 NPR's organizational accounts will no longer be active on Twitter Because the platform is taking actions that undermine our credibility By falsely implying that we are not editorially independent We are not putting our journalism on platforms that have demonstrated in interests and undermining our credibility And the public's understanding of our editorial independence NPR is pretty clearly a democrat left-wing outlet NPR literally stands for national public radio and the tv version pbs stands for public broadcasting system When you hear public that means government NPR was created by an act of congress And has always been funded in part with taxpayer money The current left-wing talking point is that it's only 1 percent, but in reality with cpb funding It's actually more like 12 percent. Here's my question. Why aren't they giving up that money if it's so insignificant? It literally says government funding is essential on their website. What remember what happened when mit romney suggested Defunding pbs and npr of federal funds. They lost their minds. I'm gonna stop the subsidy to pbs I'm gonna stop other things. I like pbs. I love big bird Actually like you too, but I'm not gonna I'm not gonna keep on spending money on things to borrow money from china to pay for You can debate whether or not there should be funding of public broadcasting But when they always sort of tout out big bird and say we're gonna kill big bird or that actually is misleading I mean my son was devastated when he heard that big bird might be killed. I mean That's gonna solve our budget crisis not funding big bird Gotcha when he was asked what he'd actually do to cut spending and reduce the deficit His big example is to go after public television so pro Somebody is finally getting tough on big bird harry fleischer press secretary to president george w bush Big bird needs to ask dora the explorer how she manages to live without taxpayer money. Try it big bird You'll be just fine last night. The late night shows had fun with it too For years conservatives have accused pbs of having a liberal bias arguing its federal funds aren't justified Even youtube labels npr a public broadcasting service Which literally means it's government affiliated and funded must even offer to give them a government funded label Which is the same thing. Why isn't npr leaving youtube? Oh, right because youtube is run by a bunch of marxists who are down with the struggle There's no political benefit to leaving youtube and making a big spectacle of it ever since elan purchased twitter and the democrats lost control of it Their state media accomplices have been losing their minds npr is quite obviously left-wing and geared towards democrats Which it should not be if it's public How would the left and the democrats react if we had another version of npr? But it was just like fox news and their taxpayer money was going towards it I guarantee you that would end immediately npr and pbs both took part in what can only be described as a mass government censorship campaign on behalf of the democrats and joe biden to suppress real actual fact-based news That was damaging to biden and influenced the election in his favor the new york post was even banned from twitter and facebook For reporting this real news did npr and pbs freak out and have a public meltdown Over the past few days president trump has highlighted a report by the new york post about hunter biden Joe biden's son There are major questions about the origins and the accuracy of that story that the president's personal attorney Was peddling russian disinformation Unfounded claims about vice president biden's son hunter unverified story about hunter biden adam schiff suggested the claims are russian disinformation disinformation Intelligence agencies warned the white house that russian intelligence used ruta juliani as a vessel to undermine the biden campaign You know, it's this article of dubious sourcing what's been disproved By lots and lots of reputable news organizations the story is suspect couldn't have two more dubious sources I think on any story they put up this story about this hard drive and it had a really wacky story about how it got to the Anyway, i'm not going to go into the details of it because I found it hard to believe the whole thing blew up and it was used You know, it took a sort of a A pretty shoddy story and then made it into this cause celebrity for the right wing about censorship, which has been one of their Things they talk about without a whole lot of proof You actually sound like you're on a fox news Show right now. You sound a little bit like an anchor. Well, unfortunately fox is one of the only news channels That's covering these real emails even fox news would not touch This story that that uh, the president trump's personal lawyer rudy juliani tried to dump You know that even the new york post the key reporter did not want his byline on this story Former business associate who identified by name Joe biden is the big guy who's profiting off of these shady foreign dealings and it's not just china It's ukraine and it's three and a half million dollars from moscow. All right. You wanted to go there You wanted to go there. You wanted to go there. It was real and it all had to involve the biden Former senior intelligence official tells me that president trump was warned juliani's information was likely russian disinformation The biden campaign says that this is russian disinformation. They're talking to witnesses. They're bringing people into the grand jury They're issuing subpoenas and there is a realistic chance this could result in federal charges NPR and pbs actively took part in a government campaign to destroy anything and anyone trying to spread that story Specifically because they knew it would sink biden in the election. That's not journalism That's what I would expect to see from russia or china or even north korea state media Which of course they deny being anything like so npr did cover the suppression story But as democrat media always does they framed it as republican seizing republican fees on the As proof of their long-running assertions that the social media networks censor conservative voices There is no statistical evidence to support those claims. What the actual fuck. Did you just say to me right now? npr and pbs both have a long history going back at least 20 years of being democrat party opinion Packaged and delivered as soft-spoken Basie voiced hard-hitting just-the-facts news, but they clearly aren't again youtube labels pbs as public broadcasting service Which is just another way of saying it's a government-run service. So what's the problem here exactly? All right, folks That's all I have for that one. I hope you enjoyed it and found it informative if you did Please hit that like button share subscribe hit that notification bill and make sure to leave a comment to vent some of those frustrations Thanks a lot and I'll see you all in the next one