 Protection of various phone tumors and is extended by MRIs, I trust Dr. Shreya Bontarka, a third year resident of Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research Center. Special thanks to my co-authors, Dr. Mona Shastri, Dr. Ekta Desai, Dr. Nehal Devanji, and Dr. Nehra Kadwani. Introduction. Phone lesions are very diverse in nature, growth and histological features, and this diversity makes it very critical to diagnose for tumors correctly, Surat patient not only survives but also maintains optimal function of the affected body parts. In the present study, imaging of phone tumors and role of MRI is seen in diagnosis, management, treatment, and follow-up. We all know it extracts preliminary and it shows the lesion characterization, whether it is latex, serotex, location, matrix, zone of transition, type of destruction and soft tissue component. But why MRI is essential? MRI is essential for lesion characterization, marrow edema, extent of tumor into soft tissues and medullary canal, killer acetylobondary involvement, schedule of tumors, complications, treatment planning and follow-up. Femes and objectives. Determination of a suspected bone tumor or tumor-like conditions on X-ray, characterization of lesion on its extent on MRI, and to study relative incidents of various tumors and tumor-like conditions. Materials and methods. An observational study was conducted about 32 consecutive patients who studied who had bone complex. MRI was performed using 1.5 tesla pilis, machine and various sequences like C1, C2, PDN, serovatation. Few of the patients also underwent CTs. Then correlating extra findings with other ideological modalities to know the role of MRI in planning management of 42 patients for studies. Approach to diagnosis. Now, whenever there is a lesion on claim data, there is an approach based upon whether the lesion is light or clear object, then based upon the age of the patient. Location of the lesion and other miscellaneous characteristics like periosteal reaction, cortical distraction, observation on results. Maximum age group which was affected was 11 to 20 years. Males were more affected than females. In bone involvement, most of the bone involvement was monostatic. And excellent appendicitis skeleton were equally involved. Location within the tumours. Now, most of the tumour locations were in metaphyseal region followed by diaphysis. And most of the tumours were malignant. Even there were tumour mimics, 7 cases per of tumour mimics. Now, the patient came with pain and respiration of movement. The x-ray showed a lytic lesion with multiple separations. Anzyl T1 weighted image showed a heterogeneous hypointense lesion with separations. So, there is an anzyl T2 and Td weighted images showed. The hyperintense lesion has multiple fluid fluid levels, which depicts the degrees of Cambridge in aneurysm of bone cysts. It is not a phenomenon of aneurysm of bone cysts, but it is very commonly seen. Simple bone cysts. Now, coronal T1 weighted image showed a well-defined hypointense lesion-like exact bone. It was hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on T2. It was an incidental finding or simple bone cyst, and the patient had no complaints. This patient presented to us with night pain, which was gradually increasing, and it was relieved the end phase. The diaphyl T1 weighted image showed a focal hypointense neidus with adjacent sclerosis. Agile T2 and coronal Td images showed heterogeneous intramedular neidus in upper diaphyl just with surrounding sclerosis and edema. So, I am very useful to see the edema pattern, whether it is intramedulary or not. And edema is well seen on MLT. This is the bone destruction along with new bone formation in a sundry pattern at the upper end of tumor. And there was lifting of periosteum causing cord band triangle. Coronal Td images and Agile T2 both images showed the tumor had both intra and extorsion extent. And it had not reached the adiphyl plate. In the second image of Agile T2 weighted, it showed heterogeneous tumor mass, which had reached the cortex and extended into soft tissue component and contour mass. It was an incidental finding. Coronal T1 images showed an intramedulary diaphyl just with surrounding hypointense neidus. Coronal and Agile T2 and CD weighted images showed it appeared hyper intense, bringing in a type of characterization which appears as internal low signal on T1 and T2 was seen. It represents convoid mantis or piochondroma. The patient presented with localized swelling without restriction of movement. T1 weighted image showed a well-defined bony outgrowth, which was arising from proximal fibula, which was directed away from the joint. Now, PD and societal image showed the T2 hyper intense catalyzed cap, which was less than 15 mm. It is very important. MRI is very important to look for catalyzed cap for malignant transformation. If the catalyzed cap exceeds more than 15 mm in others and more than 30 mm in this, it goes towards malignant transformation most commonly called the sarcoma. And this patient also had concomitant features of herbal cycle. Giant cell genus. X-ray showed an expansal eccentric lytic lesion in proximal lateral radial condyles, the margins of the lesion were largely non-ceurotic. T2 weighted image showed heterogeneously high signals with internal low signals, which represented fibrosis or hemocytolins. PD was also done, and last region was seen with marked thinning of the cortex. This patient presented with localized swelling and pain. T1 weighted images showed there was a well-defined hypo intense lesion. PD, coronal and societal images showed the lesion was hyper intense and was causing expansion and destruction of adjacent cortex. This pathology proved it to be a giant cell genus. Metatarsis. Radiograph fit in T, there is a destruction of left pedicol of T11 and inferior end plate. These are axial T1 weighted images, societal T1 and societal T2 weighted images. How this patient presented to us with lower left pain and swelling, the patient had no complaints of fever, there was restriction of movement. Exeter of the patient showed a well-defined osteolytic region in epimetaphysiological region. It was thought to be a bone tumor. When MRI was done, it showed hypo intense lesion on T1, hyper intense on T2, and it showed decision restriction. It turned out to be an infectious etiology and biopsy. It was pro-deseptic. So it was a tumor minion. So, summary and confusion. Out of 32 patients, higher male pre-converting was there. Highest incidence was in 2nd and 6th decades. Axial and appendicular skeleton were commonly equally involved. Metaphyzine region was more commonly involved. Tumor went more towards malignant site. And MRI was more sensitive for lesion detection, because it was essential for lesion characterization, marrow edema, and it was actually a bundle of involvement, staging, treatment planning, and follow-up. Thank you.