 to the basis of the search at this time. There are, however, certain points I want you to know. First, I personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. Second, the department does not take such a decision lightly. Where possible, it is standard practice to seek less intrusive means as an alternative to a search and to narrowly scope any search that is undertaken. Third, let me address recent unfounded attacks on the professionalism of the FBI and Justice Department agents and prosecutors. I will not stand by silently when their integrity is unfairly attacked. The men and women in the FBI and Justice Department are dedicated patriotic public servants. Every day, they protect the American people from violent crime, terrorism, and other threats to their safety while safeguarding our civil rights. They do so at great personal sacrifice and risk to themselves. I am honored to work alongside them. This is all I can say right now. More information will be made available in the appropriate way and at the appropriate time. Thank you. He's a... fuck you dude. Fuck you. Unreal. Not even gonna take freaking questions. Hold on guys. That's all. It was like two minutes long, literally. What in the world? All right, well, how are you all doing? I was planning on sitting through this and talking about it, but it's over, I guess. All right, well, so he basically just got up there and said, let me see if I can replay it. No, I can't replay it. There wasn't... there's not really much to replay. All he said was that, oh, we take this very seriously and we wouldn't have done it unless it was very serious. And how dare you attack our FBI who had, you know, there's no reason to attack that. Literally right now, there is a whistleblower out there alleging that the FBI is actively covering up Hunter Biden's crimes, which by extension is covering up Joe Biden's crimes, because he is involved in those crimes. We know that, that they're actively covering it up to protect him. That is out there right now. Here. FBI whistleblower. I mean, does anybody think that if there was an FBI whistleblower during the Trump years, wouldn't that be like the biggest thing out there right now in the news? Of course. But instead, there's like nothing. There's crickets. Director Ray, allegations are troubling about the FBI covering for Hunter Biden. I mean, that's huge. Like, oh, I need a haircut. I can't seem to get one scheduled. That's huge. I mean, that's just the latest. That's just like the latest FBI thing. I mean, we can go back, we can go back quite a ways, right, obviously. But I mean, even just recently, we were told by James Comey, the FBI director, that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong. She didn't know she was breaking the law. She didn't know, man, I didn't know I couldn't do that. You know, she had top secret and classified materials on her private server. And then we know that she covered up evidence by physically destroying devices with a hammer. That is a fact that is undeniable. And yet there were no FBI raids of Hillary Clinton. You know, so this equal application thing is just bull. I mean, and we can just deal with Director Ray. OK, Director Ray, after a Democrat attacked the GOP baseball game practice, he attacked it, shot a bunch of different Republican senators while screaming, this is for health care. He's sitting there shooting at Republican senators. This is for health care. OK, Director Ray takes that, almost kills several senators. Director Ray takes that and says that all it was just suicide by cop guys. No, but, you know, just a regular, everyday old crime, suicide by cop. Of course, that's that's absurd, because we even knew early on that the guy had like a list of Republicans that he went up and asked somebody, is that Republicans over there? So we know that it was like a domestic terrorist attack. But, you know, two years later or more, finally, let's say, Ray admits domestic terror. Then suddenly, see, you've got to be very specific to even find this story. Excuse me. FBI quietly admits that 2017 GOP baseball game shooting was a domestic was domestic terrorism. So it's like 18, 19, 20, four years later, they finally admit that after the election, of course, like, what's up with that? What? Like, why would he actively cover that up to protect Democrats? It's obvious because if that if he comes right out and that's domestic terrorism becomes a national news story, of course, it wouldn't. Fox would have it, you know, right? Leaning out, but everybody else would black it out, just like what we saw. And people would ask, huh, why was he screaming? This is for health care. Who? Who inside is? Who radicalized this guy? Well, it was the Democrats. It was the Democrat media who insisted that Republicans want you to die when they were opposing Obamacare, right? So and then there are just so many different examples of this. So, I mean, that's another good reason why people should be very suspicious of this FBI. One second, man, my hand hurts. I don't know what's going on. I'm like falling apart, people. All kinds of pain and crap. Yeah, I had a list. I had a running list of all the FBI stuff. You know, they talk so much about they just they actively avoid covering anything that involves Democrats. I mean, Democrats went out there, they they claim. And with along with the media, they claim that there was a widespread mass conspiracy by police officers to hunt down and murder black Americans. That incited riots, death and destruction. It was also not true. And if you look, most Democrats, man, I'm typing horribly, this survey here found that. What's going on, of course. This comes from skeptic.com. And if you look at this graph here, it shows that how many unarmed black men were killed by police in 2019? Very conservative, conservative and moderate people believe. Well, actually, everybody, pretty much conservative and mostly serve people have it about right. They said about 10, which is pretty close. It's, I think, around 20 or less than that, maybe even. But if you look at moderate or liberal and very liberal, they believe literally thousands, thousands, more than 10,000, some of them believe. So you have Democrats believing some really crazy stuff that led in just fight riots and murder and death and destruction. Where's the FBI on that? I mean, it's just like clearly the FBI is not interested in. Consistent, nonpartisan application of the law. I mean, and you got things like James Comey lying under McCabe lying under oath, did any of these people pay a price? No, Eric Holder ignored congressional subpoenas was never punished. He got off. And in fact, the media applauded it when Democrats walked out of the vote to hold him accountable for that. So, you know, it's just like that's not necessarily the FBI. I mean, it sort of is because that was all related to the ghost guns scandal, which they were involved in, the gun running scandal. So yeah, sorry, guys, it's supposed to be A.G. Garland. It was really, really quick. He was just on there for like a minute. And it's really interesting that. What you're going to start hearing now from the media is that, oh, my God, they're the right, they're they're going after the FBI and attacking the FBI. That's what Garland was saying. He again, Garland, who is a Democrat, matching Democrat rhetoric from the media and that rhetoric I can show you right now. Our friend Tom Elliott put together a supercut here, which I will show you all. And this is basically what we're hearing from the media right now that the right is danger. It's always Republicans, conservatives, dangerous because now they're attacking the FBI. Listen to this. The FBI is a conservative, meaning law enforcement organization. And we sort of like lost lost the thread on that in the past six years. What's the evidence of that? Against the FBI, these attacks against the most important federal law enforcement agency in America, 24 hours after a peaceful search that they gave them a heads up on. It's all peaceful search. All awful. It's not a raid. They didn't see not a raid to see their redefining words again. They're doing it again. They just it's like it's so Orwellian what we're living through, folks. This is straight out of the book. It's straight out of 1984. If you have not read that book, go back and read it. I'm telling you, you must go read it because this is all in there. You know, they're not there improperly or unlawfully. The Justice Department is returning to. So and this is another thing. OK, so we got the FBI lying about the other things already listed. FBI lying to get FISA warrants so they can spy on Democrat political opponents, right? FBI lies and disseminates Russian disinformation in an attempt to overturn the 2016 election against a Republican. So it just seems like it's always being used in service of the Democrat Party. And yet here we have the Democrat media who are just lockstep. They did nothing wrong. The FBI, everything was on the up. They have no idea. They don't know if everything's on the up and up. They're just saying that. It's so crazy, like the we we are really on a slide into authoritarianism. But it ain't because of Trump or Republicans. It's because of these people do its historical position as a law enforcement agency above politics, trying to do the right thing. I don't think there was any politics to be a nonpartisan process. Because anybody on this set had done the same thing. The exact same result would have occurred. But it didn't. It didn't. Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, both took presidential documents and kept them. OK, both of them did that. Trump, they knew that he had them. The FBI was in contact with him or I'm sorry, the presidential library or I'm sorry. You guys know what I'm saying, the the National Presidential Document Society or whatever the hell they're called, they were already in contact with Trump's lawyers, they wanted these documents to be better secured. OK, they knew he had them. They weren't after him for any reason other than for him to secure them better, OK, which they did. We know that Hillary Clinton literally had top secret documents on her server was never rated by the FBI. So when Michael Steele says, oh, it would have happened to any one of us. Bullshit, it didn't happen to any of those Democrats. So please a judge would not sign off on that if there were not evidence. Oh, really? But a judge signed off on those FISA warrants when there was no evidence. The FBI simply lied. They simply lied and they got a judge to sign off on it. And the judge that signed off on this search. Have you guys seen this guy? He is a big anti-trumper, tweets a bunch of any any Trump stuff. I don't have him here, but he's a typical what you would think about, you know, a lefty. He all the typical symptoms that you would expect from these people. Let's finish this real quick. Dorses tell me that, you know, there's a reason they wouldn't go in there if it wasn't really significant. They weren't really concerned about the nature of the classified information that Trump had, what he might be doing with it, who he might be showing it to. Right. But they were not interested. The same people mocked the idea that there was any scandal involving Hillary Clinton. They and we know that because it's still to this day, they're still saying but her emails. You see that everywhere. Hillary Clinton is selling merch right now that says but her emails. Now he's saying, oh, well, no, now it's totally it's totally cool. I mean, all right, it's totally makes sense that the FBI would raid his house. They didn't raid Hillary Clinton. These are real national security concerns. And the fact that a federal judge approved it shows that, hey, they've got something there. We just don't know what it is. Oh, president and his allies are escalating their. These are the walls are closing in people literally from 2017. The day Trump took office to the day he left, the walls are closing in. They said that over and over and over and they're literally doing it all over again. Tax on the FBI claiming without any evidence that the investigation is politically motivated. They're claiming without any evidence that it isn't politically motivated. Like they have. I am really like I don't understand. Like, do they really not have the self-awareness to see that they're guilty of everything they're accusing the other side of? Or is it that they know that? But it's like, so there's three things. Do they know it? But they're telling themselves that, oh, yeah, I'm lying. I'm misleading. Yes, I'm doing the same thing. But for me, it's different because I'm doing it for the right reasons and the right reasons being to keep the Republican Party, who we've demonized as inhuman domestic enemies, we got to keep them out of power, right? And keep the Democrats in power permanently. And this all makes sense in their work, the mental mind, because it's all based on conspiracy theories they've been pushing for years now. Like that's why they've been saying this shit for years. They're trying to normalize it. They literally want Democrats to be in power permanently. And anybody who opposes them, you know, right now that Republicans, conservatives, wherever you, those people are going to be outlawed. And I know people are like outlawed. How you're not going to be able to outlaw a political watch. Watch they've done it. They did it in Ukraine, right? There and the people here love Ukraine. What did they say over there? They said, oh, because they're pro-Putin media. So we had to we had to get rid of the other political parties or I'm sorry. Pro and I think they got rid of media that they claimed was pro-Putin. They do the same thing here. I mean, you look a Putin himself justified his treachery, his invasion of Ukraine by saying we're going to get Nazi. What do they do? They justify all this by just simply claiming that we're fascist Nazis. Joe Scarborough. I'll show you another clip. Joe Scarborough was on today saying that the FBI should be let loose on conservatives. He said conspiracy theorists, freaks, the Republicans. Even he even said that the FBI should go out after and lock up TV news anchors, who he says are inciting violence and pushing conspiracy theories. It's like that's literally what Joe Scarborough does on a daily basis. But they don't for whatever reason. I don't know. It just makes me very afraid for this country in the future, because this can't end well. These attacks on the FBI are just very sort of out there and outlandish. Every person out there. Oh, the attacks on the FBI are out there and outlandish, but multiple years, like four or five years worth of propaganda from the media saying that there's a massive conspiracy by police officers throughout the country, racist police officers. I'm sorry, race, a conspiracy by racist white police officers to hunt down and murder black people. They said that for years. They continue to say it. Not as much now that Byneson office, you see that stuff pretty much when he got in, even though it's got to be still happening, right? They spread that. That was perfectly fine. It's totally different when they do it. But if we attack the FBI, I mean, which is completely legitimate, given what we've just gone over, lying to FISA courts whistleblower out here saying that they are actively covering up for Hunter Biden to keep Joe Biden out of trouble. Like we know these things. We know that, like they had agents who were fiercely partisan. Peter Strock and what's her face? They we have text messages where they're talking about an insurance policy if Trump gets elected. That was an actual coup attempt, folks. That was the actual insurrection. But that's how they cover themselves, right? They do something and then they there's this massive, like propaganda effort to accuse the other side of those same things, right? And so then they cover themselves because what do we do immediately when they start accusing us? Well, we are like, well, wait a minute, you guys did that. And so then it ends up looking like to people who may not know better. They're like, oh, they're just they're just accusing the other side so to deflect from the fact that they're being accused of it. It's insane, folks. It's 1984. Shit, this is essentially attacking non politicized and independent law enforcement, Republican, non politicized and independent. Don't you love how they stake that with absolute certainty? Where like, what are they basing that on? These people, let me tell you, you know, I'm not sure if I'm right about everything or right about some things, but there's some things I am 100 percent certain of. And one of those things is that the media is your enemy. Unless you're on their side and you agree with their agenda, the media is your enemy and they are going to treat us all like a real enemy, like a terrorist enemy. You think like it's crazy now. It's going to get more crazy. Attacks on the Department of Justice and the FBI intensify Proposal fears rhetoric could turn to violence. Growing concerns over the reaction from possible. Not their rhetoric, their rhetoric is totally fine. They're fomenting that violence right now. The CCP has rhetoric that is being fomented because of this, because of how Trump talks about a raid on his own. No, man, it was no raid on your home. They are basically saying that the law. We redefined raid, man. We already rechanged the definition. Well, the fact of the matter is it's not. There's no reason to believe that and no reason to believe that. We have law enforcement to actually bring fascists to justice. There you go. That's what I was talking about. Great Grubion media, by the way, this this montage. Yeah, I want to show you that Joe Scarborough stuff. It's insane. I got to show you that clip real quick. Hold on. Here we go. Check this out. Peezing the public. You're talking about appeasing conspiracy theorists, insurrectionists, weirdos. I'm just going to throw out labels and freaks fascists. I said that twice three times. Talking about violence against the federal judge. These are like you said, you're never. Hypocrite, these people were just covering for an assassination attempt on Kavana that day that day incited a scotus judge as a pre-encored justice. Keep it together, Ryan, keep it together. We're going to win with this group, but, you know, you look at the people that are squawking the loudest. They're the people. I mean, it's, you know, it's what you expect. Someone who's guilty and no justice is about to come down on them. Right, right. That's how you expect them to squawk. So I really I think there's way too much chatter about the concern about these right wing extremists and bad just making threats. OK, communists, OK, groomer communists. I think what you do is, you know, you go after them with the law. Go after them with the law. But there's also outlaw people. The political opposition cable news channels that get rid of the journalists. Inspired violence leading up to January the 6th. Oh, OK. Oh, so you get that only inspired violence on January the 6th. That's all I care. Did we inspire violence for something? Just move on from that. Shocked on January the 6th by the violence. It took place. And then after January 6th, pretended like they weren't shocked by the violence. It took place on January 6th and they're doing it again. Well, you know, they're they're legal channels for that, too. When people legal channels, they get hurt. There's I mean, these are the people for years were saying that Trump was a threat to democracy because he criticized journalists. Now, the same people, the very same people think that journalists should be locked up by the FBI or should be looked into or should be set upon by the FBI because they say things that Joe Scarborough disagrees with and arbitrarily applies labels like fascist, right wing extremists, conspiracy theory. That's why they have these labels. They just blah, blah, blah. We got just mass these out there so that anybody who, you know, may not, you know, maybe a Democrat, maybe on the fence, you know, a moderate or whatever and they maybe, you know, they're not really into stuff. They're just going to hear that and it will turn them off. It's like a shield against any kind of anything else getting in there, except for what he's saying, you know what I mean? It's unbelievable. Like I said, these guys at Miss NBC, Joe Scarborough, CNN, they helped perpetrate myths and lies and disinformation that did the various things that they're accusing, you know, Fox News of and stuff, or I assume that they're blaming. And I just love that there's nobody, they never have somebody on the show that can push back against this crap on purpose, obviously. And I love looking at that are the walls closing in on Trump. This isn't this isn't 2017 to 2019 video clip. This is right now and you know what? I'll go. Excuse me. I just had lunch a little bit ago. I'm a little let me show you another clip. Let's get another clip here. The wall are the walls closing in on Trump. But everybody here has seen that montage, right? The walls are closing in. Let me see if I can find it real quick. Let's see if I can find it. It's on I'm I know it's on YouTube. But let me see if I can just find it quickly on here. Probably. Oh, wait, is that it? Oh, yeah, this is that right here. Here we go. I guess if you haven't seen this, you're going to love it. All right, this starts in February 2017, right when right after Trump was inaugurated. Let's go breaking news. A bombshell today is a turning point. Today was historically bad for President Trump. Today was a turning point. Turning point. We're turning point here. The beginning of the end for the Trump presidency. The beginning of the end and breaking news. We have another bombshell. Mike Pence. Democrats have been in charge of the country for two years now. The call for impeachment. And the cover just fell like this. The impeachment. Breaking news. Another bomb fell out of the White House. I believe this is the beginning of the end. I do. It's really the beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. He may be feeling the walls closing in on him. All the walls closing in on him. The walls closing in on him. Breaking news, a new bombshell. One astrologer says this means the beginning of the end for President Donald Trump. The beginning of the end of the Trump presidency. Trump will resign. Trump is going to resign. Is this the tipping point? I know we've said it over and over. You think this is a tipping point? And over and over. This is a tipping point. And over and over. Breaking news, President Trump off the rails. It was the beginning of the end today. The beginning of the end. It reminds me a lot of the last days of Nixon. Breaking news tonight, new bombshells. This is the beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. The walls are closing in. The walls closing in. The walls closing in. Breaking over nine bombshells. Do you hear Joe Scarborough just said that? Three or four years ago. Do you think this is a tipping point? This is unbelievable. This is remarkable. Have you ever seen anything like this? His presidency is crippled. We're still in 2017. This is the day that everything changed. We begin with the bombshell. The beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. The beginning of the end. In fact, if this were a football game, we're in the third quarter. May even be the beginning of the end. We begin tonight with the bombshell. Donald Trump is in a lot of trouble. The president will resign. Another hour, another bombshell. This is a tipping point. Trump's going down. This president could be impeached. I do not think the president will serve out his term. Resignation. Resignation. I don't think this president is gonna serve out his term. Mr. Trump will not serve out his term. He will not serve out his term. No way, no how. Breaking news. Absolute bombshell. I think Donald Trump is in trouble. Donald Trump is not, and he's done. And it's over. It's over. The wall is closing in. It's over. This is going to be the Achilles' Hill. Breaking news tonight. I expect Trump to depart. This week will be the watershed week. Trump is in big trouble. Trump's in a lot of trouble. Oh, that's a shorter version. There's a longer version of that that keeps going. Old man, who feels like he changed everything. Maybe at a tipping point. It's the beginning. Yeah, there's another version of that. Anywho, I'm gonna read some comments. I've kind of been ignoring you guys. Let's see who's all in here. Hey, 354 people, what's up? Hey, let me see if I can get the garland thing again. And I'll show you guys again. Okay, here we go. Good afternoon. He was really only on there for a minute. Since I became Attorney General, I have made clear that the Department of Justice will speak through its court filings and its work. Just now, the Justice Department has filed a motion in the Southern District of Florida to unseal a search warrant and property receipt relating to a court-approved search that the FBI conducted earlier this week. That search was of premises located in Florida belonging to the former president. The department did not make any public statements on the day of the search. The former president publicly confirmed the search that evening as is his right. Copies of both the warrant and the FBI property receipt were provided on the day of the search to the former president's counsel who was on site during the search. I could have sworn we were told that they were not allowed on site. Let me look at that real quick. Trump freed lawyers not allowed in... Yeah, okay. So Trump is saying, and I don't know if that's true, but his lawyers are saying that they were not allowed in. It says that FBI and other federal government officials wouldn't let anyone from his staff, including his attorneys, anywhere near the areas that were being examined. So Garland, who's lying here? Is Garland lying? Are Trump's lawyers? I doubt Trump's lawyers are lying. The search warrant was authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause. Okay, and I just wanna point out again, the FBI is, we know that they've lied before to get warrants, okay? We know that for a fact. Let's just bring that up real quick. Lied, defy is a warrants. And dealing with the same guy, right? So here we go from the United States Department of Justice, FBI attorney admits altering email used for FISA application during crossfire hurricane investigation. So they lied. They altered the forms, put lies into them so they could get warrants. So the media should be the ones pointing that out and casting doubt on all of this, but they're not. They're just, it's just like, as always, from the White House to the Democrat state media mouths. Same with this. The property receipt is a document that federal law requires law enforcement agents to leave. Real quick, I'm sorry to stop it again, but this is Garland. This is a guy that Trump and Republicans kept from getting a chance to be a Supreme Court justice. So like, why isn't that bring brought up? Like, we're talking about enemies of Donald Trump. This guy is an enemy of Donald Trump. Like, it seems like there's a conflict of interest there. Maybe I'm crazy, I don't know. With the property owner. The department filed the motion to make public the warrant and receipt in light of the former president's public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances and the substantial public interest in this matter. Faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock principle of the justice department and of our democracy. Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. But it's not being applied evenly. Precisely what the justice department is doing. But none of that, they keep saying that. It's being equally applied. But I've just given you all these examples where that's not the case. I mean, they, so let's just go down because I keep thinking of things. So we know that the current FBI director, or well we know the last FBI director let Hillary Clinton off the hook for much more egregious things than what they're accusing Trump of here who didn't, he didn't wrongly have these documents. They just claimed they were improperly stored. And then he supposedly, like they supposedly fixed it and then the FBI showed up anyway, okay? Then we have director Ray cover up a Democrat domestic terrorist attack on Republican senators. He covered it up as suicide by cop. And then later, much later, years later, quietly admits that yeah, that was domestic terrorism. Why did he do that? Why isn't anybody asking why he did that? Well, obviously because the people who would ask him would be the subjects of who radicalized that guy, right? They would be the subjects of who incited him. So that gets covered up. You got the FBI rating, like all the supporters and people around Trump rating them. And nothing came of it. Like they did this Don Raid on what's his face? Can't think of his name. You guys knew what I'm talking about. The weird guy, the little weird guy. They did a raid on him, had him out in his underwear. Nothing ever came of that. It was nothing. It's just, and then we have the Russian thing. They lied to get FISA warrants. They spread Russian disinformation and an attempt to undo the election results. Peter Strock and what's her page, Lisa page. They had an insurance policy to if Trump got elected. What is that? It is what we witnessed. It was the actual coup attempt to try and get him out using actual Russian disinformation. Then what did we see? Then we saw, before another election, the same people, and I will bring the FBI into this, covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story. You got big tech censoring it. You had the media calling it Russian disinformation. And they were justifying that by pointing to intelligence experts, which included the FBI, who claimed it was Russian disinformation, okay? Influencing another election. Oh, and thanks for the... Oh, thanks, Jim. Yeah, it's just, I don't usually have time, but I just happened to... Ozzie Berry said, this reeks of desperation I can see from Australia that they are scared of Trump retaking. Of course, yes. So you just have this long line of FBI corruption that always falls on one direction. Always falls against Republicans, never against Democrats. And I'll point out this happens with the media as well. Like, can anyone, can any of you remember the last big Democrat scandal that the media were all in on? Like, I can, maybe the Clinton years, but even then they were defending them. That's right when I got into politics, right during the Clinton years. And I remember that. That's one of the things that got me realizing that the media was corrupt way back then. Cause I'm like, wow, that's weird that they're covering for them and yet they're constantly going off against Republicans. So, what? Okay. Oh, yes. And then, thank you, wild tangent reminded me. I was getting to that. Another thing, the FBI raids, no, I wasn't thinking of James O'Keeffe, Roger Stone is who I was thinking of. But, yes, the FBI also raided a journalist, James O'Keeffe. Why? To get, as far as I know, to get this diary they supposedly had of Ashley Biden, Joe Biden's daughter. Excuse me. Think about that. The FBI raided a journalist to protect Joe Biden because supposedly in that diary, there's talking there about Ashley Biden actually showering with Joe Biden. Kind of weird that that story just went away, right? But here again, it's another one that falls on a journalist who's against Biden. So, yeah, why would, you know, and I was talking about how this always falls along one side. Well, with the media too. Every one of these stories that they supposedly get wrong, like Smollett or the Covington kids or a written house or any of these things, it always falls along those lines. They never, like, botch a story where they smear a Democrat and then there's all this stuff about a Democrat and they're like, oh, oops, we were wrong. That never happens. It doesn't happen. Look at the archetype in the media of a conservative, conservative in the media. They're all anti-conservative. They're all anti-Republican, like Michael Steele in those clips. He's supposedly a Republican. Yet that's all he does is rip on Republicans. Like, at some point, and I want to say it was Kathleen Parker. She's a journalist who worked for years and years and years, never got anywhere. Then she started ripping on her own side and won a Pulitzer Prize. Yeah. So at some point, these people realize, hey, if we want to make it in the media, we just got to go again. We got to at least say we're a conservative or say we're a Republican. And then that's what we do. We just rip on their side. Which, hey, I am totally fine with scrutiny, criticism of the highest order of Republicans. I am not like some, oh, I love Republicans. I'm gonna go to the Republican National Convention and that's not me, okay? Republicans do not particularly inspire me at all. So that's not it. It's that these standards that are put against them, Democrats have been charged this country for two years now and yet you turn on the news, it's gonna be like something about bad about Republican, something bad about Trump, anything to keep attention off the failure of the Democrats. And just to wrap this all up, because I'm probably gonna go ahead and end this because my wife's gotta take my kid to a doctor's appointment and the other two are up there. I'm gonna have to go watch them. But, and I've talked, I know I'm a broken record on this, but go read 1984. I know it's kind of cringy. I'm like, oh, George Orwell, 1984, oh, it's happening. It is happening, there's no doubt. Like, I swear at some point these people decide, they were like, hmm, this book's really good. That's a really good idea. Like, if we could do what they do in that book, we could save the planet. Because capitalism's killing the planet and all this stuff. So, and their heads are like, oh, I have to save the planet. The only way I can do that is if we take total control of all the information. I'm not saying it's like, exactly what's happening in the story is in the story, you've got, you know, a major war and then all the, you've got, I think, two major powers, or maybe three, and they're always fighting over this one area and there's a single part, which that's not, well, I mean, you could say that's going on, but the main thing is that there is a party. It's one party and it's the only party in power, Incsog, and they control the flow of information. They control what people know. They revise history to benefit the party. They revise definitions. And they so gas-eyed people and so manipulate reality that people don't even know, like, what is real and what isn't anymore? Does that seem familiar? But yeah, go read that. Oh, yeah. Jonah Duelas says the 87,000 armed IRS. I know it. That's another thing we can talk about. I guess I do have to go here in just a minute. But yeah, I do want to show that. If I can find it here. Oh yeah, here. I want to talk about one thing here. It's kind of unrelated. Here. A couple of weeks since we lost. Just another example of how the media is just basically PR, a Democrat party PR. They're all going apeshit over this video. Beto, just watch. 19 kids and their two teachers shot to death with a weapon originally designed for use in combat. Legally purchased by 18 year old who did not try to obtain one when he was 16 or 17, but followed the law that's on the books, ladies and gentlemen. That said, if you buy another one, you could buy two or more if you want to. AR-15s, hundreds of rounds of ammunition and take that weapon that was originally designed for use on the battlefields in Vietnam to penetrate an enemy soldier's helmet at 500 feet and knock him down dead. Up against kids at five feet. It may be funny to you, but it's not funny for me, okay? Okay, so the media is loving this, all right? But it's just, it's bullshit. Like for one, no, the AR-15 was never designed for combat. The AR-15 is literally a civilian designed rifle. It was, that's what it was designed for, for civilian use. They took an M16, which was made for the battlefield, which was made for combat, which has a fire selector on it for single shot, three round burst, or fully automatic. That's a gun, that's a weapon of war. If you want to call something a weapon of war, which is a stupid phrase anyway, that would be it. Of course, they use shotgun, pump shotguns, semi-automatic shotguns, handguns, revolver guns in war. Are those weapons of war? No, they just say things, they say things to get the most impact out of the word. But that's a lie. The AR-15 was not, is not designed for the battlefield. It's not used by any military. So that's all lies. But instead of fact checking, the media is just, they're just, they're all just promoting it. All the major news networks, news networks, they're all promoting it. No fact checks. But I mean, I guess that's just what we've all come to expect. Wow, this stream is actually going pretty good. I hate to stop it. I do appreciate you all showing up. I did change my upload schedule to daily at 7.30. I didn't have one today because I got stuck doing, I was busy as hell last night and I didn't get a chance to work on it. But it will be up tomorrow morning. That's why, another reason I wanted to do this live stream. But yeah, start checking in the morning for those. There was another, oh yeah. That's great. Twitter's great. Well, I hate Twitter, but I mean, you can get, let's see here. Quarters, that they had no knowledge that the attorney phones said it was a criminal investigation and they weren't going to comment. Well, now senior White House officials are telling reporters that they had no knowledge that the attorney general was going to make remarks today and they have not been briefed on the content of those remarks. So the White House is clearly, if that is true, trying to separate itself where the DOJ and the attorney general are trying to do that. Right. There's a lot of people obviously in Washington who have a hard time believing at this level with the four. Right, that's absurd. Of course they knew. Do you want to know why? I'm sure you all know why that Biden and the media now is going to try and the DOJ and the FBI are going to purposely try to separate Biden from this because that's what they do, first of all, in any situation when a Democrat's in charge and the White House or whatever, however it may be, the media will always separate them from whatever's going on. So during a Republican administration, you got kids in cages. Every article is Trump, kids in cages, Trump, kids in cages, Republicans, kids in cages. But when Obama was president and there was kids in cages and you could find some articles on it, although there's sparse, you can't find them. But when you find them, you're not going to ever see Obama's name in there. I did a video forever ago where I found this NPR article where the journalist did a whole thing about the kids in cages but never once mentioned Barack Obama. And this was during the Obama administration. I tweeted her, she actually tweeted me back and I would show you that but that's on an account banned forever ago. She said something to the effect of the lawsuit didn't, the lawsuit that was lodged against the facilities that were supposedly keeping kids in cages in bad conditions did not name Barack Obama but rather named the immigration department. And so, or DHS or something. And I came back like, but he's the president, he's in control of it. Like we would not see that now. Like they would never, she never respond after that. I'm like, well, that doesn't make sense. I mean, he's the president. It's his immigration policy. And if you remember Barack Obama back then, he did an interview, which I could find where he says that asylum seekers go home. Don't come here because asylum seeker you're not necessarily going to be able to get in here just because you're poor or you're living in bad conditions or even if it's dangerous. That's not the purpose of asylum. Asylum is specifically for people who are being persecuted in their country for some intrinsic quality. Kind of like in America where if you're white you're forced to have this guilt and to somehow take upon you the sins of people that died hundreds of years ago, that kind of thing. But so it's not surprising now to see that they're gonna try and separate Biden from this. Why? Because then, so if you remember, Ducey asked KJP the other day, does Joe Biden consider Trump his political foe? And she wouldn't answer the question. She wouldn't because that's looking pretty orwellian. That's looking pretty authoritarian third world-ish when the president, the current ruling president is sickening the government on his greatest political rival before elections. Like, I mean that obviously looks bad and so it is bad. And so now this is what you're gonna see. You're gonna see this major effort by the press, by the Democrats, by the DOJ and the FBI to separate Biden from, even though that's absurd of course he knows about this. Like if he doesn't know about this what does that say about Joe Biden? Like, the president doesn't know what his department of justice is doing as it concerns the former president, really? I think not. So that's absurd and this is why you're gonna, that is exactly why you're gonna start seeing this now. You're gonna start, because it's so right and there's so nothing wrong with it, right? It's totally on the up and up, totally cool. But Joe Biden had nothing to do with it, got nothing to do with it. Don't worry about that. Just like, you know, Joe Biden has nothing to do with the gas prices. He can't control them. It's the Putin price hike. Then they barely go, oh thanks, Biden, you did it. You got it to go down a couple cents. People will save 85 cents a month. Oh, hail, Biden. Unfreaking real. Did you guys see that clip the other day? Last thing, did you guys, last, I really gotta go. But did you guys see that clip the other day of Joe Biden shaking, he shakes hands with Schumer. Here, I'll show you in my video from yesterday. Those of you who have not seen my video from yesterday, which is doing really crappy for some reason. That's weird. Notes made me $43. It's like it's being, it's like doing way under what my videos would normally do. Oh yeah, check this out. Cameras without any attention from the former for the state. Watch this. Shakes his hand. Forgets that he shook his hand and extends his hand out for another shake. Look at the look on his face. Let me know it changed the second place today. What in the world? I did this. Hold on, look at this. Change that can either. Mm-hmm. Watch this. We let semiconductor manufacturing go overseas. We barely produced 10% of the semiconductor. Confident in both hands, right? Excuse me. Not in his shoulder like you should do. I'll see you later in chip design as well as driving up costs for a family. And everyone not just tiered around the world. Appeals. Now look at this. Like if Trump did this shit, it would be everywhere. All right, folks. I hope you enjoyed the live stream. Those of you who are just getting in and didn't happen to see the actual Garland part, I played it a couple of times so you can go back and look at it. Thanks a lot everybody for watching. If you want to support this channel, as usual, I got the pay, all those links are in the description and will be in the pinned comment, but I have got it all. I got the PayPal, I got the Patreon, I got the Subscribestar, whatever you want. I appreciate it. I also have preparewithdronetech.com and I think that's it. Oh, and also, if you guys want to hang out with us, I do have a Gilded server, my Discord server as you may or may not know got shut down for misinformation. Just out of the blue. Just shut down. Me banned server gone. I messaged them, they just say you're spreading misinformation. Whatever that message, who knows what it is. I didn't even get a chance to see what it was or get rid of it. Who knows? So, Kurt, just kick back a little bit. You'll see it. It's literally like not even two minutes. But if you want to come to my Gilded server, let me see here. Let me get the little invite link for you all. There you go. But anyway guys, thanks for watching. Check back tomorrow or tonight for a short and a new video tomorrow and I will see you then. Thanks a lot. See you all later. As soon as I get this and we are.