 Good friend of mine. His name is Josh in Texas. He was watching the kids 10 hours a day because she was pursuing a career. He has a construction business, but he can work at night. They're divorced, friendly. He was watching the kids for 10 hours a day and he was still paying $1,800 a month in child support. So they just came to a rational agreement and said, hey, I'm going to waive the child support because you're taking care of the kids all the time. Why don't we just share the kids equally and we'll just dispense the child support. So they came up with their own agreement. And in Texas, judges are required to take mutual agreements. So they show up to the judge and what they think is going to be signing this mutual agreement. No child support. They're going to equally share custody. And they had a real nice flexible arrangement where when she had to travel, he could keep the kids so they could just change it up how they needed to, you know? The Texas Attorney General sent a lawyer to court and said, you cannot do this because they will not be paying child support. They interfered with an agreement for equal custody because they would lose the matching funds over the lifetime of a child. It's a lot of money. That's the degree to which the states are involved in promoting doors.