 Nice to see you, Frank. You're welcome. How are we going to get this done? There's the rest of us in the morning. Well, we'll have some fun. No. Here, drink. You're welcome. My theory is that everyone curses itself by morning, if it's a little bit more morning. No. I'm going to sit down. Sit back, okay? Yes. I'm going to sit around. I'm going to sit here. I'm going to sit here. I realized when I read the paper. There's no privacy. There's no privacy. There's no privacy. There's no privacy. There's no privacy. It's a... It's on. It's on. German. German. That's good. I'm always glad to see you like it. He's got shooting. Hang on. We've learned to say if you weren't with that camp boy. Yeah. You're right. We're having... My life was all... You cheated. You've seen us acting. I'm not happy about it. I've got halfway. The Prime Minister and I have just concluded a very useful and a wide-ranging discussion of some of the most crucial issues that are facing the people of Canada and the United States and indeed facing people everywhere. Prime Minister Trudeau briefed me on his recent discussions with leaders in Europe and Asia on his concerns for world peace and disarmament and improving the East-West dialogue. We fully share the concerns for peace which the Prime Minister has expressed. We appreciate his strong statements supporting the joint efforts of the Western Allies to negotiate meaningful arms reductions and to promote dialogue with other nations. And I thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, for coming here, sharing your ideas with us, and we wish you Godspeed and your efforts to help build a durable peace. Well, as you have just heard, the President supported what is being known as my peace initiative. But I think he did more than support it. I think he has been showing through his administration in the past months, at least, that as far as we are concerned on the NATO side, we want to change the trend line. We want to make it clear that not only the Alliance is strong, that it will defend itself, that it will not be intimidated, but that it is also pursuing peace. And if I were to tell you, for instance, that the President agrees that we shouldn't seek military superiority in NATO. We should seek a balance, that we do not think that a nuclear war can be won. That we think that the ideal would be to see an end to all nuclear arms that might come as news at least to some of the press in Canada, because we haven't been hearing that. But this is what the President said at the Diet in Japan. And this is what our foreign ministers have said just a few days ago in Brussels. That we respect each other's legitimate security interests. Whether this is news or not, I don't know. But this, at least in perception, is a complete change of a trend line which I saw when I embarked on my initiative several months ago as one which was going downwards rather than upwards, which was to use Carrington's phrase, which was characterized by a megaphone diplomacy. In Brussels last week, there was no megaphone diplomacy. There was a call for dialogue repeated two or three times in the message and in the communique. So I'm grateful not that I've said anything new this morning, but I'm grateful that I was able to hear from the President of the United States, the leader of the Alliance, that these are not just words, that these correspond to the intention of the Alliance, and that the other side can know, the Warsaw Pact can know, that we're not trying to be superior. We're not trying to not recognize their legitimate security interests. We just want them to realize we want to be at least equal in balance and that they should recognize ours. And I think this is a great step forward. I'll say nothing, though maybe I will say something, about the decision of NATO to send foreign ministers to Stockholm. This is really stating that the politicians are taking hold of the peace issue. It is no longer for the nuclear accountants, it is for the political leaders themselves. In French, yeah, in French in two words, I think you heard what I said, I actually mentioned the Brussels Declaration of Foreign Affairs, the words of the President as what they didn't want, that there was a nuclear war and they didn't believe that a nuclear war could be won. These are important statements, they are a confirmation of the intention of the politicians to seize the problems of peace and to pursue them. That's it. Thank you. Thank you. Mr Prime Minister, did you discuss your Pentagon Pipsqueak critics with the President? Yeah, third rate and third level Pipsqueaks. We say that I'm not allowed to talk about peace because somehow we haven't pulled our way in NATO. That is baloney. Equal time, Secretary Weinberger, equal time. They had Pipsqueak critics, sir, in the Pentagon. You know we've got rid of all of them.