 M nombre yi, ibeing sicr ows ac rwy'w cwbeth i dda siŵr Met qualifications a Fire2's�� Things. The rule of charter Planning UK is making its way from all the other softer line and going asfreeth clubs to provide that services that could be enough for the flux of что roedd yn umbryddUND i unsiŵr. Felly, we have a substitute for Findlay Carson, where she is saying how important she is in making deals to those programmes so that she costs terrible office workers and so that they know what to put off and make the money enough toganwad them for the future. We have no interest in declaring it, convener. Our first item of business today is to decide whether to take item 3 in private. Are members agreed? Thank you. Our second item of business today is consideration of the sea fisheries amendment etc regulations 2022. I refer members to paper 1 on page 3. Under the protocol between the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government, the consent notification has been categorised as type 1, meaning that the Scottish Parliament's agreement is sought before the Scottish Government gives consent to the UK Government making secondary legislation in devolved competence. Does any member have any comments on the consent notification? Please raise your hand or type an R in the chat box if participating remotely. Is the committee content that the provision set out in the notification should be included in the proposed UKSI? Please raise your hand or type N in the chat box if you do not agree. Otherwise, I will presume that members are content. Finally, is the committee content to delegate authority to me to sign off a letter to the Scottish Government informing it of our decision today? That concludes our business in public. I note from the exchanges between myself and the convener on 12 January that the convener said, we wrote to George Eustace and got a response. Unfortunately, he was unable to attend on that date and we asked, but I am confident that we will be able to have him in front of us at some time in the near future. I am therefore wondering if the committee was subsequently able to reach Mr Eustace to appear to give evidence and if there is an explanation of why the committee has not been able to hear from Mr Eustace and whether there is any update on when we can expect him to do so. We do have a date that is set for the 18th of May. He will be appearing in front of the committee on the 18th of May. That is my understanding that it has been set. That concludes our business in public and we now move to private session.