 So, we basically had two main goals for our session this morning. One was to give you a sense of what the findings were of the U.S. country review, and then secondly, through the panels and Q&A sessions engage you in creating as broad a perspective as possible on what that strategic pursuit of quality and coherence and transparency might look like. I think we have accomplished that. I think through the panels we have developed a much deeper understanding of the problems. I think we've defined them even better than the way that they were already articulated in the report by bringing in your experiences and your perspectives. And I think there were lots of possible solutions that were actually generated through many of the panels. I wanted to just pick two points to suggest some possible next steps around this. One is a point that my colleague Kay made, and she said that time is getting really short. Time is getting very short to begin to look at these issues. And I think that's an important point to keep in mind, particularly if we link it to a point that Tony made just a few minutes ago where he said, you know, transparency is actually the way into the broader conversation around these issues of quality and coherence. So clearly all the right stakeholders who need to be part of the solution were here today. And I think today the conversation just started. So I hope that collectively or as Marlene said using our combined responsibilities that we can actually get to a next level of conversation which would be more around very specific actions that collectively we might want to pursue. Again I said that people make things happen and it wouldn't be here today be able to have this conversation if it wouldn't have been for the great work that Simon and Margarzotta have done. And their thoughtful analysis and Deborah who is our partner and who has provided leadership around this work, but also some of the other OECD staff, Susan Friday and Jennifer Cannon who really were critical and instrumental in making this event successful. Kevin carry and Amy Leitman from the New America Foundation need to be thanked for seizing the opportunity to shine a light on these very important issues. And I think Amy and Kevin that you pulled together an amazing group of moderators and panelists and organized such an excellent discussion. Also I want to thank all the New America Foundation people who did the logistical support. Eliza French, Lindsay Tipi and John Williams. And I want to thank our moderators Amy, Kevin and Travis and all of the excellent panelists. We appreciate that all of them took the time out of their busy schedules to be here with us today and share their perspectives. I also need to thank my partners at the National Center for Education Statistics who did a lot of work in the background to make this U.S. country review a successful Sharon Boyvin, Lisa Hudson and Tom Wico for their partnership on this project. And I need to give a special shout out to two of my colleagues, Kate Gilcher for sharing her expertise in the area of accreditation. But also to Mary Alice McCarthy who actually coordinated the entire review here in the U.S. for the OECD team. And there are four people who were part of the state teams that helped facilitate the case studies of the states Amy Albee and Kathleen Taylor from Florida, Lynn Gilley from Maryland and Brian Wilson from Washington. And with that Amy.