 Welcome to the Knuckleheads of Liberty. But this quantitative easing is a major, major problem for middle-class Americans because any little bit of savings that we have, this thing is eating away, this inflation is eating away at our purchasing power. And that's what is going on here. And these central planners, they can't manage the books of the federal government, but they think they can manage all books by this nonsense that they are trying to do. They're trying to tell us they could fix the economy. Well, they can't. I mean, Milton Friedman told us it was always a monetary phenomenon. And he have always wanted a stable expansion of the money supply. Some number, 1%, 2%, whatever it was. Right, it was 2%. It was 2%. Right. And let the market determine whether interest rates will fall. And that's how the economy could keep on going and striving and everything. Sometimes we slip into a recession or whatever and that kind of stuff. But it will bring about a giant stability in our economic activities and transactions. But these central planners, they can't deal with that. They can't deal with that. They're going to fix things for us. And they always get it wrong. Always. Well, Friedman's, I'm sorry, Jason, Friedman's idea is also central planning. You know that the whole 2% thing. That's okay. That's dialed in. That's, that's unlike anything else in nature. In nature, things fluctuate. Yeah. We have the seasons. We have, you know, we have fluctuations that even of interest rates normally. Yeah. We could argue whether his idea would be better or worse than a totally free market idea, you know, where, where the money supply may, may shift, you know, not just continual, perfectly 2% increase, but may shift, you know, because, because that whole idea behind 2% is to try to match that with the growth in productivity of about 2%, which is, yeah. So that's a whole idea. So we could argue and I could probably make a, as good an argument for one or the other. But nothing. The whole idea of this Keynesian stuff is completely blown out by either of the winners of that argument, you know, either steady 2% or kind of, you know, let the money supply either be completely stopped like in gold, everything backed in gold. So it's, hey, even gold has an increase in, in, in, they mine new gold. There's more gold out there on the planet. Even it's, it's also as, as an increase. It was just the best we had for a long time as far as, you know, control over the supply. For eons. Yeah. For eons. But oh no, but you can't make money on, on gold. You can't, you have to be able to manipulate it at will. Every little fat facet of it. And that's where Keynesians come in and screw everybody else. Us people on, you know, that aren't, you know, rubbing elbows with the rich and famous us normal people. These are the people that get screwed under Keynesian news. And even people that are in that position just, I have people, I know people that are fans of that. Keynesian news. Anyway, there we are. Yeah. Well, Paul, Keynesian is one of those economic idiots. I don't know how that man won a Nobel Peace Prize. Yeah, well, believe me. He's rubbing elbows with the rich and famous, that guy. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness always.