 Hey everyone, this is Mark Zobal, one of ToppyTV's patrons, here today to help present the Player of the Season Award, as well as kind of set up the overall context behind what these player ratings are that Ped and Baz are going to discuss throughout this video. The quick story behind what they're talking about is that after every single match, Ped gives his own player ratings in the form of the player ratings video. Additionally, we send out a form to all of the patrons of ToppyTV, so if you are not a patron, hurry up and join, then you can vote and contribute to this award. After every match, the patrons get to give their own player ratings, as well as vote for who they thought the man of the match was. I compile each of the results to those forms, and then each week we get to see what the average player ratings were, as well as who the man of the match was. Then throughout the season, I provide updates to how kind of things are going so far in the form of player of the month videos, and then ultimately at the end of the season, we have this video where we help determine the ToppyTV Player of the Season. In order to do that, we're going to be looking at three main things. We're going to be looking at each individual player's season-long average rating according to Ped. We're going to be looking at their season-long average rating according to the patrons, and then lastly, we're going to be looking at the results of a vote where I sent out to the patrons that they could just vote for who they thought was Everton's best player this season. They didn't have to think about it mathematically or go through some formula, like the player ratings portion of the video did. They just had to straight up vote who they thought was Everton's best player. And so through those three things, by the end of this video, we're going to determine ToppyTV's player of the season. Not exactly the most prestigious award when you are the 12th place team in the Premier League, but nonetheless, that's what we have to deal with. I'm just going to put up a graph right now of Rich Harleason's individual match scores. As you can see, very inconsistent performances. I think we can all agree, Rich Harleason is one of Everton's best players, yet one of our best players lacks consistency, basically in any way. His match ratings are high one week, low the next week, and really, if we want to make progress as a team and eventually start finishing in the European places, we're going to want to see a much more steadier, well, hopefully higher average rating as well. So with that being said, I just want to say a quick thank you not only to Pet and Baz for allowing me to do this and thanks to them for sending out each of the forms after every single match and allowing the patrons to vote for that, which brings me on to the second group I want to thank being the ToppyTV patrons. Your participation in all of this has allowed me to keep track of all this information, which, by the way, is kept in this kind of complicated Google doc. It's not really that complicated, at least to me. It's kind of messy, but anyways, that's where all the information is stored. And big shout out to everyone who has voted on these throughout the year. Your participation is crucial to all the work I've been putting in. And lastly, if you haven't already, please join on Patreon. If you become a ToppyTV patron, take it from me, someone who has been a subscriber since day one, you get all kinds of early content. So the same stuff you watch on YouTube just puts out earlier the live shows that they do four days a week that goes on there, which includes the patron phone and show. That's an exclusive call and show that only patrons can participate in. And in order to participate in that, you have to be a member of the patron discord forum. That discord forum is something I'm a big fan of, big contributor in. And if you have any questions at the end of this video, I highly suggest going to that discord forum where we can discuss things further. With that being said, once again, thank you ToppyTV for allowing me to do all of this, even though, as you'll probably mention, it's just free labor that you guys are taking advantage of. So you're welcome for that too. Regardless of that, without further ado, Baz and Ped, take it away. Not only myself, but we do a poll every week as well on Patreon, where people vote and those numbers are put together and we find out who's the player of the game. Just some of the things, Mark, I've let Mark dictate this. So he says plays must have a minimum of 13 appearances. That's it. So Link Baines is not in the consideration. Scandal, I tell you. He says usually an average rating is considered either a five or a six using all of the prior averages for the whole season. He says he's created a team average rating, which basically means the entire squad rating across the whole season. Which would be interesting. My team average was 5.7 for the entire team, the whole of the season. The patrons was 5.67. So basically, if a player's average is above 5.7, then they were below average. If it was below 5.7, then they were below average for the season. If they're rating is 5.7, then they were above average player for us this season. So let's get into it. Jordan Pickford, if I was to just ask you for a number for the entire season, what would you be? What rating would you give him? A six. I have given him a six for the entire season. The patrons have given him 5.8. So he is above average by the rankings that we are using. But yeah, six I've given him. So he's above average for me as well, which is probably about right. He has his good days. He has his bad days. He makes mistakes. We all know this, but and nearly on in the season, he was good. He was getting good numbers. It was only, you know, it started to come in and obviously. And then he done all right when Auntie Lottie took over us. Yeah. Few good performances, got some clean sheets and stuff. We know we need to be better, but a six is about right. Okay. Mason Holgate, 31 appearances. What would you give him? It's tough this one without being just plucking numbers. If I was just plucking a number, he'd get a bar of seven. I'd give him a bar of seven and a bar of 10 just off an high test of what he's on. But he would be used on a different scale than others because I would be using that on a lad who didn't start the season as a first huge centre back and ended up as one of our most important players and that's why he's, but I guess at a proper average score over the season, I'd have him at somewhere around a seven. I give him a 6.4 and the patrons give him a 6.5. Okay. So above average? Above average, but that might have been, like you just said, that might have been pulled down though by maybe earlier performances, you know, where he was maybe a little bit less sure. So what did you give him? 6? 6.4. Nice. Okay. So for score and huge score, I'd have him at 7.01 and 6.77. So 6.4. No, but I'm just saying that's, that's not that much difference. There's not going to be that much difference. Layton Baines only had nine appearances, but I give him 6.9 and the patrons give him 6.6. Obviously my score was pushed up by the fact I gave him 10 on the last day of the season. For touching the wall once, it was a great top. So just being Layton Baines. Okay. Interesting. Being Layton Baines is... Interesting. So yeah, Michael Keane, 34 appearances. What would you give Michael Keane? Keane overall, my score, which is obviously a little bit more than yours, overall 6.5 maximum. I give him 6.1. Okay. The patrons give him 5.8. And again, he suffered from performances for probably the first half of the season. Yeah. I mean, mine is, mine will be probably based with the bill of recency bias as well, obviously, because he finished. Well, he finished the season quite strongly, didn't he? But you've liked the early part of the season. He was terrible. He'd early won. Have I gone 6? No, 6.1 I'm giving. Luca Dean, 38 appearances. What would you give Luca Dean? And I'll be interested in this because this might have recency bias, innit? Luca Dean had given him around 7, 7. Yeah, about 7 out of 10, I think. I give him 6.1 and the patrons give him 6. He was rubbish for the first part of the season. Don't forget that. So for score, who scored 7.15, 7.17. Clearly, by far on their score, he was rubbish for the first part of the season. He looked disinterested and was prone to making mistakes that he hadn't been making the season before. So I've given 6.1 and the patrons give him 6. We're similar. Mina, who made the shocking amount of appearances, only 32 in an injury-prone season. It's amazing what a narrative does, isn't it? What would you give him? Yeri Mina had probably given 7 out of 10, being for me one of Evan's best players this season. 6.4, I give him and the patrons give him 6.3. Again, we're all quite similar. Well, I mean, Mina very similar to, like, the science. But that's your basing that off the science that you read last week. No, I'm not. You are. I'm not because my scores are here before the thing. Yeri Mina off the science, 6.98, 6.83. Man, 6.4, that's not an interesting difference. I'd give him. No, I'm just, Mina just based on how I think he's done this season. Forget about everything else. Mina just based on how he's done and I think he was one of Evan's top three players this season. No, no, and he is by mine. That's what I'm saying, but when you finish 12th and your best players don't mean you're going to have big numbers. So I've given 6.4. 6.4, Sidderby, 27 appearances. What would you give him? You see, Sidderby, I give him 6.5 out of 10. Sofa scored and who scored? 6.99, 6.95. I give him 5.5 and the patrons give him 5.7. So who's average for the patrons? Fair enough. Again, that's, I mean, that will be decency bias because well, he scores bump up for me because of his assists and I just think he was very good. I think what you've got to remember about this whole thing is that Sofa score and things like that, they're never going to give out any one or two because probably walking on the pitch, probably get you three with them. I wouldn't give people. Bunch of socks on. Well, I mean, probably get you. So he really should have been knocked down for the one sock. Probably get you a decent score on there. But mine are, you know, mine have got emotional attack. Mine are just a number that I think, as he's been a little bit better than average overall, he probably was. Chamber's come with 30 appearances. What would you give him? I give him 6 out of 10 when I mark him. 5.8. I've given patrons, I give him 5.6. He's another one that finished the season much better than he started. Janet Brant, 3 out of 8, only 4 appearances. I give him 6.5. Patrons are giving him 6.2. Delph, 19 appearances. He's in there. He can have play the year if he wants it. Go with. What would you give him? I give him 5 out of 10. I give him 5.7 and the Patrons give him 5.6. So average. You see, yours 19 appearances. Yours is based on the thing. I'm just doing it from, like, off just off. Oh, I think he's done this. He's not been massively on the well end of the season. 5.7 is nothing to be proud of. He's average. I mean, well, it's so for scores. 6.69, 6.4 now. He's average for our squad. That's not good. I mean, this one's an interesting. Guilfrey Sigarton, 37 appearances. What would you give Guilfrey Sigarton? He's recently biased. I give him 2. Yeah. But the reality is, I think, overall, 5.5 out of 10. I give him 4.6. The Patrons give him 4.8. So below average. So, well, yeah. Do you mean that? Which is bad, doesn't it? Massively, right? I mean, funnily enough, so for score, 6.86. And who's good? 6.65. Actually, one of them. It was Evan's best midfielder. 2 goals, 3 assists. Well, the 2 goals and a 3 assist, bump it up, but... Phil Walcott, 27 appearances. For me, he'd get 5.5 out of 10. I give him 5.3, and the Patrons give him 5.4. So, very, very... It's very interesting how close we're all out there. Yeah. A Wobby, 28 appearances. What was he giving? 5.5 out of 10. I give him 5.2, and the Patrons give him 5.5. So again, so he's below average. The same as me. Below average, and yeah. One goal, no assists. Pretty bad. Pretty bad. That's in the league. Yeah. Must have actually did score in the cup as well. 17 appearances. I think I give him 6 out of 10. And yet, he was one of Evan's top of owners, 6.73. And 6.6. Well, you know what? I was talking to the Piv today about... Because obviously, we were preparing to do the midfielders thing for the Patron. And he was talking about the defensive numbers. They're incredible. Yeah, well, I said... Well, you know that, don't you? We said that last time. It's the other stuff, like running. Yeah. And passing the ball forward. Dari's not very good at it. I give him 5.3, the Patrons give him 5. So again, I mean, this midfield story is telling a tale. It really is telling a tale. Bernard, 29 appearances. What would you give him? I don't care what the day give him. When I'd wrote it, I'd give him 6 out of 10. But my actual off the top of my head, it's less than that. I think I'd be in the end of the day. I think I'd give him 5.5. I'd give him 5. But he did. He was our most creative midfield player. That doesn't mean anything. I know. 5.5, I've given the Patron, I've given 4.4. 3 goals, 2 assists. There you are. Very, very tough. 6.71, 6.57 off the signs. Gomez, 20 appearances. What would you give him? Gomez. What did I have him down? I'd give him 6 out of 10, but that was what I'd written. But I actually think that's probably a bit too much. I think probably going off your scale would probably be about 5.75. I'd give him 5.5, and the Patron's given 5.6. So not too dissimilar there. No. Gabammon, 2 appearances. I'd give him a 6. Patron's given 5.9. I'd give him 2 appearances. Tom Davis, 31 appearances. I'd written 6 out of 10. But again, you know, the one I look at, and I just think now, with the recency bias at downgrade, that's like 5.7. Because I'd give him 5.2, and the Patron's given 5.5. Yeah. I think, to be honest, I've been a bit generous giving him a 6, I think probably 5.5 would be right. But, I mean, the midfield. 30 games he played in the Premier League. The midfield. There's only actually Delph, amazingly for me, who actually makes it to the average score, which is 5.7. Apart from Anthony Gordon, 12 appearances. So he's below the threshold of a... He got, for me, 6.4. He got from the Patron's 5.9. 6.68, 6.46. And the science, I'd give him 6 out of 10. I think he'd done OK. I think Delph was one of Evan's best passes when he looked at the numbers. And that's probably... And at the time, maybe that bore out some of the games, he was decent in, but when you're thinking back, like, I'm just thinking back to memory, I think he's been massively underwhelming. And I can't... That's why it's difficult to pick out, isn't it? Moving on to the forwards, with Charleston, 40 appearances. What would you give for Charleston? I'd give him 8 out of 10 overall. That's just a... That's not a scientific number. That's just a... I think he's been... That's probably half a mark, two generous to be fair. He's probably a seven and a half. But for me, him and Luka Deane have been our best two players, so it's all as an edge to it, because I think he's a match winner. So, that's... I'd give him 6.3, and the Patron's giving him 6.3 for the entire season. See, you can be pulled up and down. That's the thing, you can have big numbers, but then if your average game is only a six every week, but you're going to be pulled down. So, I've given him 6.3. Overall, he's scored 7.09 and 7.23. Oh, I know, I know. Dominic Arvenloon, 40 appearances. 7 out of 10. I'd give him 5.8 for the entire season. The Patron's giving him 6. But that's probably right, though, because the fair, until Duncan saw over, he wasn't very good. He scored four goals, I think, for Silva. Got one at Bournemouth, one at Brighton, and he got two in the cup. And then Duncan struck over and put a partner with him, and he looked like a different lad. And it's so, therefore, me looking over the season, obviously the second half of the season, he finished strongly, so 7. So that'll be about right for me. I mean, it's 5.8 for me. Yeah, yeah. No, well, that's right, isn't it, because... That's what you're... Towson, eight appearances, I'd give him 5.3. The Patron's giving him 5.3. I didn't even bother, you know what I'm saying? That's what it was. Towson, five. Okay. Moise Keane, 83 appearances. Two goals, two assists. I'd give him 5.5 out of 10. 5.5, and the Patron's giving him 5.5. So there you go, science. I think, again, another one who could do massively better. But then again, that's coming off the bench a lot of the times, and my numbers, when people come off the bench, are more naturally generous, I think, because I can't... I'm going to start at six again. Cards that are fine faulting players when they come off the bench, but then he was terrible, come off the bench. He asked three appearances. I give him a 4. The Patron's giving him a 4. Okay, one. The Patron's have given the managers a rating. I never did this. The Patron's did this. Yeah, okay. Silver, 17 games. I've got a 5. A high. Surprised. I've got, well, generous. Cards, these nice, lovely people. Duncan Ferguson, four matches, 8.1. That's about right. And Carlo Ancelotti, 21 matches, 6.8. Yeah, that's probably... Yeah, that's what I'd say, Dave. I'd say they're quite fair, them ratings, really. So, play this season from my player ratings. Yeah. Oddly enough, this doesn't actually match what I actually think, but going off this. So, third with Charleston, second, Mina. And the player this season, according to the player ratings, is Mason Holgate. According to my... Fairly enough. Fairly enough. The Patrons, they had Mina in third. They had Charleston in second. And they had Mason Holgate in first. So, Mason Holgate won my player's season and the Patrons in the player ratings. Interested in that. Which is interesting, isn't it? We've come to the same conclusion. I think my three have been, Specialis and Luchadine, and then Gerri Mina, then Mason. Mason would have been the top four. Okay. Honourable mentions from the Patrons' vote. Okay, Honourable mentions. Seed votes, but not enough for top four. Mina, Coleman, Davis, Delph. What? I'm going. Dean, 5% of the vote. 5% of the vote. Calvin Lewin, 6% of the vote. Third, Holgate, 35% of the vote. With Charleston, 52% of the vote. So, that must have just been a straight-out vote for the player this season. By the Patron. Oh, based not on thingy. Based on just what they thought. Who was the player this season. I get it, yeah. Yeah, let's have a look. Some other mentions. With Charleston won the Patron's vote of play this season. Mason, Holgate had the higher average ratings over the course of season according to myself and the Patrons, but with Charleston won it. Despite myself and the Patrons having yeti being the top three highest averages, he only got two votes in the Patrons' play this season vote. Isn't that interesting? Again, decency bias. And on the other hand, Dominic Calvin Lewin had a much lower rating yeti finished third place in the Patrons' play this season vote. That's interesting. And the top three man of the match recipient are third, Keane and Meena got six each. The Patrons had Pickford, Dominic Calvin Lewin and Sadeeby and Davis. They got three each. Second, Pickford and Holgate got seven each. That's not me. Pickford. Pickford. Holgate got four. And first was with Charleston and Dominic Calvin Lewin got eight each. And with Charleston was first for the Patrons. So with Charleston, Dominic Calvin Lewin got the most man of the matches, which is probably right to that, Joe. Yeah, second half of the season. I went to the FEC, because I imagine most of them were second half of the season. So. So, whichever way you cut it, with Charleston was key. Yeah, I'm sure, I'm sure if you went through it all, you would find with Charleston was the common denominator in it all. He is the average. So, there you go. So, that was nice, he's the player. There you go. That's, they're the player ratings might over from over the season. Some of it makes sense, some of it doesn't make sense, but that's the way it is, isn't it? It's good to do that way, so you can get an idea of what's gone on over the season. So, big thanks to Mark Dobble for helping us out all seasons and a great job. And he knows his stuff as well, because I think he won the Predictors League or something as well. That's the man. So, he obviously knows his stuff. He doesn't need to do more stuff for us. He doesn't need to do more stuff. So, big thanks to Mark for doing that. And yeah, there you go. Let us know your thoughts, because as I said, these will, people will just go, what? What a load of nonsense. But these are the numbers over the season and I don't use science, I use heart and mind, usually more heart. Yeah, there is heart. Purely rage, you understand? But there you go. Let us know your thoughts in the comments, you agree, do you disagree with my play the season and my rankings? What buzzers give you as well? Do you think they should be higher, should be lower? Let us know. There you go. Give this video a like. Subscribe if you haven't already. And if you want to join us on Patreon where we have all these votes and man of the matches and all the rest of it and you can get involved, please do the link is in the description. Thanks for watching. See you later.