 this fuzzy logic flask application. I did provide the HTML JavaScript and Python code above. I'm still getting errors. This seemed to be a mismatch between what the backend is provided and what JavaScript is expecting in terms of the names of the different components. This potentially can be untraced by co-pilot suggesting to use traceback. It's probably not a bad idea. Traceback and Analyze. Try assisting code. When we have the exception, give us the traceback. I have to select all code so it's actually sends it to the co-pilot. It's almost 300 lines of code. Fasty-fast, no specific suggestions suggesting to normalize. Wouldn't this normalize the y-axis, whereas the problem is the x-axis, the length of the array. The membership function should be defined over the same range as the input signal to print and for aggregated it's just aggregated. Actually co-pilot. Okay, while they float, once you shift C, select the whole code for the right test problem. Okay, that is just one. Obviously just resizing would not work. It's better than what we currently have. Sexually working. That must be fake. This is changing at all if this Android is not moving. No, this is not right. It's just not right. Otherwise, I'm sure the zero should be all orange. This is the updated Python code. It doesn't work as expected and it doesn't produce any errors. There are a couple of things. First of all, we would like to limit the number of digits after the decimal point 2, 3. Also, we'd like to know why the rule square array has all the same numbers. Round 2, 3 digits. F low, wrong. That shouldn't take a signal, noisy signal. The name signal is potentially incorrect. Yes, that should be a local variable. A variable called signal. Is it potentially conflicting throughout the code in terms of its name? Not matter, but we just want to change the names for consistency sake. Stop something up. It's really easy to blame the port for it, but the noise of the shoot doesn't go to zero. What we would like for right to go to zero is that used to. Interestingly, the detection error is 99%. How is it 99%? So that the gpt has the updated code. First of all, how to make sure all the variables in the code are rounded to three decimal places. Round and empty round. Can I just round everything by default instead of rounding each variable individually? Round all variables to three decimal points. It's actually doing it changed 10 lines. It keeps counting the number of lines that changed that 9, 10, 9. What? Oh, CPU really going. Okay, made a lot of changes. No, no. Did it add a function? I'm a bit confused. And when they are generated, generated, initiated, could be different things. I just need to delete all that. Yeah, it's going places. It's not right as aggregated. Symmetry universe was in waveform and MF low. Converting it to least. Where are we printing? Posit dot. This values a control I limit to three decimal points. Why doing it differently? Does it matter how many lines I select or what? Right. Yeah, obviously, that build is wrong because it's just probably padding with zeros or something. Yeah, this is a mystery why sometimes generating. Okay, I don't mind which one isn't just adding extra lines. That's okay. Here at first. Okay, this is better. Where are we printing noisy, wafer? We're rounding it down. Okay, might have to continue next time. See you in a bit. Bye.