 it's not impossible to change root code in Bitcoin. So it's been done in the past. And there's always this question of 21 million has been baked. It's a psychological number. It's not a definite number. It's not, this is fine. And this is it, there's only 21 million. It's an accepted consensus since the beginning of Bitcoin, there's only 21 million Bitcoin. Do you ever foresee the possibilities of something similar to segue, at least in the conversational manner in the future? Obviously this is way, way in the future where there is even like a 10% chance of possibly that gets extended beyond 21 million. Well, it's certainly possible. And I believe that we are going to have multiple contentious changes over the long term that are proposed. I think segue was not the first contentious proposed change by any means. It was just one of the longest drawn out. And it resulted in a ton of drama. That there were plenty of dramatic proposed changes in earlier years, but they were generally contained within the developer mailing list. So I think that in the short term, we're probably going to see contentious proposals around privacy improvements. I think there are going to be various actors that are anti-privacy improvements for various reasons. Then the question becomes, we're not even really talking about 100 years from now. It's really more like maybe 15, 20 years from now that the block reward is going to be really, really low after a few more haveings. And depending on a variety of factors like the exchange rate at the time and the transaction volume at the time and the transaction fees at the time, then we very well might find ourselves on the precipice again where we have a lot of doom and gloom and naysayers that warn of mining death spirals and all of this other stuff that has come up before, but they may have a stronger argument around it if there isn't a sufficient level of predictable transaction fees. But that is far enough away that I'm not worried about it because we have had some points in time where transaction fees I think have reached almost 50% of the block reward. And of course that was during some extreme usage and congestion. But we've seen that we've already gotten fairly close there, it's certainly possible. And I think that if Bitcoin doesn't completely die and collapse, then most likely we will continue to see more usage and more contention to get block space which means more active markets that are bidding for block space in the form of transaction fees. And that's gonna create good tension that essentially it forces people to be more judicious in their use of the block space. So it incentivizes innovation for people to use less block space in a variety of ways whether it's through sharing transaction data with like coin join type operations and aggregating signatures together and that's gonna become a thing in the next year or two. Or of course going to second layer networks be it something like Lightning Network be it side chains like liquid or drive chains or root stock, et cetera, et cetera. I do believe we're gonna continue to see evolution the economic incentives for people to become more creative in how they're using Bitcoin. Like a living organism. Pretty much. Cool, Jameson I just wanna thank you so much for sharing your thoughts. If people want to know more about you and what you do, what's the best resource? You can find everything I've ever done in the Bitcoin space at lop.net or if you want a direct shortcut to my educational resources on there just go to bitcoin.page. Thank you brother, always a pleasure. Thanks for having me.