 You have also done a lot of research on SDH and subtitling for The Dev and the Heart of Hearing. It is the one particular favourite study that you would like to tell us about. Oh Jesus, this is again a very deep rabbit hole that we could talk about for hours, but... One piece of interesting research I did was on music, how to convey music in subtitles for The Dev and Heart of Hearing. And again, it boils down to my education as a film, my PhD in film studies, because you need to realise what role music plays in a scene, and then you have these options how to convey it. Maybe you can skip it, maybe you can highlight the mood, let's say in a romantic jazz music, or for instance soft instrumental jazz, something like that. Or maybe you need to specify that it's a particular piece, like I don't know, a national anthem, or think of Imagine by John Lennon, which is an anthem of the hippies and the hippie movement. There are a lot of associations people have with the song and the lyrics are specific. It's all very utopian, very idealistic. Maybe it's important to convey that from the point of the scene. Is there one particular conclusion from that research you can share with us? Yeah, one maybe surprising conclusion is that you can very often skip the information on music, because if the music is very often there in a movie to kind of crank the scene a little bit. If it's a loft scene, you'll usually have romantic music. If it's an intense scene, you'll have some intense music if necessary. If it's a sad scene, you can see the person crying, for instance, the music will be chosen accordingly. And you can very often skip it, because it adds nothing to the scene. We, as subtitles, we learn that you should omit things that are repeated, because they introduce nothing into the story, they just divert the attention. We know from eye tracking studies that whenever a viewer watches a material, they look at the faces, they look at the action, where the action is. And when a subtitle appears, they kind of stop watching the material to read the sub. And if there's something in the sub that's unimportant, irrelevant, skippable, you can skip it because the information is there on the screen. The deaf people who use the sign language are very good at mimics, by the way, because sign language is not only signs, but it's also mimics. For instance, in Polish sign language, this is angry. But you often sign it this way. So there's mimics there. I'm angry. It's not just angry. You can see I'm angry from my face. So you don't necessarily need to add something that's pretty obvious. You can skip it. And that's okay. The viewers will know. And I think there haven't been any tests, but I think that deaf people who sign are even better at reading emotion than we are because it's a common form of communication. It's a part of their language. So you can skip that if you want to. That's not necessarily bad. I think subtitles are cluttered with subtitles for the deaf are cluttered with descriptions of music that are that do not include any new information and that could be skipped. Obviously, we are not talking about other uses of music like when music is used creatively. You have a brutal scene, but the music is playful, for instance. It's a dark comedy, for instance. And you know that the joke is there in the choice of the music. Or for instance, music can signal the place all of a sudden. We moved to China in the story. And you can hear these Chinese bells, these kind of that already make you think of China, for instance. So music can be used to mark a place, for instance. So in such cases, music should be there. But if it's just for mood, usually mood is there on the screen. And that's enough.