 That paper came out in 1929, I believe, 25 or something like this, and that one's readily available, but there's a lot of scientific papers that you can't, you don't have access to, they're behind paywalls, right, which is insane from decades ago. Peer review doesn't work. Peer review doesn't work. Yeah, lifted view, first time chat says, and a good first time chat. Peer review has been hijacked, right, they're basically gatekeepers of information. Fuck them. Any scientific paper published from any university, okay, or by any private company that has had any public funding, must be shared the raw data and the paper and methodology, all of it shared online in real time, or maybe not in real time because mistakes happen, but they should be available online for free. Okay, end of story. Anybody that is against this is an enemy to humanity because you're against sharing information with human beings, information that human beings have funded, right? Fuck paywalls, okay. Fuck copyright laws, fuck patents. It's gone so far to the corporate side that the pendulum has to swing this way, and all copyright, all patents, all paywalls for scientific, they all have to be removed. We have to swing so far on this side and have a flood of information go through our societies for a number of decades before we can even contemplate, think about reintroducing some type of copyright laws and patents to further spawn innovation to a certain degree. But I think once you remove copyright and patent and all these paywalls, I think you're going to see innovation. It might be what saves humanity. Innovation being coming into our societies in the form of disruptive innovation that's just going to blow away. It's going to be a renaissance and a half, right?