 Hi, good morning to everyone. Firstly, I would like to thank, in my name, I mean, in the name of Fossumaria and Rocco, to the DAA committee and to the organizers of the session for us at Tino Posa. It's a total honor to be here. And I'm going to talk about romance in silly. The last game, how it was created for gathering resources. And the new thing here is that nobody had done before this study in this area and within the normal period. But before going to the central topic, let me introduce you to what hasn't been done until now. Not only it lies in a vacuum. In my case, I used studies from 2011, with the industry project Arpanra, which studied the landscape during the Arab period until 2013. And it had a continuation with the European project Mevola, which is very entertaining in the landscape, which studied also the landscape during the Arab period in the area of my study case, where they discovered the importance of water management for the creation of a very concrete landscape. And the project had a continuation until now with Mevola, an archaeological laboratory which is an archaeological laboratory with a biocultural focus on landscape in the Mediterranean area and trying to interpret how water shaped the landscapes. Now let's go to the area of study, which is called Monte Trapanico, and it is in the southwest of Sicily. And my study case is very concrete, far here in the northernmost part of Sicily. And what I want to first you to understand is how important was water for the creation of that landscape. As we can see here, there are many water resources, starting for samples of wheels, water resources, natural springs, and so on. And how the water ran the landscape to define that pastoralism was created in relation of water. For example, we can see here in the slides that there are ancient pathways used for moving the cattle during the whole year depending on the season. And how it was created all these pathways depending on water resources. But not only posturalism was important, as we can see here many fields used for cropping. The problem with that is that nowadays not all the fields are complete, so we decided to characterize the fields depending on enclosure fields or not enclosure fields. For making that we use a real image from 1949 onwards and also we use LiDAR to determine some parts of the landscape and determine where we can find close fields and no non-close fields and ancient pathways. In such a way that what we have first to understand is that posturalism was very important but I mean culture was indeed important too. What we can see in analyzing the landscape is a concentration between pathways, fields, homes, rural homes or small settlements that sometimes it is not possible to determine whether these are all the rural houses or closed spaces for the castle to make the castle stay in winter or hard time. And that is exactly what we can see here. We can see close fields, walls, terraces for grazing and inside these fields we know that the crop belongs to you. And around all these fields there is always water sources. The same can be seen here. We have walls with closed fields into walls and kind of real co-lites which are not very sure about what the function is. But within that is for creating different spaces and organize the land. If we go to the real landscape we focus our eyes into the landscape but we can see these ancient pathways between different surfaces all of that used for grazing for the storehouse activity. But here is for something to say it's amazing how the landscape was created for making pathways, terraces, fields for cropping and these terraces for grazing. But we don't have to... We have to bear in mind that we can see sometimes the consistency between alfalfa and mozzarella probably mozzarella has more importance in the Middle Ages. What we really see after all is a humane landscape of terraces, fields, walls, pathways water resources which can be seen here too. But we don't have to forget about rural houses, animal shelters which all of that create a very specific, very original landscape and basically making gas for a rural part of the population which was indeed a very important part of that population. Here is for some of the same thing but from a lot, from here. We have to bear in mind also that there were some small movements which were used for gathering some kind of resources. In our study we also used this place name which are very interesting because they shed more light into what I'm saying here. For example, we don't see an entrance as a portal which is door also a loophole which is halfway or Machnato Grande which is a marker field wall and field wanderer and such kind of things which indeed means that for the people of the past these features and historicalities were such, had such an importance that marked and named the landscape. Sometimes it's interesting to compare the case of study with other cases in a particular way and in this case we chose Peba in the southeast of the Spanish area where we can see very interesting things such as a very similar use of physical environment with the creation of walls, fields small settlements and shelters which reminds a lot to Sicily. Here is the same. And we ask a question we want to ask in the future a result, the question of if here there was a persistence between agriculture and cultural activities and if we can apply the same here to Sicily or not. What is clear thanks to the right resources is that in this place historicalities have a great importance to the Middle Ages but especially with the Catholic conquest because we know of the general association of La Mesta which was dedicated in its entirety to historicalities. So the question maybe is to ask if these textures can be seen as very similar as textures back there in Sicily or not and if that determine some kind of introduction of few audience or not. Before concluding my presentation here I want to throw you some kind of hypothesis that I work with and that it's good to work with and very likely in Sicily we cannot see in the Middle Ages a real transformation between the Arabic period and the normal period. So there's no real transformation of landscape with normal cook and we know because of many studies before mine that all the lights changed in normal Sicily but the rest of the population was more or less the same. So we think that if the population was the same the economic activity should be more or less the same. We also think that it is very difficult to hear the introduction of our classical few audience in Sicily but we would suggest to marry with the beginning of the Arabian age period and not before as we cannot see a real transformation of plants. And we know thanks to Breton sources that in Sicily a movement of lamp magnetization started with the Aragonese rule. For concluding we can see here that normal Sicily had a pseudo-posteroids so the economic system that is peasants in a non-classical few audience were deemed which is surfers farmers respond to the different economic demands and to their own needs by interacting with their environment creating a very concrete and specific landscape which is indeed a human landscape forgotten with sources based on water small movements areas carbon, rock, gas lines and calcium. So maybe in the future what we have to do is to determine the importance of water in the Aragonese rule as we see that there are a lot of structures made for pastoralism but we don't know the real role of water with the Aragonese rule. We have history in a sensitive way these great areas of pastoral structures and we have to make also a comparative study with Michael and other cases which kind of reminded the introduction of few audience in Sicily and what is maybe more important these days is to preserve that kind of heritage dignified traditional labels and knowledge which is completely lost in the Italian system which imposed the knowledge of Sicilians of the knowledge of rural people. Thank you very much.