 The next item of business is First Minister's Questions. I intend taking both constituency and general supplementaries after question 2. Members wishing to ask supplementaries, please press their request to speak buttons during question 2. I'll keep a note of members who press and take further supplementaries if we have any time in hand after question 7. Members wishing to ask a supplementary on questions 3 to 7, please press during the relevant question. After months of worry about what would happen, last night we heard that the train strikes have thankfully been averted. While it's a welcome relief for commuters across Scotland, it should never have taken the 11th hour to secure. Can the First Minister explain why the additional funding and urgency was only found to resolve this now, as world leaders are coming to town for COP26, and why are they more important than ordinary Scots who have had to put up with this since March? Douglas Ross clearly hasn't looked at or understood the nature and the detail of what was agreed last night, but I'll come on to that in a second. A very reasonable offer was made to the rail unions. Negotiations have been on-going for some time. The reasonableness of the offer is evidenced by the fact that, of the four rail unions that were party to those negotiations, three of them had already accepted that offer. The outstanding one was the RMT, and agreement was reached, I'm delighted to say, last night. The basis of that agreement is a one-year deal, and this is where I don't think that Douglas Ross has looked at the detail. There is no additional funding in that one-year deal. The deal that was offered for the first year is the same as the one that was offered to the RMT earlier this week. The difference is for the second year, which the other unions have accepted. There will be further negotiations to come. I think that that is a good outcome for the travelling public across Scotland. It doesn't simply remove the prospect of a rail strike over the period of COP. It also resolves the Sunday strikes that have been on-going for some time. It's a good outcome and one that I'm delighted to see secured over the cost of the last 24 hours. Douglas Ross. Does the First Minister really expect us to believe that there was no funding involved in that? Suddenly the rail unions just suddenly decided to accept it. I was very clear in my question. I hope that the First Minister might have taken the opportunity to apologise to people across Scotland who have faced this disruption since March. They have been waiting for a resolution for months, and only now, as world leaders are about to come to Glasgow, has this been resolved. COP26 presents a huge opportunity to tackle climate change, but for working people across Glasgow it will disrupt their daily lives, even with this RMT strike cancelled. The list of road closures is considerable, and there is massive potential for traffic to climb to halt. So can I ask the First Minister if she is confident that Glasgow City Council and the Scottish Government have done everything they can to minimise the disruption to commuters and local residents in Glasgow trying to get on with their daily lives? Firstly, before I come on to the questions relating to COP more substantively, let me finish and conclude on the points relating to rail. In passing, though, it's worth just pointing out that, as far as I understand it, and I'll be corrected if I'm wrong here, where Douglas Ross's party is in power south of the border, rail workers are getting no pay increase anywhere near the pay increase that is being offered to rail workers in Scotland. So not for the first time there is something of an irony. Secondly, and this is where I really would suggest that I would have thought he would have done it before coming to ask these questions today, but given that he clearly didn't, he might want to do it after he's asked these questions. The agreement that was accepted by the RMT last night is virtually identical to the deal that had already been accepted for the other unions for that one year. That is the position. It is the same deal that had been on the table at the weekend for the RMT. I am delighted that that agreement has been reached because it now does remove the prospect of strikes. Moving on to the issue, first of all, I hope that COP is successful in terms of the objective of making real progress towards tackling climate change. All of us should want to see that success over the next two weeks. The Scottish Government, working with the UK Government, with the United Nations, with Glasgow City Council have put in place appropriate contingency measures to ensure the successful logistical operation of COP. We will not be complacent. Our resilience arrangements are stood up. There will be day-to-day monitoring of all the different aspects of that, but I am as confident as it is possible to be that those arrangements are appropriate. Of course, it is not a Scottish Government event. It is a United Nations event. The UK Government is the formal host and we are working closely with them. To the people of Glasgow—I am a resident of the city of Glasgow and I am a representative of part of the city of Glasgow—there will be disruption and inconvenience over the next two weeks, and I know that that will be regrettable in many ways. However, I think that the majority of people in Glasgow understand the importance of the COP 26 summit for the future of the planet, and I want to take the opportunity of wishing the United Nations negotiators, the UK COP Presidency and everybody attending in that official capacity every success in reaching a deal that does put the future of the planet and generations to come first. Let's just start with what the First Minister said in that answer and crucially what she didn't say. I hate to break it to the First Minister, but you can't be virtually identical. Identical means they are the same, so if they are virtually identical then they are not the same, and there was clearly a difference for that to be accepted. However, what the First Minister didn't say in her first answer or her second answer was sorry. Sorry to the people of Scotland who have been waiting for months for her Government to step up and resolve these issues. It has been resolved now, but it should have been resolved far sooner because people have been struggling with these strikes since March. However, the First Minister did accept that there will be disruption and inconvenience for people in Glasgow, and there is that real potential for disruption from protest groups at COP 26 that risks public safety. Just this morning, Extinction Rebellion said that they are planning deliberate disruption with the most impact possible. We all respect the right of protesters to express their views, but we cannot sit back and allow deliberate and dangerous disruption of people's lives. Will the First Minister reassure people across Glasgow that there will be a zero-tolerance approach to protests that disrupts people going to their work, including doctors and nurses and ambulances carrying people in urgent need of medical care? First Minister, on rail, I think that what Douglas Ross is really displaying here, if truth be told, is a real disappointment that the rail strike has been resolved, because he would rather have seen it continue. He wants to know the detail again, given that he did not check the detail before coming into the chamber today. The deals already agreed by the other unions consisted of, for the first year, 2.5 per cent backdated for 2021, a £300 COP26 payment and a rest day working agreement. The deal agreed with the RMT last night consists of 2.5 per cent backdated for 2021, a £300 payment for COP26 and a rest day working agreement. That seems to me pretty identical to the one that had already been agreed by three of the four unions. It is good news for those who travel on our railways. It is good news for the Scottish population, which is probably why Douglas Ross is so deeply irritated by it. Obviously, it is for Police Scotland to decide the appropriate approach to the policing of demonstrations. The chief constable, who I will be having further discussions with over the course of today and tomorrow, has been very clear that there will be a sensitive policing operation that will do everything possible to facilitate appropriate and peaceful protest. However, Police Scotland will respond to any protest that seeks to break the law and, of course, disrupt people beyond what would be considered reasonable. People want to come and make their voices heard. That is understandable, given the importance of the issues under discussion. However, I would say to people who are looking to come to protest in Glasgow to do it peacefully and to do it with the recognition that the people of Glasgow are agreeing to host this conference and are suffering some disruption because of that, so do not add to that disruption for them. However, let us all get behind those who will be negotiating. I hope a good outcome for the future of the planet. Douglas Ross, the class surgeon speaks about disappointment and irritation. If she wants to look for disappointment and irritation, it is commuters who have been putting up with this since March. We have now had three attempts for the First Minister to have some humility and accept that the problems of these strikes have affected people up and down Scotland for months. Will she take the opportunity to recognise the disruption that has caused to people across Scotland and the fact that it has been resolved at the last minute? It looks like it is more important for COP26 to be suitably sorted in terms of travel arrangements and not for people across Scotland, but she also mentions the protests that are expected over the next couple of weeks in Glasgow. There have been suggestions from some public figures, including one of Nicola Sturgeon's own ministers, that some unlawful protest will be tolerated. It is one thing to be frustrated by the lack of action on climate change, but it is another thing entirely to take that frustration and use it to disrupt people's lives. We all want COP26 to be a success. It is not just an opportunity to tackle climate change, it is a once-in-a-generation chance to highlight the best of Glasgow to the rest of the world. It has already been a rocky road getting to this point, from strike threats to hospital appointments being cancelled to the well-known problems with bin collections and concerns over wider travel disruption. Is the First Minister now fully confident that Glasgow is ready to grasp that opportunity? Yes, I am. Obviously, the UK Government has a big part to play here. Douglas Ross is actually sounding a bit disappointed that the UK Government decided to bring COP26 to Glasgow. Perhaps he wants to direct some of those concerns to them. Those are serious issues that the Scottish Government has been focused on with our partners, which, in the case of COP, includes the UK Government Glasgow City Council, the United Nations. I met just yesterday with the UN lead negotiator in COP26 to discuss obviously some of the logistical issues around it, but also the substance of the negotiations. On the issue of rail disruption, the Scottish Government has been supporting ScotRail to bring an end to any disruption. I always regret disruption that is caused by disputes of this nature, but I do think that the offer that has been made to rail unions was a reasonable one, evidenced by the fact that three out of the four unions had already accepted it. I am glad to say that we reached agreement with the fourth of the four unions last night to take away the prospect of strike and to end the Sunday disruption that has been suffered now for some time. Finally, on the issue of protests, in a constitutional democracy, it is not for politicians to decide how they police demonstrations. It is for the police to decide how they appropriately police demonstrations. If what Douglas Ross is asking me is, do I have confidence in the ability of Police Scotland to do that appropriately and sensitively, and with the interests of the people of Glasgow and Scotland at heart, then yes, I do have confidence in Police Scotland to do so. 2. Anna Sarwar Presiding Officer, next week the eyes of the world will be on Glasgow as leaders gather for our last great chance to avert the climate emergency. It is in all of our interests and those of future generations that COP26 succeeds. We have the opportunity to strike a historic Glasgow agreement, but the proposals currently on the table currently would still lead to over two degrees of global warming. That simply is not good enough. That is why it is important that political leaders both at home and abroad turn their words into meaningful action. Does the First Minister agree that that means leading by example? Yes, I agree that. Scotland does lead by example. That is not to say that we have not got more work to do because we absolutely most definitely have, but our own statutory climate change targets are consistent, more than consistent, indeed, with the Paris agreement. Therefore, that gives us the ability to apply pressure to others. We are not, unfortunately, directly at the negotiating table, but we have a considerable degree of influence, not least through our co-convenership of the Under 2 Coalition, bringing city-state devolved Governments together to maximise maximum pressure on those discussions. Yes, we must lead by example. There is a big job of work to do to keep 1.5 degrees alive, which is the aim of the COP26 summit. There is a gap on emissions. Right now, there is a gap on climate finance. I know that the negotiators are very focused on trying to close that gap as much as possible, and that is what we have to hope emerges over the period of this summit. I will come back to the national record, but let us talk about what it means locally. First Minister, I love Glasgow. It is my home. Frankly, it has been let down by the SNP, who cannot even get the basics right. Tons of waste piling up on our streets, fly-tipping on the rise and over a million rats. Glasgow deserves better. So, while Nicola Sturgeon lectures the world about the global environment, she is turning a blind eye on the environment that glass regions are living in every single day. Tomorrow, I will be joining cleansing workers who have been on the front line throughout this pandemic. They have been crying out for months for Nicola Sturgeon to tackle the waste crisis, but they have been repeatedly ignored. Will she join me tomorrow in Glasgow to hear directly from them about the challenges that they face every day? I will be working hard to make sure that the Scottish Government is doing everything to support cosla and local authorities' hope to reach an agreement with trade unions to resolve the issues here. That is my job and responsibility. I do not shy away from the problems and the challenges that cities like Glasgow, cos Glasgow is not unique here, faces in the times that we live through right now. Nor will I stand here and allow Glasgow, one of the greatest cities in the world, to be talked down for political purposes in the way that Anna Sarwar has disgracefully been doing in recent times. Anna Sarwar? We are going to be talking next week about making history. That was probably a historically out-of-touch answer in the First Minister. Anna Sarwar is basically saying to Glystwygiens that that is just as good as it gets, and that is frankly not as good as it gets. She talks about talking to people who are world leaders. Those are people on the front line leading the fight against the environmental crisis, and she should be taking them much more seriously. She needs to lead by example. Nicola Sturgeon is right to say that we need credible action, but while she talks about the need for more public transport and to get people out of the cars, her Government is cutting hundreds of train services. She lectures the world on the global environment while cutting cleansing budgets and neglecting the local environment. Her SNP Government has missed its renewable heating target, missed its gas emissions target three years running, and she promised 130,000 green jobs by 2020, but we have just over 21,000. We all want COP26 to be the moment that the world comes together to stop a climate catastrophe, so when will Nicola Sturgeon stop talking about the credible action and start delivering it? Let's take each of those in turn renewable heat, where we are seeing an increase in renewable heat. The decline reported yesterday, driven by the reduced output from large biomass systems, as the energy saving trust noted yesterday actually massed growth in renewable heat output from other technologies, including and in particular from heat pumps. Take greenhouse gas emissions in Scotland. We have decarbonised as a country in recent years faster than any G20 country. We have reduced emissions by 51.5 per cent. Yes, our target said that that should have been 55 per cent, which is why we are publishing a catch-up plan, which the law requires us to do. We have decarbonised greater and faster than most other countries in the world, that is why we lead by example. In terms of rail services, there has been a consultation at Scotland Rail are now looking at all the responses to that consultation to make sure that we have rail services fit for the future. It is this Government that I am proud to say, because Labour, when it was in government, did not even allow us to have the powers to do it, that it is going to re-nationalise Scotland's railways to make them fit for the future. Thank you. We will now take supplementary questions, and I call Jim Fairlie. Thank you, Presiding Officer. In 2014, we were told that the people in Scotland benefit from the UK's influence on the world stage. Yet under Westminster's control, decisions are constantly taking that affect our lives but without any serious consideration to the interests of the Scottish people. The latest example is the New Zealand trade deal. Can I ask the First Minister for her assessment of the possible effects that this agreement will have on our farming industry and on the wider Scottish economy? The proposed trade agreement with New Zealand represents a significant opening up of our agriculture market to imports of New Zealand agri-food, which is produced to lower costs and, crucially, will do nothing to offset the damage to our economy caused by Brexit. The UK Government's economic analysis concluded that a UK-New Zealand trade agreement would have a 0 per cent impact on UK GDP overall, while the deal would deliver a contraction of 0.5 per cent to GDP in Scotland's agriculture and semi-process food sector. We were not involved in those negotiations, but the proposed deal is evidence that, when it comes to negotiating those trade deals, Scotland's interests are nowhere on the radar of the UK Government. It is utterly disgraceful and yet another downside implication of the Brexit disaster. As the First Minister knows, I, along with many other Scots, are taking part in the Novavax vaccine trial. It is now over two weeks since trialists in other part of the United Kingdom have been contacted and offered an alternative vaccine, but in Scotland there has been silence. Can I ask the First Minister whether the Scottish Government will follow the UK Government in offering trial participants two doses of an alternative vaccine? That would give them clarity and peace of mind that they are appropriately protected. Discussions are on-going on that matter. We have absolutely made clear that there will be no disadvantage to those who took part in vaccine trials. We are deeply grateful to those who did so. I know that the health secretary is having discussions with the Secretary of State and the chief medical officer later today and, of course, will update Parliament as soon as possible. Jackie Baillie, a 94-year-old woman in my constituency, had to cancel her booster vaccination appointment because she caught Covid. Thankfully, she is now recovered, but the family has been trying to re-book online and on the telephone with the NHS-informed booking service. They tried over three days, phoning several times a day. The operator told her yesterday that the system was down. It has been down all week and they do not know when it is going to be fixed. When the First Minister was telling everybody to phone NHS-informed this week to get an appointment, the system was not functioning. Can she tell us when it will be fixed? It is resolved, as I understand it now. There was a problem with it. If Jackie Baillie wants to send the health secretary details over a particular constituent, we can be in touch to make sure that they have what they need to re-book the appointment. There will be issues from time to time. They are regrettable. We fix them as quickly as possible. As of yesterday, almost 600,000 booster vaccinations had happened across Scotland. Every day, there are thousands of booster vaccinations taking place, and that is to the great credit of everybody administering the scheme across the country. The First Minister will be aware that the people of Afghanistan are currently suffering through a humanitarian crisis, with more than half of its population facing acute hunger as the country is gripped in one of the world's largest food shortages. The UN has warned that harsh winter looms with over 23 million Afghans will go hungry as a result of conflict and economic downturn. Will the First Minister express her solidarity with the plight of the people of Afghanistan and calling the UK Government to work quickly with the UN to come to the red? Yes, indeed. I am sure that all of us would want to express once again our solidarity with the people of Afghanistan. The Scottish Government has announced humanitarian funding through our own humanitarian emergency fund. We did that just last month. We are also welcoming people from Afghanistan and helping to give them refuge here. We all want to do everything possible to help, and the Scottish Government is absolutely focused on making sure that we do that. Aberdeen City Council is £6 million out of pocket, as the Scottish Government has not paid vital Covid grants from over a year ago. Ministers have pushed back the date for payment on three separate occasions. When will Aberdeen Council get the money due? Councils are getting every penny that they are due. I will look into the particular issue of the timing of payments to Aberdeen City Council and right to the member. Councils have had tens of millions of pounds of Covid funding, and they get every penny that they are entitled to. Last week, one of my constituents, Ms Cooper from Bishop Briggs, went to get her Covid-19 booster vaccine. She arrived on time for her appointment, but the vaccination centre had no available disabled parking, no managed queuing and no seating for waiting patients. Ms Cooper, who is 83, has dementia, diabetes and reduced mobility and was made to wait for an hour and a half outside in the cold and rain. Ms Cooper's daughter and I tells me that our mother is afraid to go for any future vaccination. Ms Cooper is not alone. My inbox and inboxes of colleagues are full of similar cases. With the elderly forced to wait in such conditions, it is turning people off from getting their vaccination at a time when it is more needed than ever. What is the First Minister doing to ensure that our elderly and most vulnerable citizens are vaccinated quickly, safely and that nobody's mother or father has to wait for hours in inclement weather? I am sure that she will agree that that is unacceptable. I know that the health secretary has raised with NHS board chairs the issues around people having to queue or having to wait for appointments, and it is really important that that does not happen. Obviously, I would accept that what has been recounted there is not acceptable for any elderly person, but it is also important to recognise the huge success of the vaccination programme, including the booster campaign that is under way right now, literally as we speak. There are thousands and thousands and thousands of people being vaccinated with booster jags, and that is a good thing because it is a vital part of our protection over this winter period. Health boards are working hard on that. Vaccinators are working hard on that, and the Scottish Government is doing everything, and we will continue to do everything to support that programme. First Minister, NHS boarders are currently sending out booster vaccination invitations. Can the First Minister confirm to my constituents that, if they are registered with a boarders GP that even if they have had one or both vaccinations in England, for example, then they will be notified of this appointment by NHS boarders? Yes, that is the case. The appointment notification will be through the NHS in the boarders. Obviously, anybody who does not receive their notification when they believe they should have done the processes that are there allow them to check what and if there is a problem with that. A recent report revealed that 53 per cent of Thuravid University staff showed portal signs of depression, and that one in five academics were working at least two extra days per week. What action is the Scottish Government taking to help universities and colleges to reduce the workload of staff as restrictions persist? We recognise that there has been a mental health impact on many, many people in different sectors across the country. We are taking steps in a range of ways to improve mental health provision. Obviously, first and foremost, it is for universities and colleges to make sure that they are looking after the wellbeing of their own staff. Through the discussions that we have with the sector about funding and other support, we will, as we will do in all sectors, make sure that mental health issues are properly catered for. To ask the First Minister in light of COP26 what action the Scottish Government is taking to showcase the role that Scottish agriculture can play in reducing carbon emissions. First Minister, I am sure that Rachel Hamilton will join me in welcoming the announcement this morning by the Rural Affairs Secretary of a national test programme of measures to kick-start action by farmers in Croftus to reduce their carbon emissions. The Rural Affairs Secretary also announced yesterday that the agri environment climate scheme will reopen for funding in 2022 to support the ambition of doubling the amount of land under organic management. We have also published a consultation building on key themes from the farmer-led groups, which will help to inform future work. I also hope that Rachel Hamilton will have noticed what we are not doing here in Scotland. We will not be selling out Scotland's farmers and food producers and trade agreements, which threaten to undermine standards and prices. We will not be cutting the level of payments that our farmers receive, and we will fight UK Tory plans to treat agriculture payments as subsidies, unlike any other jurisdiction in the world, which further undermines the potential support that is available for farmers and crofters in Scotland for producing food. Rishi Sinuac's budget yesterday delivers for Scottish farmers and crofters, providing an additional £1.9 billion, which will be beneficial in fighting climate change. We also welcome the Scottish Government's commitment for further AICS funding, a long-standing Conservative demand, but farmers require urgency on the detail of that extended funding. Scottish agriculture has some of the most environmentally friendly practices in the world, yet there are concerns from livestock producers that the industry will be used as a scapegoat. Has the Scottish Government ever considered allocating funding to accelerate the reduction of cattle numbers, yes or no, First Minister? Our agriculture sector is being used as a scapegoat, but not by this Government. It has been used as a scapegoat by the UK Government and, frankly, betrayed and let down by the UK Government. We know that agriculture is an emitter of greenhouse gases. It must play its role in us meeting our net zero target, but we will do that in a way that supports the sector appropriately to do that, and we will not shortchange the sector in the way that the UK Government has. What is the Scottish Government's response to the UK budget? There are aspects of the UK Government that we welcome, but there is also much to be disappointed in the UK Government. It does not do nearly enough to address the cost of living crisis that many individuals and families across the country are facing, and it will leave the Scottish Government with less resources in every year of the spending review than we have at our disposal in this year. It results in considerable challenges for the Scottish Government, but we will set out our own budget plans shortly. Kenneth Gibson I thank the First Minister for that answer. Millions face a squeeze on living standards over the coming year. While the chancellor cut taxes on bank profits, he failed to introduce measures to help households already struggling with rising prices on food and fuel, the tax burden is now at its greatest since the 1950s, with national insurance contributions raised and personal income tax allowances frozen, cutting people disposable incomes. Does the First Minister agree with Paul Johnson, director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies that that is actually awful? Yet more years of real incomes barely growing, high inflation and rising taxes, poor growth, keeping living standards virtually stagnant for another half decade, anti-poverty charity Z2K. There is absolutely nothing in this budget for the 3 million plus whose disability illness are caring responsibilities mean they can't work and will be hard this winter. Does she further agree that this budget is a failure in terms of delivering a quality famous and improving the lives of people in Scotland? Could you please hold on for one minute, please? That was an exceptionally long question, but I will decide whether or not we will hear your exceptionally long question. I would be grateful if the First Minister has heard enough to respond to that. I would ask members to bear in mind that there is a great deal of interest in this session. I would like to get in as many members as possible. I suspect that I know why the Tories did not want to hear Kenny Gibson's question, because there were some deeply uncomfortable truths in it for them. When I gave my initial answer to Mr Gibson, there was laughter from the benches of the Conservatives when I said that we would have less money in every year of the spending review than we do have in this year. Let me just give the detail of that, Presiding Officer. Between this year and next year, Scotland's resource budget is being cut by 7.1 per cent in real terms. The equivalent reduction for our capital budget is 9.7 per cent in real terms, so that is the reality. I am not surprised that the Tories do not like it. If you could just give me one second, I would very much like to hear the First Minister, and I would be grateful if colleagues could desist from commenting from a sedentary position. Two final points, Presiding Officer, that I suspect the Conservatives will also not want to hear. It is the case that, on the issue of living standards, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said yesterday about the budget, that it is actually awful. More years of reeling comes barely growing, high inflation, rising taxes, poor growth, keeping living standards virtually stagnant for another half decade. Then, of course, we have universal credit, and this is what the Resolution Foundation had to say of the 4.4 million households in universal credit. Around three quarters will be worse off as a result of decisions to take away the £20 a week uplift. Beyond the headlines, those are the realities for individuals and families right across the country. That is why the Conservatives did not want to hear the facts. Could I ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government's reaction is to yesterday's call from the Scottish Tourism Alliance to extend the period of business rates relief in retail hospitality and leisure on a similar basis to that that was announced by the Chancellor yesterday? Of course, we already had extended 100 per cent rates relief when the Chancellor did not do it for other parts of the UK. There is 100 per cent rates relief already in place in this financial year. We will bring forward our budget in due course for scrutiny by this Parliament, and I can give a guarantee that we will be fair to the retail sector as we have been in a way that the UK Government over recent months has not. I ask the First Minister what her reaction is to the aviation cut in yesterday's announcement. What demand management can we put in place to ensure that it does not encourage climate pollutant to be polluting frequent flying within the UK? I think that it was the wrong choice a few days from COP26 starting when all of us have an obligation to think about how we contribute to reaching net zero in saving the planet, that the Chancellor chose to make that cut in aviation duty. It is not a choice that this Government would have made, but it is for them to defend that in the months to come. To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government anticipates the impact of COP26 will be on Glasgow's healthcare services. The Scottish Government is working very closely with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. We have been doing so for some months to plan and prepare for COP26. Information from previous summits tells us that the impact on routine health services is not substantial, but we are not complacent. We also recognise the risks associated with hosting COP during the pandemic. Therefore, we have been working with the UN, the UK Government, Glasgow City Council and Public Health Scotland and others to put in place measures to mitigate those risks and the potential impact on the NHS and other public services. Arrangements are in place to closely monitor Covid cases and respond swiftly and appropriately to any increase in cases in order to minimise impact on healthcare services. The First Minister has let to recognise the hard work that has been done by our health services, but I hope that she might share my concern. The health board papers this week in Greater Glasgow and Clyde said that no specific provision has been made for additional inpatient capacity during COP26. I hope that the First Minister will note that it is not really comparable to the G7 summit, because there will be around 14,000 delegates a day at COP 26. The activist mark on 6 November has been licensed for up to 100,000 people, so it is obvious that, given that Covid cases are high and hospitals are already under or overwhelmed, there is likely to be an increase in patient numbers. In light of that, can the First Minister today or at some other time tell me what will be the receiving hospital for COP26, and will that particular hospital have additional capacity? Finally, the First Minister will have an interest in her constituency so far as I hope that she could tell me that there will be safe and guaranteed routes to accident and emergency, not just for ambulances, but for the general public who will need to attend A&E during COP26. I hope that she could give me whatever assurance that she can that she will be mindful of the need to constantly ensure that these safe routes to accident and emergency in our hospitals are provided. On the last point, which is of course extremely important, all of that is factored into the transport plans that are in place, as people would expect it to be. On the broader question, Parliament will mention G7. I know that Greater Glasgow and Clyde have been looking at previous COP summits to try to assess the likely impact on routine healthcare. I think that it is important to recognise, though, that previous COP summits have not taken place amidst a pandemic, so there may be a different impact here. There are a number of contingency arrangements in place, both I and the health secretary have been looking closely at the contingency arrangements that Glasgow health board have in place. There is substantial on-site health provision to try to reduce the impact on hospitals in Glasgow. Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board is increasing the staffing that will be in place during the summit. Of course, the hospitals that will receive patients will depend on the nature of why patients are being admitted to hospital and, of course, the profile of impact across the city. There are substantial contingency arrangements in place, and I hope that that gives some reassurance to Pauline McNeill and the chamber. With significant road closures and ill-time roadworks all across Glasgow, what provisions have been put in place to allow hard-working NHS staff to get to work? The transport plans that are in place take account of all of those things. They have been communicated to people in Glasgow over quite a significant period now so that people can make arrangements. It is vital that those who work in our health service get to work, and that has been part of the consideration, as those plans have been put in place. To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government will be doing to amplify the voices of the global south at COP26. We have committed to ensuring that our programme for COP26 is inclusive and that we work to amplify the voices of those who too often are not heard, including through the Glasgow climate dialogues, to learn, listen and engage on the key issues for those from the global south. We want people to be at the heart of decision making in Scotland and at COP, which is why we also supported the global citizens assembly to bring lived experiences of global citizens directly to COP. We are amplifying youth voices in Scotland and Malawi, for example, through our Malawi climate leaders programme. I expect to have a number of meetings with representatives of the global south over the next two weeks to listen to their perspective on the climate crisis and to hear how we can further support their voices in the rest of COP26. Can I thank the First Minister for that answer? It is clear that leadership is being shown by the Scottish Government here, but the global south has been clear that a just transition away from fossil fuels, which leaves nobody behind, must also be a priority at this COP. Let's look at what other small nations of around 5 million people are doing using their full powers over energy. New Zealand, Denmark, Ireland and Costa Rica are all moving on from the era of oil and gas. The case for independence rests on Scotland proudly joining them as a world leader in this real just transition. Does the First Minister agree? Yes, we are all in a transition away from oil and gas. As I said earlier this week, we have to accelerate that transition as far as possible. That is why, for example, the Scottish Government has commissioned new research to look in detail at how we can do that and how quickly we can do that. We have to build up the alternatives and do that as quickly as possible, but, crucially, we have to support those who work in oil and gas transition into the jobs of the future. The Scottish Government is very focused on doing that and to make sure that the just transition is one that is fast enough in the interests of the planet. At the most recent international development CPG meeting, we discussed those people who are the most disproportionately affected by climate change in the global south, such as young people, women and the marginalised. It was stressed that any international aid must get to the local communities because they are best suited to ensure that the aid is distributed where it is most needed. Can I ask the First Minister what steps can the Scottish Government take to ensure that aid is reaching those local communities and vulnerable groups? In trying to amplify those voices over COP, this will be one of the key issues. Climate finance is one of the significant strands of the discussions that will take place in Glasgow over the next two weeks. The quantum of climate finance but also how that finance is used so that it is not just on mitigation but also on adaptation and crucially on what is called loss and damage. Our own climate justice fund is looking to pivot towards that. We can lead by example in what we do but also do everything that we can to make sure that the voices of the global south are heard on those issues. That is exactly what we intend to seek to do. To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government's position is regarding the use of facial recognition technology in schools. Facial recognition technologies in schools do not appear to me to be proportionate or necessary. That said, as Willie Rennie will be aware, the introduction of biometric identification systems is a matter for local authorities and schools. The Scottish Government is clear that, prior to introducing biometric systems, an education authority should carry out a privacy impact assessment or proportionate equivalent and consult with pupils and parents. Information should also be provided on data protection, how to opt out consent issues and alternative systems that may be used. Schools and local authorities will also pay due attention to the information commissioner's office requirements that organisations using facial recognition technology should comply with data protection law before, during and after its use. Willie Rennie. The subtle change of tone from the First Minister is mildly welcome, but I'm afraid she's not doing enough on this, because it's about children's rights and she doesn't seem to be that bothered about it. The United Kingdom Information Commissioner has called a halt to the scheme in North Ayrshire, but it should never have got this far. The SNP Government previously opposed the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner having a role in health and education. If the First Minister won't intervene on facial recognition, will she at least now support the expansion of the remit of the Biometrics Commissioner so that he can intervene? I'm happy to give consideration to that suggestion, but of course the rights of children are hugely important to all of us in this chamber. We're committed to ensuring that their rights are protected and that includes the right of children and young people to the fair and lawful process of their personal information. I'm not aware of any subtle change in the tone of my answer. What I set out in my answer is important. It recognises the role of local authorities when we're talking about schools but also sets out the requirements that local authorities need to pay heed to. I think that that's the appropriate way to deal with what I accept is a difficult and sensitive issue. I call Pam Duncan-Glancy. The First Minister, like me, has the privilege of representing Glasgow as an MSP. I'm really disappointed to hear her response today to Anna Sarwar's question. Asking you to meet with cleansing workers tomorrow because of the state of our streets and because there are rats running about our streets is not talking Glasgow down, it is letting Glasgow down. As my representative, as my MSP, I ask the First Minister again to meet with cleansing workers tomorrow and hear from them first-hand what is happening. I can assure you that there are rats in our streets, there are rats in my flats. As my representative, please meet with cleansing workers tomorrow and show that you care about Glasgow. I think that people who live in and work in Glasgow, certainly in my constituency, know that I care deeply about all the issues that they face. That presumably is one of the reasons that they have elected and re-elected me as their representative. I listen to cleansing workers, I listen to people across Glasgow on a daily basis. My job, as a local representative, is to represent those interests, which I do every day to the best of my ability. My job as First Minister is to try to find the solutions to those issues. That's why the Scottish Government will continue to do everything that we can to support COSLA to find a solution to those issues. I don't shy away as a resident of and a representative of the city of Glasgow. I don't shy away from the challenges that the city faces, but I think that some of the language that Labour is using about Glasgow, some of the ways in which Labour is seeking to characterise the city of Glasgow, is doing a disservice to the city and to people who live there, and they are doing that for political purposes, not in the interests of the city. That concludes First Minister's questions. My apologies for my late notification, my point of order. I seek your guidance over comments made by Graeme Dey, the minister responsible for transport, relating to future rail services in the south-west of Scotland. Speaking in the chamber on 22 September in response to a question from Emma Harper, the minister stated that there will be six additional services operating on the Ayrtu Sronar line. I then raised a supplementary question on his information, and Mr Dey responded. In his haste to jump up and ask a supplementary question, Finlay Carson was clearly not listening to my first answer, so I will repeat what I said. It is proposed that there will be additional six Ayrtu Sronar services compared to the current timetable. Subsequently, I asked Spice to confirm that the information provided by the minister was indeed correct. Spice have since confirmed that the minister spoke in error. In response, Spice stated that, to confirm, rail officials and the minister are aware of the error below, the other resulted in the analysis of figures by rail officials that were then provided to Mr Dey. Despite that fact, and apparently the minister has been informed that I have received no communication or apology from Mr Dey on this matter, I am therefore seeking your guidance. Has the minister made any attempt that you are aware of to correct the record on the matter now that he must surely be aware of the error that it made? If not, given how long the misinformation has been part of the official report, can you advise how the error should be addressed and whether there has been any breach in the code of conduct ministerial or otherwise? Thank you, Mr Finlay, for his contribution, which is now on the record. The member will be aware that the content of members' contributions is not a matter for me in the chair. However, there does exist a mechanism by which members can correct any contribution that they have made.