 We, in the last decade, have learned to live with multiple crises and shocks. And they have proven we are interdependent. What happens in Africa or Asia resonates everywhere, whether it is a conflict or a natural disaster, or a financial distress. It goes around the globe quite quickly. So as the administration concentrates on policy priorities domestically, it is important to keep an eye on the rest of the world and be that force for good that the United States throughout the 20th century especially has been. What the criticality of investing in these unstable countries is exactly because they are now connecting in this footprint of conflict that is getting unfortunately bigger, not smaller, not shrinking. This is fertile ground for extremism and we have seen the demonstration of that time and again in the U.S., in Europe more recently. We can do something about it. We can invest in a more stable region that is currently a region of trouble. And it would be financially a very good investment. At the bank we estimate in 2014 the cost of conflict and violence is $14 trillion. It's almost 14% of the world's GDP. To bring down this cost would be much cheaper than to continue that waste and of course not just financial waste but waste of opportunities and the erosion of a world that can be more peaceful than it is today.