 But maybe Harold, maybe you talked a bit about backup power. I know it's something that one of the very first products that I've worked on as a baby lawyer in 2005 when I started a law firm was the Burkane Katrina panel. I sort of volunteered to help out there on the law firm side. Backup power out there was a big deal coming out of that panel and that recommendation. Understanding the public interest goals, what maybe some of the legal challenges as well, but what are some of the practical challenges that you sort of say, yeah, the other side, there are some practical challenges too, but they're overcomable for these reasons. Thanks for walking through some of that. Well, yes, and I do think these challenges are overcomable, but if we're going to have real network resilience and we have to recognize it, the first I want to mention is the diesel fuel access and also diesel fuel storage, particularly in environmentally sensitive areas or potentially in isolated and hard to recover areas. There are a lot of places where we don't want to put the three days worth of diesel fuel for a generator because we're worried about it, it gets into the ground corner. There are, however, a lot of issues in prioritization by which I mean, when we have a limited resource like fuel in a disaster area, how do we prioritize maintaining power to the communications grid and the elements of the communications grid? I think that is something that the GAO has recently said, FEMA has not paid sufficient attention to and I've heard stories in the past of essentially people hijacking fuel that was down for communications, power generators being taken to other purposes. Finally, I do want to stress power in the home and the FCC has not looked at this since 2015 order. At that time, there was an expectation that commercial carriers that were offering non-powered systems, which are all voice over IP systems, were moving to systems that could use commercial batteries rather than the large and expensive batteries that generally only provide two hours worth of time. There was a consensus that it was supposed to be a phase in from the current rule, which only requires carriers to offer, at the point of sale, a backup power system that would be good for eight hours to something where at least an eight hour, ideally 24 hour backup power system would become mandatory. The need for this has increased. We've heard from some of the panelists about commercial communications impossible and this is a very real problem. It's going to be tough to solve, but it's one that we absolutely have to solve for the modern communications. Sorry, final final follow three on that point. What do you, when we first started discussing this, kick it back because of the bot, it was very much a macro network system still, right? Now we got the small sell built in, layering, the different approaches. Your view, I assume, is we need to take that into account in the sense that macro sites could have more robust backup power, small sales or whatnot just from physical capacity or just the need for them to stay up relative to the mac which is different as your view that we should get a gradient type approach? Well, I think there's a lot of room here for new thinking. For example, ATSC 3.0 is coming in and for broadcasters maintain their own generation and have a significant power it may be that we should look at how ATSC 3.0 spectrum can be used to help supplement when power is down on cell towers or on micro cells. We should, one of the beauties of our modern, a lot of different options. And instead of, and everyone for themselves, kind of mentality or and everybody is responsible for themselves mentality. We should be thinking of this as one the communications grid in the geographic area where we can shift communications depending on where power is available. Yeah, a lot of that makes sense to me. I've been sort of the big...