will take the over on that and it's a very fair number and ride with that. What are your thoughts? Do you think that's a little too high? Are you okay with this number right now? No, I actually love that. I love that. I'm going to make that bet. Okay, so thank you for pointing that one out to me. I like sending Michelle 68 and a half because I completely agree with you. I don't think K-Makers is going to be the guy this game. I don't think he's going to be the guy this year personally. Going into next season though, he will be, but that's not what we're talking about here. Sonya Michelle is the guy right now and he's going to continue to be for this game. I truly believe that. I'll take it. You've also been tied to Rondale Moore. So... What? No, the Rondale Moore guy. The happy guy and the Rondale Moore guy. Rondale Moore's yardage prop is 16 and a half. That might still be too high given that he needs roughly six targets. Yeah, he might not play, needs about six targets to get 16 and a half yards typically. So much as I love Rondale Moore, watching him shred my team in college, not quite going to get there for tonight. He just does so much at the beginning of the year. He had one, it was really just one big blow-up game where he was highly targeted and he kind of disappeared after that. But I love the guy's talent, but you're right. He's going to get a lot of, if he does get targets, they're going to be very close to the line of scrimmage. So you're right, he's going to need a lot of targets to succeed. We need Rondale Freed next year. I'll slip Cliff at 20, and we'll see if we can get him on the field a bit more next year. DJ, how's the Cam Acres line make you feel real fast? 26 and a half for Cam Acres. I know it's lowered. Do you think he can reach that, even getting 20% of the snaps, let's say? I'm either a stay away or under. I'm definitely not going over that number. I completely agree. The way I think about it is, if I'm getting exposure to being low on earths, or sorry, low on, I had the, sorry. If I'm getting away to be low on Acres, I'm getting it via the Michelle over versus the Acres under personally. So I think that's the way I think about it for me personally. Are you leaning towards the under on Acres? I am leaning towards the under on Acres, but I completely agree with you. If I'm going to fade it, I'm going to fade it betting on Michelle. Okay, final thought here, question from DJ. Would you fade earths? Sentence comes under the assumption that earths is low rostered. And I think that's a fair assumption, DJ. I think that's probably, or sorry, heavily rostered. I think that the fair assumption because the salary is 9,000, that's very low for a guy getting a 25% target share over the past four games. So I think that DJ's assumption here is correct. That earths winds up being pretty popular. For me personally, maybe it increased the incentive to go Higby over earths. Maybe you just go both, et cetera, et cetera. Maybe you go AJ Green as being the route. I think it's a consideration, DJ. I am not actively looking to fade him, though, because I think he's objectively under-salaried. That's where I'm at with earths. Josh, what about for you? You summed it up perfectly. Earths is under-salaried. He's got a really good price point, and that's why he's going to be heavily rostered. I like the point you made about maybe playing Higby over him, because while I would rather play earths, I think earths is going to have a better game than Higby. Higby, I do not believe is going to be very high of rostered. Sure, yeah, I like that kind of pivot. Double tight ends, baby. Let's just go both, you know? It's been working pretty well. The tight ends have been hot this week. That's right. Let's keep it going with your guy Higby plus earths. Josh's guy Higby. Got to remind you. The end scores for Higby regardless. After he scores his third touchdown, Josh, be sure to take a victory lap on Twitter. After the third touchdown, the second one hold off, and they put it everywhere. After the third touchdown, though, well deserved victory lap. I'll play it cool. I'll play it cool. Yeah, act like you've been there before, exactly. That is all that we have here. Yeah, yeah, exactly. The victory lap's got to come. That is all that we have here for today on the FanDuel Live Q&A. Josh, I want to say thank you to you for swinging by and joining me here. Filling in for Ryan. Find Josh on Twitter at FYF Josh and check out all the front yard fantasy guys here on the FanDuel YouTube page. Josh, enjoy the game tonight. Enjoy Zach Earths' second touchdown just as much as his first. And hopefully we'll talk to you again here soon. Thank you for having me, Jim. This was a lot of fun. Josh Higbee has been, you've been renamed. So congratulations. Josh Higbee. Josh Higbee, there we go. I'm on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to everyone for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your DFS lineups, with your bets, and just enjoy what should be a good football game for tonight. We'll talk to you once again soon. This has been the FanDuel Live Q&A.