 So, if now we move to the corporate world, Florent, you're in charge of sustainability services at Capgemini. And when you talk to your clients, are they all thinking, as we heard before, you know, like 10 years back, I had on my agenda, digital, five years ago, sustainability, and now geopolitical uncertainties, that really resonates and sounds like constraints. Are they all looking at sustainability and circular economy as a constraint? Thank you, Lucia, for this very accurate question. Indeed, we discuss a lot with all our executive clients, and circular economy has been around for quite some time. It's not a new concept, but we are still stagnating that around 9% of circularity in the material that are injected back in the economy today. And there are a lot of incentives, as you mentioned, to sustainability imperative, clearly. We heard a lot of very interesting discussions this morning also about the geopolitical pressure and the lack or the difficulty to access to materials, which raises a lot of new questions regarding sovereignty. The price of lithium has gone up and the price of batteries using lithium has gone up this year for the first time in the decade. So it would be time to increase circularity. The difficulty when you compare it to the digital transformation is that digital transformation was adopted faster first by addressing customers. Sustainability and circularity, the difficulty to put it in place, and that also explains why it is so slow, is that you have to rethink completely your business model and your operating model and your supply chain. And that's exactly what the executive tells us. We recently did a report on circularity and 70% of the executive we address tells us it's complicated. The reason why circularity is not enforced massively scaled up except at innovative companies like we see today. It's the scale of the transformation that is required. The lack of incentive financially some company still sees that it takes more time to have a return investment on circularity project than traditional project. And the lack of skills and capability to implement those. The good news, if I may say so, is that we have more and more triggers to go toward more circularity. The first one is the sustainability imperative. We've had great examples of how using circular, using biomimicry principle, regenerative principle can reduce GHG emission, but it is also seen as for 50% of the executive we integrated as a source of cost reduction. And as well, there is a lot of innovation that enables circularity. Biotechnology, synthetic biology clearly is one of them. As well as the convergence between the physical world and the digital world. A lot of the circular economy principle were just principle and were not really easy to implement in the past beyond the burning waste to produce heat or energy. Now with the development of a lot of new technology and the fact that everything is connected, you are able to develop circularity. For instance, the emergence of platforms that enable you to go toward more sharing economy. You know, instead of selling cars, you sell the access to a car. That's what we see with companies which are enabling car sharing, for instance. But as well as the traceability, which has been seen as a major issue to enable circularity. And we have now, somebody mentioned cryptocurrency but the technology behind it can also be used for traceability reasons and also to enable what is difficult today, which is the reverse logistic principle. So being able to trace your product down to their usage point but also organize the new supply chain and gather them back to be reassembled, refurbished and reused. So technology is clearly a level and an innovation that will help us accelerate the move toward circular economy. That's interesting. Thank you, Flo. And there is an interesting link to be made between the shift to circular economy and our ability to go faster on the energy transition. I believe you've done a recent survey for France that tells a lot around that. Can you give us a little bit more insight? Yes, so we worked with the French National Institute for Circular Economy and the ask was, given the constraints we have on resources due to the different crises that we discussed today but also due to the ambitious target that we have to reach the decarbonization of our economy, is it sustainable? I mean, you mentioned the planetary boundaries. Clearly, we've been burning, I think, around 1.7 Earths in usage of material. If everybody was living like France or the UK, that would be 2.6. So there's clearly a need to go toward more circularity. I think around 100 billion tons of material are used every year. So that's four or five, almost five times more than during the period of the Clover of Rome in 1972. So that's clearly not sustainable. And the study we did was to show how to enable the energy transition leveraging circularity principles which are avoid, reuse, replace and refurbish. And what we found is that applying all these levels would enable to unlock 70% of the need of material and minerals that are needed to produce the equipment that are required for the energy transition, like the solar panels, the batteries, the electric cars, et cetera, et cetera. And that could lead to reducing, and the figure is close to what you were saying, around 40% of the GIG emissions. So circular economy is not nice to have, I believe, in the journey toward energy transition and sustainability. It's really almost. But it means also changing the mindset and seeing beyond just recycling, but opening to new business model. So it's a shared economy and also going back to sustainable product design. So syncing a product right from the start that is not only performant, which is what the company has been doing for years, delivering a very performant product, but delivering a product that is resilient and then can be used in other value chain, in other industries.