 Alone 18 years, 18 editions of the tournament, the organizer, Brian Callahan, realized that the women's performance was significantly better than their international rating. That means when the stronger women's of the world were playing a very strong male opposition, they felt more motivated and the results were better than usual. Therefore, Brian decided to organize a specific edition with a clear opposition between men and women as a main matter of that edition. Among the top 100 in the world, we only have one woman. And regarding the number of players, we have just one woman for every 10, 12 or 14 men playing chess. In a game or sport where physical strength is not important at all, I mean endurance is important, but brute force is not important at all, this is a very big mystery. Unfortunately, today in the 21st century, in the majority of the countries in the world, chess has a label of masculinity. Giving a puppet as a present to a boy is almost as strange as giving a chess set as a present to a girl. The scientific studies about the differences between males and females' brains are in contradiction. We know, of course, that brains are different because the hormones are different, but how different, how much different? That we don't know yet. It could happen that women are genetically stronger than men for certain activities and vice versa, and chess could be one of those activities, but we have to wait, we still don't know about it. Before poverty, the differences between boys and girls in chess is not big, but when the hormones come, then a big number of girls are quitting chess immediately, between 11 and 13 years old, while most of the boys keep playing chess. Well, precisely at that moment, the male's brain is starting to be full of testosterone, and testosterone makes you more competitive. Among boys, adolescents boys, it is very common that their target is to be the best in some field, while among girls, this is not that important, generally speaking. They are much more interested in making some social networks, knowing new people and things like that. Of course, it is true that some girls, when they are older and they arrive to the university, then they become very competitive, but it is too late in terms of chess in a high competition because what you are not able to progress between 12 and 18 years old, it is impossible to recover later on. But the hormones theory is in question when we see the polgar case. We have three sisters, Susan, Sofia and Judith in Hungary, who are the object of a pedagogical experiment. Both parents, this is important to remember, are professionals in education and pedagogy. And before getting married, they were already thinking about the experiment they were planning to do. They were very lucky, they had three girls, no boys, and the experiment was none of the three girls went to the school, except for exams. They were educated at home, chess was one of the most important subjects, together with mathematics, literature, history, geography, et cetera, et cetera. And well, they took some additional measures to somehow balance the situation and avoid the girls having psychological problems. In the afternoons, many people from Budapest, both older people and children, were invited to come to the house, the Polgar's house, home, to play with the girls and socialize and so on. And very important, in my opinion, they started to travel very early all over the world. In my opinion, traveling is the best school of life. So probably that was a very good way of counterbalancing the lack of social life. But actually, the results were very good. In both fields, human, I mean educational and chess, from the human point of view, those three girls are today three mothers and very cultivated, very elegant, multilingual. Everything is positive from the outside point of view, regarding the Polgar sisters. From the chess point of view, well, Susan, the older one, was female world champion. Sophie, the middle one, quit chess when she was 19, but until that point, she had fantastic results playing against men. And the younger Judith is the strongest female player in the history of chess. She's the only woman in the top ten. She was the eighth in the world at her best. And she retired in 2014. And since then, she's working very hard about chess as an educational tool. And this is, of course, a very significant case when we are talking about chess and women. One very prominent psychiatrist from the USA, Luan Brizandine, wrote two books, The Male's Brain and the Female's Brain. In one of them, she talks about one very good friend of her who was a mother of one boy and one girl. And she was obsessed with educating both of them in an equal way, with no differences. Then one day, she went to her girl's room and she discovered that the girl was cradling a track. Therefore, if the baby educated in such a way was cradling a track, what does mean? Is that genetic? Maybe. But that girl was also under the influence from other elements like TV or other people, relatives visiting the home, the family, and things like that. We don't know. Instead of just wait until the science gets more clear about this debate or this problem, we can do several things. The first one I recommend to do is starting Tomorrow Morning, is to include chess as an educational tool in preschool, I mean from three to six years old, boys and girls. We have enough evidence and a very high level of satisfaction between school teachers, specialized at that age. Chess is very good in a giant floor chess board mixed with music and dancing. You can work very important pedagogical targets, like psychometricity, laterality, memory, concentration, respect for the rules, respect for the opponent, horizontal, vertical, diagonal, first impulse control, etc. If you do so with boys and girls together, for those girls chess becomes something completely normal on a daily basis. So you are deleting completely this label of masculinity I mentioned before. Then what else can we do? Precisely what Brian Callahan and the Gibraltar organizers are doing this year, 2022, here at the Garrison Library. We have a team of ten women, a team of ten men. They are playing each other every day for ten days. That means 100 games altogether. As the average of the ratings is more or less similar, more or less similar, it's a bit higher in the case of men, but just a bit. Then I think it would be very significant to see what the result is. And if the result is a victory of the ladies, then we should seriously think about the possibility of deleting the female tournaments. I mean, now a female player can choose. She can play a tournament only with women or an open tournament with men and women together. If this tournament and more editions like this one in the following years demonstrate that women are performing significantly better when they play against men, then probably one of the best things to do is to delete, to eliminate the female tournaments.