 Well, I wrote this before. I knew we were going to have this wonderful talk about quantum computing yesterday. So, whoops. Is this what I submitted? I updated it. OK, well, I'm going to start talking anyway as if it were my actual slides. Quantum computing is coming. So start preparing to program with probability distributions, a world in which everything happens out once, and brush up on your unitary transformations. Start programming in Q++, QC++, Q-Python, Q-HTML5, or Q-Coball. But you're going to need to do it. Nonetheless, I think there are some important questions to be answered. And so I'm not saying that I am a quantum computing denier. I mean, I know it's science, but at the moment, there is no shore or Grover capable quantum computer. So what are you supposed to do if you're looking to the future of cryptography? You need to understand what a technological timeline for this is going to look like in order to make decisions. We also need to know if it's human cost. I have my doubts. So as technologists, we need to be able to understand when to move to what kind of algorithms. I don't think we have that information right now. There is really a huge penalty for moving to some of these post-quantum algorithms right now. I have a wonderful slide of somebody carrying a key. And the huge keys and the computation involved really can be a serious problem. If you take a reasonable extrapolation of the data that's transmitted on the internet and what happens if you insist on encrypting all of that and doing key exchanges, it can add up by 2030, 2040 to a big fraction of the world's energy usage. So there are good reasons not to jump until you need to and to jump to something that's reasonable. Paul Hoffman is with ICANN and the IETF. He has written a draft, a drafty draft, about how to approach this, how does the standards organization make decisions for its members and tell them what they should be planning for. If you're interested in working on this, if you can delve into the physics and the cryptography, we're looking for collaborators. We'd like to make this a reasonable document that will be helpful for people for real planning purposes for standards.