 The Las Vegas swing for the PGA tour season coming up, starting off this week with the Shriners Children's Open, the CGA Cup, once again in Las Vegas next week as well. So back to back Vegas events, and we're gonna break them down from a PGA DFS perspective. Starting off with this week's Shriners Children's Open, getting you set with all of our thoughts on each golfer and how we're viewing things made DFS perspective. Welcome on into the Heat Check Fantasy podcast powered by Number Fire. That's right here on the Fanduo podcast network in NumberFire.com. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for NumberFire.com, joined here as always by Brandon Gedula. He is the managing editor for NumberFire.com. Brandon, finally back to talk with you once again after a brief layoff because I was occupied with baseball and NFL and NASCAR and everything going on all at once. So happy to be back talking with you once again on a Tuesday. How you doing today? Yeah, it's gonna say not always join. I guess technically you are always joined by me on the PDH show. But you were not always joined by me. Yes, correct. So it's one of those situations, but it's really good to have you back. I know that might be shocking news to you, but doing the solo show is, it's fun, it's different, but I'm just glad that you handle all the behind the scenes stuff. I always feel quite lazy with the podcast by comparison, so I just wanna thank you, but it's gonna be good to have some back and forth because this field is... Why do you feel lazy? You edit out breaths, which is something that I would never even consider doing because like... I got stuff to do, man. Like I don't wanna sit around here and like I'm a human being who breathes, you all can deal with it. I don't think you care, but like, so from a laziness perspective, I don't think that's you here. Well, I mean, for anyone watching this on YouTube that you can see that I got like the double like pop filters and still I must be a heavy breather. So I think it's my, yeah, I think it's just a tendency that I have. But I mean, I was just trying to say, I like having you back, you do a lot of the kind of, I don't know, not paperwork, because I'll digital or digital stuff. Yeah, that kind of stuff. That way I can focus more on the analysis. When I have to focus more on the, making sure that everything's set up properly and published, I'm not as sharp. Although I did recommend some Sam Burns, I just said I was probably more likely to... I mean, I played some Sam Burns myself. I said, he's kind of the one guy that, you know, could be popular, but I also, I did say that my one simulation model thought he was a little overvalued to win, but so. Well, how dare you? How dare you underestimate Sam Burns? Just a change. Yeah, just underestimate Sam Burns. Tragedies, we got to bounce back this week by breaking down the Shriners Children's Open. It is a TPC Summerlin, which is 7,255 yards and a par 71. There are 144 golfers in the field for this week. The top 65 plus ties will make the cut after the first two rounds. So we're gonna need to make sure we find guys who can make the cut, which is not always super easy in a field like this. So, Brandon, when you look at TPC Summerlin, what stands out to you from a stats perspective? Big greens and lots of scoring. Average green size is 7,400 square feet, according to the GCSAA for some context on the PGA Tourer's usual rotation. Average green sizes are about 6,000 square feet. So bigger greens, which would be fun for me to play. Oh, actually not because then I just three putt everything by hitting the greens. And then I feel like my putting is bad, even though I mean my, my irons and wedges are bad, but- At least you can tell yourself like, hey, I hit the green in like two shots. Yeah. Green and reg, now I can four putt from 70 feet. They're bent grass greens. So if you're someone who likes to dig into putting splits, just know that. Kind of slower greens a little bit, or at least a little more average, 11.5 in the stint meter. But here's like one thing that really stands out here. The past five winning scores have been 23 under, 23 under, 21 under, nine under and 20 under. The nine under came during a super heavy wind, year. There was gusts like up over 30, 35 miles per hour. So that's an outlier. And only two other times has this, has the winner been worse than 20 under par. So you need birdies this week, which is always a good strategy on Fando anyway, but you're going to need to ramp that up a lot. So how do we get there? Well, you know, distance is always an advantage, but the data kind of says that accuracy is important here, or at least accuracy can help gain some leverage. So scoring fast and a situation where some of the shorter hitters can very much still be in play. That increases volatility for me because it kind of keeps everyone in the conversation, aside from the very bottom tier. But again, the easier it is, like these guys are the best of the best in the world, even if this field isn't like flawless, they can cut and hit these large greens and make some putts. So I think it's going to be a week where we can be a little bit more eager to avoid the chalk, wherever we think better rises. But as far as my key stats go for the week, it's going to be stroke scan approach. Number one is always, stroke scan around the green actually popped up for one of the rare courses where I would actually put significant weight into that, which is strange because it is a scoring course. So for whatever that's worth, could correlate to some shorter approach shots and maybe good wedge play, kind of there might be some overlap there in terms of skill set, driving accuracy, birdie or better rate and stroke scan putting on bent grass. So that's what I'm seeing for this week. Yeah, for me with the off the tee stuff, I went with good dries gains because going back to last year, if you look at the median ranking to the top 15 finishers, I guess it was top 13 or whatever, cause there were some ties in there. But you look at the median rank for those guys across the full PGA tour season last year, they were 96 in distance, 74th in accuracy, 80th off the tee and 61st in good drive rate. So it did skew pretty heavily towards good drive rate there. So I'm going to go with good drives gain because like you said, distance can help too. It does kind of double count approach, but like if I'm going to double count any stat, I'm okay, double counting on approach, but then pairing that with birdies or better gained, I think will allow me to not overemphasize like dudes who hit fairways. So I think that if you pair those two together, that's kind of a good way to play things. So for me, I have a good drives gained approach, birdies are better gain and then bent grass, the stats I'm focusing on for this week as far as ones I want golfers to excel at. Yeah, I mean, I can't really argue that for anyone who doesn't know good drives or fairways hit or if you miss a fairway, that still hit the green regulation. So basically having good recovery, good irons. So it's kind of like a rudimentary stroke skin off the tee. I can't flock you for that. But I think that what it really just comes down to is when it comes to driving stats, is it do you have to be long? Do you have to be accurate or do you have to be both? And for this week, for sure, you don't have to be long. So that's kind of like how I'm approaching it. However you want to apply it from there, I think is fair. But it's just what we're trying to say here is that driving distance isn't a must. Right. It de-emphasize relative to where it's usually at. We'll take a look at golfers who have done well at TPC Summerlin in just one second. But first, a football fans, the NFL is officially back and Fanduil is giving you the opportunity to get in on the action. Each week, Fanduil is offering fans a chance to win prizes by participating in the daily fantasy football on Sundays. Prize pool is a whopping $2.5 million for a place taking home a million dollars in this week's Fanduil Sunday Million. All you got to do is head on to Fanduil today and click on the NFL Sunday Million Contest, draft a line of players, sit back and enjoy Sunday NFL football, go to Fanduil.com today to participate in the NFL Sunday Million. Eligibility restrictions apply go to Fanduil.com or download the Fanduil app for more details. Let's dive in here to who has done well at TPC Summerlin in the past talking about Kevin Na. Kevin Na is a past winner here. So obviously that's pretty relevant. One of them pretty far in the past, but either way, what do you see with Kevin Na heading here to, of course, he has enjoyed for a very long time. Yeah, I mean, so I'm gonna actually talk about two guys who have multiple wins, but they're separated by a good bit. I don't think that we put a lot of stock into the last win, but instead the more recent win, but also it's hard to knock anyone who has multiple wins at any course. Na was also the runner-up here in 2015, but he did win in 2020 and back in 2011. Now, it's not like he never struggles here, so it's not one of those situations. He was 43rd and missed the cut and 43rd in last year, missed the cut in 2016, 2018 and 2013. So there are some highs and lows for Kevin Na at TPC Summerlin. I think what matters more is the recent data and it's worth noting that Kevin Na was pretty awesome during the FedExCut playoffs. He was eighth at the Northern Trust, 17th at the BMW, third at the Tour Championship, tied for the 72-hole lead there. Missed the cut at the Fortinet Championship and his lost strokes off the tee and four of his past five starts, but I was gonna kind of save this. He's over the past three months according to DataGolf pretty easily the best golfer in the field right now. So Kevin Na, two-time winner, salary of 10,400. What are you thinking? I think that makes him interesting for sure and I really think that this is not a bad week to be balanced because there aren't really like any like super, super standout guys. So like that range is pretty attractive. The issue that I might run into is that there are other guys in that range who have also been really good recently. You got Paul Casey there. I think that Paul Casey, I probably like more than Kevin Na. The question is kind of get both in there potentially. So I think that Na is very worth that salary and very worth the look if you wanna be in there, which I very well could be. So I'm with you where I'm not totally skeptical of what he's done. Look at the past six months of true strokes game data over at DataGolf, which does include some times before this surge. It's still, he still enters up well to the salary. So yeah, I think he makes sense for sure. Not opposed, not prioritizing them over Casey specifically, but also not opposed if I do want up there. Yeah, I mean Casey, you and I both love that's just probably not the most surprising thing if anyone's ever listened to us before. His salary I think is a bit too low. He's 10, seven, I think he should probably have an 11 in front of that, in front of his name or because beside his name in front of a salary. You guys know what I mean. And yeah, it's not like he's 10, four, like Kevin Na is, 10, seven's close, but Paul Casey for me over Kevin Na, but really warmed up to Kevin Na the more and more I looked into things. Yep, I think that he's very interesting for sure. Let's talk about Abraham answer because his course profiles well for him. He's hyperaccurate, he excels on bentgrass and so not surprisingly, he's turned that into good results. In answer is three most recent starts at TPC Summerlin. He has finished fourth, missed cut and fourth. In the missed cut, he must have been right on the number because he actually gained 0.1 strokes in the field. Last year answer, he got by thanks to a lot of putting gained 8.3 on the greens. He gained 6.8 for his other top five. And that could lead you to think that what he's done has been flukey, but answer very good on approach as well. He has gained, he ranks ninth in the field in stroke team approach to the past 50 rounds. He could easily do well there too. So answers 11-8, I'm having a hard time finding any blemishes in his profile. What about you with answer for this week? Yeah, I think answer is my favorite play of the week at the top. It just, everything sets up for an A-bancer week. Like statistically, you know, he's got the good finishes. You know, it hasn't always been phenomenal with the missed cuts, but I have been the 92nd percentile in adjusted strokes, gained T-degree in over the past year, which accounts for field strength, but also recency. And I just feel like he's gonna be locked into gaining some strokes off the tee with his accuracy. He is not the longest hitter, but he's also not prohibitively short. So for me, answer is very much in play. And I'm pretty sure he's still 30 to one. No, he moved. Yeah, I was gonna say. I wrote in my helper on a number fire. I don't expect his win odds to stay at 30 to one. And they did not. Nope. I think he said he was like 20 to one in some other books too. So like even 23 might be still decently okay. We could talk more about that potentially later on. I think the answer is the priority in the upper range for this week, both because of like the corset, but also because overall from a golf perspective, he's quite good. So let's move to the other guy. The other former winner you talked about here, Martin Laird, he won in 2020, but it's the 2021 season, which still will always trip me out. So I'm gonna let you handle this one. Also I'm gonna move a plant because my dog keeps eating it. So I'll let you talk about Laird while I go handle that. Okay. All right, so Martin Laird, we get him this week at a salary of 8,100 on Fandall. I guess I'm doing this solo anyway. So good thing I got some reps in, but I mentioned Kevin Na has two wins here. So figure why not talk about Martin Laird. He's the defending champion, but also won back in 2009. That again is not the most relevant data point here, but it is hard to ignore someone with two wins at the course that we're at this week, especially when one of those wins came just last year. The recent form is quite rough, three straight missed cuts. However, it's important that you look into those missed cuts and realize kind of what happened there. He lost at least 2.8 strokes, putting in all three of those, and he's gained at least 1.2 strokes T-degree in those, which the 1.2 sounds a little low. So it's been 1.2, 2.8, and 3.3. That's honestly pretty nice. That's the recipe. If there is a recipe for having missed cuts in your profile, that's kind of what you wanna see. Struggling with the potter, but gaining strokes T-degree and data golf, which we reference a lot. They have a course history tool. They also have on that page, they have a little metric that they call experience. And it basically is like, it's like the premise that if guys are playing the same event, like they're choosing to play this event, that probably means that they like the setup and he leads or he's top five in that this week. So I mean, I feel like we could do a lot worse at 8,100 than someone who's got two wins here and is gaining some strokes T-degree. Yeah, I think that there are pretty obvious paths to failure because the bentgrass putting is not great, which is, I know that we're talking about how like, oh, you could be do for some positive punting regression, which he should be because like, you don't expect to do to lose two and a half strokes across two rounds sustainably. Like you'd hope not at least. So it definitely could bounce back. 8,100 helps alleviate those concerns too. I'm just curious if he'll generate buzz this week, given that he is the foremost recent winner, given that he is 8,100 dollars. I think that if he were to wind up generating buzz and being popular, he'd be a very easy fade just because the putting is really, really bad. But like, you know, from a just a straight up perspective, he makes sense. I'm not super inspired to get there, but I'm also not liking to cross them off, I guess. Yeah, I think it's kind of easy to get, like talk yourself into a lot of value plays, not that they're locks, but you can kind of make the case. I am scrolling through fansharesports.com. I do not see Martin Laird popping up here. Okay. So I don't think he's gonna be prohibitively chalky. Yeah. He's got one tag. Okay. So he should be fine. I don't know. I think that they like, I don't know if I'll need to be in this range because my second favorite high salary guys in the 10,000 range. So I might not need someone 81, but like he's not out of consideration. No, I know it's more, if we do open ourselves up to, and again, like you and I just don't really play low end value plays very often because their odds of even making a cut are low. When they make the cut, it's very helpful, but it's also kind of a high risk and sometimes a low reward probability for Laird. We know kind of, I'm not gonna say he's one here. So his high end outcome is winning with his current form. It very well could be, but opening ourselves up to one golfer in that salary range helps a ton, but there's also a golfer at minimum salary who I like better. So that kind of helps too. Sure, we'll talk about him later. A little tease. No, not, nope. Not gonna talk. We know. You're not gonna talk about it. Jim, you think I'm gonna keep a secret? Come on. No, I said you're gonna talk about it later and you said, no. I know it was a joke who like, as if like there's a minimum salary golfer I love, you said we're gonna talk about him. And I was like, no, I'm not. I thought that was a funny joke. I was like, freaked out. I was like, did you change your player picks? Also it's Hank Libiota in case anyone's worried that I'm actually gonna keep a secret. Good Hank, good Hank. Okay, well there we go. Now they're not gonna listen anymore. They got Brandon's value play of the week. So see you everyone. We'll talk to you next week for the CJ cut. This has been the heat show fantasy podcast. Let's talk about Lucas Glover here. Glover has missed the cut in three out of six trips to TPC Summerlin. All three of those made cuts have been recent though and all three were top 10 finishes not too shabby from 2016 through 2019. Glover's finishes were third, seventh and ninth. He gained at least 5.3 strokes T degree in each of those events. The approach play specifically very good for Glover. That's a good. The problem is that the form is kind of rough. Glover hasn't gained strokes in the field since July 11th. He won that one, but he hasn't gained since then. It's a six straight or six events stretch that includes three missed cuts. The ball striking has been good though. He's gained an approach in four straights. He's gained all the T in three of the past four. So there's some good and some bad with Lucas Glover for sure right now. How are you viewing him here at $8,700? There's some good and some bad in all of us, I think, but Glover, I love Glover this week. For the salary, he's just kind of a standout from that perspective. I feel like he's kind of a lock to gain some fairways on the field, which again, you need a little bit more than that, but anytime there's like a post win let down, it's a little bit more understandable. He's still got some life in the irons adjusted for field strength according to data golf. So for me, I'm gonna have plenty Lucas Glover and I'm not gonna worry about the missed cuts. Yeah, I think the format too. Because again, it's kind of like Laird where he's missing cuts in an acceptable fashion if there is such, I mean, there is such a thing. I think that, yeah, go ahead. Like there's probably something too like, I mean, unless these guys are looking at the data and they're like, well, I missed the cut, but I was gaining a stroke T degree and I just didn't putt well, to them, if they're missing cuts, they might not be in the best mindset. And so that might actually affect performance, but honestly, statistically like he's fine. So we're not saying that missing cuts doesn't matter to these guys, that's a different thing. But again, like you said, missing cuts in the way that we wanna see him miss cuts. And he's made two straights. So like if there were like a mental toll, it seems like he's over that. So I think that's a positive for him as well. Let's shift now to talking about current form. And one guy who could fit the mold of this course is being a guy who can make some birdies and a guy who can make some fairways, Webb Simpson, it is a non-distance course that always makes Webb pretty interesting. Webb is 11 to five. So he's in some tight competition for sure. What are you seeing with him for this week? So we're trying to do better, or at least I'm trying to do a better job but with the NFL show and just my process to think like a head to Sunday at like 4pm and maybe like five or six because we include the four o'clock slates and just be like, what are the odds I'm gonna regret not using this player? I feel like with Webb, those odds come like Friday could be, like those odds are really high that I'm just like, why did I not think harder about Webb and prioritize him? We could have talked about Webb Simpson in a course history but we didn't, so I do wanna talk about him here because in theory, we know that Webb at his peak is like world-class golfer, one of the best, especially whenever you put him at a course where he doesn't have to pound driver and just try to keep up with the field. He's not quite been himself for much of 2021 which is why I wanted to talk about him from a current form standpoint but he did finish tied for 30th at the Fortinet Championship, did lose strokes from approach which is not what you wanna see. Again, we wanna see, if we see miss cuts, we wanna see at least positive T to green if we see good results, we wanna see it come from iron play but he also ended the season with the 19th at the Open Championship, 15th at the WGC FedEx St. Jude, 7th at the Wyndham, 47th at the Northern Trust, 12th at the BMW Championship. Data Golf has him ninth in true strokes gained over the past 20 rounds including 13th in approach and 18th T to green. It's very possible Webb's like healthy again and I just, I have a lot of interest in Victor Hovland, Abraham Ancer, Scottie Scheffler, Will Zalatoris to a degree. I'm like kind of looking at these new young players but really feels like Webb could go out and just post the top three and it's like, yeah, that made all the sense. So any interest for you and Webb? No, for sure. Like it'd be very hard me not to cause like even when you, like if you look at fantasy national stuff and look at the past 50 rounds that includes the time where things were not very pretty for Webb but even if you include those times he still measures up well relative to his salary. Webb ranks 14th and birdies are better in the past 50 rounds. Ninth and bentgrass punting, 22nd in approach, 36th in good drives gained and like that lines up perfectly. We know long-term the Webb Simpson is like a world-class golfer. So you put him in this field I think that all makes a lot of sense. So I feel like to me like if I am ranking out this top tier I put private answer one and then Webb's at least in contention for number two. I would say he's competing with Hovland, Burns, Schaeffler. Like I think that's the list. It's those like four guys competing for second behind answer. So Webb is very likely to wind up in my player pool because I think that he lines up well and it's very possible he winds up being number two behind answer in the entire field. Yeah, it's one of those where I feel like he should be but I keep being drawn to Victor Hovland and Schaeffler. It makes all the sense that they would actually kind of have a breakthrough win. We've seen this event kind of be that for certain golfers in the past. So I'm nervous that I'll be too low on Webb. Yeah. And like I get the allure towards them as well because like we want birdies and Schaeffler's fifth and birdies are better getting to Hovland is first. Like you want birdies, probably want those guys. So I think that it does make sense to be drawn towards them but I still think that Webb is not shockingly a very good play. So I don't think I want to do a head to head between Webb and like Schaeffler because I think that Schaeffler does make a lot of sense too but like I at least considered it. I think I would put, I would go answer Hovland, even with the answer it feels like we love answer but am I gonna regret? Like I should have just played Webb over answer but I think it's gonna be. I don't think you'll regret that one. I think it's pretty sick. Answer Hovland Webb Schaeffler for me. I don't disagree that order. From a DFS standpoint. I think that's correct. I think I'd probably want up there. Yeah, more of the Hovland should be too. So Webb is three but that's still very high and still no Brooks. No, not currently. Okay, I just wanna check. So I'm gonna see who Kim, he's at his best on bed grass and he can make birdies. Two things we want pretty badly this week and Kim has put together some good finishes recently. If we look at him since he returned from the Olympics Kim has been to six events. He has finished 11th or better and half those. Those were all backed up by good T to green performances. He gained 8.3 at the Wyndham, 7.1 at the Fortinet, 6.7 last week. And a lot of that came around the green which as he said, it does matter this week but he's also gained at least five on approach to the past five events. Kim, $10,300. He's made all four cuts at this event and he was eighth year last year. So are you checking at Seawell Kim in that range with Kevin Na in the mid-10,000s? He's someone that's like in the mix for me. The question now is like, I'm talking in myself into more web. I really have like this feeling. Like my Wyndt simulation model feels like Scotty Shephard is a bit overvalued and pretty sure his odds of even shortened since I last looked at it. I just have a feeling that it's a very good week for Scotty Shephard. So I don't want that to like change things but if I'm seriously gonna build around four golfers in the 11,000 range, realistically I gotta say like, yeah, I'm not gonna be able to get to Seawell Kim. My initial thought was because I like Paul Casey so much that I'd probably go answer Casey as kind of my building blocks and that would put me back up into like the Seawell Kim range but for me, I like Kevin Na more. I like Cam Tringalee more and I like Walkie and Neiman more. Okay. Would you like a head to head on any of those versus Seawell? He said Na, right? Kevin Na, Cam Tringalee, Walkie and Neiman. Neiman. Not Tringalee, can't bet against my boy. I knew that was gonna happen. I might do Neiman, maybe? Yeah, let's do Neiman. Let's do Kim versus Neiman. And I like Neiman too. Like I don't think he's out of consideration but I think that I think that I feel good enough about him where I will go with him over Neiman. Yeah, I mean like this is, like it doesn't quite feel like it and the win odd, I think maybe because the win odds too or so they're a little bit flat but they're also long for like we don't have anyone at 12 to one or even though like 15 to one but that doesn't really speak to the depth of the field. It speaks to the lack of straight up like superstars in the field. Yeah. So the amount of depth we have really makes a balance build appealing but I feel like I'm gonna end up chasing the higher end guys because there are some value plays who make some sense to me. So that's always the biggest like conversation because I try to pick one of those two types of builds and stick within it rather than jump around with all my lineups. I'm still leaning more toward being a little bit more balanced with, because I can't forget about Paul Casey. Right, I think that that's the key thing for me. That's keeping me towards balances, Casey, which is scary to build your entire roster construction around one guy. That's because Casey has paths to failure, very obvious paths of failure but like I agree that he's just under salary and a guy I want to prioritize overall. So let's move now to a couple of guys who people might not be super aware of starting off with Rasmus Hoygard. He is $8,700, win odds range less than 100 to one. So what are you seeing with him in terms of the current form and what should people know about him entering this event? Yeah, I mean, if you are a golf diehard, Rasmus Hoygard is not gonna be a name that surprises you that I'm talking about here. If you're just kind of listening because you listen to us weekly or you're playing NFL and you're checking this out, Rasmus Hoygard might be a name that you hear a bit and you probably haven't heard very much before but the Hoygard boys have been kind of the rage on the European tour lately. Rasmus won the Omega European Masters after a third and then he went on to finish 18th when his twin brother, Nikolai, won. Then he missed the cut by shooting an 81, 71. So again, you wanna look at missed cuts, 81, 71. I don't know what happened. I didn't dig into that but it's like he was 75, 75 or whatever. Hoygard's just 20 years old but there's a lot of potential in the profile evidenced by that win. The European tour is I think a little bit overrated in terms of what a win actually means. So we're just kind of getting to that point in the season where you'll see someone on the European tour pick up a win or a bunch of top 10s, comes over here and plays. Like, well, he's got four straight top 10s. It's like, well, what does that mean? Thankfully, I have some data that kind of equalizes things. So here, I'm gonna kind of transfer that his three recent results, I'll skip over the missed cut and kind of give it context for the PGA tour equivalent. When he finished third at the Kazoo Classic, that would basically be like a T24 at the Wyndham. So still pretty good. His win that week would have been about a T12 at the BMW Championship. So still pretty good. And then his 18th would have been equal to about a T28 at the Fortinet Championship. So we'd still get a golfer at 8,700 with like three straight top 30s aside from that missed cut again, which I don't know what happened there. He might get some buzz, but probably not enough. I kind of think it could be worth the risk with all the unknowns. So he's someone who I wanna just kind of keep an eye out for, see if people are talking about him a ton. And if they're not, I might just try to buy early. Okay, let's talk about Sawhith heat at Thigala. And we can kind of compare those two because both these guys require level adjustments. Thigala is at the Coron Ferry Tour. And you've mentioned that the Coron Ferry Tour is pretty similar to the European Tour in terms of difficulty. Thigala, one of the guys come in from there. Pretty successful last year. Looked good early in the swing season. Thigala played both the Fortinet Championship and the Sanderson Farms Championship. He gained 2.5 an approach at the Fortinet but lost it all in the greens. Then at Sanderson Farms, he gained 6.80 to green, plus three putting and finished eighth. Thigala's adjusted stroke scan data the past six months puts him between Doug Guim and Cameron Davis. And we love Doug Guim on this podcast. In this house, we appreciate Doug Guim. It's not elite, but like, you know, it's worthy of looking at for sure. He's $8,400. So are you buying into Thigala or is it mostly Hoygard who stands out to you among these guys coming from different tours? So if I had to pick one, it's gonna be Thigala for sure. I like what I've seen a bit more overall. He's been kind of lingering a little bit more. Actually finishing TA at the Sanderson Farms is very tangible. It's gonna translate, put it on the corn fairy tour as well. I would assume translates a little bit better to the PGA tour than the European tour. So if I had to pick one, it's gonna be Thigala. But honestly, I don't, again, I talked about Hoygard as someone I would consider playing but they're not gonna be core plays for me. I like to talk about these golfers at this time of year because it's really fun to look at the new things. I was just talking about that same phenomenon with Web Simpson. They're fine plays. They're not that, these two specifically aren't standing out to me as being overrated but they're not gonna be building blocks. I think that makes sense. And probably the way it should be. I think the one thing that's reassuring with Thigala is that his short game numbers are pretty good. And a lot of times when I get drawn into these guys coming from tours, it's because of their ball striking. Thigala has had good ball striking recently but also the longer term stuff on a short game is solid too. So I think that's encouraging with him. I am open to both these guys personally but I think that Thigala I'd agree is the one I'd be more inclined to chase because I feel like the short game being good gives them a floor and then the ball striking we saw last week is in the path to a ceiling at least which is encouraging and I think worth some looks for sure. Let's take a look at what the bookmakers are saying for this week. Things, as you mentioned, super flat at the top here. Brooks Kepke and Victor Hovland, co-favorites at 20 to one. If Andrew a sports book, nobody's shorter than that. Scottish chef for an Abraham answer, both 23 to one. You mentioned that Abe open at 30 to one. He has shortened, he should have. Sam Burns, 25 to one, coming off his win. Will Zalatoris is 28 to one. Kevin Naluy Westhasen, Web Simpson and Hideki Matsuyama all 30 to one. Sung Jinn and Harris English around at the top group at 32 to one. So the win odds here are much flatter than we've seen in a long time, but as you said, it's still a deep field. So how does it impact your approach this week for DFS given the way the win odds break down? Yeah, I think it's gonna be best if we then, again, I'm very enamored with the names at the top the more I look at it, but just with the depth here I'm gonna be a little bit more balanced. I think that's the right call. Nobody in this field has, you know, obviously based on the, you know, the sports book odds, but nobody's got like crazy high win odds at all. Nobody in my model is above 5%. All things considered, that's very, very low. So I think it's gonna be best if I just optimize some things toward the mid range. There are a lot of golfers that I would justify playing who we can't get into. We can't talk about all 144 golfers, but just some names that I will be like, that I have a lot of interest in that I'm not gonna talk about as my favorite plays. Like Brian Harmon at 9,700 makes a ton of sense for this week. I will go back to Jason Kochrack. I mentioned Cam Trangali, Kevin Naugh, Joaquin Neiman, even something like an Ian Poulter, like this week is justified with 9,200. So I'm getting really into like these value plays, but I think the right call is to rein that back in and focus on like the nine and 10,000 range for the week. Yeah, I think that my favorite approach is answer plus balance. And I think that that is one that works both for cash games and for tournaments because you're not losing a lot of upside by peppering the 10,000 range. That's always my concern is that I'm sapping away upside by focusing on guys who are like in the second tier relative to the field, whereas like this week, like the separation between, you know, hypothetically, like the separation between, let's say Harris English, who we love Harris English and, you know, Kochrack, Trangali, et cetera, et cetera. I don't think that's that huge. So I'm okay dipping down and taking those guys and taking advantage of some salary savings, taking advantage of guys who do have a path to a good event. So I think that that's very much on my mind this week. Yeah, I mean, Hideki at 11, Harris English at 10,9. I have them at 2.2% likely to win. Kochrack, Trangali in the low 10,000s, 2.1%. So virtually the same like Brian Harman's up there too. I just threw his name out there, but I'm with you, you know, in a more top heavy field, you know, just with the way that Vandals hours work, you don't get golfers at, you know, 13,000 and then everyone else's in the 10,000 range. Usually this kind of the same distribution, but we see seven, eight, nine percent win odds sometimes at the top, we don't have that. So I think the right call, it's not as fun from a, you know, taking some stands on some value plays. It's not as fun, but I think the right approach is focusing on some of these 9,000, 10,000 dollar golfers. I do think there's room to still take a shot at like one of them. Like if you want to go with like Hank and Hank Leviota and then just pepper the daylights out of the 9,000 and 10,000 range, like that works pretty well too. So I'm on board of that. So if you plug in Abraham answered 11, 8, your remaining salary for your five golfers is 96, 40. If you pair him with Hank, it goes up to 10, 3. I'm not saying you play Hank in every lineup. I'm not saying that. We talked about Martin Laird. We'll talk about some other low salary plays, but you can get back up into like the 10K range for multiple, multiple golfers. And that has a lot of appeal for me this week. Yeah, I think I agree very much so. And I think that it looks pretty good. Just looking at it right now, looks pretty good. So I'm unopposed to playing things that way. We mentioned that Abraham answers odds that shifted significantly. He opened at 30, he's now 23 to one. That was a price correction, basically. He got that down because he should have, what other golfers, salaries have moved or odds have moved since things opened yesterday? So there's been a few. Scotty Schaeffler is now 23 to one. He was 25 to one. Again, Abraham answered 30 to 23. Will's out towards 30 to 28. Jason Kochrack, our guy, lengthened 37 to 44. Disrespect. The aforementioned- Did they not know about the Pocket Kings? Pocket Aces? Pocket Queens. This guy, I think he's got Pocket Sevens as well. Jacks. You know, why not? Roll it all out there. Yeah. And then Brian Harmon from 70 to 65. I just mentioned his name. Nobody else has moved with odds better than 100 to one. So I'm not gonna rattle off those guys. Are we overlooking the Kochrack in Vegas narrative? Like I feel like that should be a thing that gets discussed. I don't know if it's a good narrative. It might be a massive downgrade. But I think we should at least consider that maybe he's a guaranteed winner. I mean, so when you put Jason Kochrack out in Vegas and he's literally telling us that he has... He's cheating. That he's cheating. I think you gotta bump that off a bit. Jason Kochrack is in band from several casinos. That's actually, I have no idea if that's true. Just a disclaimer. I'm not trying to slander our boy, but just saying consider the Kochrack in Vegas narrative for better or for worse. And he won the CJ Cup if memory serves. Did he? Okay. So the Kochrack in Vegas narrative very live. I think we gotta consider. Also, isn't Kevin Knapp, doesn't he live in Vegas? I don't know. I'm really bad with knowing where golfers live. Yeah. He has a home in Vegas. So just saying, just saying, we gotta consider all this. So pepper the mid-range because we have the Kochrack and the Kevin Knapp narratives. Yeah. That's it. We should just, we kind of save so much time if we just knew where these guys were. I tried to wrap up the podcast like 20 minutes ago and you wouldn't let me. That is... Which lower salary golfers have odd standout to you? Okay. So below 9,500, if Danny Willett, who won last week at the Alfred Dunhill Lynx Russell Henley, 70 to one Danny Willett, 65, I don't know if I said that. Below 9,000, Carlos Ortiz is 95 to one at 9,900. Lucas Glover, also 95. Figala, 95. Henrik Norlander, 95. Hoygaard's, 95 to one. These guys are all below 9,000. That's really about it though. Yeah. I think that it's a week where you'd want to be cautious with those numbers too because I think there's a lot of mobility in that lower range so you could get, you know, buzz for potentially unjustified reasons. Like what's your read on Willett? I know obviously there's a reason he's getting buzzed but I feel like I'm not super drawn towards him despite the current form there. Yeah, the current form's really bad and that's hard to, like, it's hard to kind of get over. Yeah. Okay. I agree. I agree. I mean, I was trying to, like, I don't know. I feel like it's the win. I agree. Whether for this week you'd mentioned there was an event previously where wind brought the scores way closer to par. That's probably not going to be the case this week. On Thursday, wind speeds will start below five miles per hour. Pick up to around 11 by 2 p.m. So an edge for the earlier golfers. Things are a bit more steady throughout the day on Friday. There is still an edge for the early crowd but a bit more muted. So those teeing off early Thursday might have a slight edge but it's not enough for me to go with, like, waves. But like, you know, if you want to bump up guys who are teeing off earlier Thursday, I think that's fine. I would not go far with that at all. Things more calm the rest of the week. So only slight tweaks. I wouldn't change things too much based on that. I wouldn't go out of your way to target guys based on that. But at least we're noting that there is a little bit of wind for this week. Let's move into our player picks for the Shriners Children's Open based on the salaries over at Fanduel.com. Brandon, who is standing out to you in the top range this week. Who's standing out to me? Both of the guys you picked. Oh, sorry. So you did wish that I weren't in the podcast. You could talk whatever you wanted. Yeah, we should do that for the PGA. We do that for Anifono. Yeah, that's fine. I found it that week. No, I mean, I'm fine with going with Victor Hovland, 11-9. I think he's my clear secondary option behind. It's not a spoiler at this point. Abraham answer. I think he just has, like, the right skills to dominate. Go deep here at TPC Sumberland. So very fine with the salary of 11-9. Leads the field in birdie or better rate and an adjusted T-degree in play over the past year. The birdie or better rate comes over the past 50 rounds. And that's from Fantasy National. Also leads in birdie chances, which also comes from Fantasy National. It's their opportunities gain metric. So you're looking at a golfer who gets into birdie range, makes birdies, is the best T-degree. He's accurate. He's close to neutral on bentgrass. He's above average for this field with you around the green play, which again is kind of important here. I don't have anything bad to say about Victor Hovland. I don't think bad to say. I just prefer answer by a bit. And that's not a shot at Hovland. I think Hovland's a very good alternative for sure. So if like, if answer were to wind up being outlandishly popular, which I don't think will happen. I think there are enough good dudes to mute that, put a lid on it. I would say Hovland a very fine pivot. But overall, I like answer a lot. He is a statistical beast for this course. Leads the field and good drives gain the past 50 rounds. He is ninth in approach, 13th in birdies are better gained, 18th in bentgrass putting, and he's turned that into good results here specifically with a couple top buys, but more importantly, the form is very good. He has seven top 10s in his past 11 events for those or top five finishes, including of course a win at the WGC St. Jude where I was not here. Couldn't get to talk about answer there, which is kind of sad, but either way, kudos to him there. He is third in the field in adjusted strokes gain the past six months and should get a boost due to the course lad. So I think that answer, first guy put in for a cash game lineup, feeling really good about him. And I am okay with answer. Any final thoughts for you on answer? No, he's a number one play. Alrighty, who else do you like in this upper range? Kevin Nah, 10,000, 400. I know we talked about him already, but I'm warming up to him more and more. Already mentioned that he's won here twice, Jim with his detective work found out about the home game for him. According to Data Golf, I'm pretty sure it's home. I don't know where he's from originally. According to Data Golf, Nah has gained an average of 2.06 strokes per round over the past three months with their field strength adjustments. That is easily the best in the field. Only Louis Wiesteson at 1.86 is within a third of a shot per round for Kevin Nah over the past, again, three months. So good recent form, good results here, up and down results here. Just gonna go with Kevin Nah. Just to update, he was born in Seoul, South Korea, grew up in Southern California, but now owns a home in Las Vegas. So just home owner narrative, I think is the correct way to phrase that for Kevin Nah. So we'll go with that. The home owner narrative for Nah. I like Nah. I think Nah is a cash game consideration. He might have been this range. Very okay with that. And not against him for tournaments either. My second high salary guys, Paul Casey at 10.7 outside of the putting. You know, Casey looks perfect for this week. He's third and good drives gained first in approach. 10th and birdies are better gain the past 50 rounds. He ranks fifth in true strokes gained the past six months per Data Golf. That's all great. The putting is always a concern, but Bengras is his least bad surface. So that's good. I am in on Casey here, even knowing that things could go around the greens. What are your thoughts on Paul Casey, someone who you do like? Yeah, like him a lot. Just, you know, makes sense from a birdie standpoint and iron standpoint, a wedges standpoint. And then you point out that he's at least kind of close to neutral on Bengras. I'll take that. Okay, let's go down to the mid range. Who is standing out to you there? Charlie Hoffman again. He's just really underrated. The salary is 9,700. Another name in this tier who I will be building around. And we want to play Charlie Hoffman primarily at easy events, easy courses. Neutral with the Bengras putting a minus 0.02 strokes per ounce of basically just zero, which is fine. 99th percentile though over the past 50 rounds in opportunities gained and in birdie or better rate gained. And I don't know if this qualifies as S tier. So I'll call him A tier here with the ball striking where he's 91st percentile over the past year in my database with the ball striking. What's the tiering again? Why is S better than A? I believe it comes from Japan. Some people also I think say that it stands for super, but I think it's- What is A, awesome? No, I think it's just, it's like an ABC tier, but I think S just goes above A. Okay, so Charlie Hoffman A tier. Okay, I think he makes sense. I think 91st percent, if he was like 99th percentile that's 100th percent like that's S tier. Okay, it's Abraham answer S, Charlie Hoffman A. I mean, I guess- Okay, sure, I'll figure this out eventually. Let's go to Jason Kochrak. I think because I am gonna go to Casey and strive for more balance, I'm okay. Talking of Kochrak in the mid-range at 10-1 Kochrak, putting much better recently. He has lost in the greens in just three of the past 10 events. He's been to over the past six months. His adjusted strokes gain putting in that time is plus 0.52 which is actually pretty solid for this field. It's like decently good. The ball striking has been a bit spotty but he's still sixth in birdies or better gain in the past 50 rounds. Kochrak, 43rd in good rise gains, 30th in approach. That's good enough for me to take the dive on him at 10-1. What are your thoughts on our boy Jason Kochrak this week? Yeah, and I can confirm that he did win the CJ Cup. Okay. I remember that one now a bit better. It's, I always applaud people for being able to remember what happened last year. I forget already what happened like two weeks ago but he beat Xander. So that's I think why it stuck with me a little bit extra but very good profile for Kochrak as usual. I know you said he's 10-1 but it's our podcast. So he can be a mid-range play if we want. And he's going to be part of the core for me. And like I talked about the 11,000 range having a lot of names but the 10,000 range, the upper nines, tons of names here. So Kochrak, absolutely. Yep, I think that Kochrak really solid guy. And again, like nah, a catch in consideration as well. Solid guy, better golfer. Better poker player. Let's move now to your second mid-range guy. Who else do you like here? Mark Leishman, 9,600. I'm coming around on Leishman, I'm I think very late. I think people love Mark Leishman which I get from like a- Do you base your perception based on whether I talk about them or not? Cause I talked about Leishman a couple of times over the summer. No, no. Okay, okay. From what I hear and what I read and stuff. Like I think people like love Mark Leishman. I'm glad you're not basing things off of me cause I'd be detrimental. I hear the whole world talking about Doug Gimm and I've decided that Doug Gimm that's golfer on the planet based on perception. You won't believe how many people are talking to me about Luc List. I'm going to the grocery store and people are talking to me about Luc List, but- I was in a coffee shop and I overheard a small table next to me talking about Luc List's putting numbers. And I heard this guy say Jared Goff is the best thing to happen to the NFL. I don't say that, I slack it now. I keep the bad takes on slack. They're not audible cause I don't need them to be replant on Twitter. Videos are too easy to make nowadays. So those stay on slack, the Jared Goff ones. All right. So Leishman, like I'm coming around us a little bit late. I still think he's kind of tough to figure out, but for the upside, I'm willing to go there for 9,600. He was T4 at the Fortinet Championship and that came from Irons and putting, which is a perfect combination. It's not that we look at good results that come with putting and say that's bad. It's if it comes with other things, that's very good. We want golfers to be good putters. We just want the Irons and ball striking in general to be there. Slightly positive bent grass putter for him rates out in the 75th percentile and adjusted stroke scheme approach over the past year. So the longterm, again, this waits for recency in my model. So I'm starting to come around to Leishman. I think the salary is very justified. Yeah, I think he's decent in that range. I want to talk about that range in general though. We got Hoffman there. Your boy, Mito Pereira is $9,800. Matthew Wolfe has had good results here. 17th this past weekend. Like there are some guys in this range. Are Hoffman and Leishman your two favorites here? Anyone else standing out to you? What are your thoughts overall on this upper 9,000 range? We've kind of glossed over a bit. Specifically, if I don't even look at anyone with a 10 in front of their name, I am cool with... So then Royne's been kind of trending up, but I'm afraid to get there. I would say Harman, Hoffman, Leishman. That's probably those three primarily for me. Okay, no love for your boy, Mito. You've jumped off Mito, Ben. Oh, it's not that. It's just I prefer the other. Yeah, okay, I mean, yeah. And I don't want to sit here and say, here are the 27 plays. 16 guys I want to play. So those would be my top three. I think for me, I'm probably going to Hoffman above all, I think, so. Yeah, I think he'd be my number one in this tier. He just profiles as the best odds to score really well. Yep, I'd agree with that. My second midsalary guy is Kevin Strelin, a bit below this range at $9,400. He's bad on bank graphs, so that's a risk, but the ball striking has been great. He gained 2.2 in approach at the Sanderson Farms Championship. Also picked up three off the tee there. He is 11th in good drives gained in 21st in approach to past 50 rounds. Strelman, 34th in birdies are better gained despite the bad putting. And I think that's pretty encouraging. He's $9,400. I think that is where he should be, like in the old Coke rack range where he's good, but has very serious and very obvious flaws. So I think the Strelman works down here. I would probably rather find the money to get up to like Hoffman at 97, but I do think that if I can't get there, I'm okay, settling for Strelman at 94. Where does he grade out for you relative to this tier? Pretty well. I think his bent grass potting at least is trending up over like the past 100 rounds. So it's not positive, but it's not horrible. 35th percentile, a minus 0.06 per round over the past 100 rounds. But I think for me, I prefer Taylor Gutch. Would you be interested in a Taylor Gutch Kevin Strelman bet? I look to Taylor Gutch as a consideration to talk up here. Gutch is 94. If I'm trying to recall, I think the reason I went with the Strelboy was because of the birdie numbers. I think that would make you lean Strelman, but Gutch is fine there too. Yeah. I view this as being pretty even. I would be okay with it, but I'm not like adamant that I like Strelman more. I mean, we have the bobble hat, we've got wind picks, and then we have the bets we do on the show. The bets we do on the show don't actually lead to anything. So I'm gonna try to be a little bit more generous with my willingness. Yeah, let's just do it then. Let's do Strelman versus Gutch. The Strelboy versus the Gutch. Let's move down to the lower salaried options. Who do you like at $9,000 or lower this week? Now that I've entered that into the database, Patton Kezire, right at $9,000, he could kind of have some troubles because he's ninth in the ninth percentile and fairways gain, but could also make a lot of birdies. 94th percentile and birdie are better rigging over the past 50 rounds. So there's some risk, but honestly, he seems under salaried for how good he's been over the past year. He has the fourth best golfer at or below $9,000 in my long-term adjusted form. The other guys above him are Taylor Moore, who I liked last week, Ryan Palmer and Stuart Sink, but if you want to kind of have someone profile as like someone who's going to make a ton of birdies of those four, it's going to be Kezire for me. I think that if you play the angle of, oh, if the tee play doesn't matter as opposed to distance doesn't matter, that's where Kezire winds up being really attractive. And I think you can play that angle this week, given like if you look at data golf numbers where like distance and accuracy grade up to usual, both of them are less important than they usually are. So like you could play the angle of off the tee play matters less, in which case Kezire is awesome. So I think that's fine. I think that he does look pretty good for that reason and other reasons as well. I like Pat Perez at $8,700, Perez for $88. I struggled when he missed the cut at the four net championship. So things could go poorly, but I like a lot of what he does here at $88. Perez is well-rounded, ranks 34th and good drives gained, 40 second in approach, 42nd in birdies are better gained. He is 10th in bank grass putting. Perez did finish third here back in 2019. So he does another course. I think he's interesting in the lower side range. Brandon, what are your thoughts on Pat Perez this week? Gets a boost on bank grass in a course where he doesn't have to be long. I just don't know myself if I'm going to get there with Lucas Glover, with Patton, because I read above him, Sebastian Munoz at the same salary. Do you want to do Munoz versus Perez, Bet? No, I felt bad as soon as I said it. Okay, what about Perez versus? I might do Perez versus Glover, actually. I like Glover, but I might do Perez versus Glover. Let me find Lucas. Actually, no, I don't. I like both, but I think Glover is good enough for I want to avoid that one. But I like Perez. So nothing wrong with Pat Perez, but I would even go Ryan Palmer above him. You want to do that, Bet? Let me check, quick. Yeah, I would take that, Bet, if you want to make that one. Jim knows something that I don't, but... No, I like you. I talk to Ryan Palmer plenty. I just don't think that this is the week for him. All right, I'll do it. Okay, Pat Perez versus Ryan Palmer are head to head number two for this week. Number three, what was the other one? Neiman over Siwu. Oh, yeah, yeah, I'm going to win all three. Okay, who else do you like here at this low range? It's the guy we teased before, it's old Hank. Yeah, and statistically, you will win all three of these because it's been bad. Regression. Yeah, I like Hank Libiota at 7,000. If you do go minimum salary, it opens up a lot this week. And there's a difference between rostering like three golfers below 8,500 and rostering one in a lineup. I'm gonna go more of the route of one per lineup this week, which I would still consider somewhat balanced, but Libiota missed the cut at the Fortnite championship despite ranking 13th in Strokeskin approach. And that means he played two rounds, but was still 13th in Strokeskin approach. He's really been relying on the putter lately, which you don't wanna see. You wanna see that it's good, but if it's only putting, that's bad, but the irons are also great. So he's got the irons in the putting. Over the past year, Libiota's in the 80th percentile and adjusted approach play in my database. 77th percentile and adjusted putting. He's got 80th percentile birdie numbers over the past 50 rounds. He's a positive bent grass putter, 0.23 strokes per round over his past 100 on bent grass. I'm gonna play Hank. It could hurt me, but I'm gonna do it. Do you think he's gonna play for cash because of how much he opens up or no? I think so. Like his, I think so too, because like he look at the, the adjusted Strokeskin numbers he's good relative to guys in like the 9,000 range there. He's just missing cuts. But if he makes a cut and is like, even we'll give him even top 25, not say 13th in approach, like that's gonna be a great finish for minimum salary. Right. I think that he's a cash game play. Very okay going in there for tournaments too. So I think Hank is like, the mindset in cash game should be to maximize the value you're getting relative to salary. Or like the utilizing dudes who are under salary and Hank is probably the guy most under salary this week. So I think he makes sense there. My second low salary guy is Lucas Glover. I do have concerns around the form as we discussed before, but like at 87 in this field, that's not too bad. The ball striking has been good. Glover's been giving it back with a short game, lost 5.5 strokes on the short game at the Sanderson farms, lost 1.4 at the BMW. And that stuff can stabilize. And if it does, it should help Glover snap out of this little string. So I think he's a steady value play at 87 for this week. Very okay with him. I'd put him above Palmer too, because I'm gonna rank out dude. So I'd like more, but I prefer Perez over Glover, but I do like the decent enough for this week. Yeah, I mean, we have options here. There's also Stuart Sink, Brandon Todd in the low 8,000, smart and layered again, low 8,000, Lonto Griffin 7600. It's appealing, but a lot of these guys have bigger question marks. Yeah, for Glover himself, he kind of is that he's a tier above, so I'm not gonna lump him in there. But if you make your cutoff 8,700 with Lucas Glover, you have a really balanced lineup. I think that makes a ton of sense this week. Yep, I think it does as well. Let's finish up with our win picks based on the odds over at Fanadule Sportsbook. These are the first time we've done these so far. You can go first, I'll let you go. Well, I presume you want Abraham answer. I don't know. I mean, like he shortened a lot. I still think there's value there, but like there is an angle to I'm getting him at a worse number. And like I was still kind of bad about that. So I don't think he's automatic. If you want him, you can take him. So like I, he was a great value at 30 to one. He's about even for me at 23. So that's not what I want to see. I'm gonna start off though with Paul Casey at 35 to one. Okay. So you can have Paul Casey at 35. And Jeffler also was a bit lower than I wanted. So he was on my radar, but we're gonna get 30. What's that? Web is 30 still. I was gonna go web. I'm gonna take web. I like it. I know we can take the same picks here, but you know, it's the first show of the year. I don't have to use as much game theory. Hey, what do you want for your second one? I will go with, let me see real quick here. Nah, it's gonna take too long. I'll go with, oh boy. So my model likes Louie, a good deal. I don't think I'm gonna get there. Okay. I'll take him actually though. So you can talk about what you're gonna talk about, but like I'm gonna take Louie. Okay. I will, oh boy. Yeah, I'm gonna go with Abraham answer. Okay. So you have Abraham answer and Paul Casey, our two guys. I went with web and Louie, they're both 30 to one. The reason I was into Louie, we didn't talk about a lot in the podcast, but I think that's because his salary is higher. Like the discount I'm getting on Louie relative to the top guys is bigger in betting than it is in daily fantasy. And I'm okay taking that discount. Louie leads this field in data golf's true strokes gained the past six months by a decent amount. So I'm actually okay with Louie. So I will go with the vets. And in a swing season where we typically see guys break out who are younger. Let's go with the vets. I'm going to go with the web Simpson, Louie Westaysen and you have Abraham answer and Paul Casey. I like both of those two, but I think I feel pretty good about the win picks this week. Yeah, I would have went with Scotty Schaeffler if his odds were a little bit better, but yeah. Okay. Well, that is all that we have here for this week. Brandon, any final thoughts before we send people off to build their lineups for the Shriners? Fade the chalk this week. Just because it's so volatile and it's so wide open. Nobody's a must play. If it ends up that Abraham answer is the guy that everyone's talking about, even though he's my favorite, I will play somebody else more primary, like more often. There are logical pivots in each tier. And I think that's, again, we talk about this a lot, but I am far more willing to fade the chalk when I have logical pivots, hovel into very logical pivots, web, logical pivot, Louie even I think could work there too. So you've got ways to do it. We love answer, but if it tracks that way, that's okay. And I'll be very sad that that can work out for sure. That is all that we have here for today on the heat check fantasy podcast, but plenty of more goodness here on the number fire daily fantasy podcast. We, of course, have our week four daily fantasy podcast recap, breaking down how the rookie quarterbacks in week four, breaking down the David Montgomery injury, talking about the implications of that and a lot more. Find that by searching for the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed. Wherever you get your podcast while you're there, hit subscribe, leave a rating and review as well because those do help us out tremendously. Also, if you're watching over on YouTube, hit the like button there and hit subscribe as well because that does help us out a bunch. The week five preview podcast coming up on Thursday at 10 a.m. on YouTube and up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed after that, Brandon. If people have questions for you on Twitter, where can they find you there? I'm at Goodwill 13, GDULA13. And I'm at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. You can also follow the Fandual Podcast Network at Fandual Podcast. Big thank you to everyone for tuning in for today. Good luck to you with your PGA DFS lineups for the Shriners Children's Open. We'll talk to you once again next week for Jason Kochrax Playland with C.J. Cup. This has been the heat check fantasy podcast powered by number fire.