 Hello, I'm Xiao Wu and I study for my Korean language. Hello, everyone. I want to introduce a history about Taiwan. As you've seen, it's Taiwan and its distribution about indigenous people in Taiwan in the past. But it's similar to where they live now. Okay, there are 23 million people in Taiwan and our people, indigenous people, are only about 2% The most indigenous people is Army's group. It's about 20,000 people. Yeah, 20,000 people. And this one is Kana Kana group. It's about 355 people. So our country is disappeared. And beside our country, our cellar is long and happy about living in the past and our land got disappeared too. To tell you the story, we began with the importance of preserving our country and managing this in the past. And how does it happen, why our country disappeared? So the story, I will show you the history. Okay, before some people living in Taiwan, Taiwan was shown up in the world. It's in the 16th century that Portuguese were still in the past by Taiwan and said, well, a bone mosa in a beautiful land. But the people who actually staying and got political power aren't it, aren't it, yeah. Crucial time is in the Japanese rule and our Chinese government rule. They have several policies in life like this. It's about not to say local language policy and important about a gap between Eldies and teenagers. The gap is my father's generation. He experienced this and I think most people in Taiwan experienced this at that time. So it becomes a problem to pass on the language and the culture when we want to fix it and we got the power. Like this, we preserve the language culture by decadentize in online and it seems like this. And say, Our language in Taiwan's native language. I mean, greeting fellow sister and brothers, my name is Dan Hia Po, my native name. And I'm from Dodantre in Garisadec. But when we tap on this mosa like this, so many red light under the wall. Because the system treat to be one world, they should be progressed. So it's all about a typing system. They're going to introduce this. Yeah, technology marginalized. Not just about the document system. It's about online translation. It's about online translation rules about electronic resources. And in the past, we didn't have any sort of mobile keyboard. Now we do have one for our needs. But we still don't have a keyboard for the others 15 recognized as a group. Not for those unrecognized people and for thousands of dialects of languages. So the government passed the national languages development art. And it says all national languages are equal, including indigenous languages, including Taiwanese. And residents should not be discriminated or be limited when using national languages. But in reality, we are discriminated, we are limited. And also those official documents in indigenous languages policy. So it means that when you make announcements, when you make announcements in indigenous area, you should use both Chinese and their indigenous language. But they are suffering a lot. Most public servants say they are not used to indigenous languages. And they just like our own policy. Although we have quite a class on this policy in Taiwan. But some workers in public sectors, they are still trying to do it themselves to reduce the use of these. So we are thinking about building infrastructure for indigenous languages. And it's not that hard, but like Microsoft, it does not support it at all. And so we turned to liberal arts. For liberal arts, we have a powerful platform and a wonderful community helping us. And we have a full procedure for localization to make a built-in dictionary. We have a local correct center. And so it's not that hard. We just need to follow the procedure and make a dictionary for indigenous languages. Then we just keep going and try to translate the user interface. But our priority is to make a local correct. Most indigenous people, they are really good users at Chinese, since the history he mentioned about it. So we are not that eager to translate the user interface. But we do have to kill those straight lines. Those are really annoying and they are not helpful at all. And we need some real-time timing suggestion. And then this can be a shared database for indigenous languages across free and different sources. So software, like mobile keyboards, like other softwares, it can use a similar database. And we don't want other people to do it from scratch again. And last but not least, it's free and open. It's very important. So the benefits of the project. For some fluent speakers, they will see 14 or more, because young people are taking Chinese education at school. So these people, they can use this platform to enhance their type of abilities. In the past, they are used to speak, not type. They didn't have a chance to write their own languages, because the whole language writing system is also new. So when they try to type without mistakes, because now when you type, you don't have anyone to correct it for you. So you often make mistakes. After mistakes are reduced, it will help digitalize indigenous literatures and reduce tech barriers. Because we still have a little population who are more used to indigenous languages than Chinese. So also for language learners, because we have digitalized those literatures by the elderly, by people more than 40s. So we get more learning materials for language learners like Xiaowu. And they can get higher interest in improving indigenous languages. Imagine when you use WhatsApp or another messaging app. Most people, including indigenous people, will always use Chinese. So it can be fun to type in their own languages. And for government workers, like I mentioned before, we have an ODF policy, as well as official documents in indigenous languages policy. So we combine the two, and we hope to reduce the workers in public sectors. They can reduce work time by doing the both, because they help each other. We hope so. And for indigenous communities, we try to revitalize and digitalize dying languages. And as for the liberal arts community, because at least in Taiwan we have a problem engaging young people to a community. But for indigenous activists, a lot of them are very young. And they are interested, because most of them don't take sound. And they can start to at least know there's a software called liberal arts. And the community of liberal arts is willing to make this possible. And so we can probably get more uses and more orders from the software. And also the government, since this would be the best software to type in indigenous languages. So when they are making documents in these languages, they are more willing to use this. And now we talk about the current status of the project. Now we have five foreign leaders from different indigenous youths. They represent the point of view of the indigenous community. And they can hopefully fully control the project in the near future. We don't want to take over, we don't want to control the project. It's not my language, it's their language. So we should think that they have the balls to do whatever they think is the best for the community. Also we just started the normalization process. And we received a lot of kind help from Vogue, from Franklin. And we were still learning the text. But some of the leaders of this community and members, they say that they are willing to teach indigenous youths about those non-foss, non-hubs. And they to you is not the boss, but to us it's like really bad. I don't know how to say it. And also some research centers for indigenous studies mostly at NTU, which is our school. They have shown interest in the project because some professors, they have shown their, they have expressed their pretty high interest. Also they can offer support about the linguistic and can protect the government. This is important because the central government of Taiwan, they made some dictionaries and they collected a lot of linguistic materials. But when we asked them for licenses, they said they'd rather give the license to a legal entity, like a school agency, like an official agency. So after the collaboration with the university become clear, I think this will go much smoothly. So now we have some discussions about the future. Keep the microphone with the upper part. That's okay. Don't put the hand in the lower part. Because the antenna is there. That's fine. It's okay. Okay, the following question, a discussion is our, it's a problem we meet. So the one is who owns the dictionary. And the language is belong to the indigenous people. But the license is government because they, they, they learn the language from our trips. So the discussion is who owns the license and who have to decide the language go on. So it's in my, we meet, we encounter the discussion in different culture. And the next one is this, make many, many language in, in the past, every trips in, in the nation. So, so nation, so truck research, truck and truck have a similar culture. But, but in, you know, you know, in now, they, they become the, the same, the same, the same entity group. So, so in the inside, who it may, it may, it may sacrifice some, some benefit to the, to the most people. So, so it's, it's a, it's hard to, to, to say who, who can decide or who can, who can do this. And the next one is very, very few people have, have, haven't seen a problem like what is good. So, so we, we'll talk about, like, empower some, some young people to, to see the problem and, and maybe join us, maybe to, to solve this problem. Okay. Okay. So let me come through those three problems. So, like I mentioned before, we have many dialects and we have different tribes, different villages, and let's speak a little bit different. But there's a standard for each, each language. So who can decide, who can decide to use which dialect to be like the standard or, or to be like the language for this platform. And this is the biggest problem and the other problem is to empower indigenous youth to, to join this project. So we hope to build a government structure because this is a complicated issue. It's about ethnic, it's about, yeah, ethics, it's about different, different groups of people. So, so please help us to find out more about these topics. We will try to come forward and find everyone else again. And we want to hear from you as much as possible and learn about your thoughts, your ideas about these topics. And not just limited to these topics, about more different, different points of views. I think most of you have heard similar problems in your own country. So, or maybe send us an email because this is just a new, more ideal. We want to build this structure maybe in the future people from other countries, they can use, they can follow the structure or they can, they can take advantage from this. Yeah, and maybe working together is always good. Yeah, thank you so much. I don't know if we have two or three minutes. We have two or three minutes. Any questions?