 Okay, great. Thank you. Welcome to the Williston Development Review Board. It is September 13, 2022. My name is Pete Kelly. I'm the chair of the DRP. If you are a Zoom participant, please sign in by reading yourself on the participant toolbar. This is a hybrid meeting taking place in Town Hall virtually on Zoom. All members of the Board of the public can communicate in real time. Planning staff will provide Zoom instructions for public participation before we begin. Actually, let me redact that. Are you going to... You can first try that. Okay. We are not going to provide Zoom instructions tonight due to the truncated agenda. All votes taken at this meeting will be done by roll call vote. If Zoom crashes, the meeting will be continued to September 27, 2022. Let's start the meeting by roll call attendants of the DRP members. Paul Christensen. Present. John Hemmelgarten. It's not present. Scott Riley. I'm present. Pete, pull the mic down to close to your face. I can barely hear you. Is that better? That's a little better, not much. Oh, is that right? Okay. Pete, John just joined us. I was muted. No, I'm not. You were here just hidden. I was, yeah. I was trying to do it stealthily. I'm not sure what good that would ever do. Can you guys hear me? Yes. Yeah. Why does, why does it default? Why is it defaulting to a, my screen is defaulting to a black screen that says town meeting. I see you, Scott. You do. Yeah. I see you now too. That's not necessarily a great thing. No, it's not. There's something weird going on. Nope. There we go. There's Pete. Okay. So let's start the roll call again. Paul Christensen. Present. I'm here. Scott Wiley. Here. Dave Turner. Here. Nate Andrews. Is not present. Pete Kelly chair myself. I'm here. So we have five in attendance. We do have a quorum. Okay. So tonight's a truncated agenda. We've got two items on the agenda. Both are going to be opened and immediately continue to September 27. Then we are going to approve a meeting minutes from our last meeting. And we're doing meeting minutes tonight. Okay. Hey, Pete. Yes. Is there going to be any discussion as to which date these are continued to. I don't know. Because I'd like, I'd like to have that conversation. Right. Why don't we have it now before I can do a date certain. I questioned adding two items to a full agenda when there's nothing on the next meeting agenda. I really am not that interested in. Being at a DRB meeting. Until late hours. When it's not necessary. Here. So the first two applications. Some of the. Which is. I'm not getting anything that Simon's saying. He's going to move closer. Stand by. The first application on that agenda is the cat amount. Which is a pre up to growth management. So essentially that's a formality. Well, subject to what the board thinks. We anticipate that being a formality in the same way. That it was last year. When they came in to a prayer to enable them to take part in growth management. The second application. Is a discretionary permit application. To amend something that was approved earlier in the year. For the CSWD access and scale house. Which is just relocating the parking lot. It's by the increasing in size. Which is also sort of an amendment application. That's relatively minor size. The cat amount. The cat amount pre-app is not a small application. It's not well. The subdivision is not a small application. It's a big 138 unit. You may remember the last year in October. Prior to them submitting their discretionary permit this April. They submitted a pre-app. Which simply enabled them to take part in growth management. Because in order to take part in growth management, you have to pre-app in the calendar year proceeding. So you may remember Emily did like. So they're, so they're looking for more, they're basically looking for more units for the existing permit. Yeah. So they have it. Okay. That's a little more of a pre-app formality that you're right. Okay. So John comments given what you just heard. Um. So. I'm not the chit and installed waste. Is a, is a new, a new hearing though or not? Or is it just an amendment to one that was already there? It's an amendment. It's an amendment application. Uh, in, I think April, the board approved a, a new access from Redmond road. Uh, they scale and the conversion of the existing sort of house. That's there. So it's looking at sort of. Realigning the car parking parking lot rather. So essentially the car, the parking lot comes sort of linear, uh, rather than the square. Uh, that's the only challenge. The access says the same. The drainage says, stays the same and, uh, the main access road and scale through the site. Uh, they also stay the same. Well, my, my concerns remain. Um, in that, you know, the, the other one on here is a final plan review of what we had hoped would be a very quick hearing the last time. Um, and we have no idea if that's going to be the case this time. Um, either of these other two could become more complicated. Um, and certainly the two that are. On the agenda. Are ones that are going to take some time. And so I don't know why I, I'd like to, I'd like to take the two that decided they didn't want to have a hearing tonight that we're all here for. Um, and move those to October 11. Just because I think I just don't like the idea of putting this many items on a single agenda. I stated that objection in the past. That's, that's my proposal. So that's why I say that. If you don't like that, we can do it as it's proposed, right? Thank you, John. Uh, Dave. John, I take exception with your. The rudeness of not allowing us to earn this overtime pay. So Dave Turner, what are your thoughts on this topic? Uh, I'm fine with doing it all on the same night. So all we can do them all the same night as long as those two really do turn out to be short. If they start. Yeah, can't make can't make that commitment. So given given the fact that life is uncertain with your position on John's proposal. Yeah, I'll go for the overtime pay then I'll go with Dave. Okay, Scott Riley. Push him back. You're pushing back. Yeah. You're saying the two that we're continuing tonight. You're suggesting to continue them to October 11. Yes, sir. Okay, I'm the tie break. I support pushing it to October 11 as well. And so that's what we will do. Okay, any other discussion before we open and continue each of the DP items. Nope. Okay. We're open DP 21-18 the annex. And we're not going to take any testimony. We're not going to have any discussion. And we're going to continue that until October 11. Now we're going to open DP 22 dash zero six. Which is green state realty. A new facility proposed to 46.6. We're going to continue that application until October 11 as well. Next up is the meeting minutes. I don't have the meeting minutes. Dave in front of me. Thank you. Okay. I'll make a motion to approve the minutes of August 23rd, 2022. I'll make a motion to approve the minutes of August 23rd, 2022, as written. Thank you, Dave. Is there a second? I'll second it. Scott Riley seconds it. Any discussion? No. Hearing none. Vote individually, please. Paul Christensen. Hi. Yeah. Scott Riley. Dave Turner. Okay. Are the chairs a yay, five in favor? Not opposed. Motion carries the minutes of August 23rd, 2022 are approved as written. Is there any other topics to bring forth tonight before we adjourn? I have nothing. The volunteer event is Thursday at five o'clock. And if you're able to make it, that would be great. I'm planning to do that. So I just. Okay. Emily, go ahead. Oh, hi. I just pumped in Simon Texany. Where are we in the conversation? So what we've done is we've opened. Both agenda items and we've continued both to October 11th. They were, they were, they were continued to October 11th. And Lou of the second meeting in September as proposed. And. And the. You know, the agenda is because we had a discussion as a group. About having too much on the agenda. For the, for the second September meeting. And so we continued both of the items to be continued to October 11. Yes. So the first two items on the agenda. And that includes the plan. And that includes the, the, the, the, the planning. The last item was the CWD 2018 Ethan Allen homes. That's going to be a five minute procedural hearing. Just to, that they pre apt before going to growth management. The CSWD application is also very minor. They're just reconfiguring the parking lot. So I'm expecting those two items to be very short. With the annex. there's going to be a lot for the DRB to work through that night so it's likely it would get continued to October 11th before the DRB is deciding on you know final conditions of approval for that one. So what I'm hearing you you're making the case for us to reconsider the continuation to October 11th that we just made. That's correct I would recommend you know getting through what you can on the agenda on October 11th most of them are the first two are simple items the other two one will be continued so yeah. We already continued that one I don't I'm not I'm not following you Emily. I think you got the date wrong. I mean the annex is that is this the Snyder Group project right that we just continue to let the 11th so we just skip the step. So I think what I think what Emily is saying is is if we were to hear that on September 27th the annex that it's likely that given the complexity of the application we would be continuing it to October 11th again and that's in that's that's a anticipated action on Emily's part. She's not saying that's certain she's saying that it would not be unlikely. That's my interpretation of what you just said Emily. That's correct Pete. Okay I'm failing to understand the advantage of doing that as opposed to just waiting until the 27th. I think because the October 11th by continuing it to October 1 there's space available on September 27th to keep the annex there you're going to hear it anyways and continue it it it's simply it simply pulls it forward two weeks from rather than kicking it down further down the road when we don't have what Emily's point is is that we really don't have that much business on the 27th. And so another way of saying what Scott just said is if we were to continue the annex to and start the conversation on October 11th and then if it plays out where it's continued again which is Emily's what Emily anticipates will happen then we would we would continue to October 25 so to Scott's point that whole sequence is accelerated by two weeks if we were to keep it on September 27th. Does that make sense now? I'm not saying you have to agree to it. I think I understand but okay okay so with this additional information do you remain steadfast John on continuing both through October 11th. That would be my preference still. Scott where do you stand on this? It seems to me based on Emily's position it makes sense to put it back on the 27th. Yeah I concur with you Scott okay so we're gonna reopen DP 21-18 the annex and we are going to continue it a new continuing state. We're gonna continue it to September 27th 2022. We're gonna reopen DP 22-06 which is the 4626 Williston Road project. We're going to continue that also to September 27th 2022 so both those applications have been continued they've been continued to September 27th. We've approved the meeting minutes of August 23rd 2022. Is there any other business to bring forth at this time? We didn't we actually didn't vote on the minutes we just voted yes and second but we didn't actually vote on it. Yes we did. Yes we did Paul. I'm really asleep on this one. You voted. There were five in favor not opposed to the emoji carried. Oh yeah never mind I'm asleep today. The heavy rain. You voted aye. Yeah you voted aye. Okay is there hearing non no additional business is there a motion to adjourn? Absolutely. It's almost. Okay I'll take that as Paul made the motion. Scott Riley seconded it. Any discussion? All in favor indicate by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. We are adjourned. Thank you everyone.