 First, I want to thank my patrons for making more work possible. Welcome to Giza in Egypt. The topic of this video is going to be a controversial one. The question is if Khufu was really built at the latitude of the speed of light. We will try to answer this hardly debated question as best as we can in a probabilistic way. Is it coincidence that the latitude of Khufu is so close to the speed of light? It could be coincidence. However, is coincidence really an option if the digits match so amazingly well? Most of us already know that Khufu was not built by an Egyptian pharaoh. This culture was not capable to build something large like Khufu or to cut granite so smoothly straight like the coffins and amazing straight granite walls that we find inside the pyramids. The culture of the pharaohs just found the pyramids and claimed this as their own achievements. It is very well possible that large slave forces of the pharaohs uncovered the pyramids from desert sand, which alone could have been a superhuman effort. That could be the source of the tales of slaves and large achievements. But the pyramids were already there, many thousands of years before the pharaoh families came along. Giza has inspired thousands of people to do their own research, efforts for trying to find hidden mathematical patterns, hidden in the structures and its arrangement. And there are so many patterns to find that this is definitely not something coincidental. Were these patterns put in the structure for a reason? Yes, they probably are and the reason seems to be obvious. If you want a resonance sort of machine to function, it has to be built conform the laws of nature. And in nature we find only mathematical patterns because the fabric of nature is purely mathematical. And that is why it is logical that such a device contains only mathematical patterns. And if you keep looking well enough, you will find ever newer patterns. You might even find scientific constants that are even not yet discovered. What makes this topic so interesting is that Snopes also jumped on this topic. They say the claim is false and the arguments they use will be sufficient for most people. Snopes says the following. This rating indicates that the primary elements of a claim are demonstrably false. They simply ignore the fact that one of the most impressive ancient buildings ever built in the world is numerically built close to one of the most important constants in the universe. Their counterarguments are extremely weak. They build their argumentation around the dogmatic so-called historical facts. And by doing so, nothing is really debunked. History is not scientific. It is a set of narratives. And so it cannot be used to debunk numerical and mathematical facts. But this is something that most people don't understand and follow the advice of Snopes. What does it mean when the claim is true? It means a lot because the current mainstream paradigm collapses like a house of cards. We thoroughly peeled off this topic bit by bit and it's very interesting what we discovered. Our full video about Kufu's latitude has initially been produced only for patrons. You can go to my Patreon page to support our work and to watch the full video. Thank you for watching.