Loading...

Roman Polanski: facts of 1977

6,287 views

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Sep 16, 2011

You certainly know that in 1977 Roman Polanski was arrested. Why? I'm sure you'll tell me: "He raped a 13-year-old girl!" and you'll be a complete fool. Now, guys, let's open our eyes! We must not be a victim of mass media. All you know is that stupid statement about the rape. And why don't you read the real documents? The medical report?
This video contains the FACTS. The DOCUMENTS. The TRUTH.
Please, if you don't want to be ridiculous, if you don't want to be deceived, pay attention to this video and to this blog http://polanski-oddmanout.blogspot.com/ where you can find the truth about that case.

And remember: Roman Polanski is NOT a pedofhile and he did NOT rape Samantha Geimer (Gailey).

Thank you.

Songs: OST "Rosemary's baby; OST "The Tenant"

  • Category

  • Song

    • Intro
  • Artist

    • Horror Vacui
  • Album

    • In Darkness You Will Feel Alright
  • Licensed to YouTube by

    • CD Baby, and 10 Music Rights Societies
  • Song

    • Le locataire
  • Artist

    • Philippe Sarde
  • Album

    • Le locataire (Bande originale du film)
  • Licensed to YouTube by

    • [Merlin] IDOL Distribution (on behalf of BMG Rights Management), and 1 Music Rights Societies

Comments • 132

Mental Chrysalis
You are so blinded by "Polanski's genius" that you are willing to believe anything that supports your cognitive dissonance. She was 13 end of story. You need to seek help.
Ridge Road Co.
13 13 13 13 13 13  Guess that number doesnt ring a bell for you?? Doesnt matter whether the girl begged him to do it..the fact of the matter is that 13 years old is a child period and the fckr took advantage and got away with it.
Roger Flamjetski
Poland's most famous and probably only celebrity is a peedo.
susangavaghan
Polanski did drug and rape Samantha Geiler when she was 13 years old. Imagine if Polanski had not been a famous director, would people be so willing to overlook this? There have since been other allegations of sexual misconduct by Polanski by two women who were young girls at the time.
View reply
Hide replies
alinda47
This is a queen ( your word) writing now , You are a bear who's missed, I am sure.St Petersburg ,nor China town can not hide you.Please IF you can go to our castle, dance with me there. I have been trying to find you and this is but another attempt to do the same. I would write bears mother , but as her English needs interpretation I see no value in it. I've asked, Roman if he knows where you are, no reply as of yet. You know what to do. Goodmind and love then. I'm ready for the dance.Until then please stay in the pocket until your able. Thank you.
Stuart Manning
Sick Sick Shit, for the Twisted. In a million years you can never make this right!!!!
xValetinax
They said there was evidence she was willing not proof. The expert never said the evidence was forged & for all we know Polanski could have had a vasectomy which he later reversed to have children with Emanuelle. If he's so obviously been set up why isn't he or his lawyers pointing this out? Nobody but you is claiming this. You have AGAIN ignored the question whether you'd let your 13 year old have sex with Polanski. I know why. Cause you wouldn't cause an adult with a child is disgusting.
Jean Melkovsky
so, when they conclude "she was willing" and she says "I said no", it means, according to you, they are not saying she is lying? If the expert says, "the sperm belongs to a sterile male", you think it doesn't mean the evidence is forged? You're kidding me, right?
Jean Melkovsky
So? Where did he say there may be no evidence of rape? Silly, stop it. If you go on flooding, you'll be banned.
Jean Melkovsky
Kids, no. A "mature kid" is a contradiction in terms. A "kid" is someone who is immature by definition. A physically mature person, yes. See the experience of other countries: the age of consent in Europe starts with 13 and is mostly 14. Provided no harm is done, why should a young person, bursting with hormones, be deprived of the right to her/his own private life? It's preposterous and insulting. The only two things that matter (in equal measures) are physical maturity and mutual consent. 
View reply
Hide replies
When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...