 We do. The second meeting of March is full, and the first meeting of April is full. They're all relatively small. One big item is Petra Plus, which is kind of like tonight's a re-application of something. Right, we already heard that, and that was delayed for relatively unfortunate circumstances. What was it Petra? Um, Stephen Charest fell about 50 feet onto his head. He was getting in the notch, and he was climbing. Snow and something. Yeah. Is he okay? Yeah. It's like a real buggy. Yeah, he had a helmet on. So yeah, he had a helmet. Well, there are ways helmets like so much. Um, got a lot of stuff. Yeah. All right. That's, that's good. Actually, that's great to have to do that. Yeah. Nice. Um, you know the city market south end decision? Yeah. I can't find it. I need to go back and look at it. Well, they were helpful. The one way we said like the ATM wasn't within the square footage. I have a very, very, very. What? I disagree. We approved it. I have another matter. That has the exact same argument. I want to see that. Yeah. They got the zoning code of change. I know. We're like, we're like, we're totally different. That's fresh. Yeah. It's okay. You volunteered. We're going to call us to order. It's a quarter. So this is the. March 6, 2024 zoning board. Development review board. For Burlington. I am this agent. I'm also in the chair. I'm calling this meeting to order. We only have one item on our agenda tonight. It is a certificate of appropriateness. C.P. 2429 a reapplication by 323. Green Castle of C. For the construction of four unit building. The associated loading work at. The address. 325 college. Do we have the applicant here? You have the app. Yeah. We have that on a line. Are there any others in the audience who would like to be heard? On this application. I'll register one or both right now. Please raise your hand. We have. Rain and Campbell and count meeting TV. So if I don't want to do you wish to testify or raise your hand. He's raising their hand. All right. So do all of those who wish to testify. I swear that the testimony are they're about to give in this matter is true and correct under the page and penalties. Perjury. Say I do. Then that be you. Okay. You raised your hand. So. Can I have you guys hear me? Yeah. Oh, okay. Sorry about that. So. I'm interested. If any board members would be willing to treat this as a consent item. I don't know is. Scott. Use the other woman's hair. Oh, with the other. Marina, do you have. Questions on this application. Are you here to testify about it? Hi. Can you hear me? I can. Actually, no, I am the new alternate on the DRB. So I'm just joining to. To. Yeah. That's what I wanted. Marina. Well, I hope you didn't take enough. Okay. That's good to know. Hi. Nice to meet you. This is not going to be very educational. I have one thing about this. And this is more for staff than anything else. We don't really need that for all plans, but there's no full plan that shows how this can. That's just the existing building. I think we're probably at the end of the day. It's not here. So we're building in front of a building that we have no plan for. And that just seems an oversight. It should be in the file. In addition to the building, not necessarily a building. It's in front of the existing building and it's blocking existing windows. And so there's implication of that. Some of the existing buildings. We don't really need that full plans, but there's no full plan that shows how this can. That's just the existing building. I think we've probably had that. It's not here. So we're building in front of a building that we have no plan for. So we're building in front of a building that we have no plan for. Something is happening to the existing plan. I make a suggestion. Yeah. Would you be willing to treat this as a consent agenda item? Subject to the additional. Plan to be included. To show the connection of that new structure to the old structure. Yeah. I agree. I, that's fine. I just think it should be part of the record that that's in there. You have a question. I do. All right. I'm sorry. Sounds good. It was worn for one. So then we were talking about whether we want to do this on consent agenda, but we have a few questions. And as you heard from Brad, there may be a question about how the things are being connected as you know, as to yet unknown series of questions. So. I guess, I mean, I think we've seen it. We understand is I just, if you don't mind some of the DRV members have some questions for you. Okay. Yes, absolutely. I'm sorry. This is, this is for us. I think maybe Scott. The. The side maximum required. Setback is 20 feet and the proposed is 24 feet. So that just means maximum means we can't require more than 20 feet. So let's say 10% came out to 300 feet. Right. We're not going to make you move it 300 feet. The most we're going to make you move is to play. Okay. And this is one of the setback provisions that's measured based on a budding properties. Is that the side, the side can be either the average of the neighbors or 10% of the one way. Okay. And the max can be 20 feet. In no case. Good. I'm good. Great. I don't want to ask about that. I just would like to see a tool plan submitted for record that shows the existing plan on how the new, the new addition connects to the existing building in plan. Yes, we can absolutely facilitate that. We have those plans in a file somewhere. I can submit that. Would you be willing to submit that to staff after approval? Absolutely. Good. I have one question. I have a question about, so I noticed, I know that the number of units doesn't increase more than 20% 25%. So bike parking isn't required. But it looks like you added for. By parking spots by removing three. Parking spaces. Is that correct? So. If we could go. To the. On the. See these little plans I can show. We've found these. It's kind of like a modular bike locker. That. I have it on. On the. Plans that were uploaded to the city website page. There are these little modular bike lockers. You can see them in the, I guess it would be southeast corner. And allows tenants to lock their bikes and things in those versus, you know, chaining them to a tree. Yeah. And so that's just the, that'll just be the four spaces basically. Yeah, there's also a substantial amount of bike parking inside of the existing building in the connection between the two in the middle there. Okay. That's what I was, that's what I was wondering about because it, it seems adequate for the, for the new units, but I wasn't sure if there's existing bike parking again. This isn't a big enough unit increase to actually require it, but it's nice that it's there. So it's just kind of curious about more details on that. But cool. Evan, you good? Yeah. Yeah, that was my only question. Any other questions? Any members of the audience? Orina, you want to just get a question in now? Practice. Nope. Okay. So I guess then we'll close the public hearing on this item. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah. All right. So on. CP 2429 three college street. I move that we approve the application subjects and the requirement that applicant provide a. One more time to staff or the record. Second. Chase seconds. I was in favor. That's not a record. Was it? Yeah. All right. Thank you everybody.