 तुमक langsam नहींरेई work सुसाटी की अंदर क्या वायलेंस आजाए, और फिर वायलेंस लेंक्त हो जाए, बाखी आंगलs के साथ साथ, पोलेटेक्स के साथ पी अटेज हो जाए, तु देफिनेट्ली ये तिस वेरी कंसरनिंग एर्या पादर दिस्प्लन आप पुलेटिकल सुच्योलोगी. तु क्या पुलेटिकल सुच्योलोगी किस बाद का ईल्म है, पुलेटिकल सुच्योलोगी दिरेक्ली लिंक्त है, विद the life of individual, with the life of society, and specially with the context of politics and social developments. तु देफिनेट्ली ये तोपिक क्यो है, पोलेटेक्स अप वायलेंस जो है ये, सभी सुच्योलेटिकल सुच्योलोगी के है, उनके लिए बहुत इंपार्टेंट ये क्रिटिकल और्या है. And many philosophers have contributed that when there is a protest, whether in the history, whether in the modern time period, it is quite alarming for the whole system, for the whole society. Because at the initial stage, when violence takes place, sometimes it converted into the situation of war. If the conflicts are not been handled at the initial stage, then definitely whether it is between the states or whether it is within the state, then definitely the situation will move towards the situation of war. And this is the social theory of war, i.e. the initial stage of war starts with violence or terrorism. What is war ultimately? Violence against humanity only is said. So in the case of violence, only focusing on the domestic and neglecting the international arena resulted in the failure. i.e. if we only consider violence in this context, that what violence is in any society, and we don't understand that how violence operates in the international context, what is the situation of violence, then it will be an incomplete story. i.e. if we have to understand the politics of violence, then we have to keep both the context in mind within the state and on the international forum. Because only focusing on the state as unit analysis limits the discussion circle of the important issues such as human rights abuses, genocide and the role of warfare in bringing globalization. In today's modern world, in the globalization context, if there is a human rights violation in one place, then its impact and influence is also happening in other parts of the world. So definitely today, violence and politics of violence are not understood only within the state context. We have to see that in the whole world, wherever there is a human rights violation, wherever there is a genocide, i.e. people are being killed for a specific purpose, then overall, the human beings, because of their loss, then international politics gets involved in it. And the issue becomes the internationalized issue. So on the other side, some scholars, they are disagree with both of them and they think that sociological neglect of war and specifically if political sociologist only talks about his society and ignores war and is limited to violence, then it will be incomplete regarding the understanding of the issue. And to understand the issue in a broader context, it is necessary to understand both the dimensions at a time. And in this, wherever there is a human rights violation, whether it is in Kashmir, whether it is in Palestine, in Middle East, whether it is in violence or the killing of humans, whatever is happening, it is necessary to understand what was the situation in the society. Why didn't the state use its authority to harm its own people. And then on the other side, definitely, if it is not internationally recognized in the cruelty of humans, then ultimately, what is happening to it? Only further politics of violence is being inculcated and for that, more suitable environment is created. Because if there is sense in people, sense of deprivation that the system is not giving them importance whether the system is their own or international. Humanitarian law, that is why it was designed that the problem of the people will be dealt with as a human being. So, wherever the importance of human beings is done, then politics of violence will be more so that the voice can be heard.