 Hello, Callista Redmond here from Risk 5. Happy to field any questions on the Risk 5 revolution. We are absolutely seeing a continued ongoing growth and building momentum around the world. We'd love to share any details on Risk 5 that are of interest to the community or in how to navigate open source as a community or as a corporation. OK, I think I'm able to see the questions now. Apologies for a little bit of that delay. We have absolutely seen a lot of great excitement around automotive in particular. And let's say now I can't see that question anymore. In particular, we have a safety committee that has spun up. We are continuing to see growth around interest in joining that committee. We have seen public news releases using NVIDIA with Risk 5 around automotive at the software level. The safety and critical features in automotive have been paramount in our Risk 5 community. Let's see what we have going on in the chat here. So I think that one. And then how long do you think it will be until we have a desktop machine running Risk 5? Almost a trick question. So SIDE 5 has recently announced that they are able to do Risk 5 in a PC-based SOC. And that is something that has already hit the news. Risk 5 had its start in embedded. And it looks like we are growing very quickly from embedded to enterprise in everything in between. So not just desktops and other devices that could go either as a plug in the wall or we're on battery operation, but also in data centers and everything in between. You've got Alibaba in China that has deployed Risk 5 using the Risk 5 features specifically for AI. We see that as a common theme with multinationals who are looking at Risk 5 to really build on the new workloads and new opportunities, more so than, say, replacing legacy architectures. You also see Risk 5 growing in HPC. So HPC is something that has been very important across many industries and has also seen the need for acceleration and AI capabilities. And we see that most prominently in Europe with the European processor initiatives designating Risk 5 as a part of that group. Keeping up with the questions here. Wow, guys. You guys are firing away, which is fantastic. So then why would one use Risk 5? What are the main advantages? So Risk 5 from a technical level has a lot of benefits. It is a modular ISA, meaning that you start with one small base building block, 47 instructions, in fact, very lightweight, rather than starting with a legacy architecture or a legacy ISA that has been more incrementally built and has grown over time. One popular ISA is 1,500 instructions. That's a lot to go through. And when you think about the number of instructions that you are required to use or that you need to be compliant to, transparency is key. And that transparency allows you to see everything going on, which is a critical aspect for security. So you can see everything. There are no back doors. You don't have the same risks as others have had around some of those malicious attacks or other aspects around security. So it is seen as a prominent feature of Risk 5. And again, that modular approach means that you can add on the extensions that are critical for your workload. Now that's the technical side. On the business side of things, it's free and open. There are no license fees, no royalty fees. In fact, that expands your opportunity to work with other innovation partners to expand your supply chain options to really grow globally. You don't have the barriers and constraints that come with a pay-to-play licensing model or royalty model. So that business opportunity expands not only in the partners you can bring on to build your product, but also the market opportunity and where you can take your product. So as those things expand, so does your market opportunity, allowing our innovators to go into adjacent spaces, to team with others who can leverage some of the innovations that they've done together. Let's see what else we have here. Can you talk in general about the latest developments with Silicon implementing Risk 5? What is the most advanced process technology that Risk 5 core is being targeted for? I think I've addressed that a little bit in the different workload types. You know, the explosion in opportunity is really around those new workloads. We've kind of settled into some legacy models for some of the existing workloads, but the explosion in opportunity is tremendous. We see more than 60 billion cores coming to market on Risk 5 by 2025. We see global interest in that, whether those are folks who are looking for new innovation options or to take down barriers on the business or political landscape. We see a lot of interest. Today we have about a third of our membership in North America, about a third in Europe and about a third in APAC. So that collaboration opportunity has expanded tremendously as has the market opportunity. The biggest roadblocks or major problem between different Risk 5 implementations, different ISAs and verification. So, you know, the roadblocks have primarily been around, you know, kind of how mature is the technology? And, you know, those legacy architectures have been around for decades. Well, the good news is risk architectures generally have also been around for decades. So you're not fundamentally learning a new ISA, but we are continuing to work and grow the ecosystem of innovations that surround the ISA. So those might be extensions, those might be tools and design resources, and those are growing very rapidly. In fact, this is the fastest growth open hardware play that the industry has ever seen. And it is about time. You know, if you look back on the 80s when there was the processor battle, and that settled out to a few kind of large players, right? And now we're seeing the growth fundamentally at all levels, whether they are multi-nationals putting a toe in the water with microcontrollers or entrepreneurs building brand new businesses with a slew of investors around the risk of architecture. So it really is an opportunity for growth in all levels, but it does take time. We are not as old as those legacy architectures that have been building their ecosystems for as many decades as they've been around. But we do have an incredible community that's growing very rapidly. In fact, we've achieved more than 50% growth in our membership just since the beginning of 2020. That is in an era of, you know, all the struggles and challenges that our world has faced, but with challenge comes the opportunity for disruption. And that's what we're seeing in the RISC-5 community. So why is RISC-5 ISA better than other open ISA? So that's sort of a question around other open ISA models. In fact, if you go to Mark Himelstein's kind of talk on RISC-5 from a technical view, he gives a great kind of synopsis of where other open ISAs have come from. And I'll sort of, you know, encourage you to go see that talk, but I will also tell you at its core, RISC-5 was developed from the start as an open ISA. It came out of Berkeley with no commercial interest in it whatsoever with the mandate that it be open and freely available to all from the start. It was not grown inside a corporation with a very clear vested interest in its success, but it has been grown by a community much more akin to how Linux was grown. Linux was contributed very early on with the intent of being an open software. And that is also true of RISC-5. So that fundamental start means that it is an entire community that is invested in its success. Similar to Raspberry Pi, are there some good evaluation kits or boards to build real projects with? Absolutely. In fact, if you go to our website, RISC-V.org, RISC-5.org, you will see something called Exchange. In Exchange, we have many different developer boards that have come together. We have boards with SparkFun, boards that many of our members have collaborated together on. You see boards from Microchip. So many different developer kits are available. In addition, on our website, you'll also find open cores, proprietary cores, SOCs, and many other tools, design tools, software, what software runs on RISC-5. We listed all there. And there are hundreds of available resources in that Exchange area. And we're always looking for more. If you know one that hasn't been listed yet, please let us know. We're trying to keep up with the rapid growth in our community. From Ian, with the current climate, can you still cooperate with Chinese companies? Huawei did some great work with ARM CPUs, but seems like they can't continue along that track. I know it's political, but their work group could do a great job. Ian, thanks for the question. Open Source has long been held as a technology that is owned by the community. And our community is truly global. We don't have roadblocks up when something is contributed to open source. That is true of all open source. So from a technical or political or licensing perspective, there are no hurdles like that. In fact, Huawei has been a great participant and leader in the RISC-5 community. And they are continuing to do so today. In fact, that is true of many of our members who are coming from China. As I mentioned earlier, Alibaba has been another leader in our community. We also work closely with Rios. Rios is a development institute that is centered in both Berkeley and Tsinghua University and in Shenzhen. And so we see a diversity of interest from both research and academia and industry and venture capital going on around the world. And that is including China. So in the current climate, we absolutely are cooperating and working together. One of our key things of round open source is to work with transparency. So our member work groups have absolute transparency broadly and publicly about our activities. And as is common in most open source communities, we're not there to share technical, confidential technical information. So we are very clear in our rules of the road, rules of engagement that we are not there to share confidential information that would otherwise be subject to export control or any other regulations from different countries. What is the roadmap for compliance? The point where RISC-5 International would start certifying implementations. We are on that roadmap now about a year ago in, well, close to a year ago, it will be in December. We released our first test suite and we have continued to cultivate and grow and build tests since then. We have members who are offering compliance test suites as well as, and working with many of the usual Silicon tool providers and design shops. So we are working towards a compliance certification. And we're probably going to call it compatibility because ISAs is just one building block of an entire set of things. And we will build on that to establish different profiles and different other types of stacks that would be useful to our community. Most of the licensing costs and proprietary lock-in on SOCs is not related to the ISA, but the peripherals and accelerators around the CPU. Does RISC-5 have a plan to address this? Yeah, actually, I kind of just sneak peek that one. As we build out profiles and different implementation, key implementation styles, that is where you're going to see those types of compliance that we would adhere to. But we are not at the SOC level. We are composing building blocks so that any implementer can pull those together and still be compliant to that base ISA. And that is fundamentally the most important. So whether it's a microcontroller or a full SOC, those are things that we're working towards. There are many extensions now and more are being discussed or worked on. So two questions here. How are you going to deal with compatibility and interoperability? Okay, that's around our compliance and compatibility and some of the testing that we're going to be offering rolling out. I think you'll see something in the next six to nine months on that. How all that zoo of configuration is going to be verified on both W and SW front. So those configurations, as I mentioned, are around profiles and other implementation desired stacks. And that's what you're going to see coming through. And can we get the slides? Well, I haven't shown any slides, but we have a ton of artifacts. So if you visit our risk five booth at this event, you can certainly get full keynotes, you can get slides, you can get other technical talks that have been online. We have a full listing of what those technical talks are and other aspects that are live in this event. And we also have a YouTube channel. So if you visit our website, you're going to see documentation, lots of technical documentation, lots of talks, lots of forums where you can engage. And I encourage everyone to kind of look at the risk five community, see yourself in it. See where you can participate in software, in hardware, in compliance and other tools, design tools. See where it makes sense to engage your personal mission, your team's mission, your company mission, or your organization in risk five. You'll find an incredible passion in this community. And I've seen nothing like it. It is absolutely being hailed as the Linux of hardware to talk about how fast it's growing and the momentum and energy and investment behind it. So we continue to see that. We're absolutely excited to share as much information as possible. You can reach out to me directly. And I know that we're running a little bit short on time here. It feels like a speed session for us today. Let's see. Has risk five not caught on in popular areas like phones and wearable devices? We actually have wearables out there. There have been health monitoring types of devices. We have risk five showing up in headlamps of automobiles. We have many of the large mobile phone companies looking at risk five for various implementations. And I think you're gonna see that coming out soon. However, understand that a rip and replace of a legacy architecture is a very difficult business case conversation to have within your company. So we see most of the growth going down in the new workloads and advancing those further. Whether it's cloud providers with massive data centers who are looking at risk five for their future and their growth in those new areas or it's a phone provider who is looking at risk five for future generations. I think those are most of the questions that we can tackle today. Not sure where we are on time but I'm sure someone's gonna cut me off when it's time to wrap up. Please again, reach out to me directly. You can find me on Twitter. You can find me on LinkedIn. You can find me on this platform. And we'd love to continue the discussion with you.